A new low for the rabid left…
They just can’t hate this Christian conservative woman enough.
A far left startup publisher is going to release “Going Rouge,” a collection of Palin hit-pieces, on November 17th, the same day as Sarah Palin’s best seller “Going Rogue” hits the book stores.
Shelf Life reported, via Free Republic:
We know that former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin can hunt, and even field-dress a moose, but how will she take to poachers on her book sales? Start-up publisher OR Books has announced plans to publish Going Rouge: Sarah Palin An American Nightmare, a collection of essays about the maverick Republican with a title — and cover design — remarkably similar to Palin’s upcoming memoir. What’s more, OR’s paperback tome will be released on Nov. 17, the same day that Palin’s own Going Rogue: An American Life hits shelves — and one day after Palin’s just-announced, first-ever appearance on Oprah Winfrey’s show. (A shout-out to Ron Hogan at GalleyCat for the tip.)
October 21st, 2009 | 1:46 pm | #1
Uh… is it just me, or does she kind of look a little better on the Liberal hit piece?
Come on guys! At least give her glowing red demon eyes or something.
October 21st, 2009 | 1:46 pm | #2
Isn’t there copyright law against items that are “confusingly similar”?
October 21st, 2009 | 1:48 pm | #3
This has to be stopped.
let everyone know what’s going on with this. IF this attack job is released and find’s it’s way into B&N people need to know the difference.
October 21st, 2009 | 1:51 pm | #4
The cover is clearly intended to deceive the public into buying it rather than Palin’s book. I would imagine Palin’s publisher will have an injunction slapped against OR Publishing preventing them from releasing it with that cover in short order.
Far too cute and ham-handed a hit job in this day and age. For example, it will be interesting to see who funded the start up.
October 21st, 2009 | 1:52 pm | #5
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Juli , Juli . Juli said: http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2009/10/leftists-going-to-release-palin-hit-piece-going-rouge-on-same-day-as-her-book-launch/ [...]
October 21st, 2009 | 1:52 pm | #6
Clear attempt to confuse consumers.
*shrug*
Do they think they’ll really accomplish anything with this? If someone wants Palin’s book and gets their pack-o-slander instead, do they think they’ll change any minds?
October 21st, 2009 | 1:55 pm | #7
Palin will forever be a target. The people who hate her have what’s called a “conditioned response” to her. It’s not based on rationality.
The best thing we can do is make her book a huge success and not let the human equivalent of Pavlov’s experimental dogs get us down.
Pavlov’s dogs, by the way, drooled when they heard a bell ring. That’s how I picture the average Palin hater: A drooling dog reacting entirely unconsciously to stimuli provided by those with an agenda.
October 21st, 2009 | 1:57 pm | #8
Isn’t there copyright law against items that are “confusingly similar”?
Yes, there are.
This is just another example of just how frightened Obamao, the Corruptocrats and their minions are. In the fantasyland that is their “reality-based community” they think that all the crap they are pulling from tossing The Race Card(TM) to calling all of those who are not worshiping them “un American” to Nazi Nancy calling us “Nazi’s” to locking out the Republicans from committee meetings, etc, Ad nauseam.
All it is serving to do is to create an inferno that will consume them and every single institution, policy and agenda they have worked so hard to put into place.
They are playing Russian roulette with a Colt 1911.
October 21st, 2009 | 1:58 pm | #9
“Do they think they’ll really accomplish anything with this?”
Crawford,
Yea… they want to be able to scream censorship in Palin’s direction when their book gets blocked from being published with that cover.
Beat ‘em to the punch — find out who funded that start-up and drag them through the mud over such a cheesy dirty trick.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:01 pm | #10
If book stores choose to sell this “smear” of a book, they will only be inviting many returns from customers who bought the wrong book. It is deceptive and it will come back to bite them.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:01 pm | #11
I guess I’ll have to buy a copy or two of Sarah’s book.
I wasn’t but now I will…God bless Sarah.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:04 pm | #12
I don’t understand how someone who has never governed or legislated beyond the boundaries of Alaska can generate so much blind hatred.
It’s so irrational. And they call US the wingnuts.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:06 pm | #13
I wonder if Sarah will mention the fraud book on Oprah the day before?
October 21st, 2009 | 2:07 pm | #14
It is important to point out that the impostor is a PAPERBACK book.
It will be interesting to see how the bookstores that carry both books will display them.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:07 pm | #15
Hypogean
October 21st, 2009 | 1:55 pm
Two thumbs up!!!!
October 21st, 2009 | 2:09 pm | #16
Someone needs to contact HarperCollins and let them know about this deceptive practice to steal sales.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:10 pm | #17
From the OR Books website:
To avoid the waste of unsold stock and returns, we produce our books only when they are wanted, either through print-on-demand or as platform-agnostic e-books.
This system allows a rapid publishing turnaround so relevant books can intervene quickly in issues of the day.
Most importantly, we sell direct to you, the customer, shipping promptly when a book is released and/or your order is received.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:11 pm | #18
What ever happen to Tom W.? I miss his writing.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:12 pm | #19
Click the OR Books link and you get a complete picture of who these people are.
They are mostly people from The Nation and publish people like Noem Chomsky.
They have a No Return policy. Wonder why?
October 21st, 2009 | 2:12 pm | #20
Scott,
It all comes down to power. Who has it, We The People or the ones in DC now.
It is Liberty vs Tyranny. We know which side Sarah is on.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:13 pm | #21
IMHO, Sarah Palin’s publisher has a legitimate claim for both trademark infringement and unfair competition, and the right to an injunction. Probably not copyright infringement, though.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:15 pm | #22
People who support Sarah Palin can read the titles and know which book is which. Besides, most of her supporters have already pre-ordered the book.
This is from the publisher’s website:
“OR Books is a new type of publishing company. It embraces progressive change in politics, culture and the way we do business.
Our list is highly selective: we publish just one or two books a month, combining established authors with new discoveries.
Our editorial standards are fastidious; our design clear and elegant.”
…
October 21st, 2009 | 2:15 pm | #23
Best NOT to publicize this on Oprah. Why give them free PR?
BUT, we can tell our friends about this. Afterall they are the ones who will be buying the book.
And frankly, this will again show the world how small, petty and dark-spirited the Left truly is, imho. Who wants to live in their world? NOT ME.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:21 pm | #24
Ok, so you can only buy the crappy hit-piece directly from the publisher.
What a joke these people are.
Their president is socializing the country and they are worried about Sarah Palin. Sounds about right.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:28 pm | #25
“They have a No Return policy. Wonder why?”
lonestar
October 21st, 2009 | 2:12 pm
If that is the case, bookstores won’t carry their books. Unsold books are returned, minus the cover, for credit.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:30 pm | #26
Where in the world did anyone get the idea that anyone “hates” Sarah Palin? She’s a stitch–hysterically funny. Yet I often felt sorry for her during the campaign. She should have never been put in that position. I had always thought McCain had more integrity, but his true colors were on display. Need I point out that “the Left” would love to have her running again. As would every comedy writer in the country.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:34 pm | #27
“Where in the world did anyone get the idea that anyone “hates” Sarah Palin? ”
I dunno — the open hatred directed towards her? The endless, baseless attacks on her?
October 21st, 2009 | 2:36 pm | #28
The left loves women – http://www.FATBOY.cc
October 21st, 2009 | 2:37 pm | #29
I predict they don’t make their publishing costs.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:38 pm | #30
What a bunch of jerks — this will backfire enormously.
I do think that there is a copyright issue here — one that the publisher should pursue.
I’ll tell you, the left is circling the drain on this — so much hate for a stupid, backward-thinking, anti-feminist hick.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:39 pm | #31
I want to make a Sarah Waitress Sandwich!
Don’t you dare http://www.dumpchrisdodd.com
What’s your Mortgage Rate?
LOL!!
October 21st, 2009 | 2:40 pm | #32
Palin’s publisher should release Going Rogue at an earlier date and beat them to the punch.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:42 pm | #33
If you are PRO-LIFE, you an enemy of the LEFT.
http://www.FreeTheND88.org
October 21st, 2009 | 2:46 pm | #34
I have a crush on Todd Palin.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:47 pm | #35
I plan on buying the REAL book, several copies in fact. If I see the rip-off at my bookseller’s, I’ll go elsewhere.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:48 pm | #36
Mark my words. Sarah Palin book will make her the first billlion dollar bestselling author politician.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:53 pm | #37
I imagine that the vaunted NY Times will review one of the books – care to guess which one?
And CNN will be right there with their crack “fact check” team.
October 21st, 2009 | 2:59 pm | #38
Bet you guys CAN’T WAIT until the Joe The Plumber book comes out! I know I can’t!
October 21st, 2009 | 3:00 pm | #39
Sorry, Jim. I’m missing blogspot.
October 21st, 2009 | 3:02 pm | #40
“”"” Far too cute and ham-handed a hit job in this day and age. For example, it will be interesting to see who funded the start up. “”"”
Hmmm . . . . I don’t know . . . . possibly someone with the initials ‘George Soros?’
October 21st, 2009 | 3:05 pm | #41
This fraud book only makes Sarah’s case all the stronger.
Attacks on Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, etc… only drive up the interest and ratings.
Lying about Tea Parties only make the movement larger and more determined.
Will the left ever get it? I doubt it. Besides they have no valid arguments. They are bankrupt ethically and intellectually. All they have is deception and corruption as tools.
October 21st, 2009 | 3:09 pm | #42
She should have never been put in that position.
You are correct. McCain’s sorry ass should have been shown the curb early in the process.
October 21st, 2009 | 3:09 pm | #43
[...] http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2009/10/leftists-going-to-release-palin-hit-piece-going-rouge-o... [...]
October 21st, 2009 | 3:34 pm | #44
Seeing the liberal fear when it comes to Palin is simply hilarious.
October 21st, 2009 | 3:36 pm | #45
Maybe they could sell the fake book in Gay bars or at Abortion clinics, or maybe Porn/Drug paraphernalia shops.
It would be a nice STOCKING stuffer for Hillary Rodham, but alas, her STOCKINGS are stuffed already.
October 21st, 2009 | 3:38 pm | #46
It appears that the Rouge will not get in many bookstores and if it does, they will probably be removed by court order.
I wasn’t sold on Palin, but the more I see the Left panic, the more I see to like. She has them scared to death that she will awaken the silent majority. She can do it and they know it.
October 21st, 2009 | 3:40 pm | #47
Maybe a ticket of Sarah and Joe the Plumber would be the one to challenge both the Dems and Reps. LOL
October 21st, 2009 | 3:52 pm | #48
More liberal tha Howard Dean
October 21st, 2009 | 2:30 pm 26
Where in the world did anyone get the idea that anyone “hates” Sarah Palin? She’s a stitch–hysterically funny.
Yes, yes. You laugh and laugh and laugh. She’s just a funny, irrelevant clown who amuses you.
Strange that the actions of liberals utterly bely their words. You claim Sarah Palin is just a funny irrelevance, but your side has actual strategy sessions on her and pulled out all the stops to discredit her during the campaign.
Why is it that the same media that put the silly clown through the mill refused to do the same for Obama? What does that say about the president’s ability to withstand scrutiny? We all seem to understand that if questioned, Obama would collapse. Why is that acceptable to you?
October 21st, 2009 | 4:09 pm | #49
More liberal tha Howard Dean
October 21st, 2009 | 2:30 pm 26
Where in the world did anyone get the idea that anyone “hates” Sarah Palin?
—————————————————–
You’re right, “FEARS” would be more accurate.
October 21st, 2009 | 4:14 pm | #50
Liberals are such nasty little animals that I can understand the hatred that makes muslims saw peoples heads off. Liberals like those guys need to learn to fear us as much as they hate us.
Not that I am advocating anything, just venting my spleen.
October 21st, 2009 | 5:25 pm | #51
Smarty
October 21st, 2009 | 4:14 pm 50
Not that I am advocating anything, just venting my spleen.
I’d advocate rounding up all the libtards, giving each of them an M-16 and all the ammo they can carry – and setting them loose in the Swat Valley to “reason” with al queda.
Voila! No more libtards. One way or another.
October 21st, 2009 | 5:29 pm | #52
[...] addition to this, EW mentions that cartoonist Julie Sigwart and political satirist Micheal Stinson are self-publishing Going Rouge: The Sarah Palin Rogue Coloring & Activity Book, a 48-page paper…. The sample pages on the book’s promotional website fall clearly into the realm of political [...]
October 21st, 2009 | 5:32 pm | #53
I will buy as many of her books as I can possibly afford. That’ll teach them! Hahaha…this is going to be great! Can’t wait for Nov. 17.
October 21st, 2009 | 5:37 pm | #54
HypogeanNo Gravatar
October 21st, 2009 | 3:52 pm 48
Why is it that the same media that put the silly clown through the mill refused to do the same for Obama? What does that say about the president’s ability to withstand scrutiny? We all seem to understand that if questioned, Obama would collapse. Why is that acceptable to you?
I once heard Michael Medved state that Obama did go through the media ringer and survived, while Palin struggled.
This is absurd. I don’t recall anyone searching high and low in Chicago for surreptitious ties to fraudsters, querying the depth of association with Rev. Wright, or asking tough questions involving his proposed legislative agenda.
It was a whitewash, aided and abetted by a media who voted nearly unanimously for Obama.
October 21st, 2009 | 5:38 pm | #55
I am speechless… and that is rare.
October 21st, 2009 | 5:43 pm | #56
Joe the plumber and sarah palin would make an excellent ticket. He hasn’t been corrupted by being a politician, sarah being in Alaska also hasn’t been too corrupted.
I’m sure joe the plumber and sarah palin can both produce original “birth certificates”.
I just hope I don’t buy the wrong book by mistake, they both look the same.
October 21st, 2009 | 5:57 pm | #57
Solaratov
October 21st, 2009 | 5:25 pm 51
Smarty
October 21st, 2009 | 4:14 pm 50
Not that I am advocating anything, just venting my spleen.
I’d advocate rounding up all the libtards, giving each of them an M-16 and all the ammo they can carry – and setting them loose in the Swat Valley to “reason” with al queda.
Voila! No more libtards. One way or another.
Solaratov,
as much as I love the visual,a libtard could’nt carry an M-16 AND the ammo. And eventually, both, would end up in the hands of al queda. So how ’bout we just send them with thier smiles and the Reset button?
October 21st, 2009 | 6:04 pm | #58
Craig
October 21st, 2009 | 5:38 pm 55
I am speechless… and that is rare.
NO FECES.!!!!
October 21st, 2009 | 6:09 pm | #59
Richard Romano
October 21st, 2009 | 5:37 pm 54
I once heard Michael Medved state that Obama did go through the media ringer and survived, while Palin struggled.
Medved is one of those old-timey, old-school, bipartisan, reach-across-the-aisle conservatives who are embarrassed all to hell by Palin. Medved is often wring, and when he’s wrong, he’s always wrong in a huge way. He supported the amnesty bill, blatantly lying about the massive loopholes in the enforcement provisions.
He’s now lying about TARP, claiming that the banks are paying back the bailout funds and the taxpayer is making a profit. Wrong:
About $12 billion has been received in dividends or from the sale of warrants, and that led to cheery reports, including one or two of my own, that TARP was earning a decent return on investment.
Not so, Barofsky said this morning on teevee: the 17 percent return on investment being cited is not realistic, because there are many billions that, by design, will never be repaid.
http://moneywatch.bnet.com/economic-news/blog/macro-view/tarp-inspector-general-gives-program-and-treasury-low-marks/1138/
Back to Palin: I’m not a social conservative. I disagree with social conservatives on most of the hot-button issues. I don’t like hunting. I don’t go to church. I don’t drop my g’s.
But I’m very impressed with Palin. I’m not embarrassed by her. I examined her record and found much that I admired in it. She’s a throwback to an earlier era in our history, and I like that.
Medved–like McCain–is simply too inconsistent and confusing to respect. How many times did McCain have to explain his positions and reassure us that his position on whatever issue was in fact not counterintuitive but smart and honorable?
Conversely, how often did Sarah Palin have to do that? She–like Cheney and Bolton–leave no doubt as to their positions. You can agree or disagree, but you’re never left scratching your head and asking yourself why the heck she said something.
We need that clarity. I’d vote for her in a second. I don’t care that I disagree with her on social issues. She made it clear that she’s not out to impose her personal values on the country, so that’s good enough for me.
October 21st, 2009 | 6:13 pm | #60
There is ABSOLUTELY nothing remarkable about Palin as a person or a politician. In fact, the opposite is true.
What IS remarkable is the way the type of people who read this blog have attached themselves to her. I don’t think anyone “fears” her per se, what they fear is what would happen to this country if people like you actually succeeded in voting her to power. Highly unlikely, but not something to be ignored. The type of people who think that Joe The Plumber and Palin should be running this country are dangerous and need to be dealt with. We already tried 8 years of a dolt (one who is no where near as clueless as Palin or the Plumber) and look where that got us.
I don’t speak for all rational people (progressives) in this country, but that is why I pay attention to the Palin wackos. Not to mention, it’s quite entertaining to see what stupid thing she says next.
October 21st, 2009 | 6:22 pm | #61
as much as I love the visual,a libtard could’nt carry an M-16 AND the ammo. And eventually, both, would end up in the hands of al queda. So how ’bout we just send them with thier smiles and the Reset button?
I could live with that. :>)
October 21st, 2009 | 6:25 pm | #62
Conversely, how often did Sarah Palin have to do that? She–like Cheney and Bolton–leave no doubt as to their positions. You can agree or disagree, but you’re never left scratching your head and asking yourself why the heck she said something.
I agree — clarity of language matters precisely because clarity of thought does. Orwell warned that language is often used (abused?) in overtly politically ways in order to obscure meaning. This is why Palin brings out the worst in political elites (commentators, columnists, and politicians) — they love their word games and endless use of coterie jargon.
I just find her to be refreshing — she brings something special to politics that has been missing for a very long time.
October 21st, 2009 | 6:28 pm | #63
Joe
October 21st, 2009 | 6:13 pm 60
There is ABSOLUTELY nothing remarkable about Palin as a person or a politician. In fact, the opposite is true.
Truly one of the stupidest comments ever posted here. And what does this next sentence mean?
The type of people who think that Joe The Plumber and Palin should be running this country are dangerous and need to be dealt with.
Dealt with how, pray tell? I’m assuming you mean some form of incarceration or violence, since those seem to be the liberal answers to dissent.
Well, I invite you try, Joe. Seriously. You don’t scare me, and neither does Obama. Do your worst.
October 21st, 2009 | 6:32 pm | #64
Joe
October 21st, 2009 | 6:13 pm 60
Sure, sure, joey. We believe you. You idiot “progressives” (that’s a laugh!) don’t worry about Palin at all. That’s why you have strategy sessions to figure out how to fight her message.
We really, REALLY believe you, joey.
BWAhahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
October 21st, 2009 | 6:34 pm | #65
I predict they don’t make their publishing costs.
They probably don’t care. In this instance, it’s unlikely that making money is an object.
October 21st, 2009 | 6:34 pm | #66
Just to clarify, George Orwell argued in his appendix to 1984 that for tyrants to standardize thought they must, of necessity, standardize the language. Precision and clarity of language matter because precision and clarity of thought do.
Listen to any of Palin’s speeches — clear and direct. Obama’s, in contrast, are filled with trite statements and political jargon — soaring rhetoric that does just that, soar.
Is it little wonder people are tiring of his rhetoric? They want concrete speech and reasonable action — two components missing in Obama’s administration thus far, hence the falling poll numbers and growing dissent.
2010 will be a tough year for Democrats.
October 21st, 2009 | 6:38 pm | #67
[...] Gateway Pundit. November 17 is the same day her own book drops, of course. Further evidence of how obsessively the [...]
October 21st, 2009 | 6:39 pm | #68
And btw, joey, I invite you – wholeheartedly – to attempt to deal with me and mine. I’d welcome your attempt.
Having “dealt with” a fairly large number of your “progressive” bretheren (beginning in the 60s), I doubt that you and your oh-so-delicate little compadres would offer much of a challenge.
Back in the day, your ilk could actually put up a struggle. Not so these days.
But, please, by all means – do bring it on.
October 21st, 2009 | 6:46 pm | #69
“There is ABSOLUTELY nothing remarkable about Palin as a person or a politician. In fact, the opposite is true.”
-Joe #60
Perfect.Factual.Inversion
“I don’t think anyone “fears” her per se, what they fear is what would happen to this country if people like you actually succeeded in voting her to power.”
Perfect.Emotional.Inversion
“The type of people who think that Joe The Plumber and Palin should be running this country are dangerous and need to be dealt with.”
Perfect.Perceptual.Inversion
(And a revealing insight besides)
“We already tried 8 years of a dolt (one who is no where near as clueless as Palin or the Plumber) and look where that got us.”
Beautiful.Interpretative.Inversion
“I don’t speak for all rational people…”
Understatement of the Night
“Not to mention, it’s quite entertaining to see what stupid thing she says next.”
Perfect.Projective.Inversion
October 21st, 2009 | 6:47 pm | #70
Joe The Plumber and Palin should be running this country are dangerous and need to be dealt with
Totalitarianism is of the left, not the right.
October 21st, 2009 | 6:49 pm | #71
“Among other ‘Nation’ regulars showing up in the collection: Katrina vanden Heuvel, Patricia Williams, Jim Hightower, Joe Conason, and Katha Pollitt ; Salon is also well represented, as Rebecca Traister and Michelle Goldberg contribute pieces.” –OR Books.
Palin equals genius.
Bozo= Ignorant.
Persons that fight for the Bozo are the corruptOcrats — they are very ignorant.
October 21st, 2009 | 6:54 pm | #72
There are many web sites that sell these books that ask for people to review them.
I think that the alternate Sarah book reviews will be looking for a certain point of view.
I think that after I read the phony one, maybe I will provide a review as phony as the book.
October 21st, 2009 | 6:55 pm | #73
“And btw, joey, I invite you – wholeheartedly – to attempt to deal with me and mine. I’d welcome your attempt.
Having “dealt with” a fairly large number of your “progressive” bretheren (beginning in the 60s), I doubt that you and your oh-so-delicate little compadres would offer much of a challenge.
Back in the day, your ilk could actually put up a struggle. Not so these days.
But, please, by all means – do bring it on.”
Whoa… chill out there “internet tough guy”. I never said anything remotely threatening. By “dealt with” I only meant “paid attention to”. I know how much you dopes like war and “cracking skulls” (even of your fellow countrymen), but I have no interest in confronting you physically. I don’t need to. Unlike wingnuts, I only fight if I have to.
October 21st, 2009 | 6:58 pm | #74
Richard Romano
October 21st, 2009 | 6:34 pm 66
2010 will be a tough year for Democrats.
It seems more and more clear, doesn’t it?
Solaratov
October 21st, 2009 | 6:39 pm 68
And btw, joey, I invite you – wholeheartedly – to attempt to deal with me and mine. I’d welcome your attempt.
Wait: You mean you’re not afraid of Joe, ACORN, and the as-yet-unconstituted Civilian Security Corps? You’re not going to passively submit to Joe and the rest of our superiors?
Actually, I’m not going to, either.
October 21st, 2009 | 6:59 pm | #75
By “dealt with” I only meant “paid attention to”.
Buttressing my Orwellian analogy to a tee.
Well done, Joe.
October 21st, 2009 | 6:59 pm | #76
“You wanna “deal” with me, Joey? Come here and I’ll show you how I deal with commie pukes like you. Here’s a little hint: it involves anal sex. I hope you bring lots of lube, boy. I’m already hard at the thought of of bending you over and dealing with you the way real American patriots deal with pinko Marxists. Good old fashioned American sodomy.”
Funny stuff. And you wonder why people like you are laughed at and aren’t taken seriously.
Got anymore perverted gay fantasies to share with us? Like I’ve said before, most right-wing men are closet-homo-sexuals… and you just made a great example.
October 21st, 2009 | 7:03 pm | #77
Joe
October 21st, 2009 | 6:55 pm 73
I never said anything remotely threatening. By “dealt with” I only meant “paid attention to”.
Of course that’s what you meant. When you said those of us who support Palin are dangerous and must be dealt with, you’re advocating some sort of gentle outreach to us, to convince us of the error of our ways.
We all understood what you meant.
October 21st, 2009 | 7:06 pm | #78
Well, we will see which book has more sales then.
October 21st, 2009 | 7:08 pm | #79
“Like I’ve said before, most right-wing men are closet-homo-sexuals…”
Man. We’re in some kind of Freudian nightmare here, in which the liberals are projecting all over the place. And who spells it “homo-sexuals”? Are you writing from the 18th century?
And how come the italics stopped working?
October 21st, 2009 | 7:16 pm | #80
“Got anymore perverted gay fantasies to share with us? Like I’ve said before, most right-wing men are closet-homo-sexuals… and you just made a great example.”
-Jo #70
ROFLOL!
By that logic, most Left-Wing ‘males’ are closeted Women … who secretly enjoy the thought of being manhandled by a right-thinking man.
…So that begs the question, Jo: Colin Powell or Richard Cheney?
October 21st, 2009 | 7:21 pm | #81
I think solaratov might have blown a gasket. Someone should go check on him… LOL!!
That’s what happens when you have your gay ass handed to you.
October 21st, 2009 | 7:28 pm | #82
Looks like Joe is getting a lot off his chest.
October 21st, 2009 | 7:29 pm | #83
“You little pinko punk, we’ll see who’s gay when your pretty little Marxist mouth is bobbing up and down on my 3.75 inches of American exceptionalism.”
- Solaratov
And enjoying every minute of it, no doubt. Which begs the question, Jo: Bobby Jindahl or Tucker Carlson?
October 21st, 2009 | 7:32 pm | #84
[...] Gateway Pundit has a picture of the two covers, side by side, and minus the clever rogue/rouge switcheroo and the fact that the feminazi’s book has the subtitle “An American Nightmare” the books look exactly the freaking same. [...]
October 21st, 2009 | 7:32 pm | #85
LOL… that’s a tough one PSG.
I have a wife and kids, but if i were gay I think i’d have to go with good ol’ Tucker.
and if I were gay, I would freely admit it and wouldn’t be a self-loathing closet homo like solaratov.
October 21st, 2009 | 7:33 pm | #86
3.75″… LOL.
October 21st, 2009 | 7:35 pm | #87
Joe is a SUBHUMAN…
October 21st, 2009 | 7:37 pm | #88
the Subhumans were a great band! I wasn’t in that band… I WISH I WAS!
October 21st, 2009 | 7:39 pm | #89
you into anarcho-punk Bogdan? cool…
October 21st, 2009 | 7:47 pm | #90
Joe
October 21st, 2009 | 7:21 pm 81
I think solaratov might have blown a gasket. Someone should go check on him… LOL!!
That’s what happens when you have your gay ass handed to you.
—————————————
Maybe you bored him to sleep?
October 21st, 2009 | 7:58 pm | #91
C’mon folks, sure there is a lot of Palin Derangement Syndrome going around, but the woman is a mean-spirited intellectual lightweight who’s put ambition above family and public service. When you all get done sneering at her critics, please rebut them.
October 21st, 2009 | 7:58 pm | #92
I think he got his feelings hurt because GP deleted his perverted comments.
October 21st, 2009 | 8:10 pm | #93
are the italics working?
October 21st, 2009 | 8:11 pm | #94
Ahh, H e (double hockey sticks!)
October 21st, 2009 | 8:24 pm | #95
Interesting how no one has bothered to write a piece of satire attacking Pawlenty, Huckabee, or Romney…
October 21st, 2009 | 8:33 pm | #96
Joe, read The Black Book Of Communism by Stephane Courois. Prhaps you will understand.
Or rather not…
October 21st, 2009 | 8:37 pm | #97
Rouge… get it?! Because a woman had the temerity to run for VP! Oh, that’s hilarious.
Waiting for the feminist outrage.
*crickets chirp*
*tumbleweeds roll by*
October 21st, 2009 | 8:37 pm | #98
BBofC by Stephane Courtois – sorry fro a typo…
October 21st, 2009 | 8:38 pm | #99
Bozo= Ignorant.
Persons that fight for the Bozo are the corruptOcrats
The Bible tells us we’re all sinners, i.e. all corrupt. It also tells us that sin blinds us.
October 21st, 2009 | 8:40 pm | #100
Gina, I get it. But where’s the family values outrage that a woman with 5 kids, one of them severely handicapped, would run for vice-president?
October 21st, 2009 | 8:50 pm | #101
You guys are beyond hilarious! To take this mock-book seriously just pushes the whole thread into 3 stooges territory so firmly I can’t believe some of you at least don’t recognise your Jerry Lewis personalities. The book is a SPOOF, folks. It’s on the same level as Rush is a Big Fat Idiot. That is to say it’s spot on and designed to get massive publicity because of and with the help of your comical indignation. have a fun hissy-fit, Gomers.
October 21st, 2009 | 8:50 pm | #102
This makes me angry. Who else is treated this way? Who else do they launch a mocking book to coincide with a new book coming out? They think they are so funny. I hope America shows the leftie losers at the polls in 2010 and 2012 just WHO has the last laugh.
October 21st, 2009 | 8:55 pm | #103
“Gina, I get it. But where’s the family values outrage that a woman with 5 kids, one of them severely handicapped, would run for vice-president?”
What makes you think Trig is severely handicapped? And what’s the problem with having kids? Are you complaining about the parenting of the Obama kids?
October 21st, 2009 | 8:56 pm | #104
Who else is treated this way? Who else do they launch a mocking book to coincide with a new book coming out?
It won’t take long for a conservative publisher to use the same tactic. The heart of your complain is “who else gets mocked?” Well . . . Obama does.
October 21st, 2009 | 8:58 pm | #105
Yeah, this thing will never see a shelf in the big bookstores. Maybe in some Frisco indy shops, but nobody’s going to buy into it in a serious way.
October 21st, 2009 | 8:59 pm | #106
Ken, you obviously don’t think women should work. Most “family values” advocates don’t share your view.
Leif: What I see is the left, the pro-woman party, parodying itself. What’s funny about “going rouge” unless you mean to belittle a woman in politics? The thinly disguised misogyny that’s surrounded the left’s treatment of Sarah Palin from day one might be a joke to you, but it gives your feminazi compatriots a credibility problem.
October 21st, 2009 | 9:03 pm | #107
[...] Gateway Pundit. November 17 is the same day her own book drops, of course. Further evidence of how obsessively the [...]
October 21st, 2009 | 9:10 pm | #108
It’s not a spoof, it’s a libel, it suggests someone who is patriotic and honest and
who believes America doesn’t have to apologize to the world,is evil. Now most of these hacks are way past their sell date, Conason, the eternal Clinton/Obama hack, Moore the female version of Keith Olbermann
(muse on that for a bit. Matt Taibbi, known for wishing the previous Pope ill, on occasion, to be precise 101 uses for a dead pope
October 21st, 2009 | 9:23 pm | #109
Great video for the Obama supporters:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=dd5_1256056612
October 21st, 2009 | 9:23 pm | #110
I wonder if this collection of “hit pieces”, as it is so eloquently promoted, would also be open for slander and liable lawsuits?
Sarge
October 21st, 2009 | 9:33 pm | #111
Well, well. It would seem that I missed a whole raft of posts put up by our little leftists. And now gone.
I really must start checking in more frequently. If for no other reason than to see what new insanity the leftards have posted.
I wonder why they all seem to drag everything into some sort of homosexual fantasy world of theirs. All of them seem to do it.
They seem to be obsessed with homosexuality, bowel movements and any strange combination of the two. One can but be repulsed at the thought of what their “relationships” must be like.
October 21st, 2009 | 9:37 pm | #112
Solaratov, as Obama continues to crash and burn, expect his crew to allow themselves free expression of every horrendous thought that ever polluted their skulls.
By the time the 2010 election rolls around, this and other conservative blogs are going to be swamped with unbelievable levels of crud that will backfire magnificently, of course, but which will be unpleasant just the same.
October 21st, 2009 | 10:01 pm | #113
Joe wrote:
“Whoa… chill out there “internet tough guy”. I never said anything remotely threatening. By “dealt with” I only meant “paid attention to”. ”
Translation:
“Backpeddle! Backpeddle!”
October 21st, 2009 | 10:12 pm | #114
WHat’s the with the stupid Left stereotype of conservative women and working?
Nancy Pelosi can have five kids and nobody conservative sneered about that and Liberals gushed at how wonderful she is.
Obama intones that “as parents we all try to teach our kids, but uh uh you know if they mess up” I don’t want to my daughters to be burdened with a baby. No one made skanky jokes about Obama’s girls messing up, even though their father admitted that there was a real chance they MIGHT, despite his parental counsel.
Obama, owner of a million-dollar house, while living free at taxpayer expense in the world’s most exclusive address with cooks, housekeepers, chauffeurs, security guards, getting lavish free concerts on US taxpayers’ dimes come to his lawn, has a starving, orphaned half-brother in Kenya and can’t even find a ten dollar bill to send to him once a month.
What does anyone gain from listening to such rank either liars or hypocrites?
October 21st, 2009 | 10:40 pm | #115
Solaratov wrote:
“I wonder why they all seem to drag everything into some sort of homosexual fantasy world of theirs. All of them seem to do it.
They seem to be obsessed with homosexuality, bowel movements and any strange combination of the two. One can but be repulsed at the thought of what their “relationships” must be like.”
This is awfully funny coming from someone who calls people that don’t agree with him “pedophiles”. And the person who posted this comment earlier this evening:
“You wanna “deal” with me, Joey? Come here and I’ll show you how I deal with commie pukes like you. Here’s a little hint: it involves anal sex. I hope you bring lots of lube, boy. I’m already hard at the thought of of bending you over and dealing with you the way real American patriots deal with pinko Marxists. Good old fashioned American sodomy.”
Are there 2 solaratovs or do you suffer from multiple personality disorder? Or could it be the good old “phony outrage” that you wingnuts are famous for?
October 21st, 2009 | 10:43 pm | #116
Patrick Chester
October 21st, 2009 | 10:01 pm 113
Joe wrote:
“Whoa… chill out there “internet tough guy”. I never said anything remotely threatening. By “dealt with” I only meant “paid attention to”. ”
Translation:
“Backpeddle! Backpeddle!”
Uh… actually the term “dealt with” can quite clearly mean to pay attention to or strategize against. It in no way implies violence. I am as against violence as one can be. Of course, leave it to wingnuts to bring violence into everything. Typical…
October 21st, 2009 | 11:19 pm | #117
“Joe
October 21st, 2009 | 10:43 pm 116
Of course, leave it to wingnuts to bring violence into everything. Typical…”
Yes, we bring violence into everything. Cooking. Brushing our teeth. Reading. Solving physics equations. Wrapping Christmas presents…
October 21st, 2009 | 11:20 pm | #118
They FEAR Palin. I love everything about her and I’m a disenfranchised dem (ashamed of ever having been a dem). I’m pro life, pro God and anti obamao. Hey jerkoffs, your man obamao is GOING DOWN LOL. He has ONLY 27% approval rating today October 21, 2009. Down from 65% approval rating 9 months ago. Give it time and it’ll be a 5% approval rating come Christmas. Fear that you progressive pea brain. Your guy sucks and you are too stupid to admit it. Palin has awoken the silent majority. Half the Tea parties are anti-obamao ex-dems. LOL laughing now jerk offs?
You have to fear the Dems voting for her. That’s what you have to fear. Oh yes she is running. I’m certain of it. I have proof. She is pro-american and YES SHE CAN win and YES SHE CAN do a great job of running the country. And you know it!!!
We now have a pResident worse thn Nixon and Cahtah put together. Radical lefties won’t win. They’ll have to steal the election again and it won’t happen because there are too many voting for Palin. She’s the bug spray and you radical progressive maoists are the bugs LOL.
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows that 27% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Forty percent (40%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -13. That’s just a point above the lowest level ever recorded for this President. It’s also the sixth straight day in negative double digits, matching the longest such streak
October 21st, 2009 | 11:24 pm | #119
Joe
October 21st, 2009 | 10:40 pm 115
Solaratov wrote
Are you so incredibly stupid that you fail to see that posts from me have a gravitar associated with them?
And what’s the matter joey/mr. blonde? Don’t you like being reminded of your confession of being a pedophile? A child-rapist?
No wonder you chase after children. Grown women scare you too badly.
And, just keep backpedaling about what you wrote. All it does is show you to be a lying weasel and a coward. (A “progressive”, if you will.)
The only good communist is a dead communist.
October 21st, 2009 | 11:43 pm | #120
Joe wrote:
“This is awfully funny coming from someone who calls people that don’t agree with him “pedophiles”.”
Actually Solaratov uses that on a specific person who actually did *advocate* pedophilia. It’s possible he suspects you are that specific person since said person likes playing games with IP addresses and aliases.
Later, Joe bleated:
“Uh… actually the term “dealt with” can quite clearly mean to pay attention to or strategize against. It in no way implies violence. I am as against violence as one can be. Of course, leave it to wingnuts to bring violence into everything. Typical…”
I believe the new blog site’s filters prevent me from typing in the appropriate word to describe the above so I’ll just speculate on what pretty flowers you can grow with it.
October 21st, 2009 | 11:52 pm | #121
Solaratov wrote:
“Are you so incredibly stupid that you fail to see that posts from me have a gravitar associated with them?”
So, someone tried to post a bunch of items using your handle? Wonder if anyone checked the IPs of the postings… and the IPs of anyone making shocked, *shocked* gasps of dismay at them.
October 22nd, 2009 | 12:02 am | #122
[...] Palin-haters Set to Release Hit-Piece “Going Rouge” On Same Day as Sarah’s Book Launch [...]
October 22nd, 2009 | 12:17 am | #123
Solaratov wrote:
“Are you so incredibly stupid that you fail to see that posts from me have a gravitar associated with them?”
My point is that you are obsessed with homosexuality and pedophilia. You then accuse others of having these obsessions. If you are so disgusted by this, then why do you constantly bring up these subjects?
Answer- because you are a sick, twisted, hypocrite fool.