Army major Nidal Malik Hasan, identified by Texas officials as the gunman, was wounded during the shooting. (Examiner)
Well that didn’t take long.
So called decent Muslims aren’t talking about the attack as much as they are about the backlash against the Muslim community…whining about themselves rather than the tragedy that just occured at Fort Hood.
Um, yea, when Muslims keep committing terror acts both at home and abroad, it’s kinda hard not to notice. Of course people are going to be pissed. What Muslims need to do is stand with the victims and vow to confront the evil within their own and with the exception of a handful of groups we can be sure that this won’t happen. Now more than EVER Muslims need to stand up and ADMIT the problem within Islam instead of attacking anyone who questions it or who is critical of the ideology.
Al Siddiq, president of the Islamic Center of Waco, followed the unfolding news of the Fort Hood tragedy anxiously, as a veteran of the U.S. Army himself, as a friend of some Muslim soldiers currently stationed at the Central Texas post and as a Muslim who has become wary of backlash.
Siddiq said the Muslim Islamic community is very concerned that the shooter on Fort Hood was a Muslim because Muslims tend to get all thrown into the same category. Since 9/11, Siddiq said, when an individual Muslim acts stupid, it affects the entire Islamic community. The concern is backlash against other Muslims, he said.
“We’ve been very fortunate in Waco,” Siddiq said. “But there’s always a backlash.” Siddiq said he had a great experience in the U.S. Army, both in Korea and stationed at Fort Campbell.
“That’s what hurts me the most,” he said. “The Army has accommodated Muslims. Not any other Army can offer what the U.S. Army offers.”
Siddiq said what he has heard is that the Fort Hood shooter may be a convert to Islam. He said he thinks the problem some converts have is not based on the Islam religion, but on the resentment toward the U.S. government that they bring to their faith.
UPDATE: Malik attended prayer services nearly every day in Silver Spring for several years. Six months ago Hasan came to the attention of the FBI because of Internet postings that discussed suicide bombings.
After lauding a Muslim U.S. Army soldier who killed comrades in Kuwait in 2003, Hasan wrote in an online posting, “If one suicide bomber can kill 100 enemy soldiers … that would be considered a strategic victory.”
UPDATE 2: Hasan was put on probation early in his postgraduate work at the Uniformed Service University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Md. He was disciplined for proselytizing about his Muslim faith with patients and colleagues.
November 5th, 2009 | 8:44 pm | #1
Oh bull.
November 5th, 2009 | 8:47 pm | #2
ahem, ditto.
November 5th, 2009 | 8:47 pm | #3
I really do not think the Muslim population of America have anything to complain about…for the moment.
November 5th, 2009 | 8:48 pm | #4
sorry your religion of peace sucks.
take it back home.
November 5th, 2009 | 8:50 pm | #5
Blah blah blah……and obamao to follow.
November 5th, 2009 | 8:56 pm | #6
Correlation doesn’t equal causation. But, this trend is far beyond coincidence. Let’s see if I understand it.
Some non-religious nut kills Tiller the the late trem fetus and all pro-life Christians are terrorists.
You see about 17,000 muslim world-wide terrorist massacres since 2001 and (Hell no!) you can’t blame Islam.
That doesn’t add up except in liberal lalaland.
News flashes. He was born a muslim. His parents were from Jordan. He is alive. And, he has to wait for those 72 virgins.
November 5th, 2009 | 9:00 pm | #7
Victimhood the key element that ties the democrats to islam. Well that and both believe in the benefits of slavery.
O/T but what a great time to start a conspiracy theory. Note how this tragedy has all but blotted out the protest in DC today? Timing was perfect.
November 5th, 2009 | 9:01 pm | #8
I agree that American Islamists should loudly denounce the radical terrorist branch of their religion. They need to come together, go to the media, and admit that radical Islam hates America and wants to destroy it. When so-called “Christians” commit acts of terrorism, they are loudly and quickly denounced by true Christians as evil and crazy. Until American Islamists loudly admit these things, it is going to be hard for Americans to get past the hypocrisy of these American Islamic groups.
November 5th, 2009 | 9:03 pm | #9
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Infidel007, Paul Alyunov. Paul Alyunov said: Muslim leader speaks on Fort Hood Massacre: Blames attack on “resentment of US Government” and noth.. http://bit.ly/3lzn3I [...]
November 5th, 2009 | 9:04 pm | #10
“The resentment of the US government some converts bring to their faith”
I don’t think they bring it with them. I think they find it waiting for them.
November 5th, 2009 | 9:05 pm | #11
UPDATE: Malik attended prayer services nearly every day in Silver Spring for several years. Six months ago Hasan came to the attention of the FBI because of Internet postings that discussed suicide bombings.
Oh, but he brought resentment against the US gov’t with him “to the faith.” It has nothing to do with Islam, otherwise known as “Religion with a sword.” Naaaa, this latest act of terror has nuuuuuuthing to do with Islam…Well, I’ll give Siddiq a little break. Maybe it has to do with radical, jihadist, fundamentalist Islam.
Mmmmmm kay-ay
November 5th, 2009 | 9:06 pm | #12
I think that I will always remember being instructed by a Muslim shortly after 9/11 that “Islam” means “Peace,” and that in Islam women are treated with honor and respect.
And all this may be true THEORETICALLY.
Al Siddiq should be regarded with appropriate skepticism, and taken with a ton of salt.
Put another way, Al Siddiq has provided just what the Liberal Media wants to hear and to be heard, so this in deed will be that official and final word on this matter. Case closed.
November 5th, 2009 | 9:08 pm | #13
I resent the administration currently in charge of the US Government.
Difference:
I don’t kill innocent people.
November 5th, 2009 | 9:08 pm | #14
OCBillNo Gravatar
November 5th, 2009 | 9:04 pm | #10
Nice and pithy. The truth usually is.
November 5th, 2009 | 9:14 pm | #15
“Since 9/11, Siddiq said, when an individual Muslim acts stupid[sic], it affects the entire Islamic community. The concern is backlash against other Muslims, he said.”
Exactly! The Danish cartoons provides a perfect example. All the concern was over the backlash against Muslims. Why would there ever be any concern over Muslim backlash? Why indeed would that even make any sense with regards to the religion of revenge and fatwas?
November 5th, 2009 | 9:15 pm | #16
Malik was not a convert, that said, the fastest growing converts to Islam are in the prison system and why not it’s a religion where you don’t have to say you are sorry for redemption.
All one needs do is follow the prescribed rituals and whatever ugly deeds you’ve done aren’t an impediment to salvation.
Islam is a magnet for macho male sociopaths as wife beaters and terrorists have demonstrated.
November 5th, 2009 | 9:17 pm | #17
++
Mike W @ 9:00 pm #7
[Note how this tragedy has all but blotted out
the protest in DC today? Timing was perfect.]
hate to say this.. but the (more or less) same
thought came to my mind as well.. *sigh*
anyways, i’m glad you posted it because i
was in a quandary as how to articulate it..
==
November 5th, 2009 | 9:17 pm | #18
[...] suicide bombings, so much so that he posted about it on the internet. (Washington Examiner and Gateway Pundit) After lauding a Muslim U.S. Army soldier who killed comrades in Kuwait in 2003, Hasan wrote in an [...]
November 5th, 2009 | 9:18 pm | #19
[...] the U.S., and an admiration of suicide bombers…and we’re supposed to the fact that we have yet another mass murderer who’s Islamic has nothing to do with that religion or [...]
November 5th, 2009 | 9:18 pm | #20
Siddiq’s concern about “backlash against other Muslims” is even older and more cliché than the Democrats blaming Bush for whatever.
Just stuff it!
November 5th, 2009 | 9:20 pm | #21
With all this in the news congress can shove the healthcrap bill through on saturday
November 5th, 2009 | 9:21 pm | #22
I’d like ONE example of backlash against Muslims ANYWHERE.
They taunt the British soldiers returning from Afghanistan.
They refuse to scan bacon at Target in Minneapolis.
Muslim charter schools operate with tax monies used to turn children against Jews and Christians in Virginia.
They blow up airports, trains, buses…everywhere.
And yet they are always the grievance mongering leeches, coming here with 4 wives and signing up for food stamps.
A backlash is what they need.
November 5th, 2009 | 9:23 pm | #23
Could they please provide some evidence of this backlash they worry about. As far as I have been able to tell, there has never been a significant backlash, even after 9/11, just bleating about fears of one.
November 5th, 2009 | 9:23 pm | #24
Fortunately the Muslim-in-chief is probably already making arrangements for beer party to smooth things over. But wait a minute, beer? Muslims? Frothing-at-the-mouth Islamist? Uh-oh. Hey, Rahm, what’s plan B?
November 5th, 2009 | 9:32 pm | #25
I’m waiting for CAIR to declare–
-Hasan was a ‘victim’—
his cousin already intimated that in an interview…
November 5th, 2009 | 9:33 pm | #26
This was posted on Indymedia/SF in 2004:
Charles Johnson (in better times) spotted it and re-posted it on LGF:
“.. the so-called America war on terror is really a war on Islam…
In light of these revelations, Al-Masakin would like to take this opportunity to remind the American Mujahedin, and our allies in the revolutionary and anti-Imperialist left, that ROTC buildings, armed service recruiting centers, individual military personnel, and police officers are “military targets.” These institutions must be violently and ceoverted attacked.
In fact, there are thousands of unarmed military targets walking around all over the United States. Outraged American citizens and American Muslims should have little difficulty making violent contact with recruits, cadets, marines, etc. We strongly recommend that such contact be made with a very sharp knife, pepper spray, brass knuckles, baseball bats, firearms, explosives, or the bumper of a full-sized automobile, truck or SUV.”
That is a verbatim quote off a longer ranting text that was issued over the internet thru Indymedia SF.
Let it sink in and then review the apparently random SUV, armed service recruiting centers, isolated soldiers attacks and now this at Ft. Hood over the past few years.
November 5th, 2009 | 9:33 pm | #27
Mass murder at Fort Hood and the filthy pagans talk about payback . . .
November 5th, 2009 | 9:34 pm | #28
Burma, Hah! I had the same comment on the last thread. Make that a root beer, King Hussein. We wouldn’t want a fatwa from your campaign financiers.
…………………..
November 5th, 2009 | 9:34 pm | #29
Islam is a false religion, a 7th century death cult. This individual Jihadist made a conscious decision to murder US soldiers for his “god”. Hopefully, the US Military will do a better job in rooting out these psychotic enemies within their ranks and getting them the hell out of the military. The enemy within is always the most dangerous. And how many muslims have immigrated to the US in the last few years?
15% worldwide is the number most often quoted of muslims who subscribe to jihadist teachings. How many tens or hundreds of thousands of jihadist sympathizers are here now? This animal today made his decision to act on the commands of his cult and teachings.
How soon will the next one make that decision?
And how long with it take Americans to fully realize and understand that the Constitution is not a suicide pact when it comes to pagan fanatics committed to death?
November 5th, 2009 | 9:37 pm | #30
MIKE W – I thought the same thing- how fortuitous that this occurred to blot out the coverage of the 20,000 US citizens who descended upon our servants in Wash DC–
Thank you Bachmann-Levin and Voight ….and to all who traveled there ….
November 5th, 2009 | 9:41 pm | #31
Mike W
November 5th, 2009 | 9:00 pm | #7
O/T but what a great time to start a conspiracy theory. Note how this tragedy has all but blotted out the protest in DC today? Timing was perfect.
And 9/11 was an inside job…
Actually the timing of this is terrible for the passage of PelosiCare. If Congress goes ahead with the scheduled vote, the electorate will be even angrier at the callousness. And as a conspiracy it’s not very smart. It reminded Americans not only that we’re fighting two wars, but by choosing soldiers as the victims it’s going to make the country more sympathetic toward and supportive of the military.
Plus it’s going to stir up anti-Muslim sentiment. Strange that our allegedly Muslim president would want to make the country more hostile toward Muslims.
November 5th, 2009 | 9:44 pm | #32
His cousin was on FN and said he was born a Muslim. Big surprise with that name.
November 5th, 2009 | 9:47 pm | #33
The cousin also said he hated the gun range. I find it unbelievable that a single shooter with a couple of 9mm pistols can take down 42 people, killing 12. On a military base, I assume these people were not cowering under tables. There has to be more to this story.
November 5th, 2009 | 9:54 pm | #34
“Al Siddiq, president of the Islamic Center of Waco”
Another ‘wacko at Waco.’
“He said he thinks the problem some converts have is not based on the Islam religion, but on the resentment toward the U.S. government that they bring to their faith.”
People in the US convert to Islam out of being non-religious themselves and finding what the ‘fad’ is and as a way to protest the US by being able to be ‘accepted’ into the largest and most hate-filled community in the world. It is the religion of the Antichrist–what more can you say?
“I find it unbelievable that a single shooter with a couple of 9mm pistols can take down 42 people, killing 12.”
He could not have killed 12 people and injured dozens more. Heck he’d be dead after the first shot or two came out. He had to have had both a bigger gun and an accomplice to say the least.
November 5th, 2009 | 9:55 pm | #35
“There has to be more to this story.”
………………
The soldiers aren’t allowed to carry any weapons while on base.
Political correctness a la Virgina Tech.
November 5th, 2009 | 10:04 pm | #36
Hypogean. I am not saying I believe it I just stated it using the same mentality the 9/11 truthers use.
Then again the so-called “Look At Me” press conference Teh Messiah gave would go a long way to support such a “theory”.The truthers make a big deal out of the way President Bush acted when he was told about the attacks on US soil and obama was laughing and acted like a man-child rather then a leader.
Remember what this administration believes”A Crisis Is too Good to Waste”.
November 5th, 2009 | 10:10 pm | #37
The brass has some ’splainin’ to do with keeping on an officer, a Major, who had caught the eye of the FBI months ago for his dangerous ranting on line – not exactly secret.
Political correctness strikes twice.
Disarmed, law-abiding soldiers, plus “no-profiling allowed” = sitting ducks for jihad.
In the 1790s, American ships in the Mediterrean were dubbed by the Muslim sultans and Beys of the Barbary coast, “Fat ducks” because they were easy targets – no defense.
November 5th, 2009 | 10:25 pm | #38
Tomorrow we can expect the left wings loons to begin to try and connect him to all those right wing extremists in the Republican Party. Stay tuned!
November 5th, 2009 | 10:25 pm | #39
Wanumba, I’m listening to a radio show hosted by a former soldier, and he says that you have to work really hard to be as undecorated as Nidal Malik Hasan. He was commissioned in 1997 but has never earned a single decoration.
He’s also one of the only service members on record to have never been deployed overseas. Again, you have to work really, really hard to pull that off.
The former soldier on the radio is theorizing that Hasan is an incompetent and a coward who did everything in his power to avoid any real responsibilities or face any danger. He just wanted to wear the uniform and be an officer. When he finally ran out of options for preventing his deployment overseas, he snapped and started shooting.
Someone needs to do a study someday about how cowards and losers use Islam as the rationale for their loserdom. If I were afraid of being deployed into a danger zone, what better way to let myself off the hook than to tell myself that my religion wouldn’t let me support the mission? And this guy is still alive. How many of these mass shooters survive their massacres? Usually they get killed by the cops or commit suicide.
I wonder how seriously devout this guy really is?
November 5th, 2009 | 10:46 pm | #40
So glad to see John from Infidels are cool posting here. Good choice. He needed some major exposure. Go get ‘em John.
November 5th, 2009 | 11:08 pm | #41
Invade their countries. Kill their leaders. Convert them to Christianity. (Ann Coulter)
Enough said.
November 5th, 2009 | 11:13 pm | #42
bg
November 5th, 2009 | 9:17 pm | #17
I noticed the same thing early on.
I suppose that it *could* just be a coincidence.
But it sure is odd.
November 5th, 2009 | 11:24 pm | #43
But, Islam is the Religion of Peace. The government says so. That is good enough for me. Anybody who would even think for a moment that this has anything at all to do with his being a Muslim is literally insane. That’s just crazy talk. Muslims don’t kill people, guns kill people. Jeez, people, wake up. It’s called sensitivity. Look it up.
November 5th, 2009 | 11:25 pm | #44
Hypogean
…………..
I’m not convinced that “deployment worries” was anything but a Leftist wish – so the media can run with earnest stories about the stress of warfare. They’ve been doing just that all day for filler – “Ft Hood’s history of violence.” Then this gem, “Eleven years ago…” Gads, Boston, New York, Chicago, Detroit, Richmond, Phoenix, and LA have waaaaay worse histories of violence than that, but no one claims living in any of those cities gives one Post-traumatic stress syndrome. But, Ft Hood, eleven years ago and five years ago, is “violenceville.” With CHicago’s murder rate, a lot of people would be concerned to be “deployed” er, “relocated” there, wouldn’t they be?
The whole radical Islamofascism absolutely appeals to a CERTAIN personality type. In the venacular, “loser.” So, the majority of Muslims aren’t “jihadists” and never will be, but Islam is an elitist religion, one that puts one group above all others, two tiers of social protocols, one aloof, rarified and dignified for believers, one purposefully degraded state for non-believers. Dissaffected types are found all over the world, any shape, size and color. The kind who think everyone is “stupid” that they deserve more than they have … Islamofascism as fascism panders to those types, strokes their egos, builds them up – agrees that they are better than everyone else, then encourages and guides that resentment to jihad.
This guy has been building up his nerve to do something, he just took awhile – he insinuated himself into the service – up to MAJOR of all things (can’t wait to hear how) – guess he leveraged his college degree and maybe a needed foreign language into officer school – but STILL! As you said, notable for … nothing. So, how’d he wrangle promotions to Major? He have friends along the way who smoothed his ascent? Lots of questions which need answers. He’s probably not the only one burrowed in. It’s been war, why should anyone be surprised our military has infiltrators, either lone ideologues or part of a wider network? It’s been standard in human warfare since the dawn of history, but our media acts like it’s unique.
November 5th, 2009 | 11:28 pm | #45
[...] Muslim blames attack on “resentment of US Government” and nothing to do with Islam…Update:… [...]
November 5th, 2009 | 11:58 pm | #46
Is this the way to thank a nation that has provided one with a 1/2 million dollar education?
I want to know why he received a promotion when he had a “poor” rating? I want to see that report.
Is this what we have to look forward to under ObamaCare. Promotion of those that are failing?
November 6th, 2009 | 12:02 am | #47
Sadly, I have come to believe that many liberals defend and back radical Muslims because they share a common hatred for the USA. They view radical Muslims as a helpful part of “radically transforming” our system. What radical Muslims don’t get is that they will be very dispensable once the job is done.
November 6th, 2009 | 12:12 am | #48
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Political Belle and Johnny Quest, Right. Right said: {gatewaypundit} Muslim leader speaks on Fort Hood Massacre: Blames attack on “resentment o.. http://bit.ly/3kmyc8 [...]
November 6th, 2009 | 12:13 am | #49
“Since 9/11, Siddiq said, when an individual Muslim acts stupid, it affects the entire Islamic community.”
To describe the premeditated murder of 12 people and the wounding of more than 30 others, all of them unarmed, as “acts stupid” is a quite a bit of an understatement. I mean, really, that’s the phrase our President would apply to a police officer doing his job.
November 6th, 2009 | 12:16 am | #50
The liberals support Islam because they view it as being against Christians (the REAL threat to the world). Well, that and Islam’s traditional support for gay marriage and abortion-on-demand.
November 6th, 2009 | 12:50 am | #51
“Six months ago Hasan came to the attention of the FBI because of Internet postings that discussed suicide bombings.
After lauding a Muslim U.S. Army soldier who killed comrades in Kuwait in 2003, Hasan wrote in an online posting, “If one suicide bomber can kill 100 enemy soldiers … that would be considered a strategic victory.
Hasan was put on probation early in his postgraduate work at the Uniformed Service University of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, Md. He was disciplined for proselytizing about his Muslim faith with patients and colleagues.”
So the question is: Why the HELL was this guy NOT discharged??!!
There needs to be a full investigation.
Heads need to roll.
And if I were the relative of one of those killed, I would sue the bloody hell out of whatever powers-that-be allowed this guy to remain in the military and even promoted him.
November 6th, 2009 | 1:15 am | #52
This is standard in Germany. Whenever some muslim does something that fits perfectly into his murderous ideology, it has nothing to do with islam. Those are ALWAYS so called “Einzelfälle”, single cases, not connected to anything.
Honor killings, attacks on “infidels”, etc. Not connected to anything. Yep. That’s what we’re told here in Europe all the time.
It’s damn obvious.
He’s a muslim, he shot up US troops. Yes, islam is the case. He fought the infidels like Mohammed orders the muslims to do in this
shittylittle book called koran or quran.And Al Siddiq is doing what can be expected: he’s lying to the infidels, because that’s fine. Lying to infidels is ok as long as it helps islam.
Islam should be banned in all civilized countries.
November 6th, 2009 | 1:50 am | #53
“god protect me from your followers!”
November 6th, 2009 | 1:57 am | #54
++
just a sample:
Obama & Dualism
[Islam is based upon the principles of dualism and submission. However, you don't have to be a Muslim to invoke them. Obama has closely aligned himself with Rev. Wright's "Black Liberation Theology", BLT.
[..]
Since Muslims are the best of people and follow a perfect doctrine, there is no need to even examine Islam, since, ipso facto, it is right. Therefore, all criticism of Islam is hate speech.]
Islam and Black Liberation Theology
[Barack Obama has closely aligned himself with Reverend Jeremiah Wright and Black Liberation Theology (BLT). When viewed from the Christian point-of-view, BLT is a strange creed, but when seen from the standpoint of Islam, there is a very strong parallel.
Islam and BLT are theologies that have a political goal of making all politics submit to their demands. Submission is the political goal.]
The Near Enemy
[We have two sets of enemies. The far enemy is the politics of Islam. The near enemies are the dhimmi apologists, fueled by ignorance and multiculturalism and political correctness.]
Allied menace: Islamists, Marxists, and the radical Left make common cause
A Bloody Misalliance: Radical Islam and Infantile Marxism
[All of which brings us to the other great similarity between Islam and Marxism,� the tendency to induce a crippling level of ideological certainty in their less thoughtful followers. Read an article by a member of Respect or a communique� from Hezbollah and one thing becomes immediately apparent: These people have never doubted anything in their lives. Cocooned in world in which every truth is self-evident and every opponent a troublemaker, they utterly lack the sort of intellectual humility which makes democracy possible. But why? The main source of Islamist dogmatism is probably the perceived status of the Koran. Unlike Christianity, Hinduism or the other world religions, Islam insists that its holy book provides a direct record of the word of God. When Muhammad went into one of his famous trances and a "new Arab scripture [started] pouring from his lips”, or so the argument goes, he was channeling the thoughts of Allah in all their ethical grandeur. Anyone who doubts the Koran�s teachings is therefore guilty of the grossest blasphemy, even if Muhammad himself believed that some of his outpourings were dictated by satanic forces and had to be discarded. By contrast, the most powerful engine of ideological bigotry on the left is what Tony Judt has called Marxism�s “sheer epistemological cheek”. Equipped with an ideology which purports to explain everything from the “transition from ape to man” (Engels) to the events of the present day, it is very difficult for a certain type of person to resist the conclusion that he knows everything there is to know. It hardly needs saying that one of the best-known examples of this personality type is Joseph Stalin.]
The Third Jihad
much more here..
==
November 6th, 2009 | 2:20 am | #55
++
re: bg @ 1:57 am #54
“Obama introduced UN resolution to limit free speech”
[The new resolution, championed by the Obama administration, has a number of disturbing elements. It emphasizes that “the exercise of the right to freedom of expression carries with it special duties and responsibilities . . .” which include taking action against anything meeting the description of “negative racial and religious stereotyping.” It also purports to “recognize . . . the moral and social responsibilities of the media” and supports “the media’s elaboration of voluntary codes of professional ethical conduct” in relation to “combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.”
Pakistan’s Ambassador Zamir Akram, speaking on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, made it clear that they understand the resolution and its protection against religious stereotyping as allowing free speech to be trumped by anything that defames or negatively stereotypes religion. The idea of protecting the human rights “of religions” instead of individuals is a favorite of those countries that do not protect free speech and which use religion–as defined by government–to curtail it.
Even the normally feeble European Union tried to salvage the American capitulation by expressing the hope that the resolution might be read a different way. Speaking on behalf of the EU following the resolution’s adoption, French Ambassador Jean-Baptiste Mattéi declared that “human rights law does not, and should not, protect religions or belief systems, hence the language on stereotyping only applies to stereotyping of individuals . . . and not of ideologies, religions or abstract values. The EU rejects the concept of defamation of religions.” The EU also distanced itself from the American compromise on the media, declaring that “the notion of a moral and social responsibility of the media” goes “well beyond” existing international law and “the EU cannot subscribe to this concept in such general terms.”]
US IslaMarxist President
[“…even under the pressures that you and I know about, the deen of Islam is growing because people see even within all of this struggle it is better to be a Muslim under these conditions than to be a kaffir under any conditions... before Allah closes our eyes for the last time you will see Islam move from being the second largest religion in America-that's where we are now- to being the first religion in America.”]
“”Whatever” we once were, we are no
longer a “Christian” nation”.. B Hussein O
“emphasis” mine, there’s much more, but i digress..
Clinton Takes a Stand Against Islamic Censorhip
[U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton voiced strong opposition Monday to proposed U.N. resolutions on “defamation of religions,” saying that such policies would restrict free speech.
“The United States will always seek to counter negative stereotypes of individuals based on their religion and will stand against discrimination and persecution,” Clinton stated. “But an individual’s ability to practice his or her religion has no bearing on others’ freedom of speech.”
[..]
The resolution adopted this past March by the U.N. Human Rights Council is currently non-binding, but OIC has publicly stated that its goal is for the U.N. to adopt a binding international covenant against the “defamation of religions.” Next month, a similar resolution will be considered for adoption by the General Assembly.]
too little, too late??
==
November 6th, 2009 | 3:18 am | #56
I am so shocked, I thought the muslim world was going to love us when Sheik Obama was elected… Afterall he is a Kenyan Muslim.
November 6th, 2009 | 4:47 am | #57
@ FU*K OBAMA
Kenya wasn’t a country when Obama was born.
He went to the Christian church with that racist preacher, he isn’t a Muslim.
… All the real things to criticize with Obama and THAT is what you go for. Thanks for being useful *rolls eyes*
Also to the person using the Coulter comment, that is basically what they want to do to us! You say crap like that and you are no better than they are in my book.
November 6th, 2009 | 6:08 am | #58
[...] From Waco Trib (link via Gateway Pundit): [...]
November 6th, 2009 | 6:39 am | #59
This may be harsh.. but I feel that its time we deport Muzzies out of the West into their sharia lands..
Please wake up and rise agianst Islam and the
Evil it spreds
November 6th, 2009 | 9:11 am | #60
Let’s be clear about one thing: Attending Rev. Wright’s church and sermons do not identify Barack Obama as a Christian. If anything, it makes it more likely that he is not.
Rev. Wright did/does not preach Christianity, because Black Liberation Theology is not Christianity.
Best regards, Peter Warner.
November 6th, 2009 | 10:15 am | #61
Sort of OT, but it’s sort of ridiculous for people to intone B. Hussein Obama or Hussein Obama to make a point about his Muslim roots when “Barack” – “Barak” is Arabic – the Arabic dialect Swahilified “Baraka.”
“Barack” is from the Arabic, “Hussein” is a common Muslim name and “Obama” is African Luo. The Luo are a Nilotic, (Nile River region – thru Southern Sudan, into Uganda and Kenya) traditionally animist religion culture, but many are Christian converts, while other Luos were enslaved and/or coverted to Islam thru the Arab trade and slaving network that went down thru the Nile to Lake Victoria and up thru Kenya from the coast. Pretty obvious that a number of the Obama family ancestors got tangled up with Arab slavers.
Just clarifying.
November 6th, 2009 | 10:19 am | #62
Popular Swahili proverb:
“Haraka, haraka, haina baraka.”
Means, haste, or “hurry hurry, no peace.”
Our version: “Haste makes waste.”
November 6th, 2009 | 10:49 am | #63
Ladue PunditNo Gravatar
November 5th, 2009 | 9:21 pm | #22
Any Muslim in this country who says vile, hateful or threatening things about this country should be THROWN THE HELL OUT OF THIS COUNTRY!!!!
What is it with Americans anyway? We have some kind of suicide wish, letting these people stay here?
November 6th, 2009 | 4:23 pm | #64
If Muslims don’t want Islam to get a bad rap, then they need to police their own and stop making excuses in public. I’m sure some are doing this- probably we have taken down terrorist plots with the work of brave informants- but don’t ask us to mouth this “religion of peace” crap.
Our ancestors in Europe had no illusions about the “religion of peace.” If they did, they were disabused of them rather quickly- just ask the ghosts of Perchtolsdorf. Several hundred years on, we have secularized and “civilized” ourselves out of a survival instinct.
Everyone involved in jihadist groups should be deported, starting with CAIR. We should severely restrict the immigration visas from Muslim countries except for those given to Christian minorities fleeing the famous tolerance of the “religion of peace.” If Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and the rest cannot offload their problems to Europe or America, they will be forced to face up to radicalism at home.
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact