Gateway Pundit
MEMBER LOGIN




Search First Things

Advanced Search

RSS



Favorite American Blogs

Ace of Spades
Althouse
Amy Procter
Andrew Marcus
Another Rovian Conspiracy
Astute Bloggers
Atlas Shrugs
Austin Bay
Bare Naked Islam
Barking Moonbats
Barone Blog
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
Black and Right
Blogs For Victory
Blog Prof
Blue Crab Boulevard
Byrd Droppings
California Conservative
Carol Platt Liebau
Chicago Boyz
Cold Fury
Commoner Sense
Confederate Yankee
Conservative Thoughts
Da Mihi Animas
Dean's World
Debbie Schlussel
Democracy Project
Dinocrat
Discarded Lies
Don Surber
Doug Ross
Dr. Helen
Dr. Sanity
Ed Driscoll
Elephant Bar
Fausta's Blog
Flopping Aces
Founding Bloggers
FOX Nation
Free Republic
Gates of Vienna
Gay Patriot
Gina Cobb
GOP Bloggers
GOP Vixen
Grand Old Partisan
Grouchy Old Cripple
HotAir
HotAirPundit
Hugh Hewitt
I Own the World
IMAO
INDC
Infidels Are Cool
Insta-Backup
Instapundit
Irish Pennants
Jammie Wearing Fool
Jules Crittenden
Just One Minute
La Shawn Barber
Legal Insurrection
Let Freedom Ring
Lucianne
Macsmind
Maggie's Farm
Mark Steyn
Michelle Malkin
New England Republican
New Underground Railroad
News Busters
No-Liberal Spin
Noisy Room
Outside the Beltway
Pat Dollard
Patterico
PoliPundit
Power Line
Prairie Pundit
Protein Wisdom
Rantburg
Reaganite Republican
Red State
Riehl World View
Right Wing News
Right Wing Nuthouse
Roger L. Simon
Say Anything
Scared Monkeys
Sister Toldjah
Sound Politics
Strata Sphere
Sweetness & Light
Tammy Bruce
Texas Rainmaker
The Anchoress
The Autonomist
The Corner
The Futurist
The Jawa Report
The Other McCain
The Return of Scipio
TigerHawk
Tom Delay
Urgent Agenda
Verum Serum
Viking Pundit
Volokh Conspiracy
WILLisms
Wizbang!
Zombietime

Blog Ads


Favorite International Blogs


Democracy &
Human Rights


Favorite Military & Foreign Service Blogs


Favorite Media

Pajamas Media
HotAir
Power Line News
Drudge Report
Breitbart.com
Big Hollywood
Big Government
FOX Nation
Rush Limbaugh
Laura Ingraham
Mark Levin
Neal Boortz
Real Clear Politics
American Thinker
American Spectator
National Review
Weekly Standard
Commentary Magazine
IBD Editorials
SLATE- Kaus Files
Front Page Magazine
Human Events
NewsMax
World Net Daily
Town Hall
The Hill
Ashbrook Center
Media Research Organization
GOP.com
GOP.gov
GOP.gov -House
GOP Senators.com
Cybercast News Service
C-SPAN
Radio Free Europe-Radio Liberty
The White House
US State Department
US Senate
US House of Representatives
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Treasury Department
Defend America
US Central Command
Pentagon Channel
FOX News
Politico
New York Times
Reuters
World Picture News
BBC News
EUX TV News (Europe)
Arutz Sheva- Israel News
Haaretz Daily
IMRA- Independent Media
Jerusalem Post
YNET News
Debka File
Laura Mansfield
Terrorism Research Center
ADN Kronos (Italy)
Internet Haganah
Irin News- UN
War & Peace Reporting
Charter '97- Belarus
All Africa
Sudan Tribune
Arab World News
Aljazeera
Al Arabiya
Asharq Alawsat
Gulf Times
Turkish Daily News
Kurdish Media
Voices of Iraq
Alsumaria (Iraq)
Bahrain Tribune
Maan News (Palestine)
Naharnet
Ya Libnan
Iran Focus
Planet Iran
Iran Press News
Mehr News
Tehran Times
Islamic Republic News
Fars News (Iran)
Afgha-nistan
Hindustan Times
Tribune India
Inside Asia
Japan Today
China Daily
Sound of Hope Radio
Asian Tribune
Korea Times
Dawn (Pakistan)
Daily Times
Pakistani Newspaper
Interfax
Itar-Tass
Pravda
Russian News
Russia Today
Russian News Online
Ferghana
The Australian
El Universal (Venezuela)
Watching America
Babel Fish

Favorites from
Gateway City & Area


Great Websites


Contributors


Email GP


Sitemeter



« « Previous  |Home|  Next » »         

Monday, November 23, 2009, 5:33 AM
Jim Hoft

Speaker Pelosi won’t answer if Osama Bin Laden has to be read his rights when he is arrested.
CNS News reported:

Related… 9-11 terrorists look forward to their show trials in New York City and will use the occasion to air their grievances about US foreign policy.

22 Comments

    AnnNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 8:27 am | #1

    Someone needs to direct this question to Secretary Gates. Is the military being instructed to read captured combatants their rights? It could easily be asked of deployed and returning members of the military as well–if you want an actual answer to the question.

    Tweets that mention Gateway Pundit -- Topsy.com
    November 23rd, 2009 | 8:34 am | #2

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by steve, Paul Alyunov. Paul Alyunov said: Pelosi Won’t Answer If Osama Needs to be Read His Rights At “Arrest” (Video): Speaker Pelosi .. http://bit.ly/5X4Rav [...]

    LimoLibsStinkNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 8:34 am | #3

    Pelosi:

    [Blink… Blink…Blink]

    My husband is a lawyer. He is better equipped to answer that question. Why don’t you ask him?

    My limousine is running and I have an appointment at the Botox clinic. No! The Botox has not gotten to my brain. I cannot answer any more questions. I am confused. I have to go.

    [Blink… Blink …Blink…Blink…Blink…]

    MikeNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 8:43 am | #4

    She would have trouble with a lot of questions like:

    What were the Framers’ intentions in establishing a separation of powers?

    What is the square root of 16?

    What’s a verb?

    howdareyouaskformynameNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 8:55 am | #5

    On another note this also shows just how stupid the jihadis are and how little they understand the civilized world. KSM has been given a chance to muck up the works of our judicial system in ways that Ginsberg and her ilk can only dream of. There is no way to get a conviction where every rule of evidence gathering and every civil right protection has been violated. War and law enforcement are not the same thing and it would be a poor lawyer indeed who could not get this case thrown out.

    KSM would also miss a huge opportunity to reveal our sources and methods and drive a wedge between us and our allies. The damage that can be done is limited only by the imagination and when it comes to law the leftists have very fertile imaginations indeed.

    Instead he wants to rant about his insane belief that all women should wear sacks over their head and how we should all be forced to make pilgrimages to see a rock. Yeah, that will work.

    Dan FNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 8:57 am | #6

    Let us hope that our men and women in the field deliver OLB the Coupe De Grace on some rocky hillside to spare us the spectacle that dragging him to the USA would cause.

    BurmaShaveNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 9:35 am | #7

    OK, next question: Speaker Pelosi, did the CIA lie to you about waterboarding?

    OK, next next question: Speaker Pelosi, Why are you standing in front of all of those American flags? Don’t they stand for a lot of things other than what you stand for?

    Jayne on the left coastNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 9:49 am | #8

    This is a good reason not to take prisoners, or not let the media know you have. Get what info they have,anyway you can, than execute. Will I burn in Hell for thinking this?

    Confirmed: NYC Show Trial Will Be Platform For Terrorist Propaganda « Nice Deb
    November 23rd, 2009 | 9:59 am | #9

    [...] Pelosi Won’t Answer If Osama Needs to be Read His Rights At “Arrest” (Video) Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views – AP‘Show Trial’ Gives Jihadists A Platform Posted in Deesgusting, Dems, Dumb!, GWOT, Obamessiah. Leave a Comment » [...]

    USMC ThomasNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 10:13 am | #10

    By allowing a civil trial in NYC for these terrorist’s and giving them a platform to espouse their belief’s to the world, SOBama will do more to advance radical Islam than if he revealed his deception and admitted he’s still a Muslim.
    Consider the circus the Muslim Brotherhood created in Egypt at their trial and there the jailer’s had no restraints against physical punishment of unruly prisoners.
    In the words of loudmouth T. O. Owens, “Get your popcorn ready.”

    Melvin WinterNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 10:48 am | #11

    After Granting Terrorists Miranda Rights, Obama Authorizes Use of Lawyers to Act as Terrorists’ Human Shields: http://optoons.blogspot.com/2009/06/after-granting-terrorists-miranda.html

    wanumbaNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 10:53 am | #12

    USMC Thomas
    November 23rd, 2009 | 10:13 am | #10
    Consider the circus the Muslim Brotherhood created in Egypt at their trial and there the jailer’s had no restraints against physical punishment of unruly prisoners.
    …………….
    Excellent reminder. Cages to hold spitting, shouting, ranting defendents in the courtroom.

    SandyNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 10:57 am | #13

    OK, next next question: Speaker Pelosi, Why are you standing in front of all of those American flags? Don’t they stand for a lot of things other than what you stand for?BurmaShave

    The more Unamerican Pelosi acts — the more flags she stands in front of. A couple of weeks ago a reporter asked her if putting Americans in Prison for not buying Healthcare was constititutional, she laughed. SAYS IT ALL!!!

    anonNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 11:30 am | #14

    - Discovery
    - No Miranda rights
    - Putting Cheney and Bush on the stand

    I’m wondering if Obama is using this to perhaps move forward with prosecuting Bush and Cheney. Funny thing is, if Obama prosecutes Bush and Cheney he will be opening himself up to prosecution because of all of the negligent mistakes (Afghanistan, anybody?) he has made.

    Blacque Jacques ShellacqueNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 11:33 am | #15

    KSM would also miss a huge opportunity to reveal our sources and methods and drive a wedge between us and our allies.

    Not to worry, his lawyers will probably take care of that little problem.

    SolaratovNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 11:34 am | #16

    Jayne on the left coast
    November 23rd, 2009 | 9:49 am | #8

    As I’ve said before, one has only to look at the number of kia terrorists vs captured before our troops were told that they had to advise them of their rights (and the scotus ruled that terrs have the right of habeus corpus) compared to the number kia vs captured now.

    The scoutus (and potus) seem to have overlooked the “Law of Unintended Consequences”.

    JoanneNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 1:25 pm | #17

    Pelosi doesn’t answer because she knows her answer, which will be that Osama bin Laden will be read is rights, will not go over well with the American people, and she bloody well knows it. I think it is about time the traitor Pelosi is read her rights.

    JoanneNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 1:27 pm | #18

    I swear, I need to get back on caffeine….

    “….Osama bin Laden will be read ‘his’ rights,…”

    KathyNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 5:46 pm | #19

    I pray for the day that Pelsoi is read her Miranda rights.

    PaulNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 9:32 pm | #20

    Another brilliant response from the Botox whore. Look at her eyes when she speaks – there are several screws missing in that woman’s brain.

    Chris VehrNo Gravatar
    November 23rd, 2009 | 9:47 pm | #21

    She doesn’t have a brain!!!!

    More Confirmation KSM Trial Is About Trying The U.S. « Tai-Chi Policy
    November 24th, 2009 | 8:10 am | #22

    [...] Pelosi refuses to say that we don’t have to read Osama bin Laden his rights when we find him. [...]

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact