TIME mag person of the year finalist Nancy Pelosi told “delegates” today at the UN global warming junk science conference in Copenhagen that global warming climate change is a women’s issue.
That’s funny. It doesn’t seem to bother her much when she takes her big-a$$ jet back and forth from DC to California.
This jet is the USAF C-32, Boeing 757, which Madam Pelosi uses for her jaunts across the country.
The Hill reported, via FOX Nation:
Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) addressed the Copenhagen climate change conference today, framing climate change as a women’s issue.
Speaking to a roundtable hosted by the Global Gender and Climate Alliance, Pelosi said the U.S. has for too long ignored climate change.
“For too long, America has failed to lead on climate change,” she said. “We have come to Copenhagen to say: ‘Those days are over. America is back.”
Pelosi said women should be particularly concerned about the detrimental effects of climate change.
“Women have the most to gain and the most to lose in the climate crisis,” she said. “The impacts are not gender-neutral; as the primary users, managers, and stewards of natural resources, women feel the consequences first.”
“As the primary users, managers, and stewards of natural resources, women feel the consequences first.”
What is she talking about?
December 17th, 2009 | 11:39 pm | #1
Along with Reid …she has lost it!!!
December 17th, 2009 | 11:42 pm | #2
The cold temperatures have the Botox in head to freeze. She’s an idiot who spews nothing but nonsense. What is she talking about????
December 17th, 2009 | 11:46 pm | #3
“As the primary users, managers, and stewards of natural resources, women feel the consequences first.”
Can there be any doubt that this women is taking illegal drugs? Could a sober person produce a collection of words with less meaning? Leadership, Democrat style!
Hey, Nan. Did you hear that women are being denied mammograms all across the nation because of what your government has done? Do you think women would rather take their chances with “climate change” or with breast cancer? You wouldn’t know a women’s issue or a human issue if it stood up and did a jig on the House floor.
Nancy, when you start acting like there is a climate crisis, we will believe you on that day. Until then, shut up!
December 17th, 2009 | 11:53 pm | #4
[...] more: Nancy Pelosi: Global Warming Junk Science Is a Women’s Issue Share this [...]
December 18th, 2009 | 12:04 am | #5
Unbelievable!
December 18th, 2009 | 12:07 am | #6
Don’t even try to figure out what she is talking about (or thinking), as this could cause you permanent brain damage. Nancy, that’s not global warming, it’s hot flashes. Sheesh!!!
As a female, I hate to think she is speaking for us all. I am also a breast cancer survivor who, within days (maybe a total of 8 days), I had seen my primary doctor, had a mammogram, had an appointment with a surgeon who performed an ultrasound, all confirming the diagnosis from the mammogram of cancer. Because it was caught and treated VERY quickly — no waiting lists or delays — within a total of 30 days, I was cancer-free after surgery and had met with the radiologist. With six weeks of radiation and no need for chemotherapy, I am four years cancer free and would not even think of missing a mammogram appointment.
My first mammogram was in my early 30s and I celebrated my 50th birthday just a few months ago. No female in my family would even consider waiting until age 50 to begin once every two year appointments on such a highly valuable and life-saving medical test.
December 18th, 2009 | 1:09 am | #7
She is of confusion and I rebuke it!!!
December 18th, 2009 | 1:40 am | #8
not sure what she is talking about, mostly because Granny Rictus McBotoxface dosen’t either.
for her to say that climate change belongs to one sex over the other is discriminatory, and grounds for a lawsuit.
December 18th, 2009 | 3:07 am | #9
Sadly, there is someone out there who will relate to what she is saying. This woman is just plain nuts. She is no good for our country.
What are those stupid San Franciscans thinking?
December 18th, 2009 | 4:14 am | #10
She won’t be the Speaker of the House in 2011. The Republican will win in 2010 and 2012. They will take control both US House and US Senate.
December 18th, 2009 | 4:28 am | #11
Climate fraud is an issue for everyone, not just women. This fraud must be stopped.
December 18th, 2009 | 4:31 am | #12
[...] PPS: În alte știri, o altă idioată: Nancy Pelosi ne spune că femeile sunt cele mai afectate de încălzirea globală cauzată de om (inexistentă, btw). Iată cum justifică ea: “Women have the most to gain and the most to lose in the climate crisis,” she said. “The impac… [...]
December 18th, 2009 | 4:39 am | #13
“Women have the most to gain and the most to lose in the climate crisis,” she said. “The impacts are not gender-neutral; as the primary users, managers, and stewards of natural resources, women feel the consequences first.”
So, we should tax women more for climate change problems?
December 18th, 2009 | 4:56 am | #14
Here’s the general campaign “elevator speech” for anyone running against a house democrat.
“A vote for any democrat member of the House of Representatives is a vote to retain Nancy Pelosi as Speaker, perhaps the most powerful legislative position in the world. As Americans, we cannot afford that.”
December 18th, 2009 | 5:33 am | #15
Are we witnessing the implosion of the Democratic party?
When you have no facts to back your argument I suppose you revert to nonsense. The Democrats are so covered up in despair of passing something in DC they don’t realize how ridiculous they are sounding.
And this is the person who is in 3rd in line for the presidency. Jeez. Get her out of that spot. She has lost any sense she may have had…this time in history will be listed as fiction in future political studies. Who will believe this saga of such incompetent leaders?
December 18th, 2009 | 6:08 am | #16
Some thoughts on going forward in 2010.
Conservative Republican Participation
http://www.redstate.com/morton_c_blackwell/2009/12/17/conservative-republican-participation/
December 18th, 2009 | 6:18 am | #17
More thoughts.
The Battleground Poll and the Battle for America
Good news for conservatives in the latest Battleground Poll. The political implications are profound, if the already-energized conservative base takes even more initiative.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/12/the_battleground_poll_and_the.html
December 18th, 2009 | 6:33 am | #18
DUH! some of you guys just now finding out how Racist,Sexist,Bigoted and Homophobic the left is.
Come on people, they are Leftist/Statists that want control of everything and WE are to stupid to do anything on our own. They are most dangerous when in power and NOW some of you are seeing it for the first time.(not all Ya’ll)
You are going to see a S**T storm bigger than the 94 takeover of congress. Make sure you vote for a conservative and watch out for imitations.
December 18th, 2009 | 6:37 am | #19
The wicked witch of the west needs to go back to SF permanently. How she can continue to get re-elected is beyond explanation. If the best we can hope for is for the GOP to take the House back in 2010 and have her unseated as Speaker, I’ll be happy with that.
December 18th, 2009 | 6:44 am | #20
“She won’t be the Speaker of the House in 2011. The Republican will win in 2010 and 2012. They will take control both US House and US Senate.”
Let’s hope this will be the case unfortunately, talk of third party crap will be the fastest ticket to a quick suicide.
We will defeat Pope Pelosi if we support insurgent Conservatives in the Republican Party otherwise the third party will keep the tyrants in power.
December 18th, 2009 | 6:51 am | #21
SYN is correct, I got tricked by Ross Perot once upon a time. Never again. “A third party is not needed, What we need is a reinvigorated Republican party, don’t paint with pastels paint with bold colors”
Ronald Regan……….We can definately give America a better choice than these Dangerous Statists.
December 18th, 2009 | 7:17 am | #22
She’s certifiable.
December 18th, 2009 | 7:17 am | #23
Perhaps this can help explain what Madam Speaker meant when she said global warming was “women’s issues”.
She’s hoping that she can bring enough of these puppies back from Denmark to satisfy the initial demand from those democrat ladies in Congress. How about it Barney Frank? You interested?
‘Green’ vibrators promise sustainable pleasure
Yahoo! News
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091215/od_afp/unclimatewarmingirelandretailsexoffbeat
December 18th, 2009 | 7:18 am | #24
She’s absolutely right!
Think of it this way…
Global warming means a longer summer, which means a longer golf season, which means Tiger Woods can take advantage of more women.
So, either we have to stop the warming or we have to tame the Tiger.
December 18th, 2009 | 7:19 am | #25
NY Times Headline:
“World to End Tomorrow”
Subtitle:
“Women and the Poor Hit the Hardest”
December 18th, 2009 | 7:30 am | #26
I have a very negative, visceral reaction to this woman. (Anything more I could say would be inappropriate for this holiday season.)
December 18th, 2009 | 7:42 am | #27
Kate
Ditto……..
December 18th, 2009 | 7:43 am | #28
THERE IS A REASON PELOSI’S FAMILY SENT HER TO WASHINGTON. After seeing her in action, wouldn’t you want her on the other side of the country? I bet the House wishes they could send her somewhere far, far away, too.
December 18th, 2009 | 7:44 am | #29
Terry in Georgia
Bravo
December 18th, 2009 | 7:53 am | #30
Let’s see,
climate change>global warming>ice caps melting>higher tides>highest tides at full moon once a month>the “monthlies”
Oh. I get it.
December 18th, 2009 | 8:16 am | #31
I thought that farmers via the “Adamic concept” of the 19th century were stewards of the earth.Thanks to Nancy for ending that concept.Moreover,if the press wanted to display the lunacy of Mrs. Pelosi ,this speech should be front and center in the “fourth estate.”
Kates’ post is spot on.
December 18th, 2009 | 8:22 am | #32
Why in the hell do the people in San Fran keep voting for this nut job? I know that they are insane out there with their liberalism, but don’t they see this woman is making a fool of herself every time she speaks? And as their quote “representative” that she is making them the laughing stock of the country? What fools they are.
Oh and by the way, TIME magazine making her a finalist for “Person of the Year”? ARE YOU F***ING KIDDING ME???????????
When is that joke of a publication going to go out of business? And Bernake the winner? What is wrong with these people? So robbing the country blind, sending us into the worst deficit numbers in the history of the country, BY ALMOST QUADRUPLE, makes them the people of the year? Completely insane.
December 18th, 2009 | 9:13 am | #33
I’ve been getting hot flashes…must be global warming!
December 18th, 2009 | 9:42 am | #34
I didn’t think that Pelosi wanted the U.S. to lead anymore. Let’s have Uganda lead for a few years and see how that works out.
December 18th, 2009 | 9:57 am | #35
Hah! Maybe there really is an evil Spirit of Confusion.
December 18th, 2009 | 10:12 am | #36
Men (and Women) of Genius!
2010 Campaign Preview: Democrats To Say GOP Still Party Of Bush
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/12/2010-campaign-preview-democrats-to-say-gop-still-party-of-bush.php
December 18th, 2009 | 10:38 am | #37
Just when you think Nazi Piglosi is the bedrock of stupidity, she surpasses herself.
December 18th, 2009 | 10:51 am | #38
Its all about menopause and hot flashes. Jeesh!
December 18th, 2009 | 10:55 am | #39
Come to think of it. If women are causing global warming with their hot flashes, then Nancy ought to slit her wrists or maybe crash that big plane of hers to gain a little street cred. I know I’ve wanted to slit my wrist whenever the wife got hot flashes.
December 18th, 2009 | 12:07 pm | #40
I always have the impression that Pelosi is a light-weight who just parrots what her staff tells her to say. She is a lunatic, and I can only think that the people who elect her are also lunatics. (Possibly kin to the people who keep electing Barney Frank.)
December 18th, 2009 | 12:38 pm | #41
++
on a lighter note (ht Mike H)..
The 12 Days Of Global Warming
==
December 18th, 2009 | 1:13 pm | #42
A woman who’s done that to her face is in no position to tell other women what’s best for us.
December 18th, 2009 | 2:04 pm | #43
++
Terry in Georgia @ 12:07 am #6
re:
[Don’t even try to figure out what she is talking about (or thinking),
as this could cause you permanent brain damage. Nancy, that’s not
global warming, it’s hot flashes. Sheesh!!!]
ROTFLMBO!!
as for the rest of your post..
thanks for sharing & God bless you!!
==
December 18th, 2009 | 2:58 pm | #44
[...] Nancy Pelosi: Global Warming Junk Science Is a Women’s Issue [...]
December 18th, 2009 | 4:41 pm | #45
Nancy Pelosi should be handing out hot meals and cool towelettes on that big ass plane!
December 18th, 2009 | 7:45 pm | #46
Pelosi’s days of hot flashes are long past. She is probably speaking to women being in charge of their households and the resources they utilize in the management of same.
December 19th, 2009 | 4:44 am | #47
Nancy and her 20 minions took two 757s to Copenhagen. When this inconvenient truth became public, she immediately tried to make this little fling about “jobs.” Nice try, Nancy. San Francisco, please send this lady home for good in 2010.
Links
Blogs
Find Us
Contact