“I deeply regret the party getting in that kind of mess… She clearly proved in the last few days that she was in no way a loyal Republican.”
…In the last few days?
Newt Gingrich refused to apologize to the nation’s conservatives tonight for backing far left liberal Dede Scozzafava in the NY-23 race and for attacking “misinformed” conservatives and candidate Hoffman:
November 4th, 2009 | 9:50 pm | #1
Newt can kiss my grits. And then take a long walk off a short pier.
November 4th, 2009 | 9:51 pm | #2
Nuck Fewt, he’s a progressive.
November 4th, 2009 | 9:56 pm | #3
Apology is good if Hoffmann won, but he didn’t. So, apology is not needed.
November 4th, 2009 | 10:03 pm | #4
Prior to this debacle, I had a modicum of respect for Newt despite his abysmal performance as a human being (discussing divorce details with wife post cancer surgery who was a replacement wife, herself).
One very good deed, Contract with America, only carries one so far in life. Sorry Newt, you have lost a heck of a lot of supporters over THIS particular choice.
November 4th, 2009 | 10:03 pm | #5
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Flo Johnson, Right. Right said: {gatewaypundit} Newt Gingrich Refuses to Apologize For Supporting Far Left Scozzafava (Video) http://bit.ly/4eqjch [...]
November 4th, 2009 | 10:07 pm | #6
Oh come on….
Let’s cut the guy some slack. He QB-ed the 94 revolution. He took one for the team.
Ok…he screwed up on NY23
He bleeped up on the Pelosi/couch thing too but let’s not throw the guy overboard for some mistakes.
He sort of apologized. He knows he was wrong and said so.
Don’t make the man grovel.
It ain’t the Spanish inquisition.
Sometimes people need a little smack on the rump to get their mind right.
We got a whole year until the 2010 elections.
We can salvage this guy.
November 4th, 2009 | 10:15 pm | #7
Washington DC elitist never apologize.They after all know what is best for us.
November 4th, 2009 | 10:16 pm | #8
Gingrich showed his true colors when the Colin Powell debacle occurred, and lost me. And, then I watched this video about him:
http://bit.ly/1gUwz1
November 4th, 2009 | 10:17 pm | #9
Newt is part of the movement to get the REAL conservatives isolated. John McCain, Graham, to name a few. They all have to be ignored.
November 4th, 2009 | 10:18 pm | #10
I can’t hardly believe this was in the AP!!
.Analysis: Election lessons will shape ‘10 campaign
…..”2006 AND 2008 ARE GONE; REPUBLICANS CAN WIN
The warm and fuzzy feelings voters had for Democrats in back-to-back national elections are history.
George W. Bush as a political punching bag doesn’t work anymore; Democrats tried to use him against Christie and failed.
And now, after riding a wave of change to power, Democrats are the incumbents facing an electorate rich with anti-incumbent sentiment.
Of course, individual candidates matter, too, and in New Jersey and Virginia, Democrats ran candidates whom voters just didn’t seem to like much.
Victories in both states have given Republicans a much-needed morale boost. And the wins proved that Republicans can find success if their candidates gravitate toward the middle and are responsive to the voters’ mood. That approach allowed the GOP to successfully woo independents.
But the defeat in New York’s 23rd Congressional District, after a nasty race in which the GOP-picked candidate dropped out under pressure from conservatives, served as yet another warning sign: The Republicans aren’t out of the woods either. “……
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091105/ap_on_an/us_election_what_we_learned_analysis
November 4th, 2009 | 10:20 pm | #11
Newt’s a RINO. He supported Obama’s speech to school children too.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice…
November 4th, 2009 | 10:22 pm | #12
Gingrich was obviously right for endorsing Dede at the time. Hoffman had virtually no chance of winning at that point. He was a 3rd party candidate and had less than 5% support. And Gingrich didn’t handpick the Republican candidate. The local Republicans did. He merely supported her since he believed a liberal Republican which will agree with you 75% of the time is better than allowing a leftist Democrap to win who will vote against you nearly 100% of the time. It’s pretty simple logic and there’s nothing for him to apologize for honestly. This vile attack on Gingrich is just really shocking and disturbing. It seems a lot of people on the far right are hungry for some good old fashioned witch hunting. Anyone who doesn’t agree with us 100% of the time must burn! While that might work in the fairy tale world of blogs and talk radio it won’t work too well in the real world since most people are right leaning moderates. And besides, Hoffman didn’t win and there’s no ignoring that simple fact despite how much everyone here seems to want to change reality. And that “inconvienent truth” of course vindicated the decision of Gingrich to go with the sure bet over a risky last minute newbie. It’s as if we on the right have quickly forgotten what Gingrich has done for the cause of conservativism. He was the main architect for creating the first Republican majority in congress in about 40 years which stopped horribly destructive liberalism in its tracks. So if anyone has any weight of authority on how to win elections and create an effective right wing conservative movement it’s Gingrich. Yet just because he made a pretty sensible endorsement you’re all willing to chop his political head off and spit on his dead decaying corpse? Really? And Gingrich is probably one of our best bets for reclaiming the White House in 2012. Please don’t ruin it with these idiotic purges.
http://newt.org/tabid/102/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/4634/A-Good-Day-for-the-American-People.aspx
November 4th, 2009 | 10:29 pm | #13
He didn’t HAVE to endorse anyone in that election. He chose to do so and got egg on his face. For me that was 3 strikes and he’s OUT of my consideration for anything.
November 4th, 2009 | 10:37 pm | #14
Blackwater, Scozzafava is no Republican. She favors ANOTHER stimulus package, Obamacare, Cap and Tax… What 75% are you talking about that could possibly have any relevance? If it smells like a liberal and walks like a liberal, it’s not a real Republican. How could Gingrich continue to endorse her knowing that?!?
You probably thought McCain was “one of our best bets” too, right? And Colin Powell too? It’s time to clean house! There’s too much at stake for us to go all soft and mushy because of what they’ve done in the past.
November 4th, 2009 | 10:43 pm | #15
Too busy listening to pollsters instead of voters. Well-designed polls have their uses, but too many pollsters are becoming like commodity traders fascinated with their magic formulas.
November 4th, 2009 | 11:11 pm | #16
Newt screwed up, he realizes it. Time to let this one go and move on.
-Cnation
November 4th, 2009 | 11:38 pm | #17
what bothered me more was that Hannity ‘bent over backwards’ to cover for Newt when Newt’s position was challenged by M. Malkin…Sean-are you ‘worried’ that Newt will not appear on your show…
Newt- GO AWAY!!!
C-CS
November 4th, 2009 | 11:46 pm | #18
++
Newt??
isn’t that some of kind of amphibian that
lives off of pond scum, bugs, and brine??
==
November 4th, 2009 | 11:47 pm | #19
++
bg @ 11:46 pm#18
sarc!! :D
==
November 4th, 2009 | 11:52 pm | #20
“He merely supported her since he believed a liberal Republican which will agree with you 75% of the time is better than allowing a leftist Democrap to win who will vote against you nearly 100% of the time.”
Owens is more conservative than Scozzafava ‘the snake’ is. That is in and of itself frightening. Did she not have a conservative score of 12 compared to McCain’s 65? And didn’t Obama have a 10? Think of it this way, do you think the Democrats would run someone with a liberal score of 12 (which means 88 conservative)? I don’t think I need to answer that one.
Also, having a democrat, even a liberal one in is better than a RINO as in that person can’t be used as a tool by the left to show that this is the ‘true’ Republican party and at the same time, allow them to ‘intervene’ in the so-called civil war. Let the Dems in, they show everyone how they fail in only 1 year, however it takes conservatives about 10 years to forget they are conservative (i.e., Newt).
November 5th, 2009 | 5:45 am | #21
Newt and the others that “endorsed” Dede did nothing in the way of vetting her – it was a “blanck check” to just endorse her because she has an (R) next to her name…kind of like what the MSM did to Barry O…
Memo to Mike, Newt and others – read up on the local candidate before you endorse (and throw money) at them…you go nothing in return for your dive into the local GOP pond, did you…
November 5th, 2009 | 6:23 am | #22
Newt used to be my hero before he became the Wizard of Oz character (scarecrow). Colin Powell, global warming, and now the Scozzafava endorsement, there is too much there to trust him anymore.
November 5th, 2009 | 7:01 am | #23
Rino Rino Rino
The republican leadership needs to be tared and feathered then run out of this country. There is no difference between Newt, Bush, Pelosi or Chairman O. Conservatives have to act now to take our country back and then we need a new McCarthy investigation to remove the communists among us!
bg, loved your comment. Newt even looks like a scum eater.
November 5th, 2009 | 7:37 am | #24
Blackwater: please use paragraphs. Your comment is impossible to read.
As for what I think you were saying:
Scozzafava would not have voted with the House Republicans “75% of the time”. She is a bona fide liberal, and would have voted accordingly.
(Did you not take a hint when she endorsed the Democrat after she dropped out?)
She stated that she would caucus with the Republicans for 2010 – but refused to commit to doing so thereafter. This woman was a Trojan horse candidate, who – without any doubt whatsoever – would have switched parties at some point, once elected.
As for Neutered Gingrich: take another hint. His political career as an elected Republican is finished.
November 5th, 2009 | 7:40 am | #25
See, Newt, this is why you are not a conservative leader or very smart. You endorsed a candidate without checking her conservative cred, you endorsed her simply because she had an “R” after her name. Forget about being POTUS because you are not smart enough. Say hi to nancy on that big comfy climate change sofa, you moron.
November 5th, 2009 | 7:41 am | #26
Newt = Very.Over.
That said, I understand there’s a future national bus tour opportunity with Newt and Meghan McCain. Like minds, Meghan’s into those kind, crossing-the-center moderates* (one who acts like a hard-core leftist except for when it comes to taxing the holy crap out of the elite upper class, to which one should then and only then act like a “conservative”).
And Newt’s shown he’s into the joys of exploring nontraditional relationships. Monogamy is so much the stuff of extreme right-wing haters! And let’s be fair for the younger folk who didn’t actually live thru the ‘96 “revolution,” it was as much of a revolution as the old persons home serving a raspberry jello mold instead of the traditional lime. After a couple of tactical efforts mostly done to stick it to Clinton, they were back in full fat-cat Republican mode spending the crap out of our money for their special interests.
November 5th, 2009 | 8:00 am | #27
Do we really think Newt’s endorsement of global warming and the goofy commercial with Nancy was a mistake. I think it was a deliberate act to further his political and get votes should he decide to run for POTUS. Newt has a really questionable background with NWO people and should of been vetted throughly including Michael Steele. With all the really good men why these questionables.
The GOP, RNC won’t get my membership this year. McCain, Romney, Steele (to name a few)just about sealed their fate with me. Shows very poor and desperate judgement.
But heck, I’m just one person.
And I don’t support Ron Paul either.
November 5th, 2009 | 8:11 am | #28
Newt’s problem is that he still thinks that reliance upon the chart-man/focus-group approach to politics … i.e. paying more attention to the numbers and nuances of a model for human behavior in order to “assure” Republican control, instead of focusing upon the promotion/implementation of the fundamentals of sound principle within real life in order to assure conservative governance … is sufficient for this nation to remain free and prosperous.
This is especially troubling, as he apparently knows the value of conservative governance.
He is a creature of the misplaced priorities within the Beltway … as I discerned eleven years ago, when I left the GOP and became an independent when he and Trent Lott pushed for military spending that would benefit their districts … while Congress was holding hearings about soldiers qualifying for food stamps.
He says a lot of the right things … but falls short when it comes to implementing them.
Especially now.
Newt, the old political paradigm IS the problem today … it is no longer (D) vs. (R), but (US) vs. (DIM), and you are acting like one of the (DIM) right now.
Better to elect a Blue Dog — and leave a true conservative as the frontrunner for the GOP in NY-23 for 2010 — than to score another (R) right now.
November 5th, 2009 | 8:16 am | #29
I can’t take this guy seriously. I can’t.
Newt. LMAO! Always reminds me Monty Pythons and the Holy Grail.
Someone get a duck…
November 5th, 2009 | 8:16 am | #30
Forgot an “of” there. Whoops.
November 5th, 2009 | 8:36 am | #31
Newt’s days were numbered a long time ago and now he is fading fast.
November 5th, 2009 | 9:34 am | #32
[...] reading: Gateway Pundit: Newt Gingrich Refuses to Apologize For Supporting Far Left Scozzafava (Video) and Obama Not Watching the Results Tonight and Sarah Palin Slams Biden After His Ridiculous Attack [...]
November 5th, 2009 | 10:22 am | #33
He’s just selling a book.
He’s also a RHINO.
He’s damaged goods and should just go away.
November 5th, 2009 | 11:40 am | #34
Newt Gingrich.
Another Andrew Sullivan Conservative.
Why in God’s name to we listen to either one of them?
November 5th, 2009 | 11:55 am | #35
++
YOU LIE!!
==
November 5th, 2009 | 12:07 pm | #36
++
crystal @ 10:18 pm #10
re: [Victories in both states have given Republicans a much-needed morale boost. And the wins proved that Republicans can find success if their candidates gravitate toward the middle and are responsive to the voters’ mood. That approach allowed the GOP to successfully woo independents.]
need to correct that, the OPPOSITE is true..
“Conservatives” won most of the
elections in their local districts..
(i suppose a half truth from the AP is better
than their usual outright lies by omission..)
==
November 5th, 2009 | 12:30 pm | #37
Quoted from and Linked to at:
WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO ABOUT POP…ER…NEWT?
November 5th, 2009 | 2:08 pm | #38
I hope this episode marks the end of Republican backsliding. Who the Fewt needs two (or 1-1/2) progressive political parties? The GOP had better start listening to the the base or it’s only a matter of an elephant-walk to the elephant graveyard. Are you listening, Michael Steele? It is awe-some to watch a political party self-destruct.
November 5th, 2009 | 7:58 pm | #39
And the attempts by the radical right to destroy the Republican Party continues. Gingrich not a conservative? ROFL You people are INSANE. Go make your own unelectable 3rd party and get the hell out of ours. You crazy morons lost us the election in New York and we will NOT let you idiots do that again.
Gingrich for President in 2012!
November 6th, 2009 | 3:24 am | #40
++
Jennifer @ 7:58 pm #39
the laughs
are on you..
==
November 6th, 2009 | 4:20 pm | #41
How long are Jim Hoft and his cronies, going to beat this dead horse?
Do they ever have anything positive to say, about anyone? Or any issue?
Nothing but negativity aimed in all directions, 24/7.
This is not the kind of third-party I want to support.
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact