Well if Barack can win a Men’s Health Award for “Top Fittest Male” (while smoking), a Grammy for spoken word, and a Nobel Peace Prize for nothing…
Then it’s only fair that Michelle takes home a prize or two as well.
Glamour Magazine features First Lady Michelle Obama on the cover of their Women of the Year issue that pays tribute to courageous and inspiring women who are changing the world.
We wouldn’t want Michelle to get upset now, would we?
Reuters reported, via Free Republic.
First Lady Michelle Obama has demonstrated a commitment to helping the next generation of girls expand their horizons and providing them with the information and inspiration to envision themselves as the leaders of tomorrow.
Glamour celebrates her for bringing the importance of mentoring to the national forefront with events that connect young girls from around the country with women leaders from business, government, sports, science, academia, the arts and philanthropy. Mrs. Obama enlisted women in the administration to mentor girls in the community.
Mrs. Obama was photographed by Matthias Vriens-McGrath for one of five celebratory Women of the Year covers. For the profile inside, she is pictured alongside seven White House East Wing interns. Mrs. Obama salutes the 11 inspiring Women of the Year winners who are also featured in Glamour’s special December issue, on newsstands November 10.
“I am delighted to join in celebrating the Glamour Women of the Year,” said Mrs. Obama. “The women honored in this issue are changing the world for young girls around the world by removing obstacles, opening doors, and reaching back and extending a hand to the next generation of women leaders. They are role models for us all.”
“In under a year, Michelle Obama has transformed the role of First Lady, throwing open the doors of the White House to families and to children,” says Cindi Leive, Glamour editor-in-chief. “That alone earns her icon status – but we were especially moved by her determination to show girls the power of believing in themselves and their dreams.”
Because, of course, Michelle Obama is the first First Lady to open the White House to children.
October 28th, 2009 | 11:05 am | #1
I just knew Mr. Mommy pants himself would win…what happened?
October 28th, 2009 | 11:07 am | #2
I’ve seen better upholstered sofas.
October 28th, 2009 | 11:13 am | #3
Good, I’ll buy a copy, piss on it and call it art.
October 28th, 2009 | 11:19 am | #4
When I see either of these fools on a mag at the market I turn the mags to the bacK. Guess Laura Bush and all her work with children was not good enough.
October 28th, 2009 | 11:20 am | #5
I heard somewhere that Obams dips now instead of smoking. does anyone know if that is true?
October 28th, 2009 | 11:27 am | #6
Guess this shows even a horse face can be glamourus lol. Does the woman ever smile?
October 28th, 2009 | 11:28 am | #7
I think i’m going to be sick.
October 28th, 2009 | 11:33 am | #8
Notice the difference between the simpering phony on the magazine cover –
and the hate-filled visage in the photo on the right.
Any doubt at all as to which is the “real” michelle?
Not in my mind.
October 28th, 2009 | 11:34 am | #9
LOL “icon status”!
October 28th, 2009 | 11:34 am | #10
Michelle has a face only a Mother could love! There is not one empathetic and kind bone in this woman’s body. She is the epitome of Me, Me, Me, Me, Me…..
How can she love children, or care for anyone else for that matter, when she only has eyes for herself!
I can’t wait for the day Mo and BO get shown the door. Just make sure to hide the silver!
October 28th, 2009 | 11:36 am | #11
The more the Obamas need to be propped up by meaningless crap like this, the weaker they look.
October 28th, 2009 | 11:48 am | #12
I can’t wait until Bo wins Best of Show at the Westmister Kennel Club Show – just 109 days!
October 28th, 2009 | 11:51 am | #13
I feel sorry for the daughters being raised by two narcissists, not one.
October 28th, 2009 | 11:51 am | #14
Richard Bragg, you are a pathetic man and your comments have no place on this site.
Notice the difference between the simpering phony on the magazine cover –
and the hate-filled visage in the photo on the right.
Any doubt at all as to which is the “real” michelle?
Probably both! Because people are capable of expressing more than one emotion over the course of their lives. Besides, judging someone’s emotions from a still photograph is a fool’s errand.
October 28th, 2009 | 11:58 am | #15
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Dan Collins, Jim Hoft. Jim Hoft said: Michelle O Is Woman of Year http://bit.ly/or3XU [...]
October 28th, 2009 | 12:03 pm | #16
What. A. Joke. Truly shameful….
October 28th, 2009 | 12:06 pm | #17
Gee, and I buy that magazine – not that one now.
October 28th, 2009 | 12:06 pm | #18
Could be worse. Imagine how sickening it would be for he to win Playmate of the Year.
October 28th, 2009 | 12:11 pm | #19
Ick
October 28th, 2009 | 12:12 pm | #20
She will also be the First Clydesdale to win the Triple Crown.
October 28th, 2009 | 12:13 pm | #21
Qapla!
October 28th, 2009 | 12:17 pm | #22
In the first photo, Michelle was only too aware of the camera. Unfortunately, not so in the second:
She was seated next to France’s First Lady and had directed her “stink eye” at her neighbor’s lovely, angelic face.
Ah, the candid moment! One only wonders the precise “emotion” attached to it.
October 28th, 2009 | 12:32 pm | #23
If they won anything winning on merit, it would be fine. All of these awards are strictly a product of Affirmative Action. That’s how he won the presidency w/ absolutely no qualifications or credentials, and she’s just along for the ride.
October 28th, 2009 | 12:32 pm | #24
Guess Who
October 28th, 2009 | 11:51 am | #14
OK, I’ll guess. A brain damaged weasel?
October 28th, 2009 | 12:33 pm | #25
Just to clarify for the trolls who love to stir up trouble, EndAA stands for End Affirmative Action. No more, no less.
October 28th, 2009 | 12:40 pm | #26
It is nice to know that for all the staff Michelle has working diligently to make her into a “woman of substance” that there is something to show for it.
October 28th, 2009 | 12:53 pm | #27
Thank goodness someone had the good taste to not photograph her wearing one of her hideous belts! Someone really should tell her that you wear a belt just above your hips and not underneath your boobs though. She’s such a class act, not.
Notice how they accentuated her arms and hid her butt? Wonder how many hours it took to airbrush that pic?
October 28th, 2009 | 12:58 pm | #28
First Lady Michelle Obama has demonstrated a commitment to helping the next generation of girls expand their horizons…
…by opting out of higher-paying work in the private sector for more rewarding (lower-paying) work in the helping sector.
Which would be tolerable if Mrs. Obama hadn’t been pulling down $317K/yr in a no-show makework job at Univ. of Chicago Hospital as quid-pro-quo for earmarks her then-Senator husband directed to said hospital.
October 28th, 2009 | 12:59 pm | #29
What is this infatuation with Michelle Obama and how “beautiful” she is? There isn’t one physical feature on this woman that I find attractive. Arms: too long. Eyes: too close together. Butt: just too damn big! Just because she is the first black first lady doesn’t mean she’s somehow akin to Aphrodite.
http://www.hackwilson.blogspot.com
October 28th, 2009 | 1:04 pm | #30
Woman of achievement?
She got to First Lady by being a spouse.
And what’s this about mentoring girls? She’s telling everyone college is too expensive and business is b-a-d. What kind of mentoring is THAT?
Anyway, it’s all media PRAVDA, so any attempt to apply REASON or RATIONALITY to it is not part of the game.
October 28th, 2009 | 1:17 pm | #31
What is this infatuation with Michelle Obama and how “beautiful” she is? There isn’t one physical feature on this woman that I find attractive. Arms: too long. Eyes: too close together. Butt: just too damn big! Just because she is the first black first lady doesn’t mean she’s somehow akin to Aphrodite.
No, but I think she’s quite attractive, certainly better than 90% of the posters who make fun of her here could do. Just curious, what do you look like, Hack?
October 28th, 2009 | 1:19 pm | #32
Thank G-d for photoshop!
Maybe she’ll end up on Ralph Loren’s catalog cover next time.
October 28th, 2009 | 1:25 pm | #33
That is true, Hack, Cleopatra she ain’t, and she has a big mouth.
Michelle contradicts Obama nativity story
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114259
October 28th, 2009 | 1:31 pm | #34
It`s wrong to disparage an individual for their physical attributes. I`m disappointed that so many commenters on this site make these comments about Michelle Obama`s appearance. I fully understand that our outward appearance is often influenced by how we view life and our place in it, and possibly this is the case with Michelle Obama.
There is enough material for which Michelle Obama is due criticism, but to criticize her for her physical attributes is something I would expect of a leftist. It could very well be that these commenters are indeed leftist and have made these posts with the intent of discrediting Jim Hoft and Gateway Pundit.
October 28th, 2009 | 1:45 pm | #35
So where’s Michelle’s Nobel Peace Prize? Isn’t she just as deserving as Barack?
October 28th, 2009 | 1:53 pm | #36
Anybody ever find out why she was disbarred?
October 28th, 2009 | 1:53 pm | #37
I agree with Mark in Kansas that it is very wrong to attack Michelle Obama on the basis of her looks. We don’t get to choose what we look like (unless we can afford personal trainers and plastic surgery).
Leave lookist attacks for the Daily Kos and David Letterman (“Limbaugh is a tubby!” “Paula Jones has a big nose!” “Linda Tripp is a troll!” “Katherine Harris is a raccoon!!”).
The real point is that all newspapers and magazines should just issue the following press release:
“Barack and/or Michelle Obama are hereby declared the winner of every ‘ _________ of the Year’ Award for 2009 and beyond until futher notice.”
October 28th, 2009 | 1:54 pm | #38
Gee, I thought this was supposed to be a religious-oriented site, with charitable people reading it. “Love thy neighbor?” Someone (or more than one) apparently didn’t get the message.
Of course, Michelle probably doesn’t look like your mother – or mine. But I have been very impressed with her family focus, her ability to articulate real family values that any Christian would be proud of, and her support of her husband (who incidentally, has a pretty difficult job!).
And, incidentally, I think she’s pretty attractive!
October 28th, 2009 | 2:13 pm | #39
Darwin – “lookist” attacks??? LOL. Only a concern troll would use that type of language.
October 28th, 2009 | 2:21 pm | #40
Grotesque but not surprising. Remember when the press was claiming that Michelle Obama made Carla Bruni look like a plain Jane and that all eyes went to lovely Michelle when she entered the room?
The MSM is a bleeping cult. This is like how dictators have to be presented as the bestest and brightest at everything they do.
October 28th, 2009 | 2:30 pm | #41
If you actually read the article, it doesn’t appear as though Glamour gave her a “Women of the Year” award–she’s in the magazine, but the award went to 11 other women.
October 28th, 2009 | 2:36 pm | #42
Speaking of women…
In a national poll… 71% of Americans think that Sarah Pain is unqualified to be President. I was getting worried about Americans there for a while. Glad to see that they are not as gullible as I feared. Anyone who falls for the “Folksy” Palin garbage is a mental midget. Or in McCain’s case… severely misguided.
October 28th, 2009 | 2:36 pm | #43
^——meant “Palin” not “Pain”
October 28th, 2009 | 2:46 pm | #44
Where can we go to in order to cast our vote for her winning the Heisman Trophy?
October 28th, 2009 | 2:54 pm | #45
Yes siree, bigfoot in a dress, how glamorous.
October 28th, 2009 | 2:55 pm | #46
“In under a year, Michelle Obama has transformed the role of First Lady, throwing open the doors of the White House to families and to children,”
Yes, seems it was not long ago when Michelle Obama was throwing open the doors to Chicago hospitals, PUSHING patients into the streets…
Writing letters of support for Planned Parenthood, financier to her husband’s campaign, claiming that partial birth abortion was invented by Republicans to smear supporters of “women’s health”…
I bet she’s proud of her country now–44% of it anyway.
…………..
October 28th, 2009 | 2:56 pm | #47
Joe
October 28th, 2009 | 2:36 pm | #42
Where’s the link to your poll, pumpkin?
Of course you don’t, libtards don’t deal in facts.
October 28th, 2009 | 2:56 pm | #48
Hey, who put Patrick Ewing on Glam…oh wait!
October 28th, 2009 | 2:58 pm | #49
Frank
October 28th, 2009 | 1:54 pm | #38
You’re a pretty sick lil’ tard are’nt you.
October 28th, 2009 | 3:08 pm | #50
Mark in Kansas
October 28th, 2009 | 1:31 pm | #34 . It could very well be that these commenters are indeed leftist and have made these posts with the intent of discrediting Jim Hoft and Gateway Pundit.
Nah. We make these comments because michelle-o is one butt-ugly, angry, hate-filled, bi+ch.
It’s really that simple.
(Not to mention that she’s also a pretentious, perpetual “victim” who believes that she deserves whatever she wants just because she’s brown.)
October 28th, 2009 | 3:32 pm | #51
Meg #39…I hope you don’t mean that I am somehow a troll for not wanting to attack Michelle Obama’s looks….
….and the term “lookist attacks” was culled directly from Ann Coulter’s “Slander” wherein she commented on the manner in which the left slanders people on the basis of their personal appearance. Two quotes from said book: ]
“There’s nothing so irredeemably cruel as an attack on a women for her looks. Attacking a female for being ugly is a hideous thing, always inherently vicious.”
and
“You will never appreciate the full savagery of the left until you get in their way. Wincing while others are attacked cannot compare. Imagine it is you, your wife, or your daughter they have set about to destroy. Then it won’t matter if the authors of the hate speech are hideous talentless wretches. You will hear the words calling you ugly and stupid and you will believe, if only fleetingly, that the whole world sees you this way. Tripp ended up getting two face lifts and liposuction. Paula Jones got braces and a nose job.”
“Both blamed themselves for the sadistic attacks on their looks. Linda Tripp later apologized to her country for her ugliness, telling People magazine: ‘I didn’t realize how ugly I was’ and ‘ I was horrified along with the rest of the nation really.’(62) Paula Jones also blamed herself for the malevolent attacks: ‘ I can laugh at myself, you know, I mean, I looked, you know, that way. And I look different now.’(63) Despite going under the knife to quell complaints about her looks, Time Magazine would not be mollified. The magazine sniffed that Jones was getting a nose job because she ‘apparently felt her affection for the camera was not sufficiently requited.’ In response to Jones explanation that she ‘was sick of being made fun of by cartoonists’ Time sarcastically snipped: ‘this should really help.’ (64)
October 28th, 2009 | 3:48 pm | #52
Apropos to the coming holiday -
Is she hiding a pumpkin under that skirt?
October 28th, 2009 | 4:09 pm | #53
++
on her, the color RED emits a whole new perspective..
==
October 28th, 2009 | 4:35 pm | #54
Obama the “top fittest male”? I want to see his “AZV”, the German abbreviation for tidal volume. I want to see the tidal volume of his lungs. Would be interesting. He’s smoking cigarettes, his AZV can’t be impressive. And if his AZV isn’t impressive, then he’s not fit. Period.
Now Michelle is “woman of the year”? Sorry, but I can think of dozens of women who’d deserve this more than she does.
October 28th, 2009 | 4:38 pm | #55
[...] And The Media Bootlicking Continues October 28, 2009 Posted by taoist in The Media. Tags: Awards, Bias, Idiocy, Obama trackback As they award yet another prize to the Obamas for absolutely nothing. [...]
October 28th, 2009 | 5:10 pm | #56
Nah. We make these comments because michelle-o is one butt-ugly, angry, hate-filled, bi+ch.
It’s really that simple.
Why don’t you post a picture of yourself, Solaratov, so we can see what a beautiful person really looks like?
October 28th, 2009 | 5:25 pm | #57
Now Michelle is “woman of the year”?
Not clear, but I don’t think so. Also don’t know why
Sorry, but I can think of dozens of women who’d deserve this more than she does.
Well, there are at least 11 others in the Glamour issue. Keep in mind that Condi Rice and Hilary Clinton were on the list last year.
October 28th, 2009 | 5:33 pm | #58
michelle obamma looks like a damn silverback gorilla, and dresses like a blind woman. Someone needs to put her back in the zoo.
October 28th, 2009 | 5:39 pm | #59
Awhiie back there was a movie called “Tootsie”. Dustin Hoffman was made up to look like a woman. Michelle must have the same make up artists.
And for anyone who thinks that it is unfair to make fun of her looks, it is more that people are fed up with being told how beautiful she is. Just like her husband, it is a case of the emperor has no clothes.
October 28th, 2009 | 5:58 pm | #60
obama/osama, you are a pathetic excuse for a human being, and your comments have no place here.
JJAYNED, care to post a picture of yourself?
October 28th, 2009 | 6:15 pm | #61
Guess Who
October 28th, 2009 | 5:10 pm | #56
Why don’t you post a picture of yourself, Solaratov, so we can see what a beautiful person really looks like?
Nah. You’ll have to continue to do your one-handed typing with a picture of barry stuck to your monitor.
October 28th, 2009 | 6:38 pm | #62
“michelle obamma looks like a damn silverback gorilla, and dresses like a blind woman. Someone needs to put her back in the zoo.”
It is always so entertaining to me when wingnuts act so innocent and dumb-founded when they are accused of being bigoted racists. “RACISTS? US?? We just don’t agree with you, race has NOTHING to do with it!”
Race has nearly EVERYTHING to do with it. Racism and your closet self-loathing homosexuality underlies nearly every tenet of modern American “conservatism”. What a joke!
October 28th, 2009 | 7:27 pm | #63
How much photoshop did it take to make mo skinny in that photo. I bet it took at least two hours to make that photo presentable.
October 28th, 2009 | 8:25 pm | #64
obama/osama
October 28th, 2009 | 5:33 pm | #58
michelle obamma looks like a damn silverback gorilla, and dresses like a blind woman. Someone needs to put her back in the zoo.
scary:
http://www.the-two-malcontents.com/wp-content/uploads/mo_ugly.jpg
October 28th, 2009 | 8:28 pm | #65
Joe,
You’re right, she dosen’t look “just” like a silverback gorilla. She looks just like Chewbaka. Is that “racist”. I guess it’s o.k. to Photoshop pictures of a chimp over Geo. Bush’s head, it’s ok ’cause he’s white and Republican.
Fact: She hates America. She hates white Americans, (including YOU!).
And speaking of closeted homosexuals, you better check out the company her husband keeps. I hear B.O. is livin’ on the down-lo, but that’s cool w/you and your progressive buddies right, Joe?
October 28th, 2009 | 8:30 pm | #66
Joe
October 28th, 2009 | 6:38 pm | #62
That was one of your fellow leftists , playing a killgore trout.
But, you believe whatever you want lefty. It’s obvious that it doesn’t take much to make you happy.
October 28th, 2009 | 8:35 pm | #67
Ladies, would you leave the house looking like this? I would, *maybe* go out to mow the lawn looking like this.
I have no words…behold our First Lady:
http://imeanwhat.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/gal_michelle_obama_05.jpg
October 29th, 2009 | 2:43 am | #68
[...] Michelle Obama “Woman of the Year”. Why? For hiring a live-with makeup “artist” to apply her eyebrows daily? For needing to be dressed and even then it’s a failed project? For advocating for partial birth abortions? For behaving like a brute with Allies and condescending all over the world? [...]
October 29th, 2009 | 7:51 am | #69
Solaratov
October 28th, 2009 | 8:30 pm | #66
Joe
October 28th, 2009 | 6:38 pm | #62
“That was one of your fellow leftists , playing a killgore trout.
But, you believe whatever you want lefty. It’s obvious that it doesn’t take much to make you happy.”
————————————————————————————————————
Probably was Joe himself who posted that remark. He has already proven himself a slime ball troll on this blog numerous times.
October 29th, 2009 | 7:53 am | #70
Bet those schoolkids the WH turned away so they could lunch with the Steelers have a different take on Michelle opening the WH doors to children.
October 29th, 2009 | 8:10 am | #71
@ guess who, FU, I’ll comment anywhere I want. That ugly animal does belong in the zoo.
October 29th, 2009 | 8:26 am | #72
obama/osama, I am emailing the site administrator about your comments. He removed a similar comment from this thread earlier today.
Ladies, would you leave the house looking like this? I would, *maybe* go out to mow the lawn looking like this.
Yeah, and she went out to walk the dog looking like that. I don’t see the difference. Besides, she looks like a normal woman to me in that photo. Elizabeth, why don’t you post a picture of yourself, let us see what a beautiful woman looks like?
October 29th, 2009 | 9:14 am | #73
Sure Guess Who. I’ll get right on that.
The thing is, she’s NOT a normal woman. She’s the first lady of the greatest country in the world. Her behavior, dress, speech and attitude are all inappropriate for the position she has usurped. It’s not that she *couldn’t* be a decent first lady. She appears to have a decent brain, but she has a heart of darkness. You can’t cover that with makeup, and everything she does is tainted by it.
October 29th, 2009 | 9:47 am | #74
Sure Guess Who. I’ll get right on that.
Yeah, I’m not going to hold my breath. You’re just like Solaratov, hiding behind the cloak of anonymity while taking potshots at others.
Her behavior, dress, speech and attitude are all inappropriate for the position she has usurped.
Why? I mean, if the President can go out in public looking like this or like this, why is it so horrible for the First Lady to walk her dog looking like a normal person? I suspect I know the answer based on your use of the word “usurped”, but I’ll wait to see what you say.
October 29th, 2009 | 10:11 am | #75
“I guess it’s o.k. to Photoshop pictures of a chimp over Geo. Bush’s head, it’s ok ’cause he’s white and Republican.”
It’s not “racist” to poke fun at someone being stupid as a chimp. Based on GW Bush’s performance as President, I actually believe that comparing him to a chimp is insulting to chimps.
October 31st, 2009 | 12:38 pm | #76
@ joe, My comment wasnt racist at all. You assume that I am a racist, but I just stated my opinion about who mo reminds me of. There is a white woman down the street from me who I think looks like a giraffe. Does this make me a racist, NO. You are the one connecting gorillas with all black people, not me. So go eff yourself, racist.
October 31st, 2009 | 12:42 pm | #77
@ guess who, Oh no, a sternly written letter. Next you will haul off and give me a dirty look. Im shakin in my boots. I stand by my statement, she does look like a gorilla.
October 31st, 2009 | 6:57 pm | #78
October 28th, 2009 | 11:33 am | #8
“…the simpering phony on the magazine cover…”
I’m late to the party here but no sh!t about the phoniness of the mag cover. The dishonesty of her in such a schoolgirl pose is sickening.
I still think she’s America’s first First Transvestite.
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact