Health Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, an acknowledged tax cheat and Catholic, admitted that the federal government will require all participants in the new nationalized insurance exchanges – men and women of all age groups – to contribute a separate “abortion premium” to cover the cost of elective abortion services.
No one will be exempt.
Verum Serum reported:
Of course, unless you’ve been in a coma for the past 40 years, this surprises no one.
December 22nd, 2009 | 7:31 am | #1
No suprise here, Democrats are OK with killing the innocent and the elderly. Thier just being consistent for once.
December 22nd, 2009 | 7:34 am | #2
It’s a bit confusing on purpose.
December 22nd, 2009 | 8:24 am | #3
Democrat Kathleen Sebelius:
This is the exciting part of Obamacare where we make you pay for abortions. I like to call it Death with Dignity Obamacare.
Our new health care policy makes it easy to kill very young infants with your tax dollars. Sure, we will expand it to Down’s syndrome children and retarded children in the future – but let’s focus on the present.
Thanks to Harry Reid and his jihad politics we can force even the stupid Catholics of this crappy nation to pay for killing infants. In your face you Catholics. No infant should go without an abortion.
Let me explain it to you. It’s like No-Fault abortion insurance. One is is at fault! It just more death with abortion to be done. It’s a leap forward in socialism.
It a testament to the kind of leadership we have in the Senate and White House. Now, we can make the stupid Catholic taxpayers to fund killing of infants on a whole sale scale.
Just as soon as that $100 million dollar abortion hospital is founded by Democrat Dodd we can begin the mass abortions. I must commend Harry Reid for his Jihad-Terror methods of getting this legislation past – although he probably broke 20 ethics rules to get it past. I can only say keep the Jihad Politics up Harry. You are my idol. Good coat hanger politics Mr Reid.
My limousine is running and there are some decisions of who will get aborted and how much it should cost. There is huge number of infants who need killing – and the Obama Administration must make the decisions.
My limousine is running and there are many decisions to make regarding which infants must be aborted. I must go.
December 22nd, 2009 | 8:35 am | #4
That would be “Catholic in Name Only.”
December 22nd, 2009 | 8:44 am | #5
an “accounting procedure”
December 22nd, 2009 | 8:46 am | #6
“an admitted tax cheat and Catholic” makes it sounds like being Catholic is a moral flaw. Maybe something like “a Catholic who is both an admitted tax cheat and ardent supporter of publicly funded abortions” would be better.
December 22nd, 2009 | 8:51 am | #7
Wouldn’t it be something if Obama vetoed the bill, calling it flawed — to get support?
.
December 22nd, 2009 | 9:13 am | #8
2010 Congressional Elections Update:
I’ve updated several Republican U.S. Senate candidates, challenging the 19 Democrat Senators up for reelection, or retiring in 2010.
There are now Republican Senate challengers in all 19 of the States, that have Democrats U.S. Senators up for reelection or retiring.
——————————————
U.S. HOUSE: Dems=258, Repubs=177, Republicans need to beat 41 democrats, and lose no Republican seats (41 seat gain), to take the House in 2010, and to have the majority of votes needed to elect Republican John Boehner, as the new Republican Speaker of the House, and boot Nancy Pelosi out as the Speaker.
(takes 218 out of 435 seats to make a majority
in the House)
In the 1994 Republican Revolution, House
Republicans picked up 54 seats.
All of the House is up for reelection in 2010,
so all Democrats can be voted out in 2010.
———————————————————
U.S. SENATE: Dems=58, Repubs=40, Independent=2
(Bernie Sanders and Joe Lieberman)
Roughly 1/3 of the Senate is up for reelection every 2 years.
37 Senators are up for reelection in 2010, and
of those 37, 19 are Democrats, and 18 are
Republicans. Republicans need a net gain of 20 seats to have the 60 cloture-vote margin (filibuster-proof) to pass
legislation. To take the Senate, and boot out Mitch McConnell as the worthless Republican Leader, and vote in Conservative Republican Jim DeMint, as the new Republican Leader of the Senate, the Republicans will only need a net gain of 11 seats
to reach 51 Senators. There are only 19 Democrats
up for reelection in 2010 to beat, so the
other 1 added Senate seat will have to be
done in 2012, if Joe Lieberman, the
Independent moderate, does not caucus (vote)
with them on enough legislation.
If the Republicans pick up all 19 Democrat Senate seats, and lose no Republican Senate Seats in 2010, they will have the Independent Senator Joe Lieberman, who caucuses (votes) with them some of the time, to give them the 60 Senate votes the Republicans need to pass some legislation in 2010. I don’t put a lot of faith in Independent Joe Lieberman, based on his betrayal of Conservatives on Obamacare, but he is sometimes unpredictable about siding with Republicans.
In the 1994 Republican Revolution, Senate
Republicans picked up 8 seats.
———————————————————
Even with a Republican sweep in 2010, it will most likely take the 2012 Congressional elections, along with a conservative Republican President, to give Congress the ability to pass legislation, that begins fixing the damage that has been done to America. (Repeal Obamacare, Cap and Trade, etc) This is due to the fact that it takes a 2/3 majority vote in each Chamber (2/3 of total present), to override President Obama’s veto power. This would be maximum of 290 votes in the House, which is unlikely, and 67 votes in the Senate. A Sarah Palin, Mitt Romney, or Tim Pawlenty as President in 2012 would be a continuation of restoring sanity to America.
———————————————————
List of the 19 Senate Democrats up for
reelection or retiring in 2010:
-Ted Kaufman (D) of Delaware (Repubs Mike
Castle and Christine O’Donnell challenging)
-Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas (Repubs Gilbert
Baker, Coleman, Tom Cox, Fred Ramey,
Conrad Reynolds, and Buddy Rogers challenging)
-Barbara Boxer of California (Repubs Chuck
DeVore and Carly Fiorina-rino? challenging)
-Michael Bennet of Colorado (Repubs Jane
Norton, Ken Buck, Cleve Tidwell, Luke Korkowski,
and Tom Weins challenging)
-Christopher Dodd of Connecticut (Repubs Rob
Simmons, Peter Schiff, and Linda McMahon are challenging)
-Daniel Inouye of Hawaii (Repub Gov. Linda
Lingle possible challenger)
-Roland Burris of Illinois (Repubs Mark Kirk, Patrick Hughes,
John Arrington, Donald Lowery, and Kathleen Thomas challenging)
-Evan Bayh of Indiana (Repubs John Hostettler, Marlin Stutzman,
Richard Behney, and Don Bates Jr. challenging)
-Barbara Mikulski of Maryland (Repub
challengers, Daniel McAndrew, Jim Rutledge,
Eric Wargotz, and Corrogan Vaughn)
-Paul G. Kirk Of Massachusetts (Special
election held in Jan 2010, Republican
challenger Scott P. Brown)
-Harry Reid of Nevada (Repub challengers
include Dan Tarkanian, Mark Amodei, John Chachas, Mark Noonan,
Bill Parson, Mike Wiley Greg Dagani, Robin Titus,
Sharron Angle and Sue Lowden)
-Kirsten Gillibrand of New York (Possible Repub
challengers Rudy Gulianni and Liz Feld)
-Chuck Schumer of New York (Repub challenger Martin Chicon)
-Byron Dorgan of North Dakota (Repub
challengers Paul Sorum, and Duane Sand)
-Ron Wyden of Oregon (possible Repub challenger Ron Wyden)
-Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania (Repub
challengers Pat Toomey, Larry Murphy, Peg Luksik, and Robert Townsend)
-Patrick Leahy of Vermont (Repub challenger
Len Britton)
-Patty Murray of Washington (Repub challengers
Wayne Glover, Sean Salazar, Scott Johnson, Rod Reiger, Craig Williams, and Arthur Coday )
-Russ Feingold of Wisconsin (Repub challengers
Dave Westlake, and Terrence Wall)
—————————————————-
There are also many other good conservative
and republican candidates running in all 50
States, so seek them out, research them, and
join with other conservatives to get the word
out, and let’s flip the House and Senate in
2010, and restore freedom and dignity to
America.
—————————————————-
If anyone notices incorrect, or missing Republican
Candidates from my list, post a reply, and I will
research it and make changes.
Thanks, Patriotic.
December 22nd, 2009 | 9:25 am | #9
No surprise. Obama will continue to lie about this, and say that abortion is not covered. It is another fallacy of this administration.
http://neoavatara.com/blog/?p=9145
December 22nd, 2009 | 9:26 am | #10
I think it bears repeating…
DNC -Dilation and curettage; an abortion procedure
DNC -Democratic National Committee; the group of people that will ensure that you WILL fund DNC’s above
December 22nd, 2009 | 10:10 am | #11
[...] the abortion compromising, BTW, apparently the Chinese wall is made of Swiss cheese. HotAir. Gateway with more from the acknowledged tax [...]
December 22nd, 2009 | 10:12 am | #12
Harry Reid slips in a bombshell for Obamacare foes
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/12/harry_reid_slips_in_a_bombshel.html
December 22nd, 2009 | 10:32 am | #13
Representative Democracy Thrown Away In Senate Bill
http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2009/12/representative-democracy-thrown-away-in.html
December 22nd, 2009 | 10:58 am | #14
Good time for a tax revolt, as no one should be forced to pay for this immorality.
December 22nd, 2009 | 11:10 am | #15
Pro-choice = Pro-ABORTION
YOU CANNOT BE BOTH CATHOLIC AND PRO-ABORTION.
SEBELIUS IS NOT A CATHOLIC. There is a group who will pay the price, including Ted “The Swimmer” Kennedy, Pelousy, Biden, Hanoi John Kerry. May they all reach the seventh level.
December 22nd, 2009 | 11:17 am | #16
[...] Suggested Reading For Kids Included Sick Book that Promoted S&M to Children- Media Silent and Health Secretary Sebelius Praises Mandatory Abortion Funding In Dem’s Nationalized Health Care Bil… and “Keep Your Stinkin Gift” Christmas Protest at Claire McCaskill’s Office- Wednesday at [...]
December 22nd, 2009 | 12:15 pm | #17
[...] Suggested Reading For Kids Included Sick Book that Promoted S&M to Children- Media Silent and Health Secretary Sebelius Praises Mandatory Abortion Funding In Dem’s Nationalized Health Care Bil… and “Keep Your Stinkin Gift” Christmas Protest at Claire McCaskill’s Office- Wednesday at [...]
December 22nd, 2009 | 12:27 pm | #18
Obama has done a strange thing appointing “Catholics” who publicly oppose the teachings of our faith and the leaders of the Catholic church.
Obama, our great divider/leader wants to promote disloyal and disobedient Catholic/Christians and give the illusion that they represent true faith.
Sebelius and other pro abortion “Catholics” show by action they are “Catholic” in name only.
December 22nd, 2009 | 4:06 pm | #19
ben nelson is so full of crap. So is that other “pro lifer” bob casey, jr. Is there anyone who still believes that they are pro life. No, they are not kidding anyone anymore.
December 22nd, 2009 | 4:11 pm | #20
I’m 73 years old. Let them take me to prison; I won’t pay for abortions!! I hope all people who care for the lives of the innocents will follow suit.
December 22nd, 2009 | 4:21 pm | #21
[...] Health Secretary Sebelius Praises Mandatory Abortion Funding In Dem’s Nationalized Health Care Bil… [...]
December 22nd, 2009 | 5:35 pm | #22
Sebalius is a satan humping tramp
December 22nd, 2009 | 7:06 pm | #23
This is going to make sure there are choices for women? So who is in charge of the choices for the unborn?
This woman is evil and because of her immense guilt for her actions and support for the killing of the unborn, she is going to make sure every last American will also have their hand in the murder of the unborn, one way or another, to sooth her evil, rancid soul. She will be able to throw it in the face of every American and state that every American is guilty for the killing of the unborn, so they won’t have a leg to stand on in putting blame anywhere. She really is an evil beeatch, but people are not guilty for the sins of others. I hardly doubt the taxes the Judeans paid to the Romans would mean that all Judeans were responsible for the crucifixtion of Christ because the Roman soldiers were paid with collected tax monies.
December 23rd, 2009 | 9:12 am | #24
You’ll pay bitchez
January 1st, 2010 | 2:53 pm | #25
[...] A Late Overview Of The Senate Christmas Gift January 1, 2010 Posted by taoist in Democrats. Tags: Congress, Corruption, Healthcare, Obama, Obamacare, The Senate trackback I know it’s been a week, but I’m just now getting around to blogging about the Democrat’s (and only the Democrat’s) passing of the health care bill. What’s their to mention? The unconstitutionality of the bill, and the new procedural rules it’s trying to set for itself. Or the incredible amounts of corruption, vote buying, and the Democrat’s arrogance and attitudes of such. There’s all the procedural shenanigans the Democrats did to pass the bill, tossing transparency out the window. There’s the Atlas Shrugged take, all of the everyday reasons why this it’s a terrible idea that isn’t going to work, reasons that fly in the face of the very evidence supporters toss at us. There’s the abortion angle. [...]
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact