Here’s your big joke of the day.
The cut-and-runners claim that the snorkler in chief is more aggressive fighting ‘man caused disasters’ than Bush.
The Hill reported:
Democratic strategists Wednesday asserted President Barack Obama “has been far more aggressive in fighting al Qaeda” than the previous administration .
In an e-mail this afternoon to supporters — which incidentally excoriated Republicans for politicizing the attempted bombing of Flight 253 — the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) stressed it was President George W. Bush, not his successor, who relegated the fight against the terrorist network to the back burner by turning “its focus from al Qaeda to Iraq.”
Ultimately, the DCCC’s charge on Wednesday is but a direct response to a new fundraising pitch by Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.) — a petition Democrats say exploits the terrorism plot in an attempt to raise campaign dollars.
Hoekstra, who is running for governor in Michigan, asked voters in a letter on Tuesday “who will stand up the Obama/Pelosi efforts to weaken our security” to donate to his gubernatorial war chest.
“It is insulting that The Obama administration would make such a claim, but then again, these are the same weak-kneed liberals who have recently tried to bring Guantanamo Bay terrorists right here to Michigan!” Hoekstra wrote earlier this week.
For the record: In Operation Iraqi Freedom more than 19,429 Al-Qaeda and Islamic militants have been killed. Over 18,900 insurgents have been captured.
Oh, and it didn’t take George Bush five months to decide to send two-thirds of the requested reinforcements to the troops at war.
Jules Crittenden offers the cut-and-runners some advice: Want your guy to look tough on terrorism? Tell him to kick terrorist ass. Like Bush did.
December 30th, 2009 | 4:10 pm | #1
The DCCC using the words “aggressive” and “fighting” to reference Obama is off-message off-image.
Somebody call somebody. The end is near.
December 30th, 2009 | 4:10 pm | #2
It’s the same old thing with Liberals. When you get caught doing something wrong, get the word out that you didn’t. Tell a lie often enough and it becomes truth.
Like the economy. obowma (D) swears he’s doing a good job, even though we know different.
December 30th, 2009 | 4:12 pm | #3
obama couldn’t carry President George W. Bush’s jock strap.
December 30th, 2009 | 4:18 pm | #4
Jamest155…carry? obowma bows, so let’s use “He’s not worthy of sniffing Mr. Bush’s jock strap”.
:)
December 30th, 2009 | 4:23 pm | #5
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Right, Paul Alyunov. Paul Alyunov said: Democrats: Obama More Aggressive Fighting Al-Qaeda Than Bush: Here’s your big joke of the day. Democrats.. http://bit.ly/6×0USt [...]
December 30th, 2009 | 4:25 pm | #6
Then why aren’t they screaming and yelling about him being wrong? Because they were angry about Bush being so mean, so if Obama is more mean, then….
They are such liars.
December 30th, 2009 | 4:32 pm | #7
Why the talk of fighting? What war? What’s terrorism? I thought that was over when the One was elected.
December 30th, 2009 | 4:33 pm | #8
Obama is a terrorist coddler. He’s willing to close Gitmo and move jihadis to the midwest as favors for his IL cronies.
And remember this: Once up here, those jihadis will eventually BE SET FREE. Barely anyone spends life in prison, especially someone who claims to have been “in the wrong place at the wrong time” as these scum have.
Contact you congressional reps today–no enemy combatants up here, no civilian trials for enemy attackers, be they on planes, at army bases, anywhere!
December 30th, 2009 | 4:39 pm | #9
The DCCC staff are practicing for post-MidTerm Elections when they will all be applying for jobs writing for Saturday Night Lice.
December 30th, 2009 | 5:00 pm | #10
So, is the entire Democratic Party, as well as the MSM, all suffering from the obviously extensively illegal drugs they did in the 60’s? Are they all so brain damaged that they think we will buy this?
Obviously, the answer is yes, but come on. This is just utterly ridiculous.
December 30th, 2009 | 5:07 pm | #11
….and Jamarcuss Russell is a better QB than Peyton Manning.
December 30th, 2009 | 5:09 pm | #12
[...] reading here: Democrats: Obama More Aggressive Fighting Al-Qaeda Than Bush [...]
December 30th, 2009 | 5:12 pm | #13
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by notleftwing: {gatewaypundit} Democrats: Obama More Aggressive Fighting Al-Qaeda Than Bush http://bit.ly/4qg6RY...
December 30th, 2009 | 5:16 pm | #14
Obama wouldn’t know al Qaeda if they slipped into the White House and cut up his Kobe beef for him.
December 30th, 2009 | 5:25 pm | #15
I think they got it mixed up, slightly. What they MEANT to say was “Obama is more aggressive fighting Bush than Al Qaeda.”
December 30th, 2009 | 5:31 pm | #16
ROFLMAO
MR ZERO can’t even call it a war.
just wait for the so called AL QUADA trials in New York City, can’t wait for the jihad.
weak they name is Obama
December 30th, 2009 | 5:35 pm | #17
Democrats fighting terror, on the beach …
And so what do we do with the bodies next time.
December 30th, 2009 | 5:49 pm | #18
That is just, well,
Unprecedented.
December 30th, 2009 | 5:51 pm | #19
It’s amazing what passes for thought in the Democrat party.
He opposed the surge (it worked); he pledged to close Gitmo to curb terrorism (it didn’t work); he apologized to the world in order to fortify ties (but failed to get any foreign troops for Afghanistan).
If you only think, there’s no way you can be a modern-day Democrat.
December 30th, 2009 | 5:52 pm | #20
++
who cares what the Dems “think”??
do they “think” the world revolve around what
they “think” (yeah i know it’s an “oxymoron”)..
..they cannot even wrap their brains around
the ipso facto that 9/10/01 is irretrievable!!
not to mention the rest of the
world doesn’t see it that way..
ergo, i feel i must re-post the following:
On the Job Training
12/30/09; M. Zuhdi Jasser
It is sad that President Obama and his team are still going through on-the-job training a year into their administration. Despite the fact that Janet Napolitano, our homeland-security secretary, bizarrely tried to nix the use of the term terrorism and despite the fact that his own White House dubiously dubbed this global conflict “an overseas contingency operation,” the president has finally learned to use the most obvious term – terror- this week. Mr. President, if you are listening, here are a few more thoughts from a concerned Muslim.
You cannot just stay hunkered down at your “beachhead” in Hawaii after another virulent byproduct of global political Islam attacked on our homeland. While no one was really hurt, you don’t exactly look like you are taking the issue seriously when your photo of the day captures a romp on the beach. It was not a coincidence that this was attempted on Christmas day, yet you ignore the religious struggles in this conflict. It is time that our commander-in-chief and the leader of the free world come to terms with the reality that this is the greatest conflict of the century and a battle of ideas between western liberal secular democracies and political Islam.
While you and your colleagues are stymied by the question of whether to even use the term “terror,” the ideology of al-Qaeda (violent political Islam) is spreading exponentially. Your systematic failure to advance American security against ideologies that threaten us may turn catastrophic. In fact the Christmas bomber said so himself, telling an investigator that “there are more just like me who will strike soon.” By all means, Mr. President, fix the holes in our security that we know are there – but terrorists who are suicidal religious zealots and very creative will sadly very likely strike again soon. This year certainly proves that.
Our nation is clearly becoming more and more anxious and concerned over the rash of radicalized Muslims. Is it not time for you to acknowledge that terror is a simply a symptom of a more profound deeper underlying disease? That disease is political Islam.
Hopefully you will realize that we can only defeat an enemy we can name, describe, and understand. As Thomas Friedman and others have recently reminded us, the only answer to jihadists, Salafists, and Islamists is a narrative from within America, and most important from within Islam, that counters the global supremacism of political Islam. Until you say exactly that, we will continue to flail in this conflict.
I hope after Nidal Hasan, after the American jihadis in Pakistan, and now after the Christmas bomber radicalized in London, that you see our need for clear leadership against political Islam and its ubiquitous permeating militant manifestations. We need a leader who recognizes that this conflict is most significantly within Muslim communities as we Muslims struggle with the conflict between theocracy and democracy, sharia and liberty, Islamism and freedom, and salafism and modernity. The longer you squander your leadership and stay silent on this, the more vulnerable we will be.
much more here..
==
December 30th, 2009 | 5:55 pm | #21
++
re: bg @ 5:52 pm #20
Weakening Islamism is Vital to Improve US Image in the Muslim world
12/23/09; By Tawfik Hamid
[In the December 1, 2009 issue of the WSJ Europe, Fouad Ajami - in an Op-Ed entitled "The Arabs Have Stopped Applauding Obama" - argued that President Obama's diplomatic approach to win the hearts and minds of the Muslim world has not been successful. Poll results have shown that unfavorable views of the US are as high as 82%, 69 %, and 70% in the Palestinian territories, Turkey, and Egypt respectively. In fact, the Op-Ed stated that unfavorable views of the US in Pakistan have risen from 63% in 2008 to 68% in 2009 according to a recent Pew survey.
In addition, after President Obama came to office in 2009, the number of home-grown Islamist terror plots inside the US has risen dramatically compared to the previous years. The Year of 2009 represents the highest level of domestic home-grown Islamic radicalism in the US since 2001.
We must question why President Obama's approach with the Muslim world has not succeeded yet in at least having a more positive effect in improving the US image in several Muslim countries or in decreasing the rate of home-grown Islamic radicalism on the home front. One of the main reasons for this lack of success is that US strategic communications with the Muslim world was largely based on the assumption that the problem of Islamic Radicalism and hatred to America is primarily because of the US foreign policy with the Muslim world and thus changing this policy will change the latter. This can only work if the main problem was in the US approach; however, if the main problem was in the Muslim world, such an approach cannot succeed as it will be like trying to change the keys to open a room while the problem is in the rusty lock! In the latter situation, changing the lock - or in other words changing the Muslim world itself - is crucial to solving the problem.
[..]
Trying to satisfy the Muslim world by changing the US will not be effective unless the US is ready to end its values of freedom and liberty and adopt an Islamic Sharia system.
[..]
In this context, it is also important to raise the point that the Muslim world is in far greater need than the US to improve its image in the world as its image has been painted by terrorism and barbarism especially in the last few years.
In brief, no matter what the non-Islamic world does – short of submitting to the Islamic Sharia – the Islamists will never be satisfied completely. The US must either change itself to adopt an Islamic system to satisfy the Muslim world or alternatively assist in changing the latter. Weakening the Islamism phenomenon is vital to ultimately improve the image of the US in the Muslim world as Islamism is currently a – if not the – major obstacle to enhancing the US image among Muslims]
==
December 30th, 2009 | 5:56 pm | #22
Breaking News: Litards are wacked-out of their heads. Obummerfollowers said that Bush was an imperialist, meddler and warmonger. Now they support imperialist, meddler and warmonger Obummer and call it good while calling Bush bad.
“In Operation Iraqi Freedom more than 19,429 Al-Qaeda and Islamic militants have been killed. ” This upset Obummer, Reid, MurfA, Piglosi, Rham-it-donw-throat, and the DNC very badly. Al Quaeda is their only hope at defeating the Republicans.
December 30th, 2009 | 5:57 pm | #23
++
re: bg @ 5:55 pm #21
re: “The Arabs Have Stopped Applauding Obama”
11/29/09; By FOUAD AJAMI
[Mr. Obama's election has not drained the swamps of anti-Americanism. That anti-Americanism is endemic to this region, an alibi and a scapegoat for nations, and their rulers, unwilling to break out of the grip of political autocracy and economic failure. It predated the presidency of George W. Bush and rages on during the Obama presidency.
We had once taken to the foreign world that quintessential American difference—the belief in liberty, a needed innocence to play off against the settled and complacent ways of older nations. The Obama approach is different.
Steeped in an overarching idea of American guilt, Mr. Obama and his lieutenants offered nothing less than a doctrine, and a policy, of American penance. No one told Mr. Obama that the Islamic world, where American power is engaged and so dangerously exposed, it is considered bad form, nay a great moral lapse, to speak ill of one's own tribe when in the midst, and in the lands, of others.
The crowd may have applauded the cavalier way the new steward of American power referred to his predecessor, but in the privacy of their own language they doubtless wondered about his character and his fidelity. "My brother and I against my cousin, my cousin and I against
the stranger," goes one of the Arab world's most honored maxims. The stranger who came into their midst and spoke badly of his own was destined to become an object of suspicion.
Mr. Obama could not make up his mind: He was at one with "the people" and with the rulers who held them in subjugation. The people of Iran who took to the streets this past summer were betrayed by this hapless diplomacy—Mr. Obama was out to "engage" the terrible rulers that millions of Iranians were determined to be rid of. ]
DO YOU THINK THERE IS A PRAYER THAT
OBAMA & THE MSM ET AL WILL WAKE UP??
nah, they are the ones they’ve been waiting for, they are the ones making sure an IslaMarxist Jihad hastens America’s demise.. the allied fools that they be are totally focused on their Muhammad & Marx tree.. which will bloom to fruition we shall have to wait & see, but in the end it matters not, as either one kills the forest of liberty..
one can lead a Dem to knowledge..
but one cannot make them “think”!!
==
December 30th, 2009 | 6:08 pm | #24
I’m 99% sure there were airstrikes on al’Qaeda in Yemen during the Bush administration, as well as strikes on them in Africa.
December 30th, 2009 | 6:08 pm | #25
“I think they got it mixed up, slightly. What they MEANT to say was “Obama is more aggressive fighting Bush than Al Qaeda.””
LOL!
That makes complete sense, as opposed to what the Democrats did indeed say!
December 30th, 2009 | 6:10 pm | #26
Darwin Akbar
December 30th, 2009 | 5:25 pm | #15
I think they got it mixed up, slightly. What they MEANT to say was “Obama is more aggressive fighting Bush than Al Qaeda.”
HILARIOUS!!
December 30th, 2009 | 6:21 pm | #27
It is going to be hilarious listening to the minions spin the spin. Delusion spun around a delusional campaign rhetoric from the past. Apparently al Qaeda has been active in every country except Iraq. I wonder if al Qaeda in Iraq knows this?
December 30th, 2009 | 6:50 pm | #28
++
Earth to Dhimmis!!
Musawi disclose the rainbow of the existence of evidence proving the involvement of the former regime with terrorists, bin Laden and Zawahiri
[Revealed the former president of the prosecution in the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal and a member of the Iraqi National Coalition Jaafar al-Moussawi in an exclusive interview with Fayhaa revealed the existence of documentary evidence and documents proving the involvement of the regime of Saddam regime in a relationship with the leaders of the organization of terrorist leaders Osama bin Laden, the terrorist Ayman al-Zawahiri. He said al-Moussawi said the limbs, including the Saudi royal family has worked to strengthen the relationship of Saddam's regime to al-Qaeda terror network.]
btw, that’s just a sample..
==
December 30th, 2009 | 7:00 pm | #29
++
Obama Slams Security Breach – Reports, Intercepts Suggested
Attack Preparations; Multiple Agencies Had Warning
[President Obama on Tuesday described these lapses in general terms during a sweeping broadside aimed at his government's intelligence services. Citing a "potential catastrophic breach," he said the warning signs, if heeded, would have prevented the Christmas Day attempted bombing on a Detroit-bound airplane.
"A systemic failure has occurred and I consider that totally unacceptable," the president said, referencing "a mix of human and systemic failure." In his comments, the president cited information "that could have and should have been pieced together."]
Earth to Obama, you & you’re Aloha Akbar are unacceptable!!
==
December 30th, 2009 | 7:03 pm | #30
Note to dems……
Whateverrrrrrrrrrrrrrr…pffft
December 30th, 2009 | 7:22 pm | #31
[...] news via Gateway: Obama has been “far more aggressive in fighting al-Qaeda” than Bush. Gotta hand it to [...]
December 30th, 2009 | 7:29 pm | #32
++
OT.. via Poitico: Under The Radar
Judge slams Obama in Palestinian terror suit
[A federal judge is slamming the Obama administration for refusing to take a position in a lawsuit brought against the Palestinian Authority in connection with an alleged terrorist attack in 2000 that claimed the life
of a 25-year-old American, Esh Gilmore.
[..]
“The Executive Branch of the United States has been particularly unhelpful in resolving this difficult Motion,” Kessler wrote. “The Court requested that the State Department file a Statement of Interest in order to understand the international ramifications of any order it might enter, and to be apprised of our Government’s position about such ramifications. In this case, as in Knox v. The Palestinian Liberation Organization… the State Department declined to do so. Instead it filed the identical mealy-mouthed Notice there as it did in this case. That Notice, for all practical purposes, said nothing and certainly provided no substantive guidance whatsoever to the Court regarding the Government’s position or concerns about any impact a decision might have on the delicate situation in the Middle East.”]
“mealy-mouthed” = great definition.. that’s
what i call Murtha, but i’m willing to share..
oh btw, WHERE IS HILLARY??
==
December 30th, 2009 | 7:30 pm | #33
I think the most important question President Super Duper needs to to asked is:
What’s your best golf score?
December 30th, 2009 | 7:31 pm | #34
Also how are the waffles in Hawaii?
December 30th, 2009 | 7:49 pm | #35
Democrats: “… but I kid the war on terror.Hey, how about that freeway traffic in L.A.?”
December 30th, 2009 | 7:55 pm | #36
++
yochanan ben avrohom @ 5:31 pm #16
re: [just wait for the so called AL QUADA trials
in New York City, can’t wait for the jihad.]
they need to be stopped or held in Hawaii & GITMO needs to remain open for business, i mean, it has been picking up since Opology took office & boosted the TERRORISTS morale.. gah!!
re: [weak they name is Obama]
Obama is the Jihad
our enemy couldn’t do a better job of bringing US to our knees
than B Hussein O, who’s friends are the enemy of his enemy..
btw, i’ve been hearing of troops deaths
in Afghanistan.. WHERE IS OBAMA??
==
December 30th, 2009 | 8:06 pm | #37
++
and where the heck is Code Pink (Obama bundlers) & all the other Anti
- Liberation Activists that helped keep our Troops in Iraq in harms way
via boosting AQ et al morale for several years?? did the DNC fire them
or what?? gah!!
==
December 30th, 2009 | 8:14 pm | #38
++
yochanan ben avrohom @ 5:31 pm #16
re: bg @ 7:55 pm #36
re: [they need to be stopped or held in Hawaii]
Security costs will top $75M in NYC terror trial
we have got to know that the cost will triple
before we even know what freakin’ hit US..
==
December 30th, 2009 | 8:17 pm | #39
Thanks to the weakness of clinton, we were hit on 9/11 (as well as numerous other times). So far, under obama, we were hit at Fort. Hood and now another attempt to take down a plane. Thank God in between these 2 incompetents, we had President George W. Bush, who kept us safe for over 7 years and is the greatest president in american history.
December 30th, 2009 | 8:32 pm | #40
++
Airliner suicide mission blessed by imam
[The Nigerian accused of trying to blow up a Detroit-bound airliner
had his suicide mission personally blessed in Yemen by Anwar al-Awlaki, the Muslim imam suspected of radicalizing the Fort Hood shooting suspect, a U.S. intelligence source has told The Washington Times.
The intelligence official, who is familiar with the FBI's interrogation of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, said the bombing suspect has boasted of his jihad training to the FBI and has said it included final exhortations by Mr. al-Awlaki.
"It was Awlaki who indoctrinated him," the official said. "He was
told, 'You are going to be the tip of the spear of the Muslim nation.' "
[..]
Mr. al-Awlaki had e-mail contact with Maj. Hasan as many as 20 times between December 2008 and the shootings at Fort Hood. Mr. al-Awlaki praised Maj. Hasan as a “hero” and said all Muslims in the U.S. military should “follow the footsteps of men like Nidal.”
Monday’s al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula statement spoke similarly, calling on every “soldier who works for the crusader armies” to “emulate the example of the heroic [mujahedeen] brother, Nidal Hasan.”]
WHERE’S THE MSM.. oh never mind, they’re too busy fetching
tissues for their Dear IslaMarxist Leader & his little Caligula’s..
==
December 30th, 2009 | 8:53 pm | #41
Q: If Obumbles, Pelosi, Reid and all the other lefty libs were on a sinking ship, who gets saved?
A: We do.
December 30th, 2009 | 8:58 pm | #42
Obama won’t even call it terrorism, he won’t say that we are at war and the terrorist are not terrorist but criminals…in what altered world does this make Obama tougher on terror? Pleeeesssse give us all a break!!!!!
December 30th, 2009 | 9:10 pm | #43
OT- Rush Limbaugh rushed to hospital in Hawaii with chest pains, We need prayer for recovery!
December 30th, 2009 | 9:42 pm | #44
Rush is in my prayers right now!
December 30th, 2009 | 9:54 pm | #45
++
jainphx @ 9:10 pm #43
just heard about it (ht RG)..
Rush Limbaugh taken to Hawaii hospital
uh oh.. he’s in Hawaii with Obama & Pelosi??
maybe Hussein pulled a Russian & had someone
slip him a poison blow fish or something like that..
all kidding aside though, i hope & pray
he’s okay.. God knows we need him..
==
December 30th, 2009 | 10:06 pm | #46
Haaahahahahahhaahahahaaahahahahahhaaahahahaaahahahahaaaahaa!!!!… …*ahem*…sorry.
December 30th, 2009 | 10:07 pm | #47
It would be a serious blow to everyone but the far left if Rush’s voice was silenced prematurely.
But he will have left a legion of voices in his wake.
December 30th, 2009 | 10:12 pm | #48
…Thy kingdom come, thy will be done…
It is all in God’s hands. Have Faith.
December 30th, 2009 | 10:26 pm | #49
Surely they are kidding. They release classified CIA documents about waterboarding, they want to close GITMO and bring these barbarian Islamic Jihadist’s to IL, they won’t call it terror, they’ve been stonewalling Congressman Hoekstra on the FT. Hood investigation, they are going after Navy Seals, he took three months to give General McCrystal the minimum 40,000 troops he asked for in Afghanistan, and gave him less, and they think we are going to believe this. These people need to be removed from office they are criminal liars, thieves, and traitors to this nation. Damn all of them to hell!
December 30th, 2009 | 10:46 pm | #50
*Shrug*
In a way this would seem to be an attempt at sympathetic magic(“Like produces like”) to alter reality. If they *say* Mr. Obama has been tougher on terrorism than Mr. Bush and *believe* it hard enough then the world will change to make it the truth. This hasn’t been the first time this sort of delusional thinking cropped up among rulers and politicians in history and I doubt it will be the last. ^_^;
Don’t forget these are the same people who deny quite indignantly that “Al Gore never claimed to invent the Internet!” when in point of fact a CNN transcription still clearly shows that Mr. Gore claimed to *create* the Internet quite publicly for all the world to see and then expect to be taken seriously in subsequent conversation. ^o^
December 30th, 2009 | 10:57 pm | #51
Obama More Aggressive Fighting Al-Qaeda Than Bush
Nah…
0bama’s been much more aggressive fighting Bush.
December 31st, 2009 | 5:15 am | #52
0bama:
Let me read you my latest talking points. George Bush caused my constipation!
Please hold on while I adjust my teleprompter.… That is better. Bush took his focus from al Qaeda. It’s his fault. Sure, there were no terrorist attacks on American soil after he started his cowboy war – but that’s just luck. Appeasement is my solution.
When I heard Nidal Hasan went on a mass shooting spree at Fort Hood killing 13 and wounding 30 others, I cautioned to you not to jump to conclusions… even though Nidal Hasan attended the same mosque as two of 9/11 hijackers and posted on jihad websites. There is no reason to believe that he was connected to al Qaeda. He just had Sudden Jihad Syndrome, yelled Allah Akbar while firing his gun into our troops. That shows how tough I have been on Jihads and al Qaeda… yadi da.
When Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab’s father warned me of his son’s al Qaeda training in Yemen, I called Jamie Gorlick to ensure her intelligence wall was still up. I got a positive reply. So, I just let Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab keep is US visa as a good Limousine Liberal should… even though he was denied a visa to the UK. I was flabbergasted that he would try to detonate 80 grams of high explosive hidden in his underwear aboard a US jet liner – even after all of my apologies to the Muslim world.
I was even more surprised to see he said “I am the first of many [bombers]” given my gay action against al Qaeda. Look, I just followed Bill Clinton’s advice and launched a basketful of expensive cruise missiles at al Qaeda camps in Yemen. Sure, I missed but the noise and explosions should have freighted the dickens out of them. But, apparently, like Bill Clinton, I failed – and it all Bush’s fault!
Now, my limousine is running and I have more costly dinners to attend. I have done all of politically correct things. I have apologized to everybody I can. I have bowed and kissed @ss so many times I have lost count. I have done all I can do about al Qaeda – except surrender in Afghanistan. That will come later. I must go. Good afternoon.
December 31st, 2009 | 8:28 am | #53
I’ll ask a rhetorical question? When are the Dems going to stop whining about whatever Bush did or didn’t do and take some responsibility? Well, obviously never.
December 31st, 2009 | 11:01 am | #54
Boy, I thought the Clintons were liars! Reid, Pelosi, and the platitude-spouting blowhard have set a new standard for mendacity. There’s an almost pathological quality to their lying; a normal person would have too much of a conscience to step up to a microphone and utter the sorts of lies that these three utter routinely.
January 1st, 2010 | 11:10 am | #55
Nobody believes what the democrats say anymore. They’re talking to the hand.
January 3rd, 2010 | 5:05 pm | #56
[...] Watch: – Die Parteigänger des Oberschnorchlers behaupten, ihr Messias würde Al-Qaida aggressiver bekämpfen als sein blutrünstiger Vorgänger. Ihnen ist [...]
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact