9-11 terrorist attorney Scott Fenstermaker said that the 9-11 terrorists will put the US foreign policy on trial. He refused to say that innocent civilians were murdered on September 11th by the Al-Qaeda killers. He also said he will be pleased if the terrorists are released and the rule of law is followed.
Bill O’Reilly let him have it:
Dick Cheney said today that Eric Holder wants a show trial for Khalid Sheikh Mohammad.
It looks like he’ll get one.
November 23rd, 2009 | 8:55 pm | #1
This guy was without morals of any kind. A complete disgrace of a human being and a waste to society. He’d probably sell family members into slavery if it got him money or fame. Heck he’d undoubtedly have raced to defend Nazi war criminals denying the Holocaust had he been alive back in the 40s.
November 23rd, 2009 | 8:59 pm | #2
Video not available …
November 23rd, 2009 | 9:01 pm | #3
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Right, Paul Alyunov. Paul Alyunov said: Terrorist Attorney Won’t Admit Innocent Americans Were Murdered – Says 9-11 Killers Will Put US For.. http://bit.ly/5fSBDa [...]
November 23rd, 2009 | 9:12 pm | #4
“This guy was without morals of any kind. A complete disgrace of a human being and a waste to society.”
IOW, a lawyer.
November 23rd, 2009 | 9:19 pm | #5
The lawyer would be remiss if he said anything else. There is a trial, after all, and the burden of proof is on the United States.
Such is the absurdity Obama has foisted on our courts.
November 23rd, 2009 | 9:22 pm | #6
Khalid Sheikh Mohammad’s attorney:
Mr. David Nevin Esq. – Certified for (among many venues) The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and The US Supreme Court.
Mr. Nevin is the founding partner of Nevin Benjamin, McKay & Bartlett, LLP, Boise Idaho.
http://www.nbmlaw.com
November 23rd, 2009 | 9:33 pm | #7
“We are not fighting so that you will offer us something,” said Hussein Massawi, a former leader of Hezbollah. “We are fighting to eliminate you.”
As Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg (a liberal’s liberal) wrote in a case involving protecting the U.S. from “enemies foreign and domestic”, “the Constitution is not a suicide pact.”
November 23rd, 2009 | 9:39 pm | #8
Methinks that Holder wants to ask Mohammad out on a date, so he is hoping he get acquitted.
November 23rd, 2009 | 9:44 pm | #9
It isn’t the lawyers fault.Everyone including KSM has a right to an attorney and legal council.More so now that Obama has pushed this into the Civilian courts.I certainly hope that this guy does everything he can do to defend his client as opposed to the Obama brand of justice with his guarantee of a conviction and execution.Let the chips fall where they may.
November 23rd, 2009 | 9:45 pm | #10
Spencer @ Jihad Watch is reporting that these scum, our ENEMIES, will have a year to “sift through” our government documents and make their case.
Let the enemy in, show them around the place, and ask them to turn off the lights when they’re finished.
Locked and loaded in Ladue, Missouri.
……………………………………..
November 23rd, 2009 | 9:51 pm | #11
So, is there any question at all about the sympathies of Obama and his administration? How long will it be before he apologizes to Osama and calls him a freedom fighter?
And when we are attacked again, how many minutes/ days/ hours before Obama surrenders to Islam?
November 23rd, 2009 | 9:53 pm | #12
Theyarecorrupt – “Everyone including KSM has a right to an attorney and legal council.”
Really? “Everyone?” Has that right?
These jihadis, under the most liberal interpretation of Geneva, qualify for no more than a military tribunal and a swift execution.
No more than KSM originally asked for – until Obama & Holder gave him the keys to NYC.
The only thing a lawyer won’t question is the legitimacy of his mother.
November 23rd, 2009 | 9:54 pm | #13
Theyarecorrupt
November 23rd, 2009 | 9:44 pm | #9
It isn’t the lawyers fault.
———————————————————
KSM does not have the right to a civilian trial. You’re living in an Obama-delusion.
Holder could and should be impeached over this stunt.
KSM has never received his Miranda rights. Obama, et al have been taped numerous times declaring KSM is guilty and should be punished. How can he get a ‘fair’ trial?
KSM pleaded guilty and accepted the death penalty. He wanted an express ticket to Allah’s whorehouse in the sky. What right does he have now to counsel?
This trial is not about KSM. Our government, military, and past administration are now the DEFENDANTS.
November 23rd, 2009 | 9:56 pm | #14
“Freedom Fighter.”
Obama’s interpretation surely.
“What do firefighters fight? Fire. What do crimefighters fight? Crime. What do freedom fighters fight?”
George Carlin
November 23rd, 2009 | 9:59 pm | #15
“The lawyer would be remiss if he said anything else. There is a trial, after all, and the burden of proof is on the United States.”
Wrong. His job is to defend the client. He can acknowledge that thousands of innocents were murdered that day, and still defend his client.
The “burden of proof” upon the US would be to prove that KSM had something to do with the atrocities committed on 9/11, not prove that thousands of innocents died that day.
November 23rd, 2009 | 9:59 pm | #16
Let’s see, if the lawyer won’t concur that the people killed on 9-11 were murdered, then it means he is deferring to the nomenclature of Islamofascist as “combatants.”
Nearly 3,000 men, women and children were violently killed that day. Civilians waiting tables, manning elevators, cooks, cleaners, secretaries, brokers, managers, cops and firefighters, passengers on airplanes, and more, everyone minding their own business. They are dead. More than those who killed the pilots and hijacked the planes were involved.
And we’d thought his job was to try and get his clients to be declared innocent of involvement with the murders, NOT to twist and degrade the legal process to a denial of the crime itself. That “murder” never happened in the first place.
He’s a male version of the evil Green Witch in Narnia who very persuasively and wearingly argued that the sun didn’t exist. A troll in a suit.
November 23rd, 2009 | 10:00 pm | #17
Methinks Bozo will soon announce KSM and his other terrorist buddies are in fact freedom fighting heroes against suppressor Bush and the Republicans who worship goodness.
November 23rd, 2009 | 10:02 pm | #18
This lawyer is to the core a Truther. I would not be surprised if he was the no plane theory. or the unmanned plane theory that no one died on 9-11 all 2996 are government agents and now in hiding. Many truther theory are going to be explored such as the 19 hijackers are still alive. fire does not melt steal etc. This is not only going to be trial of the Bush years and there treatment it is going to be a trial on the 9-11 commission and their findings.
Would that not be a better defense. We did not do the thing because of Jihad but here is some conspiracy theory to why bush did it and made it look like we did it.
November 23rd, 2009 | 10:05 pm | #19
[...] Terrorist Attorney Refuses to Say Innocent Americans Were Murdered – Says 9-11 Killers Will Put US Foreign Policy on Trial (Video). http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2009/11/terrorist-attorney-wont-admit-innocent-americans-were-m... [...]
November 23rd, 2009 | 10:07 pm | #20
[...] said he is proud to be helping these terrorist scums in an interview with Bill Oreilly, and would be “honored” if somehow the unthinkable happens and these terrorist piles of s*…. This so called “attorney” Scott Fenstermaker also couldn’t define what [...]
November 23rd, 2009 | 10:10 pm | #21
Give the salad tossers credit for finding(buying) someone who graduated from a military academy(in this traitors case the USAF Academy)to spit on his oath to country.These despicable scum will set all time lows to further there America Is Evil campaign.
To defend a citizen is one thing or to be assigned this duty but to offer your services to terrorists of a foreign land who have no rights to the constitutional rights guaranteed Americans is typical salad tosser.
November 23rd, 2009 | 10:12 pm | #22
From Atlas Shrugs http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/11/new-yorkers-to-attorney-general-holder-we-will-fight-you-all-the-way.html
“NEW YORKERS TO ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDER: “WE WILL FIGHT YOU ALL THE WAY!”
(snip)
The Coalition formed to fight the decision of President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder to try the 9/11 co-conspirators in New York City’s federal court, effectively giving war criminals the same rights as American citizens while endangering the safety of all New Yorkers. Two weeks ago, we sent a letter signed by 300 family members of 9/11 victims to the President, Attorney General and Defense Secretary Robert Gates asking them to reverse course. The letter has now been signed by over 120,000 Americans and is posted at http://www.keepamericasafe.com.”
Please, go read the letter at http://www.keepamericasafe.com/?page_id=1822 and, if you agree with its content, sign it to show your support.
I know that petitions and such abound and that signatures don’t usually do much in the way of change. If nothing else, however, signing this letter is a way to show the loved ones of 9/11 victims that we’ve not forgotten.
November 23rd, 2009 | 10:16 pm | #23
KSM does not have the right to a civilian trial. You’re living in an Obama-delusion.
————-
No I am not. He does now thanks to this Administration.I have no delusions of Obama I have not liked any of his polices to date.This decision irks me to the core as well. But as long as KSM is allowed to be tried in this setting I do expect the American court system to follow the rules for the defendant.Yes I understand he never had his rights read to him. I do not believe he has had them read to him now.I am not even sure he has been formally charged by Holder. I understand that KSM plead guilty which will be thrown out now most likely.I didn’t say I agreed with the decision to try him this way because i don’t.
November 23rd, 2009 | 10:28 pm | #24
Harry
that is the key words there.Obama and Holder gave him the keys to NYC.You shouldn’t be mad at the attorney defending KSM it is his job plus a right that Obama afforded him.I find it appalling.What I find more appalling is Obama and Holder guaranteeing conviction and execution after saying that they wanted to try KSM in this system to so how just we are.
November 23rd, 2009 | 10:38 pm | #25
You want just? He was pleading guilty to a military tribunal, and asking for execution, until this administration stopped it.
You have to ask why? Why do what the whole country (90%) is against, and why make inflammatory statements about guilt and execution, that can only be used to dismiss the case and set these unhumans free.
Please tell me your joking!
November 23rd, 2009 | 10:46 pm | #26
Yeah lets not be mad at an attorney that takes voluntarily this scum as a client. lets just say he’s a soft hearted soul.
Hogwash! He has an agenda, and his agenda isn’t about justice. He wants to try the last ADMINISTRATION for crimes through the back door, because they don’t have the GUTS to try it straight up. I spit in his general direction. Holder should be impeached, but OBama and his cadre are pulling the strings, so don’t hold your breath!
November 23rd, 2009 | 11:02 pm | #27
I would say most of the country is against this because KSM is getting tried in the wrong court. I agree it is the wrong court and none of the Admins reasons pass a smell test.I do not believe that Obama wants KSM to get off scott free.In his half baked plan he thought he could show America that the criminal justice system works to try terrorists.As Americans spoke out against this bad idea Obama spoke out of turn and guaranteed the conviction and execution. He later retracted it realizing how stupid it was to say it in the first place. If his plans are to try Bush by proxie it will backfire and it will be another failed policy of this president.It is truly sad that we have to go through this sort of insanity and b.s but it serve us well in the future as progressives get thrown out on their ear for another seventy years.
November 23rd, 2009 | 11:05 pm | #28
I’m with you, Mike W. In a sane and morally just society, the court would have to appoint someone to defend KSM because he’d have no representation otherwise. But, of course, a sane and morally just society wouldn’t have elected Obama who, in turn, appointed Holder. We’re so totally screwed.
November 23rd, 2009 | 11:09 pm | #29
Auntiemadder is right on! Night all
November 23rd, 2009 | 11:12 pm | #30
Theyarecorrupt.
I guess we are arguing from the same side of the street, but you can’t unring a bell. He said what he said, and not by accident in my opinion. They don’t care if they lose on Bush in this back door attempt, they just care that they try that will be damage enough.
November 23rd, 2009 | 11:18 pm | #31
Holder heart KSM –about says it all.
November 23rd, 2009 | 11:22 pm | #32
Great, ( Sarcastic) so it is going to actually be a Bush and Republican trial. Maybe we can out Kerry who was in the know, and Bill Clinton. This should be fun. Both had been warned prior to the attacks.
November 23rd, 2009 | 11:31 pm | #33
++
why in Gods name are we putting up with this farcical??
and don’t get me wrong, but we got lucky!!
Rudy ordered 60,000 body bags..
that was their INTENT which is going to be buried in Jihad BS from the get go to the end.. they need to change the ROE to shoot on sight @ site.. gah!!
“we the people” are weak for letting them
bully US around since November 4, 08..
Obama is a Pontius Pilate.. aka: A COWARD, just like his brethren..
(and i’m not talking ALL Muslims, just the Islamists.. you know who they are, they’re the ones who declared a holy war on US/West as well as infidels of their own faith.. the ones Obama has been sucking up to & G-D America!!)
my friends are the enemies of my enemy ~ B Hussein O
==
November 23rd, 2009 | 11:32 pm | #34
An Argument Against Civil Criminal Trials for Terrorists.
As if anyone can present an argument FOR civilian criminal trials for terrorists such as will soon be taking place in New York for KSM et. al. instead of military tribunals at GITMO as the Constitution allows and ALL precedence demands….
Allowing civil criminal defenses to be used by an enemy combatant captured following an illegal act of sabotage or similar “act of war” in violation of the Law of Armed Conflict is the only thing insane in this case….
From Breitbart.com — Atty: Fort Hood suspect may use insanity defense.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9C5JJHO0&show_article=1
…D’OH, you’d have to be insane to be a suicidal Jihadi….
November 23rd, 2009 | 11:40 pm | #35
I guess it’s just to hard for some to believe that everything being done by the Obama gang, is on purpose. No one wants to believe that they want to tear down this country from the inside, but it’s the G-DS truth.
They have to be stopped!!!
This Bennet from Colorado, the one selected to fill out Salazars term, say’s he would vote for this crap even if he knew he would not be re-elected. Arrogance, arrogance this deep is astounding, he’s saying the people be darned, and let them eat cake.
November 23rd, 2009 | 11:41 pm | #36
Hey, he’s a lawyer. There had to be at least one who would defend this guy. The real anger should be directed at the policies that allowed KSM to be tried in a civilian court despite the fact that he was captured on a battlefield. They think this trial will “legitimize” us. We are getting laughed at for this. Our enemy understands strength and force. Is the Taliban changing their policies to make our people and media happy? NO. Even though they are animals, they are consistant animals. Our protections are here to protect our citizens. Don’t let our own system be used against us.
November 23rd, 2009 | 11:57 pm | #37
Too late, CW. This is the logical progression following the election of super majorities of Leftists to the Congress and a Marxist, America-hating, Jihadi-enabling empty suit last November.
November 23rd, 2009 | 11:58 pm | #38
Sounds like this guy AIDING an ENEMY combatant must give KSM a lot of COMFORT.
November 24th, 2009 | 12:10 am | #39
Please tell me why the far left liberals hate America so much and what we stand for; they prefer to have America on trial in favor of terrorists, no matter how much damage they do to our safety and our troops.
Don’t they realize they are cutting their own throats; when they finally see just how much hatred these terrorists have against all Americans; the terrorists don’t care what ideological political persuasion we stand for? Terrorists want us all dead and believe we are all infidels. They are EVIL to the core in there beliefs.
November 24th, 2009 | 12:11 am | #40
CW – What policies? Its not clear how Holder reached this decision. It seems somewhat arbitrary and an attempt to capitalize on a case that is all locked up.
November 24th, 2009 | 12:13 am | #41
If we give them civilian trials, this is the way their attorneys must behave. They have no choice. It is their professional duty. In fact, even in military trials they would have defense counsel who would be required to vigorously defend them, but there it would be less likely to become a public circus, etc.
It is the president’s fault that this is happening, not the defense attorneys’.
November 24th, 2009 | 12:46 am | #42
Ken, you’re right. Somebody has to unplug stopped up toilets. I just wish Obama and his 5th columnists would quit backing up so many toilets.
November 24th, 2009 | 3:35 am | #43
Ken is right, therefore we need a new POTUS.
Darn shame we have to wait until 2012.
November 24th, 2009 | 5:47 am | #44
“Weasel” is too nice a word to describe this guy. He represents all that is wrong with the liberal left, all that is destroying our great nation, and all things that reek of Barack Obama.
November 24th, 2009 | 6:01 am | #45
bg
November 23rd, 2009 | 11:31 pm | #33
++
(and i’m not talking ALL Muslims, just the Islamists.. you know who they are, they’re the ones who declared a holy war on US/West as well as infidels of their own faith.. the ones Obama has been sucking up to & G-D America!!)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
bg, what’s with the disclaimer? This is so not like you. Did something change during the months I was offline? (Please, say it isn’t so!)
November 24th, 2009 | 6:07 am | #46
[...] Terrorist Attorney Refuses To Say Innocent Americans Were Murdered – Says 9-11 Killers Will Put US… [...]
November 24th, 2009 | 6:12 am | #47
Elections have consequences. We are still living though consequences of Carter years, namely Islamic revolution in Iran that he supported.
Of course Obama will make Carter’s crimes look tiny, but we voted for Obama. After all he read Teleprompter in such a deep voice.
November 24th, 2009 | 6:13 am | #48
well, lynne stewart was the prime example of
traitor extraodinaire and justice has finally seen fit to elimitate her from the judical field.
how many more lawyers like her……
November 24th, 2009 | 6:36 am | #49
This is going to be good.
November 24th, 2009 | 6:47 am | #50
Here’s where the Obama/Holder plan to turn this into a show trial for the actions of the Bush Administration is going to fall apart, thanks to the Law of Unintended Consequences.
Unless the president and the AG are planning to also change federal law on cameras being allowed in the courtroom, we’re never going to see or hear KSM & cohorts do their political theater, other than via courtroom artists’ drawings and reporters’ descriptions. But we will hear from the defendants’ attorneys outside the Federal Building and on TV shows each night.
Fenstermaker is going to be the face of that, and in terms of likability, he’s miles down on the scale compared to even Ron Kuby. And while he may get a sympathetic ear from Keith Olbermann on “Countdown” nightly, he and others in the media can no more make Fenstermaker a sympathetic figure and get the majority of Americans to see things his way than the media was trying to make William Kunstler into a sympathetic one as the lead attorney for the Chicago defendants 40 years ago. As with Obamacare, where the more supporters talk, the more the poll numbers go down, the more people see of the terrorists’ lawyers and the more they hear about what’s going on in the trial, the lower Obama’s poll numbers are going to sink for allowing this show trial and the higher support will go for the Bush WOT policies.
November 24th, 2009 | 8:04 am | #51
You know the old joke….why do lawyers wear a tie….
November 24th, 2009 | 8:26 am | #52
[...] And this is what the attorneys who will be representing him think. [...]
November 24th, 2009 | 8:35 am | #53
[...] [...]
November 24th, 2009 | 10:22 am | #54
Since when does a fair trial have to necessarily include a blanket presumption of innocence?
Can’t a fair trial simply mean ensuring that proper trial procedures are followed and that a client (in this case murderous scum) receives an equitable sentence ( in this case death or life imprisonment, whichever is deemed worse)?
November 24th, 2009 | 10:28 am | #55
I’ve been generally disappointed with O’Reilly since he went mainstream/imbecile on Obama.
But, watching this, I truly believe he’s underpaid.
If I were interviewing that lawyer sac of excrement and he said that about our 9/11 dead, I’d have torn his pin head off and shoved it up his A$$.
November 24th, 2009 | 10:41 am | #56
He’s a Harvard graduate? Who picked him?
A little Yiddish for you:
fintster: dark; sinister
makher: influential person:
November 24th, 2009 | 10:43 am | #57
Uhm, folks… Trials in our “civilized” societies are not about justice. They are about how the law can be interpreted.
November 24th, 2009 | 10:45 am | #58
“The trial is to determine whether they’ve been murdered or not…”
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.
This quote illuminates the problem.
We know that they were murdered, we saw it.
A trial would be to determine culpability and assign the consequences.
Why do we have to pay millions of dollars for these windbags to argue points removed from relevance?
A judge needs to be assigned to establish guidelines and limitations on what these villains (I mean the legal ones…) can introduce. They have no business trying the United States, that has nothing to do with “whether they’ve been murdered or not”.
And budgetary inspector needs to be asssigned to limit the amount of time they can spend on their wild goose chase. Otherwise there is an inherent conflict of interest on the part of the lawyers to spend years researching the governmental actions, for which they can charge the public.
November 24th, 2009 | 11:22 am | #59
Has anybody in the DoJ considered that KSM’s appearence before a military commission – where he pled guilty to all charges – constitutes a TRIAL?
And that, if he is put on trial in federal court, that would constitute a SECOND TRIAL ON THE SAME CHARGES?
Can anyone at DoJ say DOUBLE JEOPARDY??!!
This whole farce is nothing but a ploy to free KSM and his bunch; and put the USA, our intel agencies, our military – and George Bush on trial. Obama and his cabal are hoping that (planning on?) charges will be brought against Bush, Cheney, et alia, in the international criminal court (to which obama and holder have decided the USA shall be subject) or the world court at the hague.
And anybody who believes that obama was not involved in “holder’s decision” to do this is a fool. It’s about the only way that they can bring anything to bear on the previous administration.
November 24th, 2009 | 11:57 am | #60
[...] Terrorists Will Put US Foreign Policy on Trial Terrorist Attorney Refuses to Say Innocent Americans Were Murdered – Says 9-11 Killers Will Put US… November 23, 2009 by Gateway [...]
November 24th, 2009 | 12:08 pm | #61
I’m thinking.. an old plane… an old building… VOILA, on your way to your 72 virgins!
Oh, and tell the truthers they are at the same place as the folks on the planes and the buildings on 9/11.
–
November 24th, 2009 | 12:18 pm | #62
This is why we hate leftists.
November 24th, 2009 | 12:34 pm | #63
This circus of a trial will be the best recruiting tool and propaganda for the radical Muslim’s…ever. The antics in the courtroom will be matched and responded with demonstrations, riots and bombings in Muslim countries. The U.S. Government is now giving the terrorist’s the world stage to recreate their cowardly attack and bask in the adulation for their strike against the Great Satan.
Give yourself a fist bump, SOBama.
November 24th, 2009 | 1:15 pm | #64
My head may explode before this is all over. I thought Clinton’s impeachment was humiliating, it will be nothing compared to this. Putting US foreign policy on trial…
However, by the time this is over, probably most Americans will hate liberals SO MUCH that it will be a generation before another is elected.
What a crock of —-.
November 24th, 2009 | 2:33 pm | #65
HA exclusive: Pentagon memo ousting Fenstermaker from Gitmo defense counsel pool
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/24/ha-exclusive-pentagon-memo-ousting-fenstermaker-from-gitmo-defense-counsel-pool/
November 24th, 2009 | 3:05 pm | #66
++
via TRBO
Krauthammer on KSM’s “show trial”
==
November 24th, 2009 | 3:15 pm | #67
[...] the 9-11 terrorists already admitted that the US will be on trial during the proceedings. Attorney refused to say that innocent civilians were murdered on September 11th by the Al-Qaeda killers. Comments [...]
November 24th, 2009 | 3:21 pm | #68
++
AuntieMadder @ 6:01 am #45
re: [bg, what’s with the disclaimer? This is so not like you. Did something change during the months I was offline? (Please, say it isn’t so!)]
oh, i’ve made disclaimers before.. so it’s not the first time, just thought i’d
refresh so as not to confuse any newcomers as to there being a difference
between Islamists & anti-Islamist Muslims..
Palin & Jasser in 12 (or vice verse) (thumbsup)
much more here..
ie: AIFD denounces Congressman Keith Ellison’s support of CAIR
["As an American-Muslim I am deeply offended that the nation's highest elected Muslim official openly supports Islamist groups," said Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser, President of AIFD. "Ellison's support of Islamist groups like CAIR which believes in the Islamic state is in direct conflict with his oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America."
CAIR is an organization that is part of a larger American Islamist network which traces its roots to the Muslim Brotherhood of the Middle East. The Brotherhood is a transnational movement which is dedicated to the creation of Islamic states. Congressman Ellison is unapologetic in his acceptance of campaign contributions from CAIR's top executives and openly supports CAIR's efforts.
"CAIR hides behind the veil of Muslim victimization, while avoiding its American and Islamic responsibility to advocate for liberty and counter the ideas of political Islam which is the root cause of Islamist terrorism," said Dr. Jasser. "A sitting Congressman should be more careful with the legitimacy that his position lends to the organizations he supports."
AIFD is the most prominent American Muslim organization confronting the ideologies of political Islam and openly countering the belief that the Muslim faith is inextricably rooted to the concept of the Islamic State. AIFD believes that Muslims can better practice their faith when they are liberated by the separation of mosque and state.]
==
November 24th, 2009 | 6:00 pm | #69
When Air Force One did a photo op with a fighter jet in tow, the people on the ground were in a state of terror and were running in fear, only a few short months ago. People will not be able to contain their emotions when this trial begins, and there will be great rage boiling just under the surface of the skin of every New Yorker. I can only see the journey to convict these mass killers to be one that will fuel great hatred for the administration and will quicken the demise of their power. I really do not believe Americans are going to stand for this circus and go about their lives quietly…..and I can’t blame any of them.
November 24th, 2009 | 6:02 pm | #70
If the United States wants to do justice for the American people, those five men would have already faced a firing squad, not a jury of their ‘apparent’ peers. That is so wrong.
November 24th, 2009 | 6:22 pm | #71
++
Obama Wants Military Tribunals For KSM
Obama is a LIAR, period..
==
November 25th, 2009 | 2:07 pm | #72
[...] guy showed himself to be a real treat in his interview with Bill O’reilly. Now, I am by no means O’Reilly’s biggest fan, [...]
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact