Say it ain’t so?
Sarah Palin has decided to sit down for an interview with Oprah Winfrey even though Oprah refused to have her on her show during the election.
Oprah said she wanted to keep her show free from politics so she campaigned for Barack Obama and offered to produce his half hour TV special for him.
And, of course she came unleashed after he won.
The AP reported:
Sarah Palin is going to sit down with Oprah Winfrey.
Harpo Productions announced Tuesday that the former governor of Alaska and Republican vice presidential candidate will appear on “The Oprah Winfrey Show” on Monday, Nov. 16.
According to Harpo, the interview will be Palin’s first about her new book, “Going Rogue: An American Life,” and it will be the first time Palin and Winfrey will meet.
October 20th, 2009 | 12:59 pm | #1
Bad decision on Palin’s part but that is just my opinion.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:03 pm | #2
Agree with olm. You play with snakes, you will get bit.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:07 pm | #3
Palin will sit down with Oprah.
Obama will sit down with Ahmedinijiad.
Obama will not sit down with FOX.
Palin is strong.
Obama is weak.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:09 pm | #4
“Keep your enemies closer” as they say. I think it’s a good idea for Oprah’s audience see what Sarah is really about. She’s smart not to hold a grudge like a 6 year old.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:11 pm | #5
Hi Marty, Pu44y boy. When did Palin say she could see Russia from her home.
She didn’t Marty pu44y boy. Typical of the cowardly LIBTARD, you need to perpetuate a lie, to make yourself feel like a man.
Prove me wrong Marty. I’ll wait.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:13 pm | #6
Oh dear Marty pu44y boy!
You have some ’splaining to do son.
>>”They’re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.”>>
Oh dear Marty oh dear.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:13 pm | #7
Nixon would take this with a grain of salt, as until Palin’s people confirm it, it is merely speculation.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:14 pm | #8
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Right, Tim . Tim said: Palin to appear on Oprah – http://tinyurl.com/yj8ypu4 [...]
October 20th, 2009 | 1:14 pm | #9
I think this a great idea. If she is truly going “rogue” she needs to go where the people that dislike her are. She has to win hearts and minds. She must go to liberal venues as well.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:20 pm | #10
I think I’ll just wait and see what Mrs. Palin has to say to the head cheerleader for the fraud in the White House. She just might unload on her the way she needs to be unloaded upon!
At least Sarah Palin is brave enough to walk into the lion’s den; that’s more than we can say for the entire Democrat party, which is afraid to get close to FOXNews! MoveOn.org has the petition out now….All fearful libtards sign up.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:20 pm | #11
Will the interview be edited? Will the entire interview be shown not cherry picked. Sarah needs to set her own demands regarding interviews, we all know how the left loves to spin.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:26 pm | #12
I can’t wait til she appears on The View and slays those lyin ho’s like the Huntress she is!
Go Sarah!
October 20th, 2009 | 1:27 pm | #13
I admire the lady for her courage and also her smarts in knowing she has to gain some support from Oprah fans, mainly ladies, to have any chance in future national politics. I do hope that Oprah will be fair in her interview and presentation thereof.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:28 pm | #14
Heh, can see Russia from her house.. LOL
Guess the Republicans should have fact-checked that SNL skit too? Oh yeah, they get satire.
The thin-skinned ones don’t get it. It’s all a personal attack.
Get over your entitled selves.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:32 pm | #15
I agree with you Jayne, editing came to my mind immediately. She really does need to lay down some rules before sitting down with snakes. I have mixed feelings about this, I applaud her for having the nerve to do it, at the same time, I’d like to see her snub Oprah. I just hope this doesn’t turn out to be an unwise decision.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:33 pm | #16
This is one reason I’ve come to hate the Party I once embraced. **** you Republican Party, I’m going Independant. Why in the world would Sarah Palin be such an idiot and go on this show is beyond me. All Oprah is going to do is attack Sarah, and true to form, Sarah’s going to be a lap dog for the Liberals. Nothing good can come out of this interview. Here’s how it’s going to go down:
Oprah “Ok, so Sarah, how’s the book?”
Sarah “It’s doing well”
Oprah “Ok, so how could a stupid backwater woman such as yourself ever hope to be President?”
This comment went to spam because of foul language. I removed the vulgarity and released it, this time. Please remember the filters.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:34 pm | #17
It’s entirely likely Sarah will show Oprah – and Oprah’s messiah – how a person of faith and character behaves.
Our nation needs good, strong leadership in that regard.
We’re in a free fall at the moment. And the ground is getting dangerously close.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:35 pm | #18
Okay. How far is Russia from Alaska. It’s 2.5 miles from Little Diomede Island, Alaska to Big Diomede Island, Russia.
Across the Bering Straight, it is 55 miles from Cape Prince of Wales, Alaska to Cape Dezhnev, Russia.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:40 pm | #19
Oprah is a racist, elitist pig from the Chicago thug-mafia. Just like Michelle Obama.
They had the world handed to them for free and couldn’t be any angrier about it.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:40 pm | #20
Sarah will most likely charm the O and score political points at the same time. This is a win win and I will watch though I cannot stand Oprah. At least the success of her book pre-sales cannot be attributed to this appearance. Hope she has her family in tow as I would love to see them, too.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:41 pm | #21
Palin has the strength to go into enemy territory.
Meanwhile back at the WH the crybabies want to eliminate the opposition a la Alinsky.
Oprah is obnoxious though. She is always interrupting her guests.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:41 pm | #22
O and that video makes me want to vomit.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:42 pm | #23
Marty, Marty Marty. Why did you try to spread a lie? Why Martypoo?
a) Dishonesty
b) Ignorance and bias.
c) Libtardism??
October 20th, 2009 | 1:44 pm | #24
This is one reason I’ve come to hate the Party I once embraced. **** you Republican Party, I’m going Independant. Why in the world would Sarah Palin be such an idiot and go on this show is beyond me. All Oprah is going to do is attack Sarah, and true to form, Sarah’s going to be a lap dog for the Liberals. Nothing good can come out of this interview. Here’s how it’s going to go down:
Oprah “Ok, so Sarah, how’s the book?”
Sarah “It’s doing well”
Oprah “Ok, so how could a stupid backwater woman such as yourself ever hope to be President?”
October 20th, 2009 | 1:54 pm | #25
Come on guys. Either Sarah is a strong woman or she’s not. I think she is. I also think she is an intelligent woman who realizes the risks and not being a coward, she will confront her adversaries. She deserves more support than I have seen from some of the posts here.
October 20th, 2009 | 1:58 pm | #26
“She deserves more support than I have seen from some of the posts here.”
I’m through supporting a fool who won’t learn her lesson. This is a train wreck waiting to happen. What can Sarah possibly hope to gain? Oprah has from now until then to sharpen her knives. Sarah’s all “Oh look, a Liberal wants to be nice…how cute. I’ll be nice too”. Ahhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!
October 20th, 2009 | 2:00 pm | #27
And another thing. I am sick and tired of you fly by night republicans whose only response to anything with which you may not agree is that you are leaving the party. Well good riddance.
You are probably one of many who decided to sit out the 2006 elections. You sure taught everyone a lesson didn’t you?
October 20th, 2009 | 2:01 pm | #28
Palin going into Oprah’s den of iniquity? What could go wrong? Palin should avoid Oprah like the plague.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:02 pm | #29
I hope it is not true.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:06 pm | #30
She’ll do fine. This is her way of expanding her support.
She has to engage the other side, sooner or later, preferably sooner.
I’m pretty sure she’ll have supporters in the audience.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:08 pm | #31
This is the future of the party (ABC News/Washington Post poll)
Only 20 percent of Americans now identify themselves as Republicans, the fewest in 26 years. Just 19 percent, similarly, trust the Republicans in Congress to make the right decisions for the country’s future; even among Republicans themselves just four in 10 are confident in their own party. For comparison, 49 percent overall express this confidence in Obama, steady since August albeit well below its peak.
The Republican Party’s difficulties are shown in another result as well; in an early assessment of preference for congressional candidates in 2010, the Democrats lead by 51-39 percent.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:09 pm | #32
I’m through supporting a fool who won’t learn her lesson.
She has to engage the other side, no? You can’t fear them either…sure, there may be some unfair questioning, but she’ll have to face that if she wants to move forward. If she sticks to her base, she can’t ever possibly win. Even Obama went on O’Reilly.
We don’t even know if she’s running yet. This could be her way of testing the waters, so to speak. Give her a break.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:12 pm | #33
The Republican Party’s difficulties are shown in another result as well; in an early assessment of preference for congressional candidates in 2010, the Democrats lead by 51-39 percent.
You mean to tell me that with the record deficits, failed stimulus, near 10% unemployment rate, people will still vote Democrat?
What poll is this? What’s the sampling?
October 20th, 2009 | 2:15 pm | #34
I’m with you Richard. But what strikes me as telling is the number of people here who are afraid of the state-run media types. And their lack of faith in a woman who they think should run for president.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:15 pm | #35
We’ve seen Sarah Palin as many things since she became a candidate for vice president, but this book tour will be the first time we see her on her terms saying what she believes. I hope she is what she seems to be, but time will tell. Oprah isn’t going to be her biggest trial, being herself and sticking to her own beliefs will be. The Oprah interview might be a moment of clarity or it might be a chop job. Let the discourse begin.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:18 pm | #36
Hey Martin:
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/20/wapoabc-poll-uses-skewed-sample-to-show-public-option-support/
Looks like the sampling of that poll you referenced is very skewed, and to the left.
Nice try though.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:19 pm | #37
“And another thing. I am sick and tired of you fly by night republicans whose only response to anything with which you may not agree is that you are leaving the party. Well good riddance.”
I’ve supported this Party for YEARS. Even through the 90’s when (R) had control. What did they do? They did everything they could to make sure they rolled over for the (D). Remember Gingrich? Remember how he *ussed out and resigned? Let me tell you, I can leave this Party if I so choose, and I’m not a “fly by night Republican”. I’ve supported them through thick and thin. And what have I gotten in return? A bunch of pansies and losers who cower at the sight of a Liberal. Maybe you should re-examine how you support these clowns. McCain GAVE the election to obama. He didn’t even try. He stomped out in anger over the stimulus bill, but then put his tail between his legs, came back and voted for it. I don’t need it. And I certainly don’t need self righteous people like you telling me how the cow eats the cabbage.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:19 pm | #38
Oprah, if she is smart will be careful how she treats Sarah. Oprah’s ratings/viewership numbers are dropping. If she is unfair to Sarah, more people will be turned off of her and her show.
Also, if Oprah goes for the throat, it will be clear that the left still sees Sarah as a real threat, yet there will be plenty claiming that she is irrelevant.
Either way, more people will read her book and be able to see the other side to the story.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:20 pm | #39
In an exchange between Jake Tapper of ABC and Chief Propogandist Robert Gibbs today, Gibbs admits Fox is not a legit news organization because of the opinions expressed by Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1009/Gibbs_opinion.html
October 20th, 2009 | 2:21 pm | #40
I’m not a huge Palin fan, but this makes sense. I’ll bet there are alot of women that watch the show that look up to Palin but still watch Oprah inspite of her blatant democratic leanings. This is a great way to advertise her book. Also, Palin has the chance to convince others that may be sitting on the fence about whether to buy/read her book. Seems to me the exposure couldn’t hurt.
Secondly, I have a hard time believing that Palin will not “stick to her beliefs.” She’s come this far and hasn’t changed a bit. I don’t think she’s going to change for Oprah.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:22 pm | #41
That’s okay, The Obama Administration is not a legit executive branch because of the opinions expressed by Anita Mao Dunn, Rahm Emmanuel, David Axelrod and Robert Gibbs.
That’s my opinion.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:22 pm | #42
Richard Romano
October 20th, 2009 | 2:06 pm 29
She’ll do fine. This is her way of expanding her support.
She has to engage the other side, sooner or later, preferably sooner.
Exactly. The press will still do everything it can to tear her down, so what better way to show she’s not afraid than by parachuting right into the Queen Bee’s hive? We need to accept the likelihood that Palin won’t be able to run for office herself, because her brand has probably been ruined, but she can certainly be a force within the party.
And Americans love comeback stories, so she just might be able to turn around the public perception of her that imbeciles like Martin have.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:25 pm | #43
Marty continues to show himself to be a pathetic lying pu44y. Marty you tried to spread a lie, and I called you on it.
What’s the Marty pu44y not MAN enough to own up to your dishonesty?
Palin said:
“They’re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.”
You spoke of eyesite and carrots Marty pu44y.
You’re a libtard coward Marty. And you know it.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:25 pm | #44
Latest Rassmusen Generic Congressional Ballot, national telephone survey. 42% would vote for a republican in their district vs 37% for dems. Independents favor republicans 40% to 23%.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:25 pm | #45
Hey Martin, that poll was severely skewed. Not that you’d let facts get in the way, but hey. I expect nothing less from people who would believe a poll from the Always Barack Channel.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:26 pm | #46
++
OT.. hope they bring up the following, as well as the this..
ht Rush..
Cap-And-Trade For Babies?
[An environmental writer mainstreams an idea floating around the green fringe — save the earth by population control and give carbon credits to one-child families. Are we threatened by the patter of little carbon footprints?
It's long been a mantra on the left that people are a plague on the earth, ravaging its surface for food and resources, polluting its atmosphere and endangering its species. Now we are endangering its very climate to the point of extinction. Even the result of our breathing — carbon dioxide — has been declared by the EPA to be a dangerous pollutant.
Treaties like Kyoto and the upcoming economic suicide pact to be forged in Copenhagen have focused on the instruments and byproducts of our civilization. Now the focus is shifting increasingly to the people who built it.
[..]
This brave new world is not too far-fetched for science adviser John Holdren, who has advised taking population control to quite another level. He has at various times advocated forced abortion and sterilization and views people as a burden, not as the ultimate resource, as we do.
In a recently rediscovered book, “Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment,” co-authored with Malthus fans Paul and Anne Ehrlich, Holdren wrote that families “contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children” and “can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility.”
Holdren envisions that a “Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits … the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.” In other words, China on steroids.]
dang, albeit probably went “poof” already, sure wish i could find that video about how “Green Government aka: Climate Change aka: Global Warming” will be central to the New World Order..
(btw, the color green stands for environmentalism as well as Islamism)
==
October 20th, 2009 | 2:28 pm | #47
Hypogean and Richard.
If Sarah Palin can’t handle Oprah, she can’t handle Putin. Let’s find out.
We know Opie can’t handle anyone who doesn’t swoon at his track record of Community Agitation. Opie can’t even handle his wife’s big mouth.
Let’s find out.
As for Marty, he doesn’t have the wrong perception of Palin, Marty is a sissy and like most LIBTARDS, he doesn’t believe lying is wrong.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:28 pm | #48
Who has bigger balls? Al Gore, who will only speak before friendly audiences and never answers a hostile question, or Sarah Palin?
October 20th, 2009 | 2:29 pm | #49
A mistake. Probably not a big one, but still.
If Gov Palin is indeed determined to appear on that worthless show, she would do well to not allow it to become another Gibson/Couric experience. If Okra pushes, push back just as hard if not more so.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:29 pm | #50
“I’m through supporting a fool who won’t learn her lesson.”
—-
Abraham Lincoln experienced many failures before becoming President.
—-
Sarah has faith in God, in her life and for this country. She is smart and is willing to take calculated risks. Bottom line: God is sovereign and Sarah’s courage is rooted in God.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:30 pm | #51
Martin
October 20th, 2009 | 2:08 pm 30
Only 20 percent of Americans now identify themselves as Republicans, the fewest in 26 years. Just 19 percent, similarly, trust the Republicans in Congress to make the right decisions for the country’s future; even among Republicans themselves just four in 10 are confident in their own party.
That’s one version of reality. Here’s one that’s diametrically opposed:
Ten for Ten: Rasmussen’s New Numbers Show Republicans Ahead on All Ten “Trust More” Issues
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/293806.php
Martin, of course, will say that Rasmussen is biased and doesn’t count. Fine. Then he has nothing to worry about. If the electorate supports the Democrats’ agenda, it’ll keep them in power. If the electorate opposes the Democrats agenda, it’ll throw them out of power.
We’ll find out soon enough whether the electorate will accept higher taxes, higher energy costs, nationalized health care, Iran ascendant, a dead dollar, no credit extended by banks, a jobless “recovery,” an enemies list that includes Fox News, and a Department of Justice that refuses to prosecute those connected to Obama.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:30 pm | #52
8 My Foot, I am not saying that all is well in the GOP. Far from it. But quitting is not the answer.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:32 pm | #53
gus
October 20th, 2009 | 2:28 pm 46
Hypogean and Richard.
If Sarah Palin can’t handle Oprah, she can’t handle Putin. Let’s find out.
Exactly! Either she’s for real, or she isn’t. If she isn’t, let’s find out now.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:33 pm | #54
A live audience setting is fine. Sarah Palin has an engaging personaloity, the audience is mostly women, she can talk carpoolling, hockeymom, family, son inthe military, Special Needs son, a daughter she loves who as Obama sagely put it, “Messed up,” all the trials and tribs of working woman/mother life, but they’re dealing with it in a family, loving way…the connect is potentially HUGE. Sarah is cutting out the middle men media, going straight to the people. Millions of women will hear Palin talk, without being edited and parsed.
Sounds sensible.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:34 pm | #55
Governor Palin is good at turning pundits predictons upside down. I’m waiting to see what happens. She is one of those people for whom convential wisdom doesn’t apply.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:36 pm | #56
Sasja, I see your point, but what’s the use in supporting a faux Republican Party? It’s high time they show US support. I’d like to see some agression. I don’t see that support from the (R).
October 20th, 2009 | 2:38 pm | #57
++
Martin @ 2:08 pm
WH: We ‘control’ the media.
==
October 20th, 2009 | 2:39 pm | #58
Martin, of course, will say that Rasmussen is biased and doesn’t count. Fine. Then he has nothing to worry about. If the electorate supports the Democrats’ agenda, it’ll keep them in power. If the electorate opposes the Democrats agenda, it’ll throw them out of power.
Wasn’t Martin the same guy who believed for years that phony Bush quote about God telling him to go to war in Iraq?
You know, some people are just willfully ignorant, others have a psychological disorder. Martin, well…not sure.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:41 pm | #59
Even if the poll is skewed and off by 10-15% i’m ok with that. The dying party that is the GOP. how about those campus republicans! Big numbers growing there.
More Palin.
Salmon also helps with your eyes. You use your eyes to read magazines. I don’t know what magazines but I read them too.
Palin for President! Either Huckabee or Jindal as the running mate.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:47 pm | #60
Hey Pu44y Boy Marty, still waiting pu44y boy.
>>”They’re our next-door neighbors, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.”>>
I’m kicking your pathetic azz Pu44y boy Marty.
Keep lying, it’s doing wonders for your reputation pu44y boy Marty.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:50 pm | #61
Even if the poll is skewed and off by 10-15% i’m ok with that. The dying party that is the GOP. how about those campus republicans! Big numbers growing there.
Did you even read the analysis? You’re just repeating left-wing boilerplate.
You’re okay with 10-15% off? Really?
October 20th, 2009 | 2:50 pm | #62
This is a smart move. Sarah needs the visibility. Oprah’s audience is the group Palin needs to reach and leave them begging for more!
October 20th, 2009 | 2:50 pm | #63
You know, some people are just willfully ignorant, others have a psychological disorder. Martin, well…not sure.
He’s a stupid TROLL!
October 20th, 2009 | 2:51 pm | #64
++
btw.. i hope Palin reveals the fact that the “death panels” aka: part 1 of Obama/Kennedy/Dodd Care passed back in February in the Stimulus Package..
.==
October 20th, 2009 | 2:53 pm | #65
If I was treated as Palin was, I would not even grace Oprah by being on her show. Oprah has a talk show and a corrupt school – how is she inspirational? Because she came out of poverty? America was created out of poverty and gives every person the ability to come out of poverty, it is a warm story, but warm stories do not make people heros. Palin is a strong woman and I hope she schools Oprah. Palin 2012.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:54 pm | #66
I sure wish Sarah wouldn’t play footsies with the devil…bad decision.
Okra must need a ratings boost.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:55 pm | #67
WTH? Palin can go to Oprah but, can’t go to a Tea Party? Can’t show up to campaign for Conservatives? Can’;t show up at all?
I hope this story is not totally true as I am a Sarah Palin fan. But, is this is true, I’m about two steps from telling EVERYONE.. FU!
October 20th, 2009 | 2:55 pm | #68
Since the GOP is dead and Martin has nothing to worry about, he won’t mind taking a peek at the 20 best tea-party signs in SAN FRANCISCO:
http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=1134
Don’t worry, Martin. Seeing these signs in über-liberal San Francisco isn’t a harbinger or anything like that. Just your everyday occurrence, a thousand of San Francsicans marching against the leftist president they elected.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:58 pm | #69
Palin haters, just because you have accomplished very little in your own lives and Sarah Palin has accomplished considerably more does not mean that you know more than she does about how to act and what to say or not say in any given situation. It just means you have a false sense of self and considerable arrogance to go with it.
October 20th, 2009 | 2:59 pm | #70
texas
October 20th, 2009 | 2:55 pm 67
WTH? Palin can go to Oprah but, can’t go to a Tea Party? Can’t show up to campaign for Conservatives? Can’t show up at all?
The tea party folks don’t want Republicans co-opting their movement. They’ve said so many times. And ALL the Republicans in the close upcoming races have told Palin they don’t want her to campaign for them.
While some of us like her, most of the country doesn’t. That’s a sad fact, but it’s a fact. Her favorable ratings are much lower now than ever before.
October 20th, 2009 | 3:00 pm | #71
Greg, bite me. I disagree with her decision to go on oprah’s show, and somehow you extrapolate some psychobabble crap out of that to make yourself feel significant.
You wouldn’t be projecting something from your own life would you?
October 20th, 2009 | 3:01 pm | #72
++
re: bg @ 2:51 pm # 64
condensed version..
["The first part of The Obama Health Care Plan was buried in The Stimulus Bill which was signed into law by the President in February. It is the second part of The Health Care Plan which is now being debated in Congress."
[..]
“President Obama has already appointed the fifteen member Federal Council. According to the Stimulus Bill, p.152, all members of the Council must be “senior federal officers or employees.” Thus, medical treatment will be dispensed by a group of bureaucrats from their ivory towers, not by the hands-on practitioners in the presence of the patients. The council was funded with $1.1 BILLION from The Stimulus Bill.”]
==
October 20th, 2009 | 3:10 pm | #73
Yes bg, but no where does it actually refer to these BureauLibtards as “Death Panel Members”.
So technically it’s an “ERTZATZ” death panel.
They’ll decide who lives and who dies, but LIBTARDS will pretend that they don’t.
It’s okay, it’s all HOPE and CHANGE.
October 20th, 2009 | 3:12 pm | #74
While some of us like her, most of the country doesn’t. That’s a sad fact, but it’s a fact. Her favorable ratings are much lower now than ever before.
Sometimes the truth hurts, doesn’t it? People should be judged by their words, and not their accents.Or personality. Or “charisma”.
In my opinion, I am happy that she’s doing this.
Oprah should be the one scared, not Sarah.
October 20th, 2009 | 3:15 pm | #75
++
Liberty @ 1:40 pm # 20
re: [This is a win win and I will watch though I cannot stand Oprah.]
a little bell went off while reading your post..
ergo, i believe that’s the gist of the entire set up..
the left is overanxious to see how high Oprah’s viewership skyrockets in order to calculate SP’s threat level..
Go Sarah!! (thumbsup)
==
October 20th, 2009 | 3:17 pm | #76
It could be a very smart move for Palin if Opie will agree to do the show live and avoid a Couric-style creative editing disaster.
I would love to watch Sarah shred The Other Mrs. O on live TV. Bring it!
October 20th, 2009 | 3:19 pm | #77
OT:
From Hypogeans’ link on the Top Twenty Protest signs….
“Put the Constitution On Your Teleprompter”.
Love it.
October 20th, 2009 | 3:21 pm | #78
++
8 My Foot @ 1:58 pm #26
i think you’re forgetting Sarah is beholden to no party..
she can now let it rip all she wants w/out fear of backlash from Obama’s minions indirectly or otherwise suing the heck out of Alaska’s budget..
==
October 20th, 2009 | 3:25 pm | #79
LOL!
Oprah is having her on during November sweeps.
I find this rather interesting because all TV shows want the highest ratings they can possibly get during that time.
All one has to do is look at the ratings for the Oprah show since she came out and bowed low to the Obamao to understand that she needs a good sweep period here if she wants to keep her show on the air. The ratings for her show have dropped like a rock since she became Obamao’s cheerleader and BFF. One more bad book for that show and the TV stations that carry it may decide to either move the show to a less desirable time slot or drop it altogether because it is no longer the cash cow that it has been for the last couple of decades.
One would think that if Obamao was doing as well and is as “beloved” as the MSM would like us all to believe Oprah would have her BFF The First Clydesdale on or maybe Obamao hisself.
October 20th, 2009 | 3:36 pm | #80
++
8 My Foot @ 3:00 pm # 71
wow, Greg mentioned no names, yet you pounce..
what do you think that projects??
==
October 20th, 2009 | 3:39 pm | #81
8 My Foot:
I can almost see the steam coming out of your ears, and man do I sympathize. I’m almost afraid to get on the internet in the morning for fear I’ll see another clueless GOP move like what’s happening the the NY 23rd district, or the RSCC coming out for Charlie Christ.
The only solution I know is to get involved from the ground up. If all the tea partiers will attend their GOP precinct meetings, we will be a majority and can have a major voice in GOP policy. In Oklahoma I’m looking at increased attention to our 10th Amendment / state sovereignty law, electing a governor and attorney general who will duke it out with the feds, and pursuing things like Arizona’s recent law exempting the state from Obamacare. We’ve got to push back before we’re completely run over.
As for SP, if the Oprah show is live it’s a good move. If not, I’ll hope SP has some pretty stringent controls in place to prevent a recurrence of the Couric / Gibson fiascos.
October 20th, 2009 | 3:43 pm | #82
++
texas @ 2:55 pm # 67
you’re the only one tying Sarah in with
the Tea Party movement, get a grip..
==
October 20th, 2009 | 4:02 pm | #83
Jack Okie
Great Comment. Let’s rebuild the GOP from the precincts up. o any of you know who your local precinct chairperson is?
Oprah can be used for the needs of Palin. She’s a big, fat vehicle. Remember that Rush Limbaugh launched his career in downtown NYC.
As for all of you sad sacks who are sick of the party and want to move on–please do. We will convert some of the masses right now who have no job, no insurance, and no more faith in hope and change.
October 20th, 2009 | 4:05 pm | #84
Sarah is scheduled to be on Nov. 16th. That is after the Nov. elections.
I saw some polling numbers yesterday that shows significant increases in Republican support. This could be interesting.
October 20th, 2009 | 4:06 pm | #85
[...] Sarah Palin is going on Oprah– completely debunking global warming theory, as hell just froze over! If you follow the link to the poll, I must admit to voting for this choice: YES! It’s great [...]
October 20th, 2009 | 4:10 pm | #86
Gateway Pundit! I love your new address, as you are now “neighbors” with my favorite internet pundit (the Anchoress). If Sarah is able to carry this off well, it will be a boon. She can win supporters in a new audience, and do so with dignity. Oprah may also stand to benefit, as I do recall her ratings and cache have plummeted since the Chicago dump by the IOC as well as the being associated with the increasingly weak Obama administration.
I think a gracious, fair, and informative interview by both ladies would be helpful to them both, so I have good hope.
I can’t WAIT to read your opinion on the interview. :)
October 20th, 2009 | 4:11 pm | #87
++
crystal @ 3:19 pm # 77
that’s a good one..
one of my favs re: Hypogean @ 2:55 pm # 68 is Mr. President [Red Phone] Glenn Beck Awaits Your Call..
Obama Wants to Control Newspapers, Internet, TV, Everything (clip #6)
“Not every item of news should be published. Rather must those who control news policies endeavor to make every item of news serve a certain purpose.” ~ Goebbels
==
October 20th, 2009 | 4:18 pm | #88
Dr James David Manning calls lesbian Oprah “The Great Whore of Babylon”… lol
I don’t like Oprah and never did…. something about her I can’t stand. But I am sure glad that Sarah is going to her show.
Your country needs strong people like her… not RINOS. Sarah is not a moderate, centrist, bi-partisan, politically correct idiot. She stands strong on her values and will not compromise like RINOS. You need more like her.
October 20th, 2009 | 4:23 pm | #89
Greg, bite me. I disagree with her decision to go on oprah’s show, and somehow you extrapolate some psychobabble crap out of that to make yourself feel significant.
You wouldn’t be projecting something from your own life would you?
No, I just have sense enough to know the difference between expressing my opinion and expressing an opinion that claims to better thabn Sarah Palin. You call it psychobable, I call it arrogance.
October 20th, 2009 | 4:25 pm | #90
Tired fingers!
No, I just have sense enough to know the difference between expressing my opinion and expressing an opinion that claims to be better than Sarah Palin’s. You call it psychobable, I call it arrogance.
October 20th, 2009 | 4:26 pm | #91
Hi there my American friends!
You have to realise that this time, during the interview with Oprah (if she indeed decides to show there) Sarah will be uncomparably better prepared and fully capable of controlling the narration of the show.
With her ability to learn fast and her photographic memory, she will have at her disposal much bigger arsenal of fact and knowledge of the details than during those unfortunate meetings with Curic and Gibbson.
Today we know that those both inteviews were organised by her campaign manager (forgot her name) who proved to be an Obama’s supporter and who deliberately set Sarah up to show her in a bad light. This was along the smear campaign (like that farce with clothing) for which that woman (but McCain indirectly as well) was responsible.
Today, Sarah has at her disposal much stronger and loyal team of advisors, she is probably reading with furious intensity and (as I stated above) she will set the condition on which she will appear on Oprah’s show.
Oprah, on the other side will agree to anything to boost he failling ratings.
Sarah, understandably, is a bit quiet now as she is extremely busy with making finishing touches to her book.
However once she is free from that, we shall se her unleashing her full potential.
Appart from that, if she indeed thinks about running for the highest office, she has to be prapared for ABSOLUTELY THE WORST.
The bile and poison that the American Communo-fascists are going to spit on her will be uncompareble even with the tratment Reagan received during his campaign.
God bless Sarah Palin! God less America!
October 20th, 2009 | 4:41 pm | #92
About 15 years ago I pointed out in an email to a friend that the “Harpo” in Harpo Productions was “Oprah” spelled backwards.
His response was “Harpo communicated profoundly while remaining silent. That’s another thing Oprah got backwards.”
That still hasn’t been improved upon…
October 20th, 2009 | 4:45 pm | #93
“…harbinger of Democratic catastrophe.”
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/20/cnn-rasmussen-harris-poll-public-disagrees-with-obama-on-pretty-much-everything/
October 20th, 2009 | 4:54 pm | #94
It will be interesting to see how Oprah reacts to the orders from her master. Maybe she will obey maybe she won’t. She has enough money and clout to do what she wants. The outcome may be a pretty good indicator of the future of this administation. If the high profiile advocates start to bail things may change for the better through paralyisis. Altough Sarah’s politics are probably an athema to Oprah maybe sisterhood will prevail.
October 20th, 2009 | 5:02 pm | #95
Being a huge Sarah fan, I always hope she will knock one out of the park — but for the life of me, I can’t imagine why she is starting with Oprah. Then again, I imagine she is down-to-earth enough to handle Oprah. I truly can’t imagine Oprah being as underhanded as Couric. And if Sarah is allowed to be herself, I’m certain she will charm everyone, including Oprah. It is just so….. MAIN STREAM… and we know how the “main stream” has treated her in the past. But she has a book to sell, and she has an image to correct, and she has a middle America appeal, so perhaps she’s hoping to reach out to Oprah’s audience. Can’t hurt, but it is a strange place to begin if she has a serious political career in mind. We’ll see…
October 20th, 2009 | 5:15 pm | #96
red carolina
October 20th, 2009 | 5:02 pm 95
Being a huge Sarah fan, I always hope she will knock one out of the park — but for the life of me, I can’t imagine why she is starting with Oprah.
A recent National Enquirer stated that Oprah feels betrayed by the Obamas, because they never followed through on their promise to find a place for her in the administration. Also, Michelle Obama is said to hate Oprah.
I can’t find the links, but Oprah recently declined twice in an interview to restate her support for Obama, claiming she was once again apolitical, and then she said that the government does too much. Individuals need to help themselves and not depend on the government.
These Chicago loons are all about petty feuds. I wouldn’t put it past Oprah to promote Palin in order to get back at the Obamas.
October 20th, 2009 | 5:16 pm | #97
By the way, is there any way to insert a “preview” function in the comments?
October 20th, 2009 | 5:41 pm | #98
Obama the Graceless
Bush will be Obama’s eternal foil.
Republicans need
n’t trouble themselves to nominate a presidential candidate in 2012. No matter what, Pres. Barack Obama will be running against George W. Bush.
Bush will be Obama’s eternal foil. At this rate, when Obama writes his post-presidential memoir, it will be titled: An Audacious Presidency, or How I Saved America from That Bastard Bush. His presidential library will have a special fright-house wing devoted to Bush’s misrule. He will mutter in his senescence about 43, like the Ancient Mariner about his albatross.
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MmNmZjRlMTZkMjNmNjhlMmJmNDViNjcxY2FmY2M3MjU=#
October 20th, 2009 | 6:03 pm | #99
I dislike Oprah Winfrey as much as the next guy, but I cannot honestly say that I have ever heard her say anything hateful about Sarah. I don’t remember seeing her say much of anything about Sarah. I know she was upset when Sarah did the interviews with Lauer,Greta and Blitzer, but that’s the worst I can recall. Just because Winfrey is friends with Obama doesn’t translate into hatred for Sarah.
I think it’s a good move by Sarah. She HAS to reach people in this audience. This audience is full of people just like her. I think Winfrey will treat her warmly and with respect and this will transfer positively over to the studio audience and the audience at home.
Remember, the mainstream media has never given Sarah this kind of exposure. A lot of people have never seen who Sarah Palin really is. Just the caricature that the MSM has created. This is their chance. When they do, a lot of them will come to love her.Look at this as the introduction of the real Sarah Palin to 50% of America.
I also would like to see her go on the Regis show and the Rachel Ray show too but to avoid the View at all costs.There is nothing to gain by going there. No late night either,except maybe Craig Ferguson who had her on once when she was not well known. Can’t you just see her cooking up some Mooseburgers for the studio audience?
October 20th, 2009 | 6:20 pm | #100
I’m usually not so blunt but……screw Oprah.
October 20th, 2009 | 6:30 pm | #101
I think it’s a mistake. Oprah will try to make her look like an idiot. I hope she’s up to it.
October 20th, 2009 | 6:34 pm | #102
++
it’s all about ratings
shhh!
==
October 20th, 2009 | 6:38 pm | #103
++
uh-oh, what’s with the line?? :D
==
October 20th, 2009 | 6:50 pm | #104
Lots of reasons to go on Oprah.
1. Show the contrast between Obama and the White House being afraid of going on Fox News.
2. If she can’t handle Oprah, then she can’t handle Putin. I’m betting on Sarah.
3. Oprah’s show is not edited. Big difference between that and the network news interviews that were edited in such a way as to make her look stupid.
4. Go where the voters are. She especially needs to pick up her numbers among women.
Can’t find a better place than Oprah for that.
Sarah is fearless. And she’s ready. Better to start with Oprah, the president’s buddy.
Reminds me of Coach Vince Lombardi’s philosophy of attacking the other team’s strength. When you break that, the team falls apart.
Go Cuda!
October 20th, 2009 | 7:46 pm | #105
It is likely that most viewers who watch Oprah really do not like Palin. The liberals already hound her about everything she says or does not say.
What’s the worse that could happen? What, the people who hate her hate her more? It matters not at all what she does to them. The left will find something or twist something or completely fabricate something as that is what they do.
Christ did not hang out with the popular. As a woman of faith she also does not necessarily do what is popular. She does what she believes is right.
She is going to shine a light in the darkness. That is the proper role of a Christian in this world. Those who can it see will. Those who can not never will.
October 20th, 2009 | 7:54 pm | #106
It is all about ratings.
October 20th, 2009 | 8:01 pm | #107
Sarah Palin and Oprah may be discussing a new diet and exercise program for Oprah. She needs one and Sarah Palin is in fine physical shape, so she can help Oprah!
John DeFlumeri Jr
October 20th, 2009 | 8:12 pm | #108
I hope Sarah lays out OprBozo.
Maybe Palin can say to OprBozo.
Look you rich tub of lard, I’m poor because I help society, while you eat almost 2- 3 countries worth of food a day, while complaining that the poor people like me are bad people and mentally unstable.
October 20th, 2009 | 8:23 pm | #109
At first, I didn’t think that it was a good idea at all. But then, I started thinking about Oprah’s audience. Even with a drop in her audience, it’s still huge – and it cuts across all socio-economic lines. And it’s mostly women – and a huge number of them don’t know anything about Sarah Palin other than what they’ve been spoon-fed by a hostile media and democrat operatives.
Those women are going to get a chance to see and hear Sarah for the first time; and a lot of them are going to think to themselves, “Wow. She’s not what I expected! She’s not at all like what I’ve been told. She’s for real.”
They’re going to not only see Palin in a new light – but they’re going to realize that they’ve been lied to by the media and democrats. They’re going to see that Sarah is a human just like them who has the same worries and problems that any of them face daily.
Not all of them, of course – but I’ll bet on a substantial number going through some heavy mind-changes.
All Palin has to do is be real – be herself – and let people see who she is.
.
.
.@Martin — I can smell the flop sweat of fear on you from here, marty. You see that your little tin god is dropping like a rock – and that people are losing faith in him and in the democrats in general.
Change is coming, marty. REAL change — and there’s not a thing you can do to stop it.
You and yours are scared, marty – and with good reason.
I love the smell of libtard flop sweat.
It smells like………………..VICTORY!!
.
The only good communist is a dead communist.
October 20th, 2009 | 8:43 pm | #110
I don’t watch Oprah, but will watch her interview Sarah Palin. The snide comments about Oprah are really uncalled for, in my opinion. Her politics are not my politics, but she is a highly successful businesswoman and knows she’s going to get lots of viewers for this. I bet she will be alot more fair than Couric and Gibson were (of course, the election of The One won’t be on the line with this interview …).
October 20th, 2009 | 8:56 pm | #111
Sasja
October 20th, 2009 | 1:35 pm 18
Okay. How far is Russia from Alaska. It’s 2.5 miles from Little Diomede Island, Alaska to Big Diomede Island, Russia.
………….
And don’t forget the Bering Straits Webcam! With that, EVERYONE in America can see Russia from their front porch or living room couch.
The media and the education systems has tried very very hard to be sure Americans would not know their geography or history. Alaska WAS Russia 150 years ago.
October 20th, 2009 | 9:19 pm | #112
wanumba
October 20th, 2009 | 8:56 pm 111
Remember, I belive the human eye can see about four milies or more upon the ocean, due to the cervature of the earth, humans cannot see forever.
October 20th, 2009 | 9:30 pm | #113
Sasja October 20th, 2009 | 2:00 pm 27
And another thing. I am sick and tired of you fly by night republicans whose only response to anything with which you may not agree is that you are leaving the party. Well good riddance.
What makes you think “8″ really is (oh sorry, was) a Republican?
October 20th, 2009 | 9:31 pm | #114
….and italics don’t work?
test
(Let’s see if bold does.)
October 20th, 2009 | 9:33 pm | #115
No. Drat.
October 20th, 2009 | 9:51 pm | #116
[i]last[/i] [b]test[/b] using UBB code.
October 20th, 2009 | 9:51 pm | #117
Fail. Grumble.
October 20th, 2009 | 10:11 pm | #118
My italics worked earlier.
October 20th, 2009 | 10:51 pm | #119
Did you use the “i” within brackets or the “em” html code?
Another test using “em” html code.
October 20th, 2009 | 10:51 pm | #120
…which failed. Oh well.
October 20th, 2009 | 11:07 pm | #121
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by WakeUp_USA: Palin to appear on Oprah – http://tinyurl.com/yj8ypu4…
October 21st, 2009 | 1:02 am | #122
Sarah, do not cast your pearls before swine. You hear me? I wrote to your campaign managers telling them not to let you do interviews with couric or gibson and lo and behold within a couple weeks there you were. People are out to trick you even fatso oprah.
Oprah was never poor. Her dad was a businessman who owned a barbershop. That was big in those days. Michelle obama put oprah up to this to take Sarah down. Michelle and oprah are tight. And to the person who said “most of the country hates Sarah” Wrong!
If that were true she wouldn’t be on the best seller list before her book even reaches the shelves. Yes the left doesn’t like her because they get their info from the fringe media of abc and nbc and cnn. Listen Sarah, call oprah at the last minute, like a day before the show and cancel. Leave her in the lurch. Let them call you a quitter all they want. When they see you running for president and packing in the crowds without rock bands and free beer and hotdogs to lure the crowds they’ll have to admit otherwise.
Oprah is a two-faced liar and God doesn’t like people who are two-faced. Oprah says all her nasty things behind closed doors and will never say it in public. She is the great pretender. Just like the obamas she pretends to be someone she is not. When she dies she can’t take all her money with her and God certainly doesn’t want her because she already has gotten her reward on earth. You people are pathetic. All your name-calling and party politics is what got this country into the jam it is in now. We are Americans, period.
Sarah, why sit down and chat with a gluttonous racist who supports a man who voted 4 times for infanticide? Listen up. Going on this vile woman’s show is classless. I think you are classier than that. Oprah is planning and plotting how to take you down. Stick it to her. Make her scramble for a replacement guest. Tell her at the last minute that you have a better offer.
October 21st, 2009 | 7:34 am | #123
Only chance she has is bold truth. I mean Nuclear truth.
If Oprah spins a lie. Response should be your Lieing and its expected. You know time and time againg you supported and promoted lies.
Operah has invented her own religion and perverted the Christian message.” Christians have no business and will have to answer for even listening to you”
No more mrs Nice guy. Take her scalp.
E-A