Of course they will.
…Was there ever a doubt?
Representative Debbie Wasserman Shultz (D-FL) admitted today that the Stupak Amendment will most likely not be in the final health care bill:
Via HotAir
More… The far left pro-abortion democrat also said that Sarah Palin repulsed women:
Asked about Foxx and Bachmann, Wasserman Schultz, blasted away:
“This is a party that doesn’t respect women, a party that doesn’t believe women are equal to men,” she told POLITICO. “I don’t think [Bachmann and Foxx] attract women to their party,” she said.
“I think they repulse women.”
Perfect.
From the party that beat down both Hillary Clinton and then Sarah Palin, now all of the sudden they supposedly speak for women.
Of course they do.
November 9th, 2009 | 1:01 pm | #1
Of course they will. Abandon a key platform of the party?
How’s it feel, Stupak? Blue Dogs? Your game lasted less than two days. What DID you expect?
Either you are too dumb to realize you were going to be had this way, or you care more about Pelosi’s approval than voters’, and think you can fool them.
You better hope so.
November 9th, 2009 | 1:03 pm | #2
If true then there will be the delicious irony of a democrat killing the health care bill for us.
I have never seen a group of people so willing to cut of their nose to spite their face as liberals.
November 9th, 2009 | 1:04 pm | #3
Jim,
I don’t think she is a (R-FL)…
November 9th, 2009 | 1:05 pm | #4
Representative Debbie Wasserman Shultz (R-FL)
she is far from a Republican
November 9th, 2009 | 1:05 pm | #5
So Democrats lied when they passed the Stupak Amendment that gave the pro-life Dems cover to go ahead and vote for Obama/Pelosi Care. Gee, who would thunk that?!!!?
November 9th, 2009 | 1:07 pm | #6
There isn’t even a law on the books legalizing abortion in Canada, and all Canadians fund abortions with their tax dollars through the healthcare system.
November 9th, 2009 | 1:14 pm | #7
you need to take the R from beside her name…she’s a screaming liberal….
November 9th, 2009 | 1:19 pm | #8
Jim, what is wrong with this blog? It doesn’t post very benign comments. What is up with this? Are there moderators who just randomly eliminate comments and/orthere words that trigger comments not to post?
November 9th, 2009 | 1:22 pm | #9
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Pamela Pope, Le Combat and Terri Campbell, T. Joseph Carter. T. Joseph Carter said: RRT @LeCombat House Dem: We’ll Get Abortion Funding Back In the Bill (Video) http://bit.ly/1GiraN [...]
November 9th, 2009 | 1:23 pm | #10
I thought she was a lib demo rat! She’s always there sucking on Pelosi’s tittys!
November 9th, 2009 | 1:25 pm | #11
Greasy-haired, ugly-as-hell WASSERMAN is the one who repulses women.
I’d pick beauties(inside and out) like Palin and Bachmann ANY day over THAT beoootch!
November 9th, 2009 | 1:27 pm | #12
Don’t turn your back on this female! She gives me the feeling that she will stab you in the back in a heart beat to get her share of the power!
November 9th, 2009 | 1:27 pm | #13
We are just being lied to. How many evidence do you need that these politicians does not represent us?
November 9th, 2009 | 1:29 pm | #14
I love how far leftists claim to ‘know’ more about Republican women, than even Republican Women do.
Sarah Palin and Michele Bahcmann make me MORE proud everyday to be a Conservative.
They have MORE balls than most of the men in the GOP, and because these women rile up Conservative Women – Liberals are trying harder everyday to bring them down.
It isn’t working….we can see right through your rhetoric Schultz!
November 9th, 2009 | 1:30 pm | #15
This legislator has it all wrong. She and her type of woman repulses me. I am a woman. She doesn’t speak for me. It’s interesting to track how womens’ organizations “speak” for me. I’m thinking particularly about NOW. That organization is on the opposite side of the spectrum of my beliefs.
I find it ironic the liberals have the audacity to think they speak for all women. I don’t need her to tell me how I feel and what I believe.
She lies! I happen to respect Palin, Bachmann and any of the other conservative women leaders. So again, Wasserman Schulz is wrong.
What ELSE is new??!!
November 9th, 2009 | 1:32 pm | #16
I love Sarah Palin and she is the real deal feminist.
Shultz is a democrat and member of the DNC circus.
November 9th, 2009 | 1:37 pm | #17
Wasserman Schultz is pro-choice, pro-gun control and pro-gay rights, and an active member of the National Jewish Democratic Council, Planned Parenthood and Hadassah. In other words, a certified moonbat all too happy to shout down different points of view rather than engage in civil discourse and let the average person decide for themselves right and wrong.
November 9th, 2009 | 1:39 pm | #18
Why is it that liberal women are all about killing babies and then say what repulses women?
Clearly they have no idea.
November 9th, 2009 | 1:48 pm | #19
She must be nut! Is she another Rino’s from Florida or liberal Democrat? Hope her district in Florida will vote her out next election.
November 9th, 2009 | 1:54 pm | #20
This lady must be a girl RINO… put her on the list to VOTE OUT whenever possible.
Liberal women are so jealous of conservative women they can’t even see straight.
This story reminds me of Garafalo speaking for all blacks.
Totally off base on both accounts.
Palin / Bachman and women like them rock!
November 9th, 2009 | 1:59 pm | #21
What pathetic wishful thinking from a very homely Dim out of Florida.
I’m a woman and I’m a big fan of both Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann.
November 9th, 2009 | 2:01 pm | #22
Well, we’ve kinda already figured out that people outside the Beltway, generally speaking, repulse the people inside the Beltway, beginning with Senator Reid’s complaint about tourists’ sweat stinking up the Capitol, and continuing with BuyInsuranceOrGoToPrisonCare being rammed through the House right in the teeth of huge numbers of people from outside the Beltway telling Congress over and over that they DO NOT WANT this bill to become law.
So this sort of thing (“I think they repulse women”) is just a litmus test letting us know who’s who so we can take names for when the sewage finally hits the fan for real and we’re ready to extract some payback.
November 9th, 2009 | 2:08 pm | #23
Ultimately, the biggest loser on the Stupak Amendment is the US Conference of Catholic Bishops. The bishops who usually stay quiet due to tax code restrictions on non-profits, endorsed this product when the Stupak Amendment was added.
The bishops have an almost irrational concern over the treatment of (illegal) immigrants, which is why they were willing to endorse once the abortion funding was removed.
Most Catholics will be hearing about the endorsement over the next few weeks. Does anybody really think that the bishops connection with the Catholic community is so tight that they can do a quick about-face when the abortion funding is put back in ? I don’t.
The bishops will look stupid in the end, especially if this thing passes, as many Catholics will think that the Church has changed their position on abortion, a victim of a political “bait-n-switch.”
November 9th, 2009 | 2:08 pm | #24
Wasserman Shultz (sounds like a test for VD) is the one who fought that allowing uniformed military members to be covered under hate crimes legislation. SHe said including veterans or military members who are targeted would insult the “REAL VICTIMS” like minorities and gays.
Wasserman Shultz has ignored the targeted killing of US service members. She doesn’t think it is hate.
November 9th, 2009 | 2:08 pm | #25
Wasserman-Schultz is a DEMOCRAT from FL.
November 9th, 2009 | 2:14 pm | #26
Jim, she is a leftee D, not an R. She is offended/repulsed by anyone who disagrees with her. Like jackboot Janet Nap(& Reno& Holder) she would have us all in the Gulag for 10 for anti-party crimes.
No way she is not going to get abortion funding done; our people been had.
November 9th, 2009 | 2:18 pm | #27
Debbie Wasserman Shultz is Jewish. Yet she supports the abortion holocaust. Has she learned nothing from history? Obviously she has no respect for the Law of God. Her attitudes are repulsive. Former Planned Parenthood Executive Director Abby Johnson is now Pro Life. She saw the reality of abortion.
She appeared on the Mike Huckabee show.
Wasserman Shultz should take a look here:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=609_1257728183
November 9th, 2009 | 2:19 pm | #28
Whenever I hear Wasserman-Schultz speak it reminds me of Eliza Doolittle with marbles in her mouth.
“The rain in Spain falls mainly on the plain…”
November 9th, 2009 | 2:23 pm | #29
Did anyone really believe that the salad tossers would leave the Stupak bill in. Pelosi used it and from I have been hearing and reading extortion to get blue dogs to vote for her power grab.Pelosi let drop that more investigations may be in the making of democrats in the House prior to voting on the death care bill.Salad tossers are sure to be all grins and giggles that their freedoms are being stolen from them one chip at a time.
November 9th, 2009 | 2:27 pm | #30
It is repulsive that liberal
November 9th, 2009 | 2:28 pm | #31
“This is a party that doesn’t respect women, a party that doesn’t believe women are equal to men,” she told POLITICO. “I don’t think [Bachmann and Foxx] attract women to their party,” she said.
“I think they repulse women.”
Well of course she would say that. The communist democrat party is simply using standard old communist tactics. Demean your opponent, call them crazy … say anything that could cast a smidgen of doubt.
All the while the democrats remain the true oppressive party.
Communist democrats … it’s just who they are.
November 9th, 2009 | 2:31 pm | #32
My computer is a little too fast for me….
It is repulsive that liberal women believe that unless a woman believes she has the right to kill her own unborn children, she is repulsive. These liberals women certainly like to show their envy.
November 9th, 2009 | 2:35 pm | #33
Of Course she *sic* said that. That’s alot of deep thought coming from someone that used to be a man.
November 9th, 2009 | 2:38 pm | #34
I’m Jewish, but Wassserman-Schultz makes me sick. She represents everything that’s wrong with Jewish voting habits…she doesn’t understand or deliberately ignores the fact that every position she takes goes against Judaism. Jews should be pro-gun/pro self-defense, not pro-gun control. Abortion goes against Jewish law. The National Jewish Democratic Council is one of the worst of the Far Left groups, Planned Parenthood is now just an abortion-mill organization…well, Hadassah is far too Leftist politically, but their magazine has some decent articles sometimes on non-political items!
Wasserman is just a skanky kook, but that’s an oxymoron along with “Democratic woman Rep or Senator”. They are all hateful and ugly, and forget outer beauty (though I agree about Bachmann and Palin vs. Wasserman, but that’s not a reason to support or not: Golda Meier was no raving beauty, but accept for her mistake with the ‘73 war, she was an effective leader). It is the inner ugliness, the ugliness of spirit, that so pervades the Left.
The enormous hypocrisy of the stand on abortion…when the Leftist health care bill will take away EVERYONE”S right to choose their health care…and yet, Wasserman et al scream about a “woman’s “right to choose” to murder her baby….is just breathtaking.
Anyway, yes, far too many Jews support this kind of stupidity, but not all of us. And I hope and pray, some are coming around and realizing that they screwed up electing the Sociopath-Muslim-lover-in-Chief, Obiwan Barackabee.
Not enough, yet, but we’re working on it! In the meantime, please folks, just don’t think that Wasserman represents all of us. SHE DOES NOT.
November 9th, 2009 | 2:49 pm | #35
Another liberal that does not speak for me. Of course, when you are insecure about yourself as a woman you tend to trash other women.
We NEED more women like Michelle and Sarah in politics!! Conservative, intelligent, energetic – real women not dried up prunes loaded with resentment :(
November 9th, 2009 | 2:59 pm | #36
These people have no honor, no integrity, and NO SHAME.
It is mind-boggling.
November 9th, 2009 | 3:07 pm | #37
“beat down both Hillary Clinton and then Sarah Palin, now all of the sudden they supposedly speak for women.”
Not only that; this party got down on bended knees to get their pat the head for soaking up the One’s magnificent essence.
November 9th, 2009 | 3:24 pm | #38
I find liberal women repulsive whores
November 9th, 2009 | 3:25 pm | #39
If Sarah Palin was a liberal, she would have been given a queens crown. They don’t have liberal women that look like Sarah.
November 9th, 2009 | 3:33 pm | #40
Give me the inner and outward beauty of conservative women any day. The left leaning women mostly do so because of feelings, I’ll take the thinking beauty of the women on the right. Oh and by the way, they are nobody to mess with, try it and find out.
November 9th, 2009 | 3:38 pm | #41
Reps don’t respect women?
Wait!
We’re supposed to see women as women? I mean, the left is the one behind gender-mainstreaming and all the nonsense around. But suddenly they pretend to be worried? Oh my!
That coming from the party that welcomed a mock trial by national-socialist North Korea against two WOMEN journalists, that calls men and WOMEN being shot to death in Iran’s streets by the regime’s thugs “robust discussion”… now that is rich, really.
Debbie Wasserman Shultz. Oh yes, the usual suspects. In Germany she’d be Wasserman-Schultz, one of those wannabe feminists with double names. Oh yeah, we know them here, we know them well, and we know that, whatever such women say, the things my cat used to cough up are worth more in comparison.
November 9th, 2009 | 3:40 pm | #42
Palin/Bachmann in 2012!
We don’t need no Mittens, TPaw or Huckster.
Pants Afire can beat the flaccid without us.
November 9th, 2009 | 3:43 pm | #43
Here is another prime example of a kool aid drinking sickofant for Obama and the democrats. This woman, i use the term loosely cause she claims republican scare women, i’d be surprised if she didn’t scare little children she meets on the street. The voters of her florida district need to kiick this clown out of office. She stands there and lies about everything she can while claiming to be just trying to help the people who voted for her. Unless nancy pelosi voted for her i don’t think anyone wants what the democrats are selling as help. I will but donating to anyone who runs against this total suckofant. I don’t she can think for herself at all. To top it off she’s Jewish and doesn’t satand up for her people as she folows Obama the closet Muslim inhis quest to destory America and Israel. How can other Jewish peole vote for this clown. She’s only out to line her pockets and if she sells out her family and friends well so be it she got hers! Maybe she can take Billy Mases old job. She just wants to sell something, anything to be part of the left wing kooks club. Kick her out florida before she does real damage to you and your family by her blind ambistion!
November 9th, 2009 | 3:44 pm | #44
Francesca
November 9th, 2009 | 2:59 pm | #36
These people have no honor, no integrity, and NO SHAME.
Communists never do.
November 9th, 2009 | 3:57 pm | #45
What a vile disgusting example of legislation in action.
The “progressive” (progressing into hell) left is in full blown ecstasy, over getting their bill through the house.
They can barely contain themselves anymore… perfect for showing the just awakening electorate how sick and twisted they really are.
This should make it even easier to get them out in 2010…
so long to the communist “progressive” moonbats
November 9th, 2009 | 4:00 pm | #46
This South Florida native would like to apologize for the multitude of annoying and corrupt left-wing politicians my former neighbors send to Congress: Carrie Meek, Alcee Hastings, and Debbie Wah-wahman-Schmaltz among them.
I’m a woman and I’m repulsed by the Democrats’ disrespect for religious belief that’s not Islam, its epic fail to defend our country, its loose morality, its overspending, and its statism. They make a show out of “women’s rights” but apparently, conservative/pro-life women are not *their* equals.
November 9th, 2009 | 4:03 pm | #47
I remember this woman being interviewed after the announcement from McCain’s group about Gov. Palin. Schultz was saying that one day she got up, her daughter was very ill, had a high temperature, and she patted her on the head and told her “mommy had to head off to work, see you later”, and she hopped on her plane and went to DC…..and the w.tch was bragging about it! She claimed Gov. Palin wouldn’t do that. I guess the child was lucky she hadn’t killer her yet.
November 9th, 2009 | 4:06 pm | #48
I would say that they have no principles but that simplifies the situation. They have perverse principles.
Their leader, the so-called president, President Missing-in Action, compared the potential sacrifice of their beloved political careers to the bravery of our military forces as they face enemy fire. And this for the most partisan bill in history.
While the national economy continues to decline under the transformation, and a horrendous attack has occurred on a military base, the tyrants used the occasion to ram their bill through late at night on a weekend. And yet again nobody has read the bill.
November 9th, 2009 | 4:09 pm | #49
“We promise there will be no federal funding of Abortion, if you pass this healthcrap bill, trust us”
Suckers! Did’nt anyone think that they were being hornswaggled by the Dems. In the real world something like this would be called fraud.
A shout out to Obama for flying into Berlin to celebrate the 20th anniversary of the “Wall” being torn down, my bad, nothing to celebrate I guess.
November 9th, 2009 | 4:27 pm | #50
Wasserman Schultz Has twins and is a cancer survivor so – normally I would give her a pass as a mother and a woman who has overcome very hard times – but not this time. Every time she speaks I want to throw up. She is quite possibly the most repulsive individual I have ever seen in the political arena. She is a disgrace to my state.
November 9th, 2009 | 4:36 pm | #51
ArielNo Gravatar
November 9th, 2009 | 1:59 pm | #21
You and me both! Oh, and I have 3 daughters who really admire those 2 women. Wonder when Debbie last looked in the mirror? Just asking.
November 9th, 2009 | 4:39 pm | #52
MNo Gravatar
November 9th, 2009 | 2:38 pm | #34
You are probably in the minority, along with Pamela Geller, but what a nice minority!! Hopefully, that minority status will change as women wake up.
November 9th, 2009 | 4:40 pm | #53
I wanted CSpan, and the HealthCare debate Friday and Sat. And the republicans had, for the most part, read the bill. The Dems, some admitted they had no time and did not read the bill. It was too long. Republicans are correct. The States are going to be socked with financial commitments because the Feds cannot fund all of the HealthCare programs. This means heavy taxes and depletion of educational funding, and job loss. $Billions and $Billions will need to be footed by the state. The Dems argument is that Rich people may have to mortgage their houses if they cannot pay their medical bills. They want to stop that.
November 9th, 2009 | 4:43 pm | #54
Dems understand that most republicans are middle to lower class in economics, and most Lefties are rich despite, a minority of inner city poor that votes left on both coasts or main large metropolises. The idea of the lefties is to tax heavily the middle and poor republicans so that the rich lefties can keep power and money. Most of the lefties on Capital hill are Filthy Rich, many $millionaires.
November 9th, 2009 | 5:04 pm | #55
Jealous that Palin and Bachman were natural born women eh Deb?
What’s a transgender to do? You’ll figure something out Deb. FYI Debbie, you gender change operation and that of your fellow “he that wants to be a she” liberals is not covered under the “public option”.
November 9th, 2009 | 5:05 pm | #56
She’s used to running unchallenged. Not this time around!
Debbie Wassserman-Schultz is repulsive and a blight on the X chromosome.
November 9th, 2009 | 5:18 pm | #57
At least we give women the choice to be or not to be repulsed…at least we allow the female infant to take its first breath and grow to the age of reason where that choice is made…at least we, the GOP, are the party of liberty and right to life; whereas the diabolical democrats are naught but the party of death, tyranny and taxes.
November 9th, 2009 | 5:33 pm | #58
[...] As expected, those who thought that the PelosiCARE bill will not fund abortions you were sadly wrong. Today on MSNBC Debbie Wasserman-Shultz (who is basically the Nancy Pelosi of Florida) said this: “I am confident that when it comes back from the conference committee that that language won’t be there,” Wasserman Schultz said during an appearance on MSNBC. “And I think we’re all going to be working very hard, particularly the pro-choice members, to make sure that’s the case.” [...]
November 9th, 2009 | 5:56 pm | #59
Tammy says:
#11
Greasy-haired, ugly-as-hell WASSERMAN is the one who repulses women.
I’d pick beauties(inside and out) like Palin and Bachmann ANY day over THAT beoootch!
Great, another republican hypocrite comes out of the closet! You and Larry Craig would make a sweet couple.
November 9th, 2009 | 6:32 pm | #60
Who says that MOBY is a Repub?
The only people we’ve heard talk like that are Libs – hard-core no manners potty-mouths – sort of verbal flashers ’cause they think it’s “edgy” or something. Oh, “progressive.”
November 9th, 2009 | 7:40 pm | #61
I’m pretty sure that’s a man…with 3 names. Aren’t we over the whole hyphen name thing? Also, dosen’t that imply it’s married? I guess [it's] in a “progressive” relationship. Someone should tell “Debbie” she can take estrogen to modulate her voice…what a f’ng hag.
November 9th, 2009 | 8:04 pm | #62
“Great, another republican hypocrite comes out of the closet! You and Larry Craig would make a sweet couple.”
Oh, look, Beerslut appears and accuses someone of hypocrisy. This douchenozzle called Sarah Palin the “whore from Wasilla” the other day and had his comments removed by the Moderator.
Talk about projection!
November 9th, 2009 | 8:31 pm | #63
Nice adams apple “Debbie”
November 9th, 2009 | 8:46 pm | #64
Debbie Wazaman
November 9th, 2009 | 9:55 pm | #65
Pelosi’s Abortion Land Mine Explodes
http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/11/pelosis-abortion-land-mine-explodes.html
November 9th, 2009 | 10:26 pm | #66
Unfortunately, this complete loon, Debbie Wasserman-Shultz, is my congressional representative. She is a member of the Progressive Caucus in the House. She is the absolute WORST! This lady cannot come up with an original thought. It is always straight from the Democratic talking points. I would love to see this nitwit debate Bachmann. Michelle Bachmann would run circles around Debbie WaWa.
We are a Jewish household and I can’t believe how far apart we are in ideology from this hack. I have written her letters, called her office and faxed her office to express my opinion on various pieces of legislation. I gave up! She is San Fran Nan’s latest pet project. I cannot wait to campaign next year for ANYONE (a conservative Dem or Republican) who runs against her. She ran un-opposed last time. I wrote in “Minnie Mouse” on the ballot. However, things do not look good in south Florida for a Republican right now. There are a lot of FBI corruption probes and arrests into people with ties to statewide Republicans and the RINO, Charlie Christ. So, I’m not sure that any Republican would have a chance against Debbie WaWa next year. Also, San Fran Nan and The Won will pour lots of cash into this progressive’s coffers!
November 9th, 2009 | 11:19 pm | #67
I figured this anti-federal-funding-for-abortion language won’t stay in the final bill because Pelosi is rabidly pro-abortion (a truly fake and sinful Catholic is she–you are not a Catholic in good standing if you support abortion the way she does), but my understanding is that there will be major problems fully passing the bill with or without the language.
November 10th, 2009 | 12:13 am | #68
She is one angry bi#@ch anymore. During the election she was as cheerful as ever,now that the Republicans have successfully damaged her king,she is pissed. I am pleased.
November 10th, 2009 | 12:32 am | #69
These hypocrite women claim that women are the peacmakers and the “caring ones” and all that. But they don’t even protect or value their own babies, making them unusually cold-blooded – a very undesirable character flaw for any sort of “caring” or “peace” goals. Incredibly, crocodiles do a better job caring for their unborn.
November 10th, 2009 | 1:33 am | #70
Women are the peacemakers? Really?
Catherine the Great. Hojo Masako. Tomoe Gozen. Maggie Thatcher. Maria Theresia. Boudica. Just to name a few. These were all powerful women in important positions, ruling whole nations and partly even fighting on the battlefields. Catherine the Great and Hojo Masako were both extremely ruthless when it came to achieving their goals.
Old Vietnam, long, long, long, long, very long before the colonization, was ruled by women and women had a very strong position in society. Was it peaceful? No. Of course not.
The idea that women are the peacemakers and the “caring ones” is a myth. Women are humans and as such subject to all our vices, just like men.
November 10th, 2009 | 8:45 am | #71
Anti-christian Jewish b1t4ch.
November 10th, 2009 | 8:53 am | #72
Shelly H-
Allen West-R (District 22) WILL win.
Ed Lynch-R (District 19) One can only hope.
November 10th, 2009 | 9:05 am | #73
Blue Dogs will realize that they are just useful idiots to Obama. Who cares if they never get reelected. These Marxists hardcore are willing to eat their own. Blue Dogs got what they deserve. The wrath of angry voters will be there to vote you OUT.
November 10th, 2009 | 9:37 am | #74
Oh honey, have you looked in the mirror lately? I love Sarah. *You* are the one who repulses me. Well, you and the other women libs.
Thank God, I’m a conservative.
November 10th, 2009 | 10:38 am | #75
This woman needs a reality check.
If the Stupek Amendment is not in the final bill if it ever gets to conference, all that is needed is 5 of those people who voted for Stupek to vote “no” this time.
Remember, campaigning starts in January 2010 for the November 2010 elections. Make sure that is known to those 40 who voted for Stupak and the abomination of a bill on Saturday that you are watching.
My Rep. is a conservative Republican who voted no on the bill so I am safe. However, a leftist loon announced he is running against the encumbant yesterday. This guy was great at quoting B.O. talking points. He has a zero possibility of winning.
November 10th, 2009 | 3:01 pm | #76
Your laugh for the day.
Levi Johnston gets “shat” on by William Shatner.
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2009/11/william-shatner-does-levi-johnston.html
November 10th, 2009 | 5:48 pm | #77
What about all of those women being killed in utero? Who speaks for and respects them? Certainly not these Democrats who pay lip service to “women’s” rights. Abortion isn’t about female equality. It’s about not having to face the consequences of one’s actions and not having to lead a moral life.
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact