Sarah Palin blasts Barack Obama as “incorrect and disingenuous” on the death panel legislation included in the democrat’s nationalized health care legislation.
The Orlando Sentinel reported, via Free Republic:
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin turns more political in her interview with ABC’s Barbara Walters.
Their chat starts on Tuesday’s “Good Morning America.” Palin’s first interview to promote her book, “Going Rogue,” aired today on “The Oprah Winfrey Show.”
Palin has blasted President Barack Obama’s push for health-care reform by saying the changes would open decisions on the elderly and disabled to “death panels.” Obama has blasted that criticism as “a lie, plain and simple.”
Palin notes that the words “death panels” are not found “in any of those thousands of pages of different variations of the health-care bill.” Yet Palin adds that the president is “incorrect, and he is disingenuous.”
The woman who was John McCain’s running mate last year hails the tea party movement. She says that the McCain campaign was wrong to support the first bailout package.
“That very first bailout, yes. Now we have learned, too, it didn’t fulfill the promises that were made by Congress, and by the White House, that bailing out these businesses that were ‘too big to fail,’ ” Palin said. “That did not put our economy back on the right track. So we learn from our mistakes. The tea party movement, beautiful. It energizes our country. More power to these people who are showing up there.”
Oh no. Barack Obama won’t sleep for a week.
November 16th, 2009 | 7:48 pm | #1
Bozo Spews Hatred.
November 16th, 2009 | 8:05 pm | #2
Obama’s constant campaign mode has its dangers. It invites attack and ultimately makes him look petty and thin-skinned. Not an admirable quality in a leader.
November 16th, 2009 | 8:25 pm | #3
I hope he goes to sleep and NEVER wakes up! Better yet I hope he never comes back to America! Take him to his home country Kenya and drop him off! Hes a louzy fraud of a president!
November 16th, 2009 | 8:56 pm | #4
Go Sarah Go!
November 16th, 2009 | 9:03 pm | #5
In case you’re interested. O’Reilly will be interviewing Sarah on the Factor this week. Said he read the book and liked it. She didn’t whine, like some are trying to infer, but presented her side of the story… to which she was entitled.
November 16th, 2009 | 9:05 pm | #6
She was too kind and too politik to add – dangerous, seditious, treasonous, American hating, Communist, Alinskyite, terrorist loving (Ayers/Dohrn), Leninist, Maoist (but, certinaly not Trotskyite). Mooslim and uh, “Progressive.”
She was.
But I’m not.
Go, Mrs. Palin, go!
November 16th, 2009 | 9:07 pm | #7
NOTICE: CLEANUP – COMMENT #22, in the “Che-Supporting Commie Goons Beat Tea Party Protesters In Florida (AMAZING Video)” thread.
Someone has posted personal info for who knows what reason. Addresses, names, phone #s.
November 16th, 2009 | 9:09 pm | #8
Mobys on conservative sites are increasing their numbers. Anyone else notice this?
November 16th, 2009 | 9:13 pm | #9
Shouldn’t that handle be “taqiyya?”
From the always unreliable Wiki group – The word “al-Taqiyya” literally means: “Concealing or disguising one’s beliefs, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions, and/or strategies at a time of imminent danger, whether now or later in time, to save oneself from physical and/or mental injury.” A one-word translation would be “dissimulation.”
They don’t add that “al-taqiyaa” is always approved when dealing with infidels.
November 16th, 2009 | 9:20 pm | #10
Why is anyone specifically the MSM surprised at Obama. He has no experience at anything.
This is what you expect of a complete loser empty suit.
November 16th, 2009 | 9:29 pm | #11
Indeed, Gus, when you look at his so-called political “career” you find that the reason he can’t write or move legislation is that he has, literally, no experience in the endeavor.
One reason perhaps is that he has had little practice. He served as a legislator for a dozen years before becoming president, but was only rarely an active one. He spent one of his eight years as an Illinois state senator running unsuccessfully for Congress and two of them running successfully for U.S. senator. He spent two of his years in the U.S. Senate running for president. During all of his seven non-campaign years as a legislator, he was in the minority party.
No wonder he’s outsourced all his legislative actions to the idiots Pelosi & Harry (the Hollow) Reid.
The guy ain’t done nothing, never.
“He brings disaster upon his nation who never sows a seed, or lays a brick, or weaves a garment, but makes politics his occupation.”
Kahil Gibran
The guy ain’t so much as run a lemonade stand.
November 16th, 2009 | 9:37 pm | #12
I know, Harry. I’m quite well acquainted with taqiyya, and I can spot it from a mile away. Hence the name. I abbreviate it sometimes.
Muslims don’t try that obfuscatory Koran-inspired, satanic “outwitting” with me vis a vis Islam. Not more than once, anyway.
I’ve been posting with this nic at various sites since ‘04 or so.
November 16th, 2009 | 9:41 pm | #13
See my comment here, from earlier today, for example:
http://www.longwarjournal.org/cgi-bin/mt-comments.r991.cgi?entry_id=23407
Responding to a well-used taqiyya card, by either a Mohammadan or a lefty tool.
November 16th, 2009 | 9:41 pm | #14
Never mind. Link is gone.
November 16th, 2009 | 9:44 pm | #15
It’s on this thread at LWJ.
http://tinyurl.com/yjelba8
November 16th, 2009 | 9:44 pm | #16
Taqiyyotomist
Inshallah!
I wasn’rt meaning to be critical – just trying to get the real meaning out to those that might not know how just how perfidious and mendacious our President is. In the spirit of “know thine enemy” donchaknow.
To do so we should understand his lexicon – asalaam aleikoum.
November 16th, 2009 | 10:03 pm | #17
“To do so we should understand his lexicon.”
President T.Jefferson knew this, too. It’s why he had a Koran. Once he understood their lexicon, he understood that we needed to defeat them, and off to Tripoli for the newly-minted USN.
They’ve not changed since then, except that the world has in relation to their neverending Jihad. Now the world is mostly okay with it. Tolerance, doncha know.
November 16th, 2009 | 10:10 pm | #18
Sarah isn’t my first or third choice for President but she is going to pull whoever the nominee is to the right and that’s a good thing. With her in the conversation, conservatives won’t be ignored by the GOP and we won’t end up with Newt, Huck, Pawlenty and probably not even Romneycare.
I’d love to see Jim DeMint, Bobby Jindal or Michelle Bachmann give it a go.
November 16th, 2009 | 10:13 pm | #19
Sarah Palin’s ability to provoke the Left into displaying its inner ugliness alone makes her a national treasure.
November 16th, 2009 | 10:24 pm | #20
Sarah Palin to Obama, you lie, to paraphrase of course.
November 16th, 2009 | 10:36 pm | #21
We will not get the candidate we want as conservatives until we have closed primaries.
November 16th, 2009 | 10:41 pm | #22
UncleZeb, you’re precisely correct! The next action for the GOP should be to get each state to have closed primaries, to prevent the goons from forcing a bad candidate to be OUR candidate in the general election! (I hope Steele and the GOP are thinking as clearly as Uncle Zeb!!)
.
November 16th, 2009 | 10:44 pm | #23
Craig @ November 16th, 2009 | 10:10 pm | #18
I kind of think that is her intent. Sometimes influence is a better agent of change than being hemmed in by holding an official office.
November 16th, 2009 | 11:15 pm | #24
The punditocracy can’t predict Palin because she shares neither their perspective nor their assumptions.
November 16th, 2009 | 11:28 pm | #25
I’ll admit I’m a Palin fan. I watched her today on Oprah (a real sacrifice for me since I don’t like nor trust the “queen”) and I thought Palin was her own person. The McCain idiots may have done the country a favor by mishandling her. I got the feeling today that after that experience NOBODY and I mean NOBODY will tell Sarah what to say or do!!
GO SARAH.
November 16th, 2009 | 11:41 pm | #26
I liked the Oprah interview, although Oprah was kind of redundant and a little intrusive in the questioning, but I like this fighting side of her better.
November 16th, 2009 | 11:52 pm | #27
calling out Obama is a huge service to the country, we need the truth spoken plainly.
i don’t think she can win in 2012, but if she can articulate a vision for conservatives and Republicans to rally around, it would be awesome
November 17th, 2009 | 12:11 am | #28
No one can win but Sarah Pirahna. Ask the Indy’s and the ex Dems who are unafilliated. If no Sarah to vote for then they sit it out. And Steele is an obama lover. He’s a plant. Better get rid of him before you have to suffer another term with obow wow and Hillary the baby killer in office.
November 17th, 2009 | 12:47 am | #29
Oprah “interviewing” Mrs. Palin was like Cardinal Bellarmine “interviewing” Galileo.
The likeness being Bellarmine’s bibical pre-Copernican beliefs and Oprah’s 9/10/01 beliefs.
Both inquistors grasp of the subject (like their ostensibly infallible mentors) was way, wa-a-a-y, way “beyond their pay grades.”
November 17th, 2009 | 1:26 am | #30
Pray for Obama – Psalms 109:8.
The first installment of TARP and the AIG bailout – which came in around $350 billion altogether – was necessary to avoid a complete meltdown of the financial system. It was not sound policy, but it did have to be done: the “cure” of letting the system sort itself out was far worse than the disease of a couple hundred billion of taxpayer money being used to cover private transactions.
BUT ~ the crisis was in no way a failure of the free market, but was wholly caused by the federal government’s expansion of the mortgage market to include, well, people who didn’t deserve loans based on their credit histories. Their implicit guarantees meant these loans were folded into the packages of mortgages in the secondary market, and when it came a-cropper no one could place a definite value upon these instruments, which tanked their market value.
More feds: the “mark to market” rule meant that assets worth billions – in AIG’s case, TRILLIONS – would suddenly be evaluated at near ZERO.
That is an emergency. The real problem is that after the first half of the TARP essentially solved the emergency as intended, Obama got in and spent the rest on his cronies, and wasted even more with the bogus “stimulus” plan (something like 1% of which has gone to roads and bridges, great “investment in our infrastructure,” Barry, you Bozo).
November 17th, 2009 | 4:57 am | #31
Orlando Sentinel: “Palin notes that the words
‘death panels’ are not found in any of those thousands of pages of different variations of the health-care bill.”
Really? Gee. Thanks for clearing that up OS.
November 17th, 2009 | 5:45 am | #32
Sarah Palin is right!
November 17th, 2009 | 8:36 am | #33
[...] Oprah wanted the Jerry Springer interview, Gateway reports Walters gives Palin her political opening. “Obama is incorrect and [...]
November 17th, 2009 | 11:01 am | #34
I saw just a few seconds of this interview on Fox – Baba wawa really had a hatefull look on her face. Looked like a great segment for O’Reilly’s body language expert to talk about. heh heh …
November 17th, 2009 | 11:36 am | #35
“I hope he goes to sleep and NEVER wakes up!”
My sentiments exactly. This man is pure evil. I love this woman, she is quintessential America!
November 17th, 2009 | 10:17 pm | #36
I’d love to see Jim DeMint, Bobby Jindal or Michelle Bachmann give it a go.
Why do you think these people are more qualified than Palin or even able to win an election for president? Regardless of the dem polls, Palin drew huge crowds at her ralleys and incited 47 million people to vote for McCain. I would have voted for him anyway because the alternative, as we see, was so awful, but with Palin on the ticket I voted much more enthusiasically.
November 17th, 2009 | 10:21 pm | #37
We will not get the candidate we want as conservatives until we have closed primaries.
And make it a rule that a voter cannot change his party affiliation less than a month before a primary. Or at least he cannot vote in the primary if he does so. That was the trouble largely. The dems changed to republican for the primary and back again to dem for the election. We did the same thing but two wrongs do not make a right.
November 17th, 2009 | 10:54 pm | #38
“Disingenuous”?
How about “counterfactual”?
Or maybe just “He Lies.”
John 8:44
…not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar …
November 17th, 2009 | 11:21 pm | #39
[...] of Senator Lieberman’s home?Palin: ‘I will forever question’ Rev. Wright strategySarah Palin to Barbara Walters: Barack Obama Is “Incorrect & Disingenuous”Sarah Palin Goes Rogue– Slams Newsweek For Their Sexist Hit PieceBernie Goldberg On O’Reilly: [...]
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact