Hugo Chavez would be proud–
The White House banned FOX News today from interviewing the Pay Czar along with the other four major state-run media outlets. FOX News has been a member of the five network rotation since 1997. Surprisingly, the Washington bureau chiefs of the five TV news networks stepped in an agreed to skip the interview if FOX was not included.
The administration relented… this time and allowed FOX to attend.
FOX News reported:
Unreal.
But remember… Barack Obama is a moderate.
HotAir added this on the disgraceful move by the White House:
Decide for yourself what the most disgraceful aspect of this is. Was it the fact that Gibbs told Jake Tapper explicitly on Monday that the White House wouldn’t try to dictate to the press pool who should and shouldn’t be included — before doing precisely that? Was it Anita Dunn going out of her way to say she respects Major Garrett as a fair reporter — before the administration decided he didn’t deserve a crack here at Feinberg? Or was it the repeated insistence by Dunn and Axelrod that of course the administration will make its officials available to Fox — before pulling the plug today?


October 22nd, 2009 | 8:21 pm | #1
“Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas.”–Joseph Stalin
That says it all.
October 22nd, 2009 | 8:26 pm | #2
Well, hooray for the drive-bys. Pretty amazing. Has to be a huge blow to the POTUS. Perhaps the beginning of his downfall?
October 22nd, 2009 | 8:27 pm | #3
The theme song of the Obama administration:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLkVWcyPg8o
Backfired
Your plan, your plan
Backfired
Backfired
My man your plan
Backfired in your face
October 22nd, 2009 | 8:31 pm | #4
That is a ruse. Obama’s administration wants you to believe that Fox News is their enemy. They want you to stay with them because they are safe with them, they said the eligibility issue is bogus.
So now they can say all they want as long as they shut up on this issue. The other things don’t harm your Teflon Usurper.
BTW, did Fox News covered the 9/12 marche on D.C.? Not really. All they said was that there was about 70, 000 people there… lol. What a bunch of liars.
Was Glenn Beck at that Tea Party? Hannity? O’Reilly? Nope. They are all sellouts.
October 22nd, 2009 | 8:35 pm | #5
I applaud the five Washington bureau chiefs (NBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, and FOX) for decided that none of them would do the interview if Fox weren’t allowed.
Sure, they may have decided so because of political reasons (maybe they feared backlash?), but at least they stood up and made the White House back away from their decision.
[By the way, they all did interviews with Feinberg.]
October 22nd, 2009 | 8:38 pm | #6
Simple. Obama thinks he was elected “Emperor” of the USA. He thought he wouldn’t be questioned about his policies, just like during the campaign. Seems like there are a few people who are interested in what his answer in Afghanistan will be. Some that would dare question the Constitutionality of an unelected, un-confirmed Czar setting pay rates for private corporations. Some that might even want to know just exactly HOW he is going to protect the world from a nuclear Iran.
It isn’t enough to shout “Keep Hope Alive!” anymore. Well, that may be the other guy. Lofty, vagueries are not going to create any jobs, or help our boys win in Af-ghan-eee-stahn. I guess it’s hard to take the tough questions when vague rhetoric is all you got.
October 22nd, 2009 | 8:39 pm | #7
Anon, call me suspicious if you want , but I am convinced that was all a show.
October 22nd, 2009 | 8:44 pm | #8
Apparently Obama knows that absolute control of the media is a requirement for the installation of a tyranny. He overreached this time because he wrongly estimated that most of the major media was already in his pocket based on the support they gave him in his campaign and continue to give him during his presidency. This setback will not deter him from trying again in the future.
October 22nd, 2009 | 8:44 pm | #9
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Josh Schulte, Cathy OBRIEN. Cathy OBRIEN said: Unreal. White House Bans FOX News from Press Pool Interview. …agreed to skip the interview if FOX was not included: http://bit.ly/4cSrDJ [...]
October 22nd, 2009 | 8:46 pm | #10
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by conservatweet, Paul Alyunov. Paul Alyunov said: Unreal. White House Bans FOX News from Press Pool Interview (Video): Hugo Chavez would be proud– The Whi.. http://bit.ly/XpYOa [...]
October 22nd, 2009 | 8:49 pm | #11
Craig
October 22nd, 2009 | 8:31 pm 4
That is a ruse. Obama’s administration wants you to believe that Fox News is their enemy. They want you to stay with them because they are safe with them, they said the eligibility issue is bogus.
Right. Of course. How devilishly clever of Obama and his secret allies, Fox News. Luckily for us Super Sleuth Craig figured it out and warned us! Fox is actually on Obama’s side! Spread the word!
October 22nd, 2009 | 8:51 pm | #12
Craig
October 22nd, 2009 | 8:31 pm 4
Was Glenn Beck at that Tea Party?
He originated the idea for the 9/12 March. Duh.
October 22nd, 2009 | 8:58 pm | #13
++
“In relation to the political decontamination of our public life,
the government will embark upon a systematic campaign
to restore the nation’s moral and material health.
The whole educational system, theater, film,
literature, the press and broadcasting –
all these will be used as a means to this end.”
~ Adolf Hitler
“you ain’t seen nothin’ yet!” ~ B Hussein O
==
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:03 pm | #14
The mask is off, it’s plain as day: Obamie’s a commie.
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:11 pm | #15
This is the thuggery like behavior you’d expect in a totalitarian dictatorship in a banana republic. You’re right, Hugo must be proud of his protege.
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:12 pm | #16
WTF. Obama becoming more and more a dictator in a banana republic.
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:21 pm | #17
Leaving the obominable actions of the administration aside since they need no further comment, I have to say that I am duly impressed by the act of solidarity by the press pool.
There still is at least a shred of honor left in the MSM. Good on them!
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:23 pm | #18
++
ht crystal in a previous thread..
‘Interest of Tyrants’
“Is it not high time for people of this country to explicitly declare, whether they will be freemen or slaves? It is an important question which ought to be decided. It concerns us more than anything in this life. The salvation of our souls is interested in the event. For wherever tyranny is establish’d, immorality of every kind comes in like a torrent. It is in the interest of tyrants to reduce the people to ignorance and vice. For they cannot live in any country where virtue and knowledge prevail. The religion and public liberty of a people are intimately connected; their interest are interwoven, they subsist separately; and therefore they rise and fall together. For this reason it is always observable, that those who are combined to destroy the people’s liberties, practice every art to poison their morals. How greatly then does it concern us at all events, to put a stop to the progress of tyranny.” ~ Samuel Adams
The 9/12 Project
via TRBO
Thank You Glenn Beck!!
==
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:24 pm | #19
Hypogean, you need to get with it!!
Didn’t you know tha Glenn Beck is a Nazi?
That’s what Pastor Manning said.
It’s amazing.
If I didn’t think he was spot on concerning the race issue, I’d say he was certifiable.
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:26 pm | #20
BTW, I probably should have spelled it
obaminable
makes my meaning more clear instead of looking like I don’t know how to spell abominable ;-)
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:34 pm | #21
The blog Legal Insurrection linked to this New York Times story about the war between Fox and the White House:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/us/politics/23fox.html?_r=2&partner=rss&emc=rss
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:37 pm | #22
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by pedbsktbll: Unreal. White House Bans FOX News from Press Pool Interview (Video) http://j.mp/1MyGaY...
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:37 pm | #23
HypogeanNo Gravatar
October 22nd, 2009 | 8:27 pm
The theme song of the Obama administration
How do you come up with all these neat and apropos songs?
Someone’s got a big music library :-)
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:41 pm | #24
From Scott’s link:
“Speaking privately at the White House on Monday with a group of mostly liberal columnists and commentators, including Rachel Maddow and Keith Olbermann of MSNBC and Maureen Dowd, Frank Rich and Bob Herbert of The New York Times, Mr. Obama himself gave vent to sentiments about the network, according to people briefed on the conversation.”.
At then end of the article, Axlerod said their concern is that other media not “follow Fox’s lead”.
WTEF?????????
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:47 pm | #25
I’m glad but surprised the other networks protested the exclusion of Fox News from the interview. It seems that they recognize that they’re next in line if Obama succeeds in shutting out Fox News.
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:47 pm | #26
Richard Romano
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:37 pm 23
How do you come up with all these neat and apropos songs?
I was a freelance music journalist in L.A. for ten years. Love-love-love music. Love art in general.
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:47 pm | #27
For the last year, I have watched Fox News on-line at Blinko TV. Since Obummer’s proclamations against Fox News, it no longer has Fox News. Wonder if there’s a connection…
Where can I get Fox News on-line, live? Thanks in advance, guys.
.
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:53 pm | #28
crystal
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:24 pm 19
Hypogean, you need to get with it!!
Didn’t you know tha Glenn Beck is a Nazi?
I don’t get it. Now we’re supposed to hate Glenn Beck, too? Doug Hoffman is a joke; Glenn Beck is a Nazi… Apparently the only person we can support is the utterly unelectable BEM Alan Keyes.
Yes, BEM:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bug-eyed_monster
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:58 pm | #29
Craig, whether Opie is/was eligible or not, is not even on Opie’s radar screen. That’s what campaign donations are for. LAWYERS.
There is NOTHING, you (you’re not eligible) I or anyone else can do, pending litigation. Obama is way too busy having Beer summits and Date nights to be concerned with this old news.
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:58 pm | #30
Ahhhh, the real Just Saying.
Hypogean, don’t forget that Fox News is on the Enemies List well.
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:59 pm | #31
“He originated the idea for the 9/12 March. Duh.” (Hypo Tom W.)
Was he on Washington that day? Nope. Did he cover it? Nope. Did he say there was between 1,5 to 2 millions protesters? Nope. He’s a fraud.
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:59 pm | #32
I wouldn’t be so quick to lavish praise on the other MSM outlets. They doubtless acted out of self preservation and there’s also the fact that they have contractual business agreements with the other networks on pool news coverage which they would have abrogated by excluding Fox News.
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:00 pm | #33
“Speaking privately at the White House on Monday with a group of mostly liberal columnists and commentators, including Rachel Maddow and Keith Olbermann of MSNBC and Maureen Dowd, Frank Rich and Bob Herbert of The New York Times, Mr. Obama himself gave vent to sentiments about the network, according to people briefed on the conversation.”.
Imagine the level of arrogance in that room at one time. Classic, the Idiot in Chief with his cadre of deranged leftwingers.
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:02 pm | #34
white house cry babies don’t get their way, ha ha.
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:10 pm | #35
Expect tomorrow’s press briefing to be ugly
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:12 pm | #36
Hi, Crystal. Do you have somewhere on-line I can get Fox News? :)
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:15 pm | #37
Make it Happen
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:00 pm 33.
Imagine the level of arrogance in that room at one time. Classic, the Idiot in Chief with his cadre of deranged leftwingers.
Did you catch what Axelrod said? The white house is concerned that the other media doesn’t follw Fox News.
Pinch me, somebody.
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:19 pm | #38
Craig
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:59 pm 31
“He originated the idea for the 9/12 March. Duh.” (Hypo Tom W.)
Was he on Washington that day? Nope. Did he cover it? Nope. Did he say there was between 1,5 to 2 millions protesters? Nope. He’s a fraud.
Craig, here’s video of Glenn Beck reporting on the 9/12 March live:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lasR47NTARs
Here, Olbermann is angry because Beck says on Fox and Friends that there were 1.7 million marchers.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB7_4QtFQJo
Oops, I forgot: You never click other people’s links. Oh, well.
For some reason Craig is trying to revise history and spread easily disproved lies about Glenn Beck. Why do you suppose that is? Also, what are the odds that Craig will click my links, see that he was wrong, and admit it to us?
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:22 pm | #39
Just_Saying
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:12 pm 36
Hi, Crystal. Do you have somewhere on-line I can get Fox News? :)
Unfortunately, I don’t. I just go to their site, and watch the videos. If you find a live stream, let me know:-).
Por favor.
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:23 pm | #40
Tom W.,
You are right, I never click your links, I do not trust you. You may have changed your name but you are still the same old you.
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:26 pm | #41
What kind of a man would organize a marche and not go? Think about it.
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:27 pm | #42
For some reason Craig is trying to revise history and spread easily disproved lies about Glenn Beck. Why do you suppose that is
Maybe because Pastor Manning is.
After the 9/12 Tea Party March, Beck’s viewership just kept going up.
I am a believer of conspiracy theories as much as the next person.
However, I think Manning is just good ol’ fashioned jealous of Beck.
Manning says that Fox news is no longer credible because they have abandoned the birth certificate issue,
Hmmmn…that sounds strangely familiar.
Since Glenn Beck does not talk about the B.C, according to Manning, he is a Nazi.
Here is the link, just in case.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6Ub50bWG34
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:29 pm | #43
CraigNo Gravatar
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:23 pm 40
Tom W.,
You are right, I never click your links, I do not trust you. You may have changed your name but you are still the same old you.
That’s okay. Everybody else will click my links and see that you’re lying about Glenn Beck. Care to explain to us why you’re trying to pass along such easily disproved propaganda?
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:31 pm | #44
Good grief Craig. Go peddle your crazy BS somewhere else.
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:32 pm | #45
Ha ha ha, so the other four TV news chiefs had the cojones to stand up for FOX? I’m not sure it’s cojones so much as that they know that any one of them could be next…. So they’re not COMPLETELY out of touch with reality. Good.
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:32 pm | #46
Care to explain to us why you’re trying to pass along such easily disproved propaganda?
Just like he kept repeating that the Saudis had a majority share of Fox News until Solaratov called him on it.
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:33 pm | #47
Craig
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:26 pm 41
What kind of a man would organize a marche and not go? Think about it.
First you said he didn’t cover the march. That was a lie. You also said he didn’t acknowledge that there were between 1.5 and 2 million marchers. That was also a lie.
Now, you’re trying to say that because he didn’t go in person he’s a fraud. All of us rational people understand that for a person like Glenn Beck security issues are paramount. He recently said that his family must have round-the-clock police protection because of endless death threats.
The only fraud here is you, Craig. You’re spreading lies about Glenn Beck. Why is that?
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:36 pm | #48
The only fraud here is you, Craig. You’re spreading lies about Glenn Beck. Why is that?
Craig,
Who is next on your smear campaign?
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:38 pm | #49
But according to Manning, Beck is faking the threats against his family.
Manning says that a true patriot would sacrfice his family if need be, to bring the birth certificate issue to light.
(I keep bringing Manning up, because He-Wh-Shall-Not-Be-Named is a follower.)
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:38 pm | #50
crystal
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:27 pm 42
After the 9/12 Tea Party March, Beck’s viewership just kept going up.
I am a believer of conspiracy theories as much as the next person.
However, I think Manning is just good ol’ fashioned jealous of Beck.
Manning says that Fox news is no longer credible because they have abandoned the birth certificate issue,
Hmmmn…that sounds strangely familiar.
Since Glenn Beck does not talk about the B.C, according to Manning, he is a Nazi.
Good lord. I know you are/were a fan of Pastor Manning, Crystal, but this is pathetic. I agree with you about the jealousy. Strange how that works. When I heard that Sarah Palin got paid seven figures for her book, I was happy for her. My reaction was to laugh out loud and say, “Good for you, Sarah!”
I’ll never get paid seven figures for anything I write, but it tickles me pink that Palin got paid as much as she did. I hope she enjoys every penny, and I hope she writes more books and gets paid eight figures. Or nine.
You go, Governor Palin!
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:40 pm | #51
I think it was smart for neither Glenn Beck nor Sarah Palin to be physically present at the 9/12 March. What is freaking out the leftists is that the Tea Party movement truly is a GRASSROOTS movement. The left could not point to any particular figurehead at the rally to try to paint us all as a bunch of mindless hero-worshippers.
Nope, the march represented the tip of an independent, spontaneous, one-person-at-a-time, massive citizens’ rebellion that is sweeping this country. And 1.2 to 1.5 million people showed up NOT to bask in the glory of some celebrity or another–no, they showed up because they genuinely CARE! That scares the Left far more than Glenn Beck or Sarah Palin as individuals do!
Much as I love both of them, I’m glad the march was all about US. We the people!
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:41 pm | #52
crystal
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:38 pm 49
But according to Manning, Beck is faking the threats against his family.
Manning says that a true patriot would sacrfice his family if need be, to bring the birth certificate issue to light.
We don’t even ask our troops to sacrifice their families. What a bozo. How come the birth-certificate issue attracts only mental patients?
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:44 pm | #53
I’d like to amend my last statement:
How come the birth-certificate issue attracts SO MANY mental patients, not “only mental patients.”
Sorry about that.
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:47 pm | #54
“Now, you’re trying to say that because he didn’t go in person he’s a fraud. All of us rational people understand that for a person like Glenn Beck security issues are paramount. He recently said that his family must have round-the-clock police protection because of endless death threats.” (Tom W.)
You gotta be kidding right! Dr Manning recieves death threats every day and he went to the marche. And without protection… how do you fell now? Think Glenn is a real man? I don’t.
BTW, I did not look at your link. And I don’t watch Beck since he said the eligibility was bogus. What a sellout! It is far from been bogus. But I watched Fox on 9/12 and they did a lousy covering saying only 70,000 people.
attended. Glenn is part of Fox, right!
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:51 pm | #55
++
Kathy from Kansas @ 10:40 pm #51
Amen!! (thumbsup)
==
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:53 pm | #56
But if it makes you feel good to think that Fox is on your side… go ahead. Meanwhile Obama will take your country away because Glenn doesn’t was told to shut up about the only issue that would get this country rid of this Usurper.
Imagine if Beck, Hannity, O’Reilly and Limbaugh would be hamering that isuue 24/7… it would be a done thing. And if Obama was really fighting them (but the’re not), Fox could start fighting back with the eligibility issue and Obama would get kicked out. It’s all a scam!
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:55 pm | #57
Hypogean
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:41 pm
We don’t even ask our troops to sacrifice their families. What a bozo. How come the birth-certificate issue attracts only mental patients?
Well, I don’t really know the answer to that one.
I have a question, though.
If those like Manning and Craig true lovers of the United States (and I am not questioning Mannings allegiance at all), why won’t they aggressively use their passion and forums to support the movements that are making a difference? Why is the B.C the only issue that they are passionate about.
Good Lord. I certainly do not mean to go there.
Back on topic. Sorry.
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:55 pm | #58
Craig
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:26 pm 41
What kind of a man would organize a marche and not go? Think about it.
Possibly an agente provacateur – not unlike you.
However, since Beck was at the march, reporting live, it would be interesting to know to whom you are referring.
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:55 pm | #59
Oupst… I meant: Meanwhile Obama will take your country away because Glenn was told to shut up about the only issue that would get this country rid of this Usurper.
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:56 pm | #60
Craig
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:47 pm 54
BTW, I did not look at your link.
Of course not. You were caught lying, and you can’t admit it. But that’s okay. Everyone who reads this can check my links and see what a pitiful liar you are.
Beck reported extensively on the 9/12 March, and he said there were at least 1.7 million marchers. You lied about him, but I corrected the record. Your lies won’t go unchallenged.
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:58 pm | #61
I like Fox News and Glenn Beck.
Beck is exposing all the frauds working for the WH.
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:58 pm | #62
++
someone’s not busy ousting their own usurpers..
via [AIFD in the Media] e-mail alert
Shariah-compliant stock index comes to TSX
[TORONTO – Shariah law has hit the local economic community with the launch of a new Canadian stock index: the S&P/TSX Shariah 60.
This Standard & Poor’s index is a variant of the TSX 60, representing the large-cap segment of the Canadian equities market. The crucial difference is the rules and strictures applicable to Muslims regarding financial and commercial activities, which therefore excludes many sectors.
A supervisory board consisting of Muslim scholars was appointed to ensure that the companies in the index abide by Shariah law. One of the four, Abdul Sattar Abu Guddah, who holds a Ph.D. in Islamic law from Al Azhar University in Cairo, was accused of being closely affiliated with Sheikh Muhammad Taqi Usmani, who has been removed from numerous boards of Western banks. Abu Guddah was on the board of the al-Baraka Bank, which was implicated in the financing of 9/11 terrorism in the US. The allegations against the bank were later dismissed.
Four years ago, Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld, director of the American Center for Democracy and author of Funding Evil: How Terrorism is Financed and How to Stop It, warned of an international “Islamic impetus…to impose Sharia-governed banking on the West” in an article on Human Events.com. She quoted former Malaysian Prime Minister Mohamed Mahathir telling a banking conference in 2002 of the need “to absorb the 11 September shock and reinforce the stability of Islamic finance.”]
Barack Obama linked to Chicago sharia
finance fugitives wanted by FBI
freakin’ agents we have can’t connect the dots
Obama is handing to them on a silver platter..
==
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:59 pm | #63
“How come the birth-certificate issue attracts only mental patients?” (Tom W.)
The birth-certificate issue only attracts patriots who care about their Constitution and you are clearly not one of them.
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:59 pm | #64
crystal
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:55 pm 57
If those like Manning and Craig true lovers of the United States (and I am not questioning Mannings allegiance at all), why won’t they aggressively use their passion and forums to support the movements that are making a difference?
I think you’ve answered your own question.
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:06 pm | #65
Craig
October 22nd, 2009 | 10:59 pm 63
The birth-certificate issue only attracts patriots who care about their Constitution and you are clearly not one of them.
Yes, yes. My mother is a hamster, and my father smells of elberberries. The French can really taunt!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9V7zbWNznbs
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:06 pm | #66
OT:
Very relevant today.
Have you seen it?
Make Mine Freedom(1948)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVh75ylAUXY
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:08 pm | #67
While Obama pisses his pants over Fox News, http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=65579
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:09 pm | #68
Glenn beck is not making a difference, Tom, W.
He is keeping you asleep on chloroform while Obama is destroying your country. Wake-up!
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:09 pm | #69
Yup. Saw that before, Crystal. That’s where we’re headed, I think.
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:09 pm | #70
You have a USURPER sitting in the Oval Office and Beck is silent!!!!!!!!!
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:12 pm | #71
BDU-33
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:08 pm 67
While Obama pisses his pants over Fox News
If you’re a trooper, thanks for your service. I really appreciate it. Those of us who want to win wars knew that Obama would be a disaster. I’m sorry more of us didn’t understand that.
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:15 pm | #72
Craig, you were factually incorrect about Beck. He did do the things you claimed he didn’t. How about acknowledging that you were wrong? Would it kill you to admit you made a mistake, or were you deliberately lying?
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:20 pm | #73
We cannot focus only on the b/c because Obama made sure, when he was a candidate that his records would never see the light of day.
However, he never anticipated the grass roots level of resistance so I think we are onto something big here.
The Tea Party Protesters are like a freight train increasing it’s speed with every new scandal plaguing the WH. Eventually the WH will be incapable of stopping the change that is coming next year.
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:22 pm | #74
Tom W. (72)
How about you apologizing for spitting on patriotic Grand jurors and all the attornies who are trying to get you rid of this Evil Usurper Dictator?
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:24 pm | #75
Hyperbole.
It gets me every time.
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:26 pm | #76
Tom W,.
This blog was nice till you came back. You are always looking for a fight and you cannot stand a conservative who doesn’t agree with you. You want an echo chamber. You are just like Obama who tries to shut up everyone. Maybe this is because you are still a liberal in your heart.
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:36 pm | #77
Crystal that was a good video…Thanks…
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:41 pm | #78
Craig,
For you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPGb4STRfKw&NR=1
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:42 pm | #79
And yet, craig, you do nothing to stop the encroachment of socialism and sharia law in Canada.
Why is that, craig?
All you ever do here is try to get people to stop doing anything that will work to stop obama’s plans – and concentrate on some scheme that has a record of abject failure. Why?
And now, you’ve even started advocating for violent insurrection by Americans (while you, btw, sit safely in Canada). Why would that be, craig?
It couldn’t be so that you can try to get this blog – and others like it – shut down because some nutcases agree with you about revolution, could it?
You’re just a standard-issue agente provocateur, craig. And you’re not even good enough at it to alter your tactics now that people have seen through you.
Give it up, craig. You’re a failure.
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:42 pm | #80
Craig said:
“Tom W,. This blog was nice till you came back. You are always looking for a fight and you cannot stand a conservative who doesn’t agree with you. You want an echo chamber. You are just like Obama who tries to shut up everyone. Maybe this is because you are still a liberal in your heart.”
Yes, proving that you flat-out lied about Glenn Beck makes me a liberal who is looking for a fight, who wants only an echo chamber, and who can’t stand conservatives who don’t agree with me. Of course.
This blog would be much nicer if you were allowed to get away with your lies, Craig, but for some of us truth still matters. We’re in the middle of the biggest political battle of our lives, so we can’t let liars like you go unchallenged. Sorry. It would be easier for you if people didn’t point out when you are lying, yes, but my purpose in life isn’t to make it easier for you to lie.
And it’s very strange that you apparently believe that true conservatism is about blatantly lying. That’s not my definition of conservatism, but what do I know?
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:47 pm | #81
Hypogean,
Liberal logic. Craig is a liar. You are commenting on this blog.
Ergo it’s your fault that Craig is a liar.
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:50 pm | #82
Take a hike Tom W.
I did not lie. Glenn didn’t attempt the marche and Fox News did a louzy covering. As for Glenn video I did not look at it. I can’t stand this clown that talks to people like if they were 3 years old.
And you don’t know what I am doing here in Canada… you have no clue. And I surely won’t give you any. Like usual, you don’t know what you are talking about. But that’s liberal specialty, right?
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:53 pm | #83
Baby Chisum is back in the Tom W. Hypogean fan club… lol
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:58 pm | #84
Craig said:
“I did not lie. Glenn didn’t attempt the marche and Fox News did a louzy covering.”
Here’s what you said, Craig:
“Craig
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:59 pm 31
Was he on Washington that day? Nope. Did he cover it? Nope. Did he say there was between 1,5 to 2 millions protesters? Nope. He’s a fraud.”
I posted links to videos of him covering the march and him saying that there were 1.7 million marchers. You blatantly lied, and everyone here knows it. Sending me on a hike won’t change the fact that you were busted lying.
October 23rd, 2009 | 12:01 am | #85
Chisum, I don’t understand how Craig thinks he can get away with his lies, when they’re so easily disproved. Craig said Beck didn’t cover the march, when there are videos all over the Internet showing the extensive coverage.
Craig said that Beck never acknowledged that there were between 1.5 and 2 million marchers, but I linked to video of Beck saying in his own words that there were 1.7 million marchers.
And now Craig is lying about the lies he told. Who does he think he’s fooling?
October 23rd, 2009 | 12:07 am | #86
Hypogean
October 22nd, 2009 | 11:58 pm 84
But…but…it’s not lying when craig does it. He works for a superior cause, you know.
Besides, craig’s the “final arbiter” of all things conservative.
October 23rd, 2009 | 12:07 am | #87
Fight with someone else you loser Tom W.
I don’t watch Beck’s videos, he is a clown. But I did watched Fox on 9/12 and never saw Beck covering it. Beck is part of Fox, right?. Why does he work for a TV station that says there was only 70,000 people. I’ll tell you why, because he is a sellout.
Now continue your childish idioties with someone else, I want nothing to do with a liberal like you. You are clueless and you protect a Usurper. I want nothing to do with you. I despite people like you.
October 23rd, 2009 | 12:11 am | #88
++
BDU-33 @ 11:08 pm #67
[“Guys back in Washington need to get, I think, a better operational understanding, [of] what goes on here,” she said. “To separate the enemy from the population to make progress will take a really long time, and the administration really needs to understand that. Even more than in Iraq, to get to the point where they … they can build a government — which they can’t do now — [and] get rid of corruption, is going to take years.”]
sarc on/
oh i believe Obama “gets it”..
he just cannot afford to ever afford oppressed people’s freedom over
there.. especially not while he’s struggling to oppress US over here..
/sarc off
==
October 23rd, 2009 | 12:11 am | #89
WOW! The fanclub is forming out again… lol
Tom W. needs people to defend himself, he is so helpless.
October 23rd, 2009 | 12:20 am | #90
Craig said:
“I don’t watch Beck’s videos, he is a clown. But I did watched Fox on 9/12 and never saw Beck covering it.”
Well, then that means Beck didn’t cover it, of course! That means this video doesn’t exist:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6f1slksFmc&
Since you won’t look at it, Craig, I’ll tell you that it’s titled “GLENN BECK Hosting 9-12 Tea Party March, Part 1 of 10.”
See, there are ten videos on YouTube of Glenn Beck covering the 9/12 march as it happened, but since you didn’t see it, that means these ten videos don’t exist.
October 23rd, 2009 | 12:22 am | #91
May I suggest that certain posts are just ignored? Sometimes, it just isn’t worth the aggravation.
October 23rd, 2009 | 12:26 am | #92
Solaratov, there are some interesting correlations between Obama and Craig.
Both hate Fox News; both lie about Glenn Beck; and both are becoming increasingly inept over time.
Craig’s pathetic attempt to smear Beck on this thread is very similar to Obama’s various childish lies that are disproved with about four seconds of research. Now Craig is reduced to covering his eyes and shouting “No! I won’t look! I won’t look!” when someone shows him proof that Glenn Beck covered the 9/12 March extensively.
Have you ever seen a more incompetent, embarrassing performance that Craig’s here tonight? He and Obama are crashing and burning at the same time. How funny is that?
October 23rd, 2009 | 12:29 am | #93
Pat, when people blatantly lie, it’s necessary to expose them. Craig is lying about Glenn Beck, because Craig–like the Obama White House–has an agenda to discredit Fox News.
But I’ll stop for the night. I’ve proven that Craig is a blatant liar.
October 23rd, 2009 | 12:38 am | #94
I guess he figures that, if he doesn’t look at the videos, he can always claim that it was a plot to infect his computer. And that the videos don’t really exist.
That’s only slightly paranoid.
It is interesting, though, how he rants and rails about the attempts to unseat obama through the courts. And then, of course, calls the courts corrupt — all the way from municipal courts up to the SCOTUS. But we need to put our faith in that plan.
And then, in the next breath, he calls for a revolution to toss out the “Evil Usurper Dictator” by force of arms — as though obama wouldn’t be defended. (I guess all of the right-thinking, “true” conservatives would just naturally go along with that.)
I still believe – as I’ve said before – that craig’s little plan is to get people to agree with his “revolutionary” call to arms, and bring untoward attention to GP. And to have it eventually shut down.
October 23rd, 2009 | 12:43 am | #95
The only thing that you have proved is that you are a fool, Tom W.
Youy say you like your country and you defend a Usurper. You say he is legal. Shame on you. No wonder USA is in such a mess with citizens like you that keep their head in the sand. Pitiful!
October 23rd, 2009 | 12:50 am | #96
…and bring untoward attention to GP. And to have it eventually shut down. (Solaratov)
LOL… talking about paranoiying. You people have really lost it. Remarkable! O boy!
October 23rd, 2009 | 12:59 am | #97
Solaratov, Craig and Obama sure do hate Fox News. Odd for such a “true conservative” to be in bed with Obama on that issue.
October 23rd, 2009 | 1:16 am | #98
[...] Gateway Pundit Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Congrats to Fox News for winning the prestigious “Hated by Chavez” awar…White House Escalates War on Fox News – Political News – FOXNews.comHelen Thomas Warns White House to Quit Attacking Fox News.Picking a fight: White House vs Fox News Comments (0) Trackbacks (0) Leave a comment Trackback [...]
October 23rd, 2009 | 1:31 am | #99
I loved Fox News till the day they said the eligibility issue was bogus. I knew that day, that they were sellouts. Too bad you don’t see that. But you will one day, except it will be too late.
While you are listening to the clown gigling and laughing and who talks to you like if you were little babies, the Usurper will have taken away your country.
October 23rd, 2009 | 1:40 am | #100
Craig said: “I loved Fox News till the day they said the eligibility issue was bogus.”
Good lord. Is the entire birth-certificate brigade operating at the emotional level of 13-year-old girls?
(As if I don’t already know the answer.)
October 23rd, 2009 | 1:46 am | #101
You don’t give a damn about your Constitution, we all know that. So for you, to have a Usurper sitting in the Oval Office, it is okay with you. You make me sick.
October 23rd, 2009 | 1:47 am | #102
[...] most outrageously bizarre criticism of the Bush administration, I’m quite sure they never tried a stunt like this. The White House banned FOX News today from interviewing the Pay Czar along with the other four [...]
October 23rd, 2009 | 1:58 am | #103
State controlled media, what could possibly go wrong, eh?
And honestly, I start wishing people would simply STOP with the whole birth certificate issue. It’s not leading anywhere, is it? I mean, it’s been almost a year since the elections and Obama is still there. Where’s the result of the campaign? Where is the actual birth certificate. Innocent until proven guilty. That’s how it works.
I’d rather see people using their energies and time on actual issues when it comes to Obama. Nail him over his policies towards fascists and terrorists, his crazy spending. He’s doing all that now. If someone manages to prove that Obama wasn’t born in the US next year, what good will it do?
NONE.
None at all.
Because by then Obama has already destroyed trillions of dollars.
You need to hit him with the issues at hand, not with something you can’t prove.
October 23rd, 2009 | 2:00 am | #104
“I did not lie. Glenn didn’t attempt the marche and Fox News did a louzy covering.”
Here’s what you said, Craig:
“Craig
October 22nd, 2009 | 9:59 pm 31
Was he on Washington that day? Nope. Did he cover it? Nope. Did he say there was between 1,5 to 2 millions protesters? Nope. He’s a fraud.”
I posted links to videos of him covering the march and him saying that there were 1.7 million marchers. You blatantly lied, and everyone here knows it. Sending me on a hike won’t change the fact that you were busted lying.”
More to the point, now that he’s been caught lying, Craig’s using the typical leftist tactic of moving the goal posts. So he’s gone from “not covered the march” to “didn’t cover it ENOUGH” in his claims. Though I’m sure that if someone finds a ton of coverage by Fox et al he’ll twist even further.
I do find it amusing that Craig is projecting his own tactics upon Beck: claiming that Beck is some awful person trying to fool people into taking the wrong approach in dealing with Obama’s actions. More of a “what a sick joke” kind of amusement, but then my sense of humor is a bit twisted…
October 23rd, 2009 | 3:19 am | #105
Fox News Network will not go away. Fox news is a very good network and they are telling the truth. Obama will lose the election 2012. Sarah Palin will be next President of the United States. We need to have our country back and freedom. The problem is the White House that have these Chicago gangs, wierd staffs like Anita Dunn and all these ‘czars’ doesn’t need to belong in there. They are not doing their job; just want to complaining and whiny. And, Mr. Obama listened to his White House staffs and they tell him how to run the country. Mr. Obama isn’t doing his job. His job approval rating is down below 45%. He does have a lack of inexpirence and leadership.
October 23rd, 2009 | 3:34 am | #106
Craig said:
“You make me sick.”
Because I expose you as a blatant liar. Gives you a tummy ache, huh? Maybe the solution is to not spread cheap, stupid, childish lies about Glenn Beck, hmmm? Then your poor little stomach will feel all better. Give it a try.
October 23rd, 2009 | 4:18 am | #107
Only one question comes to mind …
Craigie wanna cracker?
October 23rd, 2009 | 4:44 am | #108
Disgraceful indeed.
Obama caved again. No wonder his numbers are dropping. He’s got the spine of a Democrat.
October 23rd, 2009 | 5:09 am | #109
[...] Related reading: Start Thinking Right: Lying, Demagogic White House Finally Gets Its Media Smackdown Hot Air: Again: Axelrod, Emanuel attack Fox News on morning shows Gallup: Many Americans Remain Distrusting of News Media Crush Liberalism: Obama tries to bar Fox News from interviewing pay czar…and fails, embarrassingly so Jules Crittenden: Hardball Host … Likes A Softball Boston Herald: Chris Matthews refuses hardball question Nice Deb: Video: White House Tries To Exclude Fox News From Pay Czar Interviews Cadillac Tight: Tell me another one, Steve Patriot Burr: White House vs. FoxNews Gets Uglier Fire Andrea Mitchell!: UNBELIEVABLE! Obama tried to ban Fox News from Pay Czar Kenneth Feinberg interview The Strident Conservative: Bad Day At The White House? Just Blame FOX News David Limbaugh, Townhall.com: Barack’s Enemies List Frugal Café Blog Zone: Blame FOX News! Obama’s Approval Index Back Down to Minus 13, Record Consecutive Low, Plus Funny SNL Obama/Biden Spoof (video) and Stunning Admission: Glenn Beck Reveals That One of Anita Dunn’s Favorite Philosophers Is Murderous Mao Tse-Tung (video) and Anita Dunn… Glenn Beck Has Red “Hotline” Phone Installed for You to Call Him (video) and Who Is White House Crybaby Anita Dunn? Plus, Bill O’Reilly’s Take on WH Attacks on FOX (video) Gateway Pundit: Unreal. White House Bans FOX News from Press Pool Interview — Then Relents After Protest (Video) [...]
October 23rd, 2009 | 5:55 am | #110
For the record, Rush has made many comments about the birth certificate isssue. Whenever he mentions Barry being born in Hawaii he does it in a mocking tone. As for Beck and Fox, my impression is that since the “Birthers” have been turned into jokes, rather than subject themselves to ridicule, they are no doubt doing due dilligence quietly. What better way to establish yourselves as “news” than to come out with “news”? Similar to the ACORN story, it makes more sense that they would be mum about the story until they have irrefutable proof. At least it makes sense to me.
October 23rd, 2009 | 6:18 am | #111
“thers” are people who passionately believe in things which are demonstrably untrue or not proven. Truthers believe Bush was behind 9/11 even though every sane person knows it was al Qaeda that attacked America.
Birthers believe Obama was born in Hawaii even though he has refused to produce his hospital records and birth certificate. Birthers are afraid to demand these documents. They call people this derogatory name to foreclose examination of the question because they are afraid of the answer.
It’s not clear where Obama was born. What is clear is that people who use the term birthers are themselves birthers. The word more appropriately describes themselves than those who believe in due diligence. People who use the term birthers are either intellectually dishonest or not smart enough to approach the question of Obama’s birth in a logical manner: stop the name calling and demand what you would demand if he were a Republican.
It’s no wonder Obama thinks he can do whatever he wants.
October 23rd, 2009 | 6:22 am | #112
Everyone pay attention.
Craig=MOBY
His profession is agitating and presenting a negative image of the site and diverting threads from important issues being addressed.
Please keep it in mind.
October 23rd, 2009 | 7:26 am | #113
Man up Barry, put some pants on. Get a pair from Hillary. She has extras in her testicle lock box. LOL
You keep pushin boy. you have no idea of the public image that we see. I have scraped more interesting stuff off the bottom of my shoe in a cow lot.
October 23rd, 2009 | 7:26 am | #114
Whatever their motivation, this is a great development:)
October 23rd, 2009 | 7:36 am | #115
Fox news is a very good network and they are telling the truth.
33% of Fox viewers think we found WMDs in Iraq. 67% think we had clear evidence Saddam was working with Al Queda. 80% thought
October 23rd, 2009 | 8:31 am | #116
Mainstream Media Confronts The Monster It Created
http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/10/mainstream-media-confront-monster-they.html#
October 23rd, 2009 | 8:33 am | #117
Dr. Carlo Lombardi…
I enjoy your posts on other blogs:-).
And yes, you are right. Criag was outed a long time ago.
He is resilient, so the truth must be as well.
He hates Americans, actually. BUT only if they disagree with them.
October 23rd, 2009 | 8:40 am | #118
What is this strange little man doing now?
Perhaps he should get his crayons out and copy this down … “I am not a king” … and then repeat it over and over again until it’s his time to go back to Chicago.
October 23rd, 2009 | 9:44 am | #119
Craig, it very well may have been a show, I wouldn’t doubt that. The other media organizations know that Fox has excellent ratings and they will continue to lose viewers if they don’t tone down their beliefs. I will note that several individual reporters have come out showing support for Fox.
I just wanted to point out in my comment that the White House indeed relented since that wasn’t stated in the post at first.
October 23rd, 2009 | 10:04 am | #120
[...] Unreal. White House Bans FOX News from Press Pool Interview — Then Relents After Protest (Video) October 22, 2009 by Gateway Pundit [...]
October 23rd, 2009 | 4:32 pm | #121
We cant let up on these
assholesin the White House, Fox and all opposition needs to relentlessly point the finger and criticize these corrupt Marxists.October 23rd, 2009 | 5:33 pm | #122
We cant let up on these
assholesin the White House, Fox and all opposition needs to relentlessly point the finger and criticize these corrupt Marxists.October 23rd, 2009 | 5:59 pm | #123
I’m deeply concerned about Obama going “half-Chavez” on Fox News. I would be greatly disturbed if he goes “full Chavez” with it.