Gateway Pundit
SUBSCRIBER LOGIN
forgot password? | obtain login




Search First Things

Advanced Search



Favorite American Blogs

Ace of Spades
Althouse
Amy Procter
Andrew Marcus
Another Rovian Conspiracy
Astute Bloggers
Atlas Shrugs
Austin Bay
Bare Naked Islam
Barking Moonbats
Barone Blog
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
Black and Right
Blogs For Victory
Blog Prof
Blue Crab Boulevard
Byrd Droppings
California Conservative
Carol Platt Liebau
Chicago Boyz
Cold Fury
Commoner Sense
Confederate Yankee
Conservative Thoughts
Da Mihi Animas
Dean's World
Debbie Schlussel
Democracy Project
Dinocrat
Discarded Lies
Don Surber
Doug Ross
Dr. Helen
Dr. Sanity
Ed Driscoll
Elephant Bar
Fausta's Blog
Flopping Aces
Founding Bloggers
FOX Nation
Free Republic
Gates of Vienna
Gay Patriot
Gina Cobb
GOP Bloggers
GOP Vixen
Grand Old Partisan
Grouchy Old Cripple
HotAir
HotAirPundit
Hugh Hewitt
I Own the World
IMAO
INDC
Infidels Are Cool
Insta-Backup
Instapundit
Jammie Wearing Fool
Jules Crittenden
Just One Minute
La Shawn Barber
Legal Insurrection
Let Freedom Ring
Lucianne
Macsmind
Maggie's Farm
Mark Steyn
Michelle Malkin
New England Republican
New Underground Railroad
News Busters
No-Liberal Spin
Noisy Room
Outside the Beltway
Pat Dollard
Patterico
PoliPundit
Power Line
Prairie Pundit
Protein Wisdom
Rantburg
Reaganite Republican
Red State
Riehl World View
Right Wing News
Right Wing Nuthouse
Roger L. Simon
Say Anything
Scared Monkeys
Sister Toldjah
Sound Politics
Strata Sphere
Sweetness & Light
Tammy Bruce
Texas Rainmaker
The Anchoress
The Autonomist
The Corner
The Futurist
The Jawa Report
The Other McCain
The Return of Scipio
TigerHawk
Tom Delay
Urgent Agenda
Verum Serum
Viking Pundit
Volokh Conspiracy
WILLisms
Wizbang!
Zombietime

Blog Ads


Favorite International Blogs


Democracy &
Human Rights


Favorite Military & Foreign Service Blogs


Favorite Media

Pajamas Media
HotAir
Power Line News
Drudge Report
Breitbart.com
Big Hollywood
Big Government
Daily Caller
FOX Nation
Rush Limbaugh
Laura Ingraham
Mark Levin
Neal Boortz
Real Clear Politics
American Thinker
American Spectator
National Review
Weekly Standard
Commentary Magazine
IBD Editorials
SLATE- Kaus Files
Front Page Magazine
Human Events
NewsMax
World Net Daily
Town Hall
The Hill
Ashbrook Center
Media Research Organization
GOP.com
GOP.gov
GOP.gov -House
GOP Senators.com
Cybercast News Service
C-SPAN
Radio Free Europe-Radio Liberty
The White House
US State Department
US Senate
US House of Representatives
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Treasury Department
Defend America
US Central Command
Pentagon Channel
FOX News
Politico
New York Times
Reuters
World Picture News
BBC News
EUX TV News (Europe)
Arutz Sheva- Israel News
Haaretz Daily
IMRA- Independent Media
Jerusalem Post
YNET News
Debka File
Laura Mansfield
Terrorism Research Center
ADN Kronos (Italy)
Internet Haganah
Irin News- UN
War & Peace Reporting
Charter '97- Belarus
All Africa
Sudan Tribune
Arab World News
Aljazeera
Al Arabiya
Asharq Alawsat
Gulf Times
Turkish Daily News
Kurdish Media
Voices of Iraq
Alsumaria (Iraq)
Bahrain Tribune
Maan News (Palestine)
Naharnet
Ya Libnan
Iran Focus
Planet Iran
Iran Press News
Mehr News
Tehran Times
Islamic Republic News
Fars News (Iran)
Afgha-nistan
Hindustan Times
Tribune India
Inside Asia
Japan Today
China Daily
Sound of Hope Radio
Asian Tribune
Korea Times
Dawn (Pakistan)
Daily Times
Pakistani Newspaper
Interfax
Itar-Tass
Pravda
Russian News
Russia Today
Russian News Online
Ferghana
The Australian
El Universal (Venezuela)
Watching America
Babel Fish

Favorites from
Gateway City & Area


Great Websites


Contributors


Email GP


Sitemeter



« « Previous  |Home|  Next » »         

Posted by Jim Hoft on Monday, January 4, 2010, 5:19 AM

The Left Ups Their Attacks on Christianity–
Leftists in the state-run media are lambasting Brit Hume for promoting Christianity on a Sunday morning talk show.
Yesterday, Hume suggested that Tiger Woods try out Christianity to help him with his infidelity problem.

This enraged the liberals and leftists.
According to democrats and liberals it is no longer acceptable to promote Christianity publicly.
Steve Benan at The Washington Monthly reported:

I was taken aback when I saw that Fox News’ Brit Hume, reflecting on Woods’ career on the air this morning, talked about whether the golfer may return to his chosen profession.

“The extent to which he can recover seems to me depends on his faith,” Hume said. “He is said to be a Buddhist. I don’t think that faith offers the kind of forgiveness and redemption that is offered by the Christian faith. So, my message to Tiger is, ‘Tiger, turn to the Christian faith and you can make a total recovery and be a great example to the world.”

Hume was not, as the video shows, kidding.

It’s hard to even know where to start with something like this. How many high-profile Christians have had damaging sex scandals of late? Why is Buddhism deemed inadequate for those with family problems? Why is a senior political analyst for a so-called “news” network proselytizing, on the air, during one of the network’s “news” programs?

It used to be that liberals didn’t want you to mention Christ in schools. Then they banned Christ from Christmas concerts and public squares.
Now they are demanding that we not talk about Christianity in public.
We should have seen this coming.

More Brit-bashing from Politics Daily– “Jesus can tame you, Tiger”

172 Comments

    Bill In PANo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 7:46 am | #1

    Brit was right on target. Christ is the only way to true forgiveness and eternal life. I just love FOX!

    Toaster 802No Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 7:58 am | #2

    Only Obama can walk on water, heal thy sick and feed the masses with loaves and fishes…

    The first order in setting up any Marxist dictatorship is to do away with Christ…

    DanteNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:02 am | #3

    Is Easter here already? Jeeze. Christmas just ended and the attacks keep comin. Satan is working overtime.

    Tweets that mention Gateway Pundit -- Topsy.com
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:03 am | #4

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by FocusOnHistory, DNC Fail!. DNC Fail! said: #tcot #ucot #sgp It Has Begun… Libs Attack Brit Hume For Promoting Christianity on Sunday Talk Show: http://url4.eu/13FHY [...]

    Terry GainNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:05 am | #5

    Good for Brit Hume. There are many examples of athletes who’ve been sustained by their Christian faith. I would make the same recommendation to Obama but I think he would get the message of turning the other cheek and little else.

    I think it will be very hard for Tiger Woods to get past this debacle if he is not doing what he loves most and is best at. He is going to endure public humiliation when he re-enters public life but he will receive a lot of encouragement from people who wish to make a public display of their compassion.

    My recommendation to Tiger Woods is that he call a press conference to announce that he is immediately returning to the PGA Tour and is determined to lead a less selfish life.

    No ManNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:05 am | #6

    Score ONE for the Britster!

    I love it when vicious liberal scumbags (I repeat myself again) get their tighty-whiteys in a bunch over the TRUTH.

    New Years Resolution: Annoy liberal daily!

    DellNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:06 am | #7

    Hume, of course, will simply ignore them all and continue to do what Brit Hume does so well – tell it like it is.

    They won’t even get a rise out of Hume. They should have waited for a weak target. Hume is not weak.

    DanielNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:09 am | #8

    “I don’t understand. You don’t have a problem with God, do you?”

    Now where, oh where, have I heard that before?

    Seems it was a local news interview (somewhere) with an auto salesman.

    JamesDoulosNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:30 am | #9

    I have a much better idea, lets have a pogrom against the liberal-progressives! For all intents and purposes they’re an ethnic group, haters of all humanity and civilization so pogrom is the correct term.

    The environmentalists and liberals all think that there are to many people walking the face of the earth – yet they ALL refuse to volunteer themselves for disenfranchisement. Why not just appoint them as inheritors of Darwin’s natural selection process – that would definitely take care of any hypocrisy they might be displaying concerning one of their major god figures (the infamous Charles Darwin).

    HueyNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:37 am | #10

    I was astonished when I heard that the head of the “fair and balanced” NEWS portion of FOX News Network suggested that someone not only “accept Jesus” but that his current religion was inferior to Christianity and should, therefore, be REJECTED.

    Shame on him.

    Is it even possible to list/name all the “Christians” who have engaged in infidelity all the while attending church? Good thing they were/are “Christians” so that they can be so easily “forgiven…”

    We don’t know a lot of things about Tiger’s behavior. Further, we don’t know a lot of things about his WIFE’s behavior. It could easily be argued that his wife KNEW about his behavior and ACCEPTED his behavior so long as he was DISCREET. This type of “partnership/marriage” is not uncommon. Certainly, it is hard to believe that she didn’t know what was going on. The fact that she didn’t blow up until it was on the verge of going public militates towards the “keep it discreet” paradigm (as does the fact that the first thing she did after the story broke was to call in the LAWYERS to “re-negotiate” her pre-nup into a more lucrative “post-nup.”)

    So, we don’t even KNOW that there’s anything to be “forgiven” in the first place.

    But, to say that becoming a “Christian” is the only path to forgiveness is outrageous.

    “Forgiveness” by WHOM? His wife? The public? Himself? The universe? GOD?

    What a load of proselytizing crud. As a fan of FOX news, I’m appalled that one of its heavy hitting symbols of “objective reporting” decided to proselytize in such a fashion. (I have no problem with him doing so in private, or even in some other public venue. He’s as entitled to his views as much as anyone…but this was on the NEWS for cripe’s sake…)

    BobbiNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:39 am | #11

    Frankly, I disagree with Brit. He should not be proselytizing. My spiritual master told me never to discourage anyone who had “faith”. What you do is you end up destroying the person’s possibly only asset. Seems to me Tiger has more of a psychiatric problem, rather than one of faith. Buddhism seems to have worked very well for the Dalai Lama. I am not, BTW, Buddhist.

    Militant ConservativeNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:46 am | #12

    Liberals problem in a nut shell.
    If you don’t believe in GOD, you’ll believe anything.

    synNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:46 am | #13

    “Shame on him.”

    wow Huey, you are some ‘holy’ with all your moral indignation.

    And another thing, your ‘keep it discreet’ is quite telling; are you the cheater or is your partner the cheater.

    Or are you the lone loser because everyone you know knows you to be a cheater and a liar?

    Listen Sweetie, you don’t know me so STFU.

    synNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:54 am | #14

    “Buddhism seems to have worked very well for the Dalai Lama”

    The easy thing about being a Buddhist is that GLBT will never get in front of Buddhist temple protesting their hatred for the Dalia Lama beliefs against homosexuality.

    Ironically, the Buddhist position against homosexuality is the same as Islam as it is Christianity.

    Fascinating how the Do-gooders pick and choose what is moral and what is not.

    According to Do-gooders Pope Pelosi and the Bishops Kennedy are more morally righteous than whatever comes out of the Vatican.

    templar knightNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:54 am | #15

    Hmm…did the liberals criticize Buddism when Tiger proved to be “a high profile” failure to his religion? That’s what I thought. Christians are the only people held to any standard by the liberal media. So all you people who don’t agree with Hume, go suck a hot hotchie! You have double standards, and you show it.

    JamesDoulosNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:55 am | #16

    Bobbi
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:39 am | #11

    RE: “My spiritual master told me never to discourage anyone who had “faith”….Buddhism seems to have worked very well for the Dalai Lama.”

    LOL That sarcastic crack about the Dalai Lama is great! Yup, he’s doing great in his robes and mansions – Buddhism is working EXTREMELY well for him! Kind of like ‘global warming’ is working out very good for Al Gore, the inventor of the Internet! LOL

    BTW, who is your ‘spiritual master’? Is it your lower bowel? It sounds as if you might be suffering from oxygen deprivation due to your windpipe being compressed via your bung hole!

    FedUpNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:56 am | #17

    Hoooray for Brit! As long as we have people like him who aren’t afraid to speak up about Christ, there is hope for US! All you who get your panties in a bunch, breathe into a paper bag.

    I can’t get excited when someone wants to talk about Buddha or Druids, witches or those who want to worship trees or atheists. I can’t even get bent over muslims PEACEFULLY worshipping their god. That’s the neat thing about a country founded on religious freedom. I do get rabid abour muslims using their faith to kill people.

    JamesDoulosNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 9:02 am | #18

    JamesDoulos
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:55 am | #16

    Oh, lest you misunderstood me Bobbi, about my last comment concerning your ‘spiritual master’ being your lower bowel – I wasn’t commenting upon your sexual preference’s, although that may be true also. Don’t tell me – I don’t want to know!

    IOpianNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 9:02 am | #19

    humm.. wonder what this progressive Steve Benan was doing watching this so-called “news’ network. Liberals can get fired for this type of treasonous behavior.

    synNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 9:03 am | #20

    Speaking of ‘proselytizing’

    The Do-gooders are the world’s greatest proselytizers from proselyting free government heath care to being against a war to remove a mass-murdering tyrant to Thanking God for abortion to starving human beings will save a tree to instructing children how to shove a fist up another human being’s anal cavity etc etc.

    Do-gooders: the PROSELYTIZERS of the Temple of Evil Empires.

    MorightNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 9:04 am | #21

    Touchy, touchy. Why so offended?

    ElizabethNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 9:08 am | #22

    Brit comes across with the true Christian spirit of love. He is witnessing for his faith in a most beautiful way, reaching out to a fellow man to save his soul and steady his walk here on earth.

    Well done, Brit. Well done.

    Scott JeromeNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 9:11 am | #23

    First of all, Hume offered this advice during the FNS All Star Panel opinion segment. So the charge that he is abusing his journalistic integrity is incorrect.
    Secondly, the old ruse that Christianity is a failed belief system because we can see plenty of fallen Christians who are guilty of infidelity is very tired. No one ever claimed that all Christians are perfect. We are sinners. Hume was opining that if he wants to redeem himself, Woods’ Buddhist faith is probably inadequate and Christ is the straight path toward redemption, not only with the Lord, but with the American public, as well.
    Of course, the Christian-hating left and lame-stream media cannot see that because their vision is so clouded with pride.
    Hume is a smart guy. When he’d said this, he knew full well what the reaction would be from certain corners. I’m sure he welcomes the discussion,.

    Ladue PunditNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 9:15 am | #24

    Tiger Woods had no problem taking the Lord’s name in vain on the golf course.

    Maybe he can start swearing the name of his Buddha, Siddartha Gautama, since he does not believe in the true God.
    —————

    ScottNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 9:27 am | #25

    Is Huey really so stupid that he is unable to distinguish the OP-ED part of the show from the NEWS reporting?

    Those folks were expressing their OPINIONS. Were you outraged when Bill Kristol said he thought the regime in Iran will fall this year? Maybe it will, maybe not. It’s his OPINION. Were you beside yourself when Juan Williams said it was his OPINION that unemployment will be 8% by the November elections?

    It is Brit Hume’s OPINION that christianity is more forgiving than Buddism.

    Get a clue.

    kateNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 9:32 am | #26

    Speaking of proselytizers, the left doesn’t seem to have a problem with Kevin Jennings.

    One WayNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 9:38 am | #27

    Both Elizabeth and Scott (#22,#23) have expressed my thoughts better than I ever could.

    I’ll only add that Tiger’s finding redemption through Christ might serve as an incredible example to others who are struggling to find their own way back from a fall.

    If anything could surpass his achievements on the golf course, that would be it, in my book.

    My heart and prayers are with Tiger and his family. And with others who are searching for forgiveness as well.

    SojournerNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 9:52 am | #28

    I have to say, Brit’s comments stopped me dead in my tracks.. not because of their content but because it’s been a long time since a public man,held,I believe, in high regard by both political parties for his integrity and steady hand on issues, spoke frankly about his faith and its redemptive power to heal… the morning moment’s power emerged from the power of Brit, the man, expressing in plain words a universal truth:faith can save us from ourselves.. the synergy between the man and the message showed so well.. the lefties and libs can whine away.. Brit’s message went across the airwaves seamlessly and hit their mark.

    PamlinsonNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 9:54 am | #29

    Thank you Brit Hume for having the spine to stand up for America’s values! Christian America is finally waking up. This country dosen’t belong to Islam or any other twisted mindset – DEAL WITH IT.

    AnimusNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 9:55 am | #30

    No, I am afraid Brit was in error.
    Christianity is simply incapable of providing the transcendence that Tiger needs; Tiger and many others would be much more at peace if they were to acknowledge the truth that is Gaia, the Goddess.
    Not to get everyone upset, but it seems inescapable that paganism is much more conducive to personal healing than Christianity.

    TexmomNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 9:59 am | #31

    #23, well said.
    The big concern for us all is that they are trying to make it seem unacceptable (and, I think, soon to be illegal) to express faith publically….at least the Christian faith.Look out for new broadcasting legislation in our near future.
    We have allowed this to escalate over the years in the name of political correctness, and now we are paying. We’ve got to stand up strong now before it’s too late.

    Robb76No Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 9:59 am | #32

    My, my. Why do heathens rage and protest so strongly when Our Lord is brought into the public square?
    But we all know the answer to that, don’t we?

    BackwardsBoyNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 10:03 am | #33

    Good for Brit! It’s about time we Christians started standing up for ourselves despite what others think.

    It’s also rather telling that non-believers in the MSM are so insistant to be heard, but don’t want Christians to be heard. Nice double standard ya got there.

    I feel sorry for Tiger. He’s obviously struggling with his addiction from which he can no longer hide. Hopefully, he’ll take the good-natured advice from Brit Hume and allow God to help him.

    aprilnovember811No Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 10:05 am | #34

    Boy, the COMMUNISTS, really hate Christianity, don’t they. I have a piece of advice for you COMMUNISTS in the COMMUNIST PROPAGANDA networks, don’t watch or listen if you don’t like it! We’ve had it with you, and we are going to do everything in our power to put you out of business! Maybe you can join all of the other unemployed, caused by your MARXIST PRESIDENT OBAMA!

    DanielNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 10:17 am | #35

    Robb76,

    Yes. We do.

    John in the Land of LouisNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 10:23 am | #36

    They needed Christopher Hitchens on the other side to remain “Fair and Balanced.”

    John in the Land of LouisNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 10:25 am | #37

    What if Brit said for Tiger to turn to Islam? What you all be saying then?

    Carbon MonoxideNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 10:34 am | #38

    Christianity has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and not tried. G.K. Chesterton

    Carbon MonoxideNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 10:36 am | #39

    “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” Jesus

    MopeNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 10:41 am | #40

    Someone should tell the libs about the Islamification of prisoners in the prisons. Oh, wait. It’s the separation of church and state, not mosque and state.

    flipsideNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 10:43 am | #41

    Right, and didn’t we all get non stop coverage of Bill Clinton and his special prayer meetings a the WH with Jesse, Sunday morning video of Bill and Hillary cluching their bibles…blabla…liberals are are full of it

    uberVU - social comments
    January 4th, 2010 | 10:48 am | #42

    Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by FocusOnHistory: Hume is right. If your golf swing stinks chg it. If your morality stinks chg it. Be’g a Christian is good choice. http://bit.ly/6uuVyh...

    HueyNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 10:57 am | #43

    The notion that it is acceptable for the senior political analyst of FOX News to tell an American Citizen that his chosen religion is INFERIOR to Christianity is outrageous.

    Is he on a pulpit? Is he a religious leader? Is he a spokesman for Christianity (of whatever persuasion)?

    No.

    He is the Senior Political Analyst of FOX News, speaking on FOX News Channel who CHOSE to inject RELIGION into the conversation. In doing so, he opined that ONLY his religion provided the answer he believed that Tiger needed.

    Not Islam.
    Not Buddhism.
    Not Hinduism.
    Not Judaism.

    ONLY Christianity. Only accepting the divinity of Jesus will result in the forgiveness that Hume believes Tiger needs. Somehow, none of the rest of the world’s religions can provide this answer — regardless of the age of those religions and the billions of adherents they command.

    Only Christianity.

    It is this arrogance of belief which has caused so many travails over the centuries — the notion that MY truth is superior to YOUR truth.

    It is when this arrogance of belief is coupled with a willingness to forcibly convert others to the “superior truth” that we have, well, what we have today as Islamofacists try to convert the world to their superior truth.

    (To those who would twist this to convey an implication that Hume is comparable to Islamsfacists…yawn… I’m a fan of Hume. I just think that it is outrageous that he would say such a thing.)

    I’m a conservative atheist. (Yeah, some believe this to be an oxymoron. Can’t help that. Some believe that their truth is THE truth. Can’t help that either.)

    I don’t have any problem with Hume being a Christian. (Just as I wouldn’t have any problem with him being Islamic or a Mormon (which I assert isn’t a “Christian” religion.) I almost envy him his certitude of faith. (It has been said that atheists visit upon themselves their punishment.)

    But, I don’t SHARE that certitude of belief.

    Islamics don’t SHARE that certitude of belief.
    Buddhists don’t SHARE that certitude of belief.

    Anyone who doesn’t SHARE that certitude of belief would be OFFENDED (especially Buddhists) by the notion that ONLY Christianity (of whatever and unstated kind Hume practices) would offer the “forgiveness” that Hume believes Tiger needs.

    Sigh.

    kevinycNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 11:04 am | #44

    I am a Christian, but if one is going to posit Christianity as superior to Buddhism, then one should at the very least know what they are talking about. I am not sure that Brit Hume does. For one Buddhist perspective, read this:

    http://buddhism.about.com/b/2010/01/04/lets-forgive-brit-hume.htm

    Ladue PunditNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 11:05 am | #45

    But, I don’t SHARE that certitude of belief———————-

    Sigh. It’s not about YOU.

    Atheists are so boring, and unable to accept the fact that people, even Opinion/Editorial types, are allowed opinions.

    Bill Kristol is a Jew. Had he suggested that Tiger, the fad religion follower, embrace Judaism, who would care?

    Christianity’s mention throws holy water on the vampires. Listen to them sizzle!

    jimboNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 11:07 am | #46

    Are you really that stupid? If I’m going to screw around, as so many evangelicals have been caught doing lately, I’m instantly forgiven, and I can go out and do it again with a clean slate? Here’s a fact. As a 68 year old athiest who keeps himself in super shape, I get my share of hit-ons. But I adopted a radical approach many years ago, I don’t lie. Been a tough way to go, but I’ve never cheated on my wife. Unfortunately so many republicans could never live under that simple agenda. Lying is what these people do best. You may excuse them by saying they are ‘forgiven’, you can never excuse their lack of character and integrity. You can scream your phoney religious horse pucky, but all you do is identify what a failure it is, and you are.

    sandyNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 11:08 am | #47

    Keep it up Libs–everytime you attack Church going people more of those people will come out and vote Republican. With the economic problems this nation has turning to God may be all we have left cause the self-proclaimed Messiah is only making things worse.

    Ladue PunditNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 11:17 am | #48

    What is sin? Oh, I see, you atheists decide. Cheating and lying are sinful…until you decide they’re not.

    You are such good people. Not like the fallen Christians who acknowledge their sins and repent.

    Remember: it’s not the number of times you fall down, it’s the number of times you get up.

    The problem with atheists is, you guys don’t realize that you’re down.

    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 11:34 am | #49

    Huey, Brit was expressing an opinion. In my view, the correct opinion.

    And it was an expresssion that took courage. You don’t think that he knew outrage would be coming from the MSM and agnostics and atheists who seem to think that they are the only ones who can rule thought and expression? Of course, he knew that. Yet, he said it.

    That my friends (believes and non-believers) is a snapshot of courage.

    If we Christians (those who live it in thought, word and deeds) live with that kind of courage, we could make a difference in the way our country is turning. Let’s face it . . . political correctness got us where we are today. With an amateur in the WH and loons in Congress.

    bgNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 11:34 am | #50
    SolaratovNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 11:37 am | #51

    John in the Land of Louis
    January 4th, 2010 | 10:25 am | #37
    What if Brit said for Tiger to turn to Islam? What you all be saying then?
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    We all be saying that there’s enough of that crap going around already.

    Why? What did you think we’d say, fool?

    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 11:45 am | #52

    bg, that video at #50 is awesome . . . it must go viral. I am so glad I am at home. I am crying like a baby. That is what the world needs. Christian love!

    SolaratovNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 11:48 am | #53

    Huey
    January 4th, 2010 | 10:57 am | #43

    It was on an OPINION show, huey. Now unwad your panties and get over it.

    Obviously, Brit doesn’t really care if you and the rest of the non-Christian world are/were offended by his expression of his belief.
    When asked for his OPINION, he gave it – honestly.
    Are you suggesting that OPINIONS now be tempered to fit your definition of what might or might not be offensive to some group or another? Wouldn’t that sort of be like “bending to political correctness”You might consider joining up with the democRATS. They just loooove all the politically correct crap.

    **************************************

    He who dares not offend cannot be honest.
    —Thomas Paine

    SolaratovNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 11:53 am | #54

    jimbo
    January 4th, 2010 | 11:07 am | #46

    If Republicans do so much lying – why are all of the democRATS getting caught in lies?

    You leftists would rather climb a tree to tell a lie than stand on the ground and tell the truth.

    Go peddle your crap elsewhere. You’re a fool and a parrot.

    JoanneNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 11:56 am | #55

    Now if a Muslim called Tiger Woods to Islam, the leftards wouldn’t have said a thing.

    SolaratovNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:02 pm | #56

    bg
    January 4th, 2010 | 11:34 am | #50

    Thank you!

    JoanneNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:08 pm | #57

    First off, atheism is proselytizing every single day on the air and in everyone’s lives. You can’t use the word ‘Christmas’ because it offends the atheists, but when the word ‘Christmas’ isn’t used you are catering to the religion of atheism. Atheists want it their way, every day.

    I just love it when people refer to themselves as ‘Christians’, but then do not stand behind their own religion. Ever heard of the Commandment – ‘Do not take the name of the Lord in vain.’ Do not claim to be a Christian, when you do not do the works thereof.

    bgNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:14 pm | #58

    ++

    The History of Political Correctness

    can you say GLSEN??

    yes you can!!

    can you say anti-Christianity??

    yes you can!!

    can you say assault on Traditional Values??

    yes you can!!

    can you say assault on Traditional Western Culture??

    yes you can!!

    can you say Marxism??

    yes you can!!

    ==

    JoanneNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:21 pm | #59

    That was a great video bg @ #50. How hard is it to be kind anyhow; this world needs a whole lot of love.

    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:24 pm | #60

    If you have studied the Bible very much, you know that attacks are to be expected. It will get worse as we head more and more to a liberal, left leaning society. At some point, we will be persecuted more fully and will at some point be forced to go underground like they did during the formation of the early church.

    It is coming. Just didn’t think I would see so many signs in my lifetime. I am concerned for the small children in my family. It is going to be so much worse for them.

    ChisumNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:24 pm | #61

    Go peddle your crap elsewhere. You’re a fool and a parrot

    Ah, but he is a “shapely and desirable” parrot.

    Just ask him.

    CowboyJoeNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:24 pm | #62

    Isn’t it interesting that the posters who are offended at Brit’s remarks are all atheists and not Buddhists.

    BoNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:25 pm | #63

    There are plenty of reasons why Hume’s “come to Jesus” comments were silly (and arrogant and closed-minded and ridiculous and unprofessional); however, the chief problem is that they are untrue. There is a path to foregiveness and redemption in the Buddhist faith. It begins with making amends and self-awareness — two concepts that are apparently foreign to Hume or anyone who pimps on the FoxSnooze channel.

    DanielNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:26 pm | #64

    jimbo said “… Unfortunately so many republicans could never live under that simple agenda.”

    ——–

    Nothing like painting with a broad brush, eh?
    So. Feel good about yourself?
    Excuse me if I don’t feel a thing for your pompousness.

    ChristopherNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:27 pm | #65

    Once again it is Proven Absolutly.

    Truth to a Liberal is Like Holy Water to a Vampire.

    Bret is Correct. Tiger has an opportunity to make a total recovery and be a great example to the world.

    It Depends if Tiger wants to worship Cows (Budist), Sever Heads (Muslims) or Love & Be Loved (Christianity).

    JoanneNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:30 pm | #66

    jimbo – you know a Christian by their works, not their words. Many people claim to be Christians, but they are far from it. If you had any understanding of Christianity or of its teachings, you would know the Bible speaks of these people.

    Now Christians who stumble and fall, well, God does forgive those people when they ask for forgiveness and turn from their sins. It isn’t easy to be a Christian these days, with everything that goes against the teachings of the Bible are being forced down your throat daily, but the strong will persevere.

    JosefNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:31 pm | #67

    A question for Mr. Hoft:

    Would you be as quick to defend this if Mr. Hume were a Muslim and were urging Tiger to find “salvation” in Islam?

    Just curious.

    MumonNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:32 pm | #68

    Talk all you want about Christianity. Just don’t consider “talking about Christianity” the equivalent of making idiotic remarks about Buddhism and Buddhists won’t complain.

    What is it, you don’t want discussions about Buddhism in the public square? Isn’t that religious bigotry?

    HueyNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:33 pm | #69

    Of course it was Brit’s “opinion.”

    But, that’s the point, isn’t it?

    It is his opinion that 1) Tiger needs “forgiveness.” (It isn’t apparent from his remarks from whom that “forgiveness” is needed or which of his actions require “forgiveness”, just that it is needed.); 2) That Tiger’s chosen religion doesn’t provide that which Britt has decided that Tiger needs; 3) That, therefore, Tiger should discard his chosen (and inferior) religion for Christianity.

    As noted above (with link) Hume clearly isn’t up on his Buddhism or he wouldn’t have made such an ignorant remark. (Read the link…do some research on Buddhism…)

    But, more importantly, it is simple arrogance that provided the impetus for this remark, the arrogance that HE knows THE ANSWER and his answer (the TRUTH) is the ONLY answer — every other “answer” either wrong or incomplete.

    Again, I have no problem with Hume’s religious beliefs (whatever they are — it is an assumption that any person who advocates another to abandon his religion for Christianity is a Christian of some denomination, but only that). I just find the arrogance of the remarks — remarkable.

    (For the person who remarked that atheists self-define “sin” as they choose, you miss the mark. As an atheist, I deny “sin” in the first place as “sinning” is acting against the will of a God I deny exists. I do believe in “right” and “wrong,” however, and one of the things I believe to be “wrong” is the belief that any mortal has discovered the ultimate meaning of life, the universe, and everything… I just believe that “right” and “wrong” are outgrowths of the human experience rather than handed down from above or as an effect of “Natural Law.” By the same token, I don’t believe that I know the answer to “life, the universe, and everything” and respect any person’s search for their own truth so long as they don’t attempt to force it upon me.)

    KevinNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:34 pm | #70

    Brit was being utterly arrogant in his suggestion… and seriously… Christians are immune to infidelity? C’mon get a grip.

    And “Christopher” – Buddhists don’t “worship cows”… I’ll presume you were thinking of Hindus (and wrong there as well) is it asking sooo much to be actually informed about something before pontificating?

    JoanneNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:37 pm | #71

    Huey – no one is forcing you to become a Christian; although, atheists certainly seem to believe everyone should conduct themselves as an atheist, at least in public. Personally, I’m sick of atheists shoving their religion down the throats of everyone else, under the assumption that atheism isn’t a religion at all. If you don’t want Christians to speak about their religion, then do not speak about yours.

    SojournerNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:38 pm | #72

    bg.. great, just great.. thanks.

    TomNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:38 pm | #73

    Everybody knows that Christians aren’t perfect, just forgiven. Non-Christians aren’t perfect, and will burn in hell.

    greenfairieNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:40 pm | #74

    Brit was only saying what a lot of people were thinking.

    JoanneNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:41 pm | #75

    I am a Christian, and I believe the Word of God to be the truth……why else would I believe it?

    Who believes in a religion and doesn’t believe it to be the truth? Atheists are the most hardcore believers of their religion…..and they constantly ridicule, especially Christians, about their beliefs.

    bgNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:41 pm | #76

    ++

    re: bg @ 12:14 pm #58

    note the NOI Black Panthers @ the 20:10 mark..

    i’m also betting Stanley Ann Dunham was there marching..

    [Barack Obama referred to his mother as ‘the dominant figure in my formative years… The values she taught me continue to be my touchstone when it comes to how I go about the world of politics.‘

    [.. ]

    When Ann Dunham arrived in Hawaii , she was a full
    fledged radical leftist and practitioner of critical theory.]

    ==

    betty0224No Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:54 pm | #77

    Who cares if the liberals are pissed off?….Dont even give them the satisfaction of giving any sort of importance to their claim of being taken aback…..Let them get knocked on their asses by the “shock” at the promotion of Christianity.

    It they dont like it ….they dont have to watch Fox…Im sure they will find an abundance of “reporting” sterilized free of any mention of religion, and political correctness to their heart’s content on MSNBC..let them watch THAT garbage. The best thing to do is just to keep doing what Brit is doing…..exercise your free speech, as long as your employer is okay with it, at least while your on their time.

    Afterall, there is nothing that infuriates but unarms an opponent better than treating them with absolute indifference, and as if they are utterly insignificant….in other words the truth.

    HueyNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 12:54 pm | #78

    I tend to agree that many atheists are radical and want (especially in publicly funded places) there to be no vestiges of religion of any sort.

    Personally, I think this is not only wrong, but wrong-headed. Religion is the fundament of any society, usually a shared belief in our place in the universe.

    While there is indisputably an historical record of the ills of state-sanctioned action (wars) in the name of state-sanctioned religion (and continues to be a growing historical record of such), this small group of radical atheists completely disregard the good that religion works in society to concentrate on the evil that religious fanatics visit on society.

    But, it’s a small group of well-financed anti-religious fanatics that works this ill, just as it’s a small group of leftist fanatics, or environmental fanatics, or global warming fanatics — all “true believers” — who work this ill, which, if “strict constructionist” Supreme Court Justices were on the bench, would have little effect.

    I know that no one here is attempting to force any religion down my throat, and, frankly, I have seldom had any truly religious person attempt to do so, leaving me to choose my own path. In this country, that is as it should be. I also understand that Hume wasn’t attempting to force his religion down Tiger’s throat.

    That wasn’t what I said, nor is it what anyone said.

    I just said that his remarks were arrogant and ignorant and inappropriate for the Senior Political Analyst for FOX News to say on national television.

    I guess that if you believe it is appropriate for anyone to tell another that they should abandon their religious beliefs for another in any context other than a religious setting, that’s on you.

    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:09 pm | #79

    Yeah, right, Bo. Whatever.

    Non-Christians love telling Christians they are wrong. However, visa-versa doesn’t work for them.

    Tough. Get used to, Bo.

    marc blochNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:10 pm | #80

    You don’t have to be an atheist to see that Brit Hume was obviously wrong here. Not in bringing up his own religious faith – there’s nothing wrong with that. If he had talked about his own life, and his own experience as a Christian – things he knows about – then that would be entirely appropriate. Maybe even valuable.

    But that’s not what he did. He went farther. Why is he telling Tiger Woods what to do? And where does he get off, stating flatly that Tiger needs to convert, in order to find forgiveness, because Tiger’s own religion can’t offer that?

    Does he even know Tiger Woods? Does he have the foggiest idea about the Buddhist faith, or Tiger’s own experience of it?

    Sorry folks, but nobody is objecting to Brit being a Christian, or talking about his own Christian faith. This is about Brit being totally presumptuous, ignorant, and arrogant – pushing his own religious beliefs upon someone who he doesn’t know, and whose existing beliefs he doesn’t understand or care to understand.

    TimosophyNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:15 pm | #81

    Although not stated as such, I’m assuming Brit is coming from a place of personal belief and experience. I’m assuming Brit could easily add a qualifiers of the following nature: “It has worked for me.” Or, “I know Jesus Christ, He lives with-in me. I am compelled to tell you about Him.”

    It is quite an honorable moment when one human-being shares with another, “This my friend, is how I am attempting to live life. I share with you now, only to help you.”

    Whether we are communicating with a whispered suggestion, or a rant, whether it be pro or against atheism, statism, Islam, Christianity, Buddhism, or “keep-private-yet-open-to-all” -ism, we must recognize that we are simply crossing the divide from one to another.

    The comments are the best part of blogs. The diversity of opinion provides a great and concise circumscribing education. You do learn to read past the “clenched fist,” the offenses taken, and the offenses given.

    The story is of interest because it “lifts the lid” on the tension that exist between the Christian and the Statist (who seem quite careless with regulation). The story also “lifts the lid” on the tension that exist between Christianity and other core belief systems, aka other religions.

    An ignorant but “no longer blind” man once said; “One thing I do know. I was blind but now I see!” (John 9:25)

    Jesus Christ healed this man. Jesus Christ dwells within me, guides my heart, and heals me daily. Given the opportunity to talk with Tiger Woods – out of nothing but love and compassion for him – I would attempt to discuss Jesus Christ with him. Why? Because that’s just how powerful He is.

    HeidiNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:22 pm | #82

    Frankly, I don’t particularly care what Mr. Hume said, mostly because I would never watch FOX news with the expectation or belief that I was watching anything other than conservative propaganda anyway, but I do have to wonder whatever happened to journalistic objectivity or integrity? If it was his opinion, that’s fine, but sort of weird to be discussing one’s religion on a political news commentary show. Since when is religion supposed to be this badge that people wear on their chest in public?

    On a more personal note, Hume’s remarks themselves were ignorant in the sense that they display a lack of knowledge about basic concepts of Buddhism, and arrogant in the sense that they assert a religious superiority that clearly isn’t even based on an informed analysis of the tenets of either religion that he was comparing. But that’s okay, because BOTH Jesus and the Buddha will forgive you Brit!

    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:22 pm | #83

    I just said that his remarks were arrogant and ignorant and inappropriate for the Senior Political Analyst for FOX News to say on national television.

    So, I guess in an opinion part of a program, Brit is not allowed to give HIS opinion when asked how he would advise Tiger . . . got it. We know how you believe. People need to give only their opinion as long as it has nothing to do with their personal beliefs. So be it.

    I will continue to admire Brit for his courage and his clear advice and message.

    GridlockNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:23 pm | #84

    Huey,

    You are wasting your breath. As you already stated, “true believers” cannot be reasoned with. And what you got here on this blog is a strong case of true believing.

    Myself, I prefer to live by two rules, both elicited by great men.

    The first: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.

    The second: What we think, we become.

    The first was uttered by Christ (before him, by the Greeks, Egyptians and Confucious). The second by Buddha.

    HueyNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:27 pm | #85

    Pat the First:

    He gave his opinion. Of course, he’s allowed to give his opinion.

    I found his opinion to be ignorant, arrogant and inappropriate to be expressed by that person in that venue.

    That’s MY opinion.

    JosefNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:28 pm | #86

    To Pat the First:

    Yes, non-Christians tell Christians their beliefs are wrong, and vice-versa, and both sides have their own internal divisions that tell their fellow Christians and non-Christians that *their* beliefs are wrong.

    Its a feature of the system, not a bug. Lets all get used to it, accept its going to happen, and that no-one has a monopoly on ‘the truth’.

    War on Christians Watch « If-By-Whiskey
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:29 pm | #87

    [...] } The Acts of St. Hume, Televangelist, I find headache inducing, but this huffy response (via Benen) from Jim “Gateway Pundit” Hoft is pretty funny: According to democrats and [...]

    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:29 pm | #88

    Gridlock, Jesus said more than that. He also said that the number one rule was to love God with all your heart, soul and mind. He also said that no one comes to the Father God except through Him. I guess you can call Him ignorant and bigoted if you wish.

    JoanneNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:30 pm | #89

    Huey – it was Hume’s own message to Tiger; he wasn’t speaking for anyone else, so that’s on him. Hume just believes Christianity offers the forgiveness Tiger might need. Personally, I wouldn’t have made those comments myself on national television; I believe there is a time and place for everything and perhaps a personal message sent to Tiger by Hume would have been more appropriate. I still do not think that atheists have any more right to promote their religion under the guise of it not being a religion than anyone else – Hume was just not making any bones about how he feels – and I admire him for that at least.

    Ladue PunditNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:31 pm | #90

    The second: What we think, we become.
    ———————
    You Godless people are in trouble.

    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:33 pm | #91

    Its a feature of the system, not a bug. Lets all get used to it, accept its going to happen, and that no-one has a monopoly on ‘the truth’.

    Actually, Christians believe that Christ is “the Truth”. And if there is one thing I know, the continual bashing of Christianity is only going to get worse. It was predicted. Just a little earlier than I thought it would happen.

    And Huey, it is only an ignorant opinion because you believe Christians are ignorant. We got it. You aren’t the first. You aren’t the last. Just get in line. It starts at the WH and runs right through Congress.

    ChisumNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:37 pm | #92

    That’s MY opinion.

    Hume is paid for giving his opinion. Which means that quite a lot of people are interested in hearing it.

    Are you paid for yours?

    HeidiNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:37 pm | #93

    And if someone had asked MY opinion or wanted to know how I would advise someone in Tiger’s position, I would have left religion and statements revealing religious superiority complexes out of it entirely, and said simply this: Tiger, STOP screwing around if you want to be married!

    See, no religion needed there…just a little common sense is all.

    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:38 pm | #94

    FYI – I will defend Christ and His followers unabashedly.

    I am not ashamed of the gospel, because it is the power of God for the salvation of everyone who believes: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. Romans 12:16 (NIV)

    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:43 pm | #95

    Heidi, if people would all use common sense in ALL of their dealings there would be no sin. The problem is they don’t. Using common sense would alleviate all of our problems. Using common sense would not have gotten B.O. elected.

    Life has never been as simple as you wish it was.

    I assume that you don’t think that Tiger is not living in a very dark place right now and that he is not seeking any help wherever he can get it. You can bet that the Christians on the golf tour who he calls friends are giving Tiger the same advice as Brit.

    It is too bad that Payne Stewart is no longer living. He certainly would give Tiger some very good advice.

    HeidiNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:45 pm | #96

    “Actually, Christians believe that Christ is “the Truth”. And if there is one thing I know, the continual bashing of Christianity is only going to get worse. It was predicted. Just a little earlier than I thought it would happen.”

    Okay, this type of statement cracks me up, because EVERY religious follower believes that his or her religion is “the Truth.” Also, why is it “bashing of Christianity” to call someone out for the “bashing” of Buddhism? That’s the irony of all of this: Christianity has been the dominant religion in this country, and now, when other beliefs demand acknowledgment in the public square, or when non-believers ask for respect for their point of view, so-called Christians get a persecution complex. Guess what guys? Not everyone believes what you do, and yet we all have a right to religious liberty in this country…too bad we didn’t all recognize a responsibility for respectful dialogue about our different beliefs.

    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:45 pm | #97

    Revision:

    I assume that you think that Tiger is not living in a very dark place right now and that he is not seeking any help wherever he can get it.

    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:51 pm | #98

    Okay, this type of statement cracks me up, because EVERY religious follower believes that his or her religion is “the Truth.”

    Heidi, Christ in His own words . . .

    Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. John 14:6 (NIV)

    Christians believe the tenents of Christianity is the “truth” because they believe in Christ. He said He is the “truth”. Go ahead and call Him ignorant and bigoted. He has been called worse.

    HeidiNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:53 pm | #99

    “I assume that you don’t think that Tiger is not living in a very dark place right now and that he is not seeking any help wherever he can get it.”

    I would not presume to know Tiger’s emotional/psychological state right now. It may be that he feels awful about his choices. It may be that he is relieved to have been caught. It may be that he is seeking forgiveness. It may be that he is defensive of his choices. Who knows?

    But Christianity is not the only refuge for lost souls my friend. And to assert that it is only shuts down the opportunity for dialogue and shared understanding or common ground with people who hold different religious beliefs. The point that I am trying to make is that Mr. Hume could have offered his personal opinion that Christianity has been redemptive for him and others without the need to disparage Buddhism. Since I was raised Christian, I know that exclusivity is part of the belief system, but I am telling you that you only turn people off to Christianity (and to Christians) when you act like you are the only ones with the keys to spiritual truth.

    GridlockNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:55 pm | #100

    Pat the First: I called no one ignorant or bigoted.

    Ladue Pundit:
    love God with all your heart, soul and mind

    Think love, become love.

    SYSPROGNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 1:57 pm | #101

    You incredible victims. NOBODY said Brit Hume couldn’t talk about Christianity. What was SAID was that it is the absolute height of arrogance to presume that Christianity will ‘heal’ you and that another religion is somehow LACKING. The Christmas thing? It’s YOU GUYS constantly bringing it up. No liberals truly CARE what you call it. Because you know JESUS blessed ALL people. I guess you’ve forgotten that. Christianity is NOT a political party, it’s a religion and reading this post just reminds me that MY God is not the same as yours.

    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 2:02 pm | #102

    Heidi, I don’t worry about turning people off because I live my life according to the calling of Christ on my life. And sorry, but one of the main tenents of Christianity is that they do believe the only way to eternal life is through Christ. If you think we will change our mind about that one, you are really, really wrong. It isn’t going to happen.

    Just like you think it is your place to put down us who believe in Christ, we believe we must stand for what we believe.

    Please do continue to think I am ignorant. I don’t care. Just don’t blaspheme God. I will fight for what He means to me and those who love Him. I will defend Brit for saying what he believes. Not many people have that kind of courage.

    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 2:04 pm | #103

    Oh, goodie . . . now we are victims. It is just getting better.

    HeidiNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 2:06 pm | #104

    Trust me, I know what Jesus said (or at least what men translated about what other men wrote about what other people said about what Jesus said). I was raised in a fundamentalist Christian church and probably know my Bible better than many practicing Christians. Nevertheless, and without getting into a theological debate over the meaning of those words attributed to Christ, I will simply say that you will not gain followers by insisting that you are right and all others are wrong. If you are to find followers at all, you will do so by your actions and by how you live your life. Insulting other religious viewpoints will never cause the result you seek.

    HeidiNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 2:15 pm | #105

    “And sorry, but one of the main tenents of Christianity is that they do believe the only way to eternal life is through Christ. If you think we will change our mind about that one, you are really, really wrong. It isn’t going to happen.”

    But Pat, this is where it gets really funny–no one is trying to change your mind about what you believe! Only Christians do that…

    “Just like you think it is your place to put down us who believe in Christ, we believe we must stand for what we believe.

    Please do continue to think I am ignorant. I don’t care. Just don’t blaspheme God. I will fight for what He means to me and those who love Him. I will defend Brit for saying what he believes. Not many people have that kind of courage.”

    Please quote any of my words that put down Christians for their beliefs, that accuse you of being ignorant, or that “blaspheme God.”

    That’s the problem with many conservative Christians today: you think that we’re all at war just because we don’t subscribe to your belief system. You feel the need to “defend” your faith by shoving it down the throats of the rest of us and then crying about persecution when we don’t all agree with you.

    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 2:18 pm | #106

    Heidi, I don’t think standing up for what you believe is insulting anyone. Let’s just say I will never agree with you. You obviously believe that you know much more than me. I guess my decades of Bible study mean nothing. So be it.

    However, no matter what you think, God will still be God. We are still just His creation. His Will will be done.

    JoanneNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 2:22 pm | #107

    “And if someone had asked MY opinion or wanted to know how I would advise someone in Tiger’s position, I would have left religion and statements revealing religious superiority complexes out of it entirely, and said simply this: Tiger, STOP screwing around if you want to be married!

    See, no religion needed there…just a little common sense is all.” by Heidi

    Why do you think your advice is common sense? What exactly is common sense based on anyhow? It is all one’s perception on what is common sense or not. Why shouldn’t Woods believe that he is able to sleep around and be married? It is obvious he did. Just look at the number of people who cheat in a marriage, and knowingly, continue to remain married. I’m thinking he possibly presumed he could sleep around and still remain married even if his wife found out. It is obvious to me that if my husband cheats, I have every right to leave him, but it isn’t based on common sense, it is based on my beliefs on what marriage means to me and how a couple should conduct themselves within a marriage…or why be married. Precluding religion from common sense is like precluding intercourse from sex.

    JeffNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 2:27 pm | #108

    I’m a Christian, but I’m respectful enough of other people who believe differently than me to keep my religion to myself. In return, most people I interact with offer this same respect to me, and we all get along better because of it. Religion is and should be a strictly personal thing, and it throws a wrench into the process when some know-it-all starts insisting that his beliefs are the only real truth. I would never claim that my beliefs should or would work for everyone; I know only that they work for me. It is absolutely arrogant for Brit Hume to talk down to Tiger Woods in the way he did. For Tiger, Buddhism is his truth, and Brit should respect that. On behalf of my fellow believers, I apologize to all nonbelievers for the actions of a few arrogant, careless types like Brit Hume, and ask that you don’t think poorly of us because of a few disrespectful spoilers.

    Neil BNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 2:33 pm | #109
    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 2:34 pm | #110

    Jeff, how do you reconcile Christ’s commandment to be “salt and light” to the world? Or how about not putting your “light under a bushel”? If Christ believed in “live and let live” philosophy, He wouldn’t have come to die for you and me. It wouldn’t have been worth it. His death and resurrection drew a line in the sand. No sitting on fences. No grays, only blacks and whites.

    Brit Hume and Tiger Round Up » The Anchoress | A First Things Blog
    January 4th, 2010 | 2:36 pm | #111

    [...] Pundit seems to support Hume’s remarks, sees the criticism as impending persecution: It used to be that liberals didn’t want you to mention Christ in schools. Then they banned [...]

    JeffNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 2:44 pm | #112

    Pat The First: we all have our own way of interpreting the teachings in the Bible. I personally believe that Jesus’s ultimate goal was to bring contentment, love, and peace between man, not to encourage His followers to go around insisting that everybody think exactly like they do. If Buddhism, or Islam, or Hinduism, or whatever else satisfies and brings inner peace to someone, I don’t believe Jesus would hold that against them or expect Christians to try and convert them away from something that they’ve found to work. We’re all different.

    DeezNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 2:44 pm | #113

    Brit “my dead gay son” Hume said something?

    HeidiNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 2:45 pm | #114

    @ Joanne: while morality may be found in many religions, religion is not necessary for morality. Jesus said to “do unto others as you would have done to you.” Well, guess what? He wasn’t the only one who said it! So did Aristotle, Buddha, and many, many others who both preceded Jesus AND came after him. You don’t need religion to know that because it doesn’t feel good when someone harms you, you shouldn’t harm others. Simple logic is all.

    JoanneNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 2:46 pm | #115

    Heidi – Christians are being persecuted in predominately Christian countries and most certainly in non-Christian countries, often in the form of killings. I think it is those of other religions, atheism and Islam for the majority, that are shoving their belief systems down the throats of others. Tell me how is it that evolution, a mere theory, is taught in the schools, but not anything else pertaining to Christianity is allowed in the schools. Who is actually forcing their beliefs on the populace? Atheism is a minority in the U.S., but it is controlling and trying to control the conduct of all people in the U.S.

    Christians feel the need to defend their religion, because it is under attack.

    Who is going to respect a Christian who states that they believe their religion may not be the truth because there are many religions and they all have the right to be the truth? People should realize simply that whatever people believe in, they all believe that what they believe in is the truth….but it should also be realized, that there is only one truth. A belief in Christ saves lives; it doesn’t take lives or reduce lives to the level of being of no consequence to anything or anyone.

    JoanneNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 2:55 pm | #116

    Jeff, if you want to know God and His Son, Christ, I would suggest you read your Bible, or please do not refer to yourself as a Christian. You are lukewarm, and God spits you out, because He does not know you.

    You do not have to be a preacher or a teacher, a gift may be in another form, but to suggest that God would not have a problem with people following other religions, idols, then you don’t know God. He is a jealous God – learn your Commandments.

    HeidiNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 3:04 pm | #117

    Joanne,

    I am against ALL forms of real religious persecution, regardless of the religion practiced. While Christians face persecution in countries where religious liberty is non-existent, so do other persons of other faiths. But here, in America, Christians are not being persecuted for what they believe and there is no attack on Christianity.

    Evolution is allowed to be taught in schools because it is a scientific theory (which is a different thing that just a “mere theory”) that can be tested, observed, and for which evidence exists. Faith is about belief in the absence of evidence. If you want to teach your children about faith and about Christianity, please, by all means, FEEL FREE! But to insist that ALL children learn about Christianity in public schools is ridiculous and would deprive those who believe otherwise of religious liberty.

    Atheists are not trying to control people or the conduct of people in this country. Whatever religion you choose, please, feel free to practice it in your home, your place of worship, and all other private places that it is welcomed. But in the areas we all share (public schools, government property, etc.), please try to respect those who believe differently than you. There is no war on Christianity–just a request that Christians stop using Christianity to tell the rest of us how to believe and act.

    bgNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 3:10 pm | #118
    JoanneNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 3:10 pm | #119

    Heidi – with all your biblical instruction, I would have presumed you would know that no man preceded Jesus Christ.

    bgNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 3:32 pm | #120

    ++

    “I am confident that we can CREATE A KINGDOM right here on EARTH”

    (the revealing video, along with numerous others,
    was also sucked up by Obama’s black hole machine)

    “MY INDIVIDUAL SALVATION is not gonna come about
    without a COLLECTIVE SALVATION for the COUNTRY”

    ~ B Hussein O

    Obama, like Clinton before him, has every
    intention on wedding church/mosque & state..

    oh there’s so much more, like his stating policy should be in sync
    with religious doctrine, guess he means the IslaMarxist religion..

    UCC member Sen. Barack Obama discusses faith and politics

    [Later -- during his interview with United Church News -- Obama continued his thoughts about religion and politics; specifically, the role of religious principles in reaching a balance between national security and social justice concerns.

    "I believe that democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal values," Obama said. "Social justice and national security are both universal values, values that may originate for some in their religious beliefs, but are shared by us all."]

    ==

    MarkJNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 3:49 pm | #121

    I suppose it hasn’t occurred to the lefties that multiple cheating on your spouse is not considered good form for observant Buddhists.

    The reason I suspect some people convert to Buddhism is due to the impression that it makes no significant demands on you. Christianity (and Islam, for that matter) do make demands–and lefties can’t stand that, can they?

    American Conservative Values JournalNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 3:50 pm | #122

    Heidi I’ve been reading your comments and I’m wondering where and what you base your beliefs in.

    MORALITY and RELIGION go hand in hand. When religion is weak in a nation so are its morals. When religion (Christianity) is strong in a nation like it was in America in the 19th century it produces a moral people.

    Unlike you the founding fathers believed Christianity should be practiced in public places, not just in our homes and places of worship.

    I would like to know your sources?

    JoanneNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 3:51 pm | #123

    Heidi – I do not know even where to begin, because it is evident that you are not seeing or are refusing to see what is happening in the world around you.

    “But here, in America, Christians are not being persecuted for what they believe and there is no attack on Christianity.” by Heidi

    Wow, Heidi, you must be kidding me.

    “Whatever religion you choose, please, feel free to practice it in your home, your place of worship, and all other private places that it is welcomed.” by Heidi

    But what, keep it to yourself? Is that not persecution in of itself? People have the freedom of speech, which includes the right to spread the Word of God, just like it is every other religion’s right to do the same. Atheists do not seem to have any problem forcing their beliefs into governments, schools, and anywhere else these can infiltrate and influence change in their favour, while forcing the beliefs of others out.

    “Faith is about belief in the absence of evidence.” by Heidi

    Evolution is a theory, the scientific title is disputable. The word faith comes with many definitions, but I just have to look at the earth and the heavens to see the result of God’s work. Doesn’t an atheist look at the same and claim the creation for their own religion? The teachings of evolution is in direct opposition to the teachings of Christianity, but it is taught under the guise of it being a ‘scientific’ theory. How ludicrous! There is no evidence that evolution exists. There is not one living thing on earth in transition, and all things that have mutated have ALWAYS mutated for the worse, not for the betterment or advancement of a living thing. Christianity is based on the laws of God, the creator of all that exists; humans refer to it as science, but its originator is God. If all things were to be treated equally, evolution should never be taught in schools, and it isn’t taught as a theory, but as a truth. How many times have I heard people state evolution is a scientific theory, but then claim evidence exists. If evidence exists, then it wouldn’t be a theory, but a fact. And now people actually have gone the step further, and claim it as fact. Evolution is but a theory, and allowing it to be promoted and taught in schools is for the sole purpose of promoting the religion of atheism and teaching the masses from a young age that God does not exist.

    Brit Hume Suggests Christ For Tiger Woods « The Raw Deal
    January 4th, 2010 | 4:33 pm | #124

    [...] I first saw this story today on Gateway Pundit I felt great pride. Brit Hume, speaking from the heart, suggested that Tiger Woods look to [...]

    Ladue PunditNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 4:41 pm | #125

    Bravo Joanne.

    Evolution has “evolved” over the years-because it is fraught with hoaxes like Lucy’s missing kneecap, the pig’s tooth, monkeys eating fish and becoming human, monkeys eating bananas and remaining monkeys.

    A lot like global warming, uh, I mean climate change and Islam, too, for that matter.

    These are beliefs which cannot stand on their own in the marketplace of ideas. All competing ideas (and ideologies) must be forbidden.

    Isn’t more information always better? Present all ideas and let people make up their minds. And then we’ll talk about “faith,” which it takes a lot of to believe in evolution.

    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 4:58 pm | #126

    The truth is that if the majority of scientists would be truthful they would admit that evolution has never been proven. In fact, parts of it have been disproven.

    I attended a symposium years back which featured an anthropologist from Johns Hopkins U. He said that one thing you will never hear is that there were other human bones with the Peking Man who did not have the same bone structure as the Peking Man but came from the same time period. Peking Man was an anomoly in comparison without any real explanation. However, you won’t hear that one.

    Proselytizing : Pursuing Holiness
    January 4th, 2010 | 5:22 pm | #127

    [...] In Ireland, that may or may not be a legal crime, but here in America it is at least being made socially unacceptable by postmodern leftists who screech like a goth in the sun if they hear a simple declarative [...]

    HueyNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 6:08 pm | #128

    Reading these comments fully informs me why I’m an atheist.

    We have people here, supposed “Christians” who insult others, condescend to others, tell others that their view of the universe is not only wrong but worthy of eternal damnation, and believe that they, most enlightened and intelligent of all people who have walked the face of the Earth, have discovered “the TRUTH” and are happy to let every other person know that THE TRUTH has been revealed to them.

    Sigh.

    When every denomination of “Christians” are able to agree on every article of faith arising out of the same Bible, when Catholics become baptized and Baptists take communion, when Lutherans believe as do the Methodists — heck, when each division within the Baptist religion or the Catholic religion can agree on just what it is that “God’s word” actually SAYS, then maybe I’ll start believing that some yahoo on the internet has found “the TRUTH” just by reading the same book I’ve studied for years.

    Sheesh. Typical scribblings and rantings of “true believers.” It’s the same type of ranting you get from the “true believers” on the left, whether it’s global warming, environmentalism, or whatever.

    I’m glad that anyone has found what they believe to be “the truth” and meaning for themselves in this world and their place in the universe.

    But, the hubris, the sheer arrogance that some yahoo sitting in his living room has found the one truth, the only truth and that every other person, no matter how great the thinker throughout recorded history is WRONG is staggering.

    JosefNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 6:21 pm | #129

    To Joanne:

    I’m sorry you feel so persecuted. I’m afraid that’s the price you pay for living in a modern multicultural, industrialized society where education and literacy is essentially universal. I’m not being snide here; you correctly point out you have the right to speak your mind, spread the Word of God (as you interpret it), and practice your faith as you see fit. That right is enshrined in our national Constitution and our secular law.

    But do think for a moment anyone, anywhere, is under any obligation to take you or your faith seriously. You in turn can turn your nose up at the faith and practices of others, and are under no obligation to give their creeds any more credence.

    You and every other Christian here and in this country are not being persecuted, Joanne. You’re just like every other American citizen, with the same rights and obligations as the rest of us. Nothing less and nothing more than that.

    Welcome to the modern world.

    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 7:03 pm | #130

    Brit Hume is going to be on O’Reilly re his advice to Tiger. I will listen with interest. I hope he doesn’t back away from his statement. Contrary to people who want Christians to shut up, some of us are not going to do it. Too bad for you.

    Welcome to the modern world.

    JosefNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 7:10 pm | #131

    Another point to Joanne:

    Evolution is being taught in school because its a scientific theory, one with a fairly solid body of experimental and physical evidence underlying it. Its not “proven” in any absolute sense because, realistically, it can’t be. I have yet to see or hear of a competing theoretical framework with an equally strong body of empirical evidence to it.

    “Christianity”, in contrast, is a religious creed which while arguably the most prevalent in the world today, is neither based on scientific nor solid historical data. The Bible (as published today) is a mish-mash of oral history of Hebrew culture and tradition, self-help advice, and societal changes of the late Roman Empire. The figure of “Jesus Christ” (properly Jesu Ben Joseph, I believe) is a hotly debated figure in terms of actual documented history; objectively he amounts to little more than a local messianic prophet in the early Roman era, a carpenter-turned-rabbi-turned-rabble rouser whose focus was reinvigorating his native Hebrew culture. No surprise he annoyed the established hierarchy so much they ultimately had him put to death, encouraged by the buck-passing of the local Roman governor.

    Ultimately, Christianity is just one creed of dozens other in the cultural marketplace. Evolution is similar, albeit pertaining to a different discipline (one less wedded to articles of faith and more to rigorous inquiry). Both can and should be taught in school, but not in the same sentence and certainly not as equals.

    And before you get all huffy, keep in mind there are a conservatively estimated 1.5 billion Christians (combined denominations) on Earth, versus an equally conservatively estimated 1.57 billion Muslims. Given Christianity has roughly a millennium on over Islam, its looking like their in a dead-heat in the global marketplace of ideas between the two.

    Food for thought.

    JosefNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 7:19 pm | #132

    To Pat the First:

    Good. Don’t “shut up”. Please, be true to your faith and your ideals.

    I mean that truly and sincerely. Such conviction and honesty is too rare in this World of Tears (as the Shinto so properly refer to life on this side of the veil) to be anything but celebrated.

    Just don’t expect the rest of us to convert to your line of thinking, nor to stop pursuing our own paths. Keep in mind there were a multitude of creeds and religions before the arrival of Christ (whoever or whatever he may have really been), most now forgotten and going unpracticed; there will be a multitude of others arising in the future when the Abrahamic creeds fall by the wayside.

    That’s the way of things, for as long as time has turned. What’s important is that you find your own path to fulfilment/salvation/enlightenment/whatever, and follow it religiously.

    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 7:23 pm | #133

    Josef, you can do whatever you want. Just don’t make me have to change those things are important to me.

    I live in a state that no longer has a long time traditional Nativity Scene at the state capital because of anti-Christian people. No longer are things that are primary and important to me are allowed in the public market where I live so I have decided I will fight back.

    And evolution is an unproven theory. None of it has been proven. And that is the truth. It should never be taught as truth, but it is.

    JosefNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 7:29 pm | #134

    To Laude Pundit:

    (Islam and evolution)”These are beliefs which cannot stand on their own in the marketplace of ideas. All competing ideas (and ideologies) must be forbidden.”

    Okay, so what’s the ‘proven’ alternative to evolution? Creationism? “Young Earth Science”?

    And as for Islam, given its got a conservatively estimated 1.57 billion adherents (who work from a single text and set of customs), versus between 1.5 and 2.0 billion Christians (who are spread across 34,000 separate denominations, mind, some of them decidedly controversial and not all reading from a single text), I’d say its a dead heat in the global ‘marketplace’.

    Sorry about that.

    Pat the FirstNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 7:45 pm | #135

    Brit Hume was awesome on O’Reilly. Very clear explanation on what he meant and said. I now admire him even more.

    JosefNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 7:45 pm | #136

    To Pat the First:

    I live in a state that no longer has a long time traditional Nativity Scene at the state capital because of anti-Christian people. No longer are things that are primary and important to me are allowed in the public market where I live so I have decided I will fight back.”

    I’m sorry you feel that way. I would ask is your faith so fragile it needs public displays, even to the point of infringing on the First Amendment prohibition against the State sanctioning of a specific religious creed?

    “And evolution is an unproven theory. None of it has been proven. And that is the truth. It should never be taught as truth, but it is.”

    Re-read comment #131. Scientific theory, of which evolution is one, is never *absolutely* proven. The most one can hope for is that a theory builds sufficient concrete and experimental evidence behind it to be accepted as the *best* and most likely explanation of a given phenomenon. Evolution has done so, whereas its nominal alternatives haven’t reached that point and likely never will.

    Science, however, is just a tool for inquiry. A very good tool, mind, but one that can be misused as surely as any other to drive the worst policies imaginable; the various eugenics programs across history are a case in point.

    Perhaps someday an alternative theory will arise and build a decent case to counter evolution as an explanation for our species’ origins. What it might be, I’ve no idea, but I acknowledge the possibility.

    As many here have demonstrated, unfortunately, its a case of all-or-nothing. Sadly, the world is a lot, lot muddier than that.

    DanNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 7:46 pm | #137

    Enraged? Hell, no. Amused at the man’s ignorance? Absolutely!

    JoanneNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 7:57 pm | #138

    I guess when atheists are doing the persecuting, it isn’t persecuting, its just not taking Christians seriously.

    “But do think for a moment anyone, anywhere, is under any obligation to take you or your faith seriously. You in turn can turn your nose up at the faith and practices of others, and are under no obligation to give their creeds any more credence.” by Josef

    Isn’t that a bit much from someone who says, ” The figure of “Jesus Christ” (properly Jesu Ben Joseph, I believe) is a hotly debated figure in terms of actual documented history; objectively he amounts to little more than a local messianic prophet in the early Roman era, a carpenter-turned-rabbi-turned-rabble rouser whose focus was reinvigorating his native Hebrew culture. No surprise he annoyed the established hierarchy so much they ultimately had him put to death, encouraged by the buck-passing of the local Roman governor.”

    Where is your tolerance of other religions and beliefs? You have no tolerance, because atheism reigns supreme for you and all other beliefs are mere folly to be ridiculed.

    bgNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:17 pm | #139

    ++

    i repeat..

    The History of Political Correctness

    can you say GLSEN??

    yes you can!!

    can you say anti-Christianity??

    yes you can!!

    can you say assault on Traditional Values??

    yes you can!!

    can you say assault on Traditional Western Culture??

    yes you can!!

    can you say Marxism??

    yes you can!!

    ==

    JoanneNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:18 pm | #140

    Josef – you may have missed my point, but atheists seem to be the ones intolerant of others beliefs, especially, if not exclusively Christianity. It doesn’t seem to be others of religious beliefs so much who don’t want the Nativity Scene or the Lord’s Prayer in schools – it is the atheists. Atheists want everyone to convert to their religion of no God, no laws, no restrictions unless they originate with them, and no thinking that perhaps we were all created and not just a result of basically the composition of dust turning miraculously into a human being, animal, fish, etc. Sorry, but there is no scientific thought in that, and one thing I give atheists and that is they have a great deal more faith in what they can’t see, than I ever will. At least as a Christian, I believe that the dead return to the earth as dust and their spirit returns to God; atheists believe the dead return to the earth as dust, and that’s it…..sad really.

    JoanneNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:24 pm | #141

    Josef – how many Muslims do you think there would be in this world if they were allowed the choice of their religion without the fear of death? All Muslims have to do is keep having children, and they increase their numbers. Christians are at least people who choose to believe as they do. The Christian faith has been around for thousands of years and has stood the test of time. Can Islam say the same?

    Gateway Pundit
    January 4th, 2010 | 8:41 pm | #142

    [...] he suggested yesterday that Tiger Woods become Christian to help him with his marital problems. The left attacked Hume mercilessly when he promoted Christianity on FOX News [...]

    Larry FlynnNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 9:43 pm | #143

    Men will call evil good and good evil. – Bible

    WillNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 9:55 pm | #144

    Everyone knows that Christianity is the only way to heal a cheating heart. Just ask Ted Haggard, Newt Gingrich, David Vitter, Larry Craig, Jim Bakker, Bob Livingstone, Jimmy Swaggart, Rudy Giuliani, Henry Hyde, Mark Sanford…

    JCNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 10:05 pm | #145

    My, my, my. Poor l’il righties. Always fighting your imaginary war on Christianity.

    JosefNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 10:07 pm | #146

    To Joanne:

    “Where is your tolerance of other religions and beliefs? You have no tolerance, because atheism reigns supreme for you and all other beliefs are mere folly to be ridiculed.”

    For the record, I’m Roman Catholic by birth, baptism, and heritage. Then, at age 11, I realized how unfulfiling the ritualism was for me.

    Since then, I’ve become an old-fashioned deist. The Almighty is a very real force in my life, but I require neither a messiah nor a building to find meaning to my life.

    That others do is their path. My own leads me to wonder at theirs, but I’ll defend their right to find their own way to end.

    Make of that what you will.

    JosefNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 10:18 pm | #147

    To Joanne:

    “Josef – how many Muslims do you think there would be in this world if they were allowed the choice of their religion without the fear of death?”

    Quite a few, I suspect. The Qu’ran is quite inspirational and challenging. But then it was reportedly dictated directly by the Archangel Gabriel, so no surprise there.

    “All Muslims have to do is keep having children, and they increase their numbers.”

    Your point being?

    “Christians are at least people who choose to believe as they do.”

    As do the Muslims I know.

    “The Christian faith has been around for thousands of years and has stood the test of time. Can Islam say the same?”

    It can, especially given the unfortunate propensity of Christians to invade, ravage and conquer their lands back during the Middle Ages and into the Renaissance. Lets leave more modern troubles out of the conversation; I promise its a conversation you won’t like.

    JosefNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 10:32 pm | #148

    To Joanne:

    Atheists want everyone to convert to their religion of no God, no laws, no restrictions unless they originate with them, and no thinking that perhaps we were all created and not just a result of basically the composition of dust turning miraculously into a human being, animal, fish, etc.”

    A fair if somewhat incomplete appraisal of ‘atheism’, and one that misses a critical point of it: that we human beings can and must find meaning and fulfillment in our lives, and are challenged to make the greatest use of our time in this world not because a vast and unseen deity decrees we do, but because we are *alive* and have only this time to make our mark.

    “Sorry, but there is no scientific thought in that, and one thing I give atheists and that is they have a great deal more faith in what they can’t see, than I ever will.”

    Haven’t you been railing against atheism as a competing religion, rather than a line of scientific inquiry? I’m rather confused as to your approach now.

    “At least as a Christian, I believe that the dead return to the earth as dust and their spirit returns to God; atheists believe the dead return to the earth as dust, and that’s it…..sad really.”

    Or a more objective reading of reality. Depends really.

    bgNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 11:25 pm | #149

    ++

    Josef @ 10:32 pm #148

    re: [scientific inquiry]

    just a sample:

    Since scientists are not able to have 100% certainty they must accept their conclusions by faith. We hope that they have good reasons to believe their conclusions but ultimately it is an act of faith.

    The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an improved theory, is it then a science or faith? ~ Charles Darwin

    Pope stokes debate on Darwin and evolution

    Science and Belief, Not Incompatible

    [The more you know about the amazing intricacies of the world around us, the easier it is to believe in an omniscient supreme being as designer and creator.

    [..]

    I have found there is a wonderful harmony in the complementary truths of science and faith. The God of the Bible is also the God of the genome. God can be found in the cathedral or in the laboratory. By investigating God’s majestic and awesome creation, science can actually be a means of worship.]

    ==

    JosefNo Gravatar
    January 4th, 2010 | 11:33 pm | #150

    To bg:

    Fair enough. I’m not sure what your point is given nothing I’ve written counters or argues against those quotes.

    Nice sentiments all the same. Rather poetic, in their own way.

    bgNo Gravatar
    January 5th, 2010 | 12:39 am | #151

    ++

    Josef @ 11:33 pm #150

    it wasn’t meant as a rebuttal..

    just filling in the blank between “faith & science”..

    i myself know & believe in God, as for Jesus, i go back & forth, but one
    thing i know is if he wasn’t the literal son of God, he’s as close as we’re
    ever going to get to one..

    albeit both have their “realities”, i just don’t believe in the so called
    unproven scientific “theory” of evolution anymore than i believe in
    “religion” per se..

    ==

    JosefNo Gravatar
    January 5th, 2010 | 5:48 am | #152

    To bg:

    Gotcha. I’d suggest you look into the life of the prophet Muhammad; he was pretty close to Jesu in terms of conduct and philosophy.

    As for evolution, well, I suspect we’re in the same boat. I don’t dismiss the theory entirely, but given the state of the world some days, I find myself wondering when the successor species is going to show up.

    BobbiNo Gravatar
    January 5th, 2010 | 8:35 am | #153

    Look james DeLous. i will spell it out for you. My spiritual master is a very high teacher in India. I simply said don’t mess with people’s faith. Got it? Yes, we’d all like our friends to convert to our “faith’, but it doesn’t work like that. it’s a journey, and sometimes it takes several lifetimes. Frankly, Tiger Woods is an attractive 34 yr old guy who happens to think he’s hot stuff. Maybe this experience of being mocked and scorned will send him on another spiritual voyage. But remember, it’s his voyage, not yours, or Brit Hume’s, to control.

    Public Expression of Christianity are Unacceptable? « Federal Way Conservative
    January 5th, 2010 | 9:41 am | #154

    [...] a known Buddhist, to adopt Christianity. Liberals begin attacking him for his expression of faith. (link) (Hat tip: Gateway [...]

    Today’s Tidbits
    January 5th, 2010 | 10:56 am | #155

    [...] It Has Begun… Libs Attack Brit Hume For Promoting Christianity on Sunday Talk Show Like I said many times I’m not a Christian and never claimed to be one. (That however doesn’t mean I’d ever support anything a Leftist nitwit whined about) Now you know they’ve got this new thing out now.  Comes on your remote control. It’s called the channel changer.  If you don’t like what’s on the channel you’re watching, change it.  Hell I get over a 100 channels so I only watch what I like. Novel concept, huh? [...]

    matNo Gravatar
    January 5th, 2010 | 1:11 pm | #156

    Things like this encourges me to do more for the lord . Christians need to forget about what this world thinks and say . its better to obey God rather than man. I talk about the lord Jesus christ wherever i go outloud so every one can here me . pray out loud everywhere you go i could care less what people think. way to go. thank you Jesus someone in the main stream was not ashamed of Jesus.

    Brit Hume: Jesus Christ Offers Tiger Woods Something Tiger Woods Desperately Needs (Video)
    January 5th, 2010 | 2:10 pm | #157

    [...] he suggested yesterday that Tiger Woods become Christian to help him with his marital problems. The left attacked Hume mercilessly for promoting Christianity on FOX News [...]

    HeidiNo Gravatar
    January 5th, 2010 | 3:19 pm | #158

    @ Joanne:

    Here’s a link to better explain what the word “theory” means when we place the word “scientific” in front of it:

    http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/evolution-fact.html

    It also explains why evolution is both “fact” and “theory.” I do hope that helps you understand a bit better why I think the scientific theory of evolution has a place in the public school classroom but Bible study (as “truth”) does not. I should add that I wouldn’t necessarily be opposed to students learning about the Bible or about Christianity in public school IF it was part of a comparative studies course on religion/philosophy generally, and the course included a discussion of Buddhism, Hinduism, Paganism, Islam, and every other religion that has had any major impact on human history. Of course, if kids were going to read the Bible in that class, they’d have to also read the Q’uran, the Bhagavad Gita, etc. But to suggest that Christianity should be taught alongside evolution as an alternate “theory” of how the universe and life began is laughable and offensive to those of us who don’t share your religious beliefs.

    And for the record, I’m not an atheist, so I can’t speak for what they do or do not believe.

    “Heidi – with all your biblical instruction, I would have presumed you would know that no man preceded Jesus Christ.”

    This cracked me up! Joanne, just because I have read, studied, discussed, and even memorized parts of the Bible doesn’t mean I believe it as FACT!

    “But what, keep it to yourself? Is that not persecution in of itself? People have the freedom of speech, which includes the right to spread the Word of God, just like it is every other religion’s right to do the same. Atheists do not seem to have any problem forcing their beliefs into governments, schools, and anywhere else these can infiltrate and influence change in their favour, while forcing the beliefs of others out.”

    Listen, Joanne, I am the first person to stand up and defend your right to say whatever you want about your beliefs. But I will also defend everyone else’s right not to listen. And I don’t really care whether there is a nativity scene in the public square, so long as every other religious viewpoint is also on display. Of course, while the public representation of every religious belief system is a possible solution, it does seem to trample on the religious liberty of those who don’t subscribe to any of them, now doesn’t it? That is why the private sphere is the appropriate place for religion. That doesn’t mean you can’t speak freely about it–it just means you can’t use a shared public forum to do so at the expense of those who don’t share your faith! THAT is NOT “persecution”–it is respect for different people in a pluralistic society.
    —————————————————————–
    @ ACVJ:

    “MORALITY and RELIGION go hand in hand. When religion is weak in a nation so are its morals. When religion (Christianity) is strong in a nation like it was in America in the 19th century it produces a moral people.

    Unlike you the founding fathers believed Christianity should be practiced in public places, not just in our homes and places of worship.

    I would like to know your sources?”

    Religion and morality CAN go hand in hand, or they can be mutually exclusive. It just depends on how the religion is used (or abused). For example, I happen to believe that it is immoral to treat GLBT people as second-class citizens in a free country, but it is mostly the religious who have no problem doing just that. Some of the best moral accomplishments have been made in the name of religion, while some of the most horrific injustices have also been done using the same religion. So yes, religion and morality can go together OR they can be diametrically opposed.

    As for what the founding fathers did or did not believe, that is always a topic of debate, now isn’t it? Of course, the bigger question is: who cares? We live in the 21st century, not at a time when the men who wrote the most beautiful words about human liberty saw no problem with keeping other men as slaves and preventing women from participating in their own government. Of course, they did so in the name of Christianity.

    As for my beliefs and/or “sources,” let me simply say that I am a student of many, but a “believer” of none.

    bgNo Gravatar
    January 5th, 2010 | 4:26 pm | #159

    ++

    Josef @ 5:48 am #152

    re: [I’d suggest you look into the life of the prophet Muhammad;
    he was pretty close to Jesus in terms of conduct and philosophy.]

    uhm, i have, and you’re nuts!!

    besides, if you stripped away “Muhammadans teachings”, what you would be left with are
    Islams plagiarized versions from the Bible & Torah, go figure..

    their belief that Mary was a virgin, and that Jesus as a prophet are the ONLY
    thing Muslims can point to & make any claim whatever that Islam is a religion
    of “peace”..

    ==

    bgNo Gravatar
    January 5th, 2010 | 4:42 pm | #160

    ++

    Heidi @ 3:19 pm #158

    re: [As for what the founding fathers did or did not believe, that is always a topic of debate, now isn’t it? Of course, the bigger question is: who cares? We live in the 21st century, not at a time when the men who wrote the most beautiful words about human liberty saw no problem with keeping other men as slaves and preventing women from participating in their own government. Of course, they did so in the name of Christianity.]

    to put it bluntly miss (?) know it
    nothing, scholar of nothingness..

    BULLS HIT!!

    Were all of America’s Founding Fathers racists, pro-slavery, and hypocrites?

    go here & here, you may actually learn
    something, then again, maybe not..

    “one can lead a Liberal to knowledge,
    but one cannot make them think” ~ bg

    ==

    bgNo Gravatar
    January 5th, 2010 | 5:08 pm | #161

    ++

    Heidi @ 3:19 pm #158

    you want all religions or none in the “public square” (and they all are mind you.. so why do only things that have to do with Christianity get banned from the public square??), but ONLY “faith in the scientific THEORY of evolution” taught in the public classroom, can you say hypocrite??

    ==

    JoanneNo Gravatar
    January 5th, 2010 | 9:34 pm | #162

    Here’s hoping God will call all those who do not believe today.

    But Peter said to them: “Change your minds and be baptized, every one of you, in the Name of Jesus Christ, for a release from your sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. Because the promise is for you, and for your children, and to all afar off, whoever the Lord our God may call.” Acts 2:38-39

    reneeNo Gravatar
    January 5th, 2010 | 10:40 pm | #163

    I would like to say how happy I am to actually see all the positive comments about my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ! It is such a wonderful feeling to know there is still Christians willing to defent our Lord. I think Brit was brave, certainly knowing there would be backlash for his statement. For the ones who think there is another way to salvation and redemption I say I will pray for you..even if you do not want me to. Jesus Christ is the only way..you may not say it now but I promise you will say it one day and you will worship him even though at that time it will probably be to late for some of you. “Every knee shall bow and every mouth confess that Jesus Christ Is Lord”!

    Carl HamesNo Gravatar
    January 6th, 2010 | 7:05 am | #164

    I’ve always respected Brit Hume even before his statement to Tiger. I respect him even more now. And as a Biblical Counselor I can tell you he’s 100000000% correct in his statement.

    Rock on Brit.

    Tiger and Elin …. I’m praying for you both.

    HeidiNo Gravatar
    January 6th, 2010 | 10:19 am | #165

    @ bg:

    “you want all religions or none in the ‘public square’ (and they all are mind you.. so why do only things that have to do with Christianity get banned from the public square??), but ONLY ‘faith in the scientific THEORY of evolution’ taught in the public classroom, can you say hypocrite??”

    You are still misunderstanding the difference between the meaning of the word “theory” as it is used in common venacular and as it is used in scientific study. Science deals with the observable, the measurable, the testable, the material. Evolution is a “theory” in the sense that it is a means of explaining that which is observable, measurable, testable and material. Evolution is also a “fact” in that it can be evidenced in the material world around us. Faith is NOT observable, measurable, testable, or material. If you cannot understand why one “theory” belongs in a public school classroom and the other does not (at least not in a science class anyway), then I am afraid that I can be of no further use in your enlightenment. One need not have “faith” in evolution, because one can observe it and test it. The same is not true for religious belief.

    As for public displays of religion, the last time I checked, it was only the fundamentalist Christians freaking out about this issue. Seriously, why are you guys so angry? Why do you insist on forcing your religion into the public sphere and imposing it on the rest of us? We live in a country where we are free to believe, speak, practice, worship, etc., as we choose and it is only some Christians who insist that their beliefs and practices must be accepted by all and that representations of their religion must be publically displayed. Why is that? I ask this question in all seriousness, because I really don’t understand why exactly it is that your God or your religion needs “defending” or why you are unsatisfied with private displays of religion. Why does there have to be a nativity scene in the public square as opposed to in your own home or on your front lawn? Why is it necessary to post the Ten Commandments in courthouses or other government property for you to feel that your religion is being respected? I don’t see any other religious symbols (other than maybe an occasional menorah) being forced on the rest of us. Please explain why it is so important to your religious freedom to take religious freedom away from others.

    I am not a scholar of nothingness my friend; I simply accept that not a single one of us knows anything with any certainty. Therefore, I keep my mind open, learning as much as possible about everything I can, accepting the right of others to reach their own conclusions about the world in which we live and to believe what they choose to about God, and respecting the amazing diversity that exists around me. But the minute I say that “I believe” anything, I simultaneously close my mind to any other possibility or idea. That to me is a sad way to live.

    reneeNo Gravatar
    January 6th, 2010 | 8:35 pm | #166

    I would just like to say we are not trying to stuff anything about Jesus Christ down anyone’s throat. Just that the happiness and peace that He brings just makes us want to share Him with everyone eles. We like to display things like the 10 commandments and the Navity in hopes it will make others think about Christ in hopes they may want to dig a little deeper and seach for the real Truth. I understand there is some people who get really “religious” and seem extreme, although I think most of the time it is done out of love, however, I feel like Christians are attacked alot of times out of ignorance (not meant to be sarcastic), which makes some seem really defensive. I do at times feel like I have to defend my Lord. Like, at times, I have felt the need to defend one of my family members..you say no one can know anything with certainty..I have to disagree..I know with certainty that Christ died for our sins..mine and yours..I know he rose from the grave and will return one day to bring us to our heavenly home. The Bible says “Blessed are the ones who have not seen yet believe”. I hope friend that this helps answer a few of your questions. I do not pretend to know all the answers to this life but I have another friend who does..Jesus Christ. May I introduce you to him?

    mark shawnseyNo Gravatar
    January 7th, 2010 | 2:30 pm | #167

    Now the over paid ego driven talking heads of the news media are advising/discussing the fast and easy “Jesus Way” to get your career back on track. Brit Hume giving Tiger Wood advice on infidelity is priceless.

    HeidiNo Gravatar
    January 7th, 2010 | 4:44 pm | #168

    Renee,

    I appreciate your post, and appreciate your desire to share your faith. But can we agree that there is a difference between sharing with someone who is interested in what you are offering and imposing on someone who is not? No need to introduce me to Jesus, I was raised in the church and my father was a preacher. I just don’t believe in it anymore. I have simply learned too much about other religions, about science, about philosophy, about archaeology, etc. to believe in the “truth” of the metaphysical/supernatural aspects of the Bible. Funny thing is, the truth really has set ME free. I definitely think there was this pretty awesome and brave guy named Jesus who existed, but I don’t believe in the virgin birth, or that Jesus was the “son of God” anymore than you and I are the sons and daughters of God. Sorry. As I’ve said, I have read, and continue to read the Bible (and religious texts from other religions as well), but I’m afraid that nothing you or others say OR display is going to convince me to believe as you do. To be perfectly honest, it actually gets pretty annoying after a while…thus creating what I suspect is the opposite effect of what you hope to achieve.

    I have happiness and peace without a belief in the divinity of Jesus. I don’t reject his moral teachings at all, any more than I reject the moral teachings of Buddha. They were both onto something and said some astonishingly similar things, even though Buddha lived first. But there is a difference between recognizing moral truth found in religious text and believing in the literal truth of that same text. Think Aesop’s Fables for example.

    “We like to display things like the 10 commandments and the Navity in hopes it will make others think about Christ in hopes they may want to dig a little deeper and seach for the real Truth.”

    Renee, I just want you to think about the words that you wrote and that I have quoted above. Is it at all possible for you to understand why such a statement is offensive to someone who doesn’t share your belief?

    “you say no one can know anything with certainty..I have to disagree..I know with certainty that Christ died for our sins..mine and yours..I know he rose from the grave and will return one day to bring us to our heavenly home. The Bible says ‘Blessed are the ones who have not seen yet believe’.”

    Renee, no offense, but you do not KNOW. You BELIEVE. There is a HUGE difference between the two. If you HAD seen, you might know, but because you have not, you can only believe. And again, I know what the Bible says (quite well in fact), but if there is indeed a God who created us all, then he or she gave me a brain to think for myself, to ask questions, to doubt, to search. I may forever be the “doubting Thomas,” but hey, at least I am honest about it and honest when I say that I know that I really know nothing.

    reneeNo Gravatar
    January 7th, 2010 | 11:08 pm | #169

    Heidi, I understand your point. You are very correct in alot of things you say..Like you have the CHOICE to believe or not to. That’s exactly what Jesus gave us is a choice. He does not force us to believe. I don’t feel as though I force anyone to believe. I do, however, feel the need to share my faith. Just like people share things they feel or know to be good for a friend, like a sale or something like that. My hope is that something I can say or do may intrige someone enough to search for themselves. I do not force, how could I? No one can force their beliefs on someone although I know some are extreme in their faith, being Christian or muslim. There is no need to say your sorry for what you believe. It is what it is. I really don’t see how it could be offensive to anyone when I say Jesus is the real Truth. It is my opinion. I don’t see how the 10 Commandments are offensive either. Even if you don’t believe in Jesus, you have to admit they are pretty good words to live by, wouldn’t you agree? Although we have very different views on what we believe, I think we can both agree on the fact that one day we will both know. We may find out at different times or we may both find out at the same time..like when the rapture occurs..The one thing I do not want to happen, as a Christian, is make people feel like I am a radical who tries to FORCE my belief on someone who is not interested. I do, however, feel I need to share the love of Christ. Like, let’s say, some muslims who think that everyone who does not believe in their god is an infidel and should be killed. Of course I do not feel that way about my religion. I would just like to say I do believe in Jesus Christ, The Virgin Birth, and everything else the Bible says. I may not be able to convince you or anyone else but I am convinced. One thing is for sure..we will find out someday. I am glad you feel free. No one can live your life but you. And no one will have to answer for your life but you. Same for me. I have enjoyed discussing this with you.

    HeidiNo Gravatar
    January 8th, 2010 | 11:43 am | #170

    Thanks Renee. Me too. I think that if more people engaged in discussion, accepting each other’s right to reach their own conclusions, instead of shouting back and forth at each other and insisting on being “right,” we’d all be a bit less angry and able to really respect our differences. As for the 10 Commandments, I’m not offended by them and I agree that they aren’t bad rules to live by (just as I think there are good moral rules found in other religions), I just don’t like the idea of a government that is supposed to represent ALL citizens regardless of religious belief being used to display one religious viewpoint. That’s why I don’t like religious displays on public property or Bible study in public school. Because government property and public schools belong to all of us, not just to Christians, and not just to people who believe in God. However, I fully support anyone’s right to speak about their beliefs, to display religious stuff on private property, and to teach their own children about whatever faith they choose. To me, religious liberty also includes the liberty to be non-religious, and when there are so many different religious beliefs and practices of diverse people, it is only when we refrain from publicly choosing one over another that we can truly ensure religious liberty and respect for all faiths.

    reneeNo Gravatar
    January 8th, 2010 | 5:37 pm | #171

    Heidi, I certainly agree with you on issues about shouting and trying to force someone to see each others point of view. I also agree that liberty in this country has given all of us the right to choose our religious beleifs, to believe in God, or not to. But do you recall the principles that THIS country was founded on? Is he not referred to on our currency? (in God we trust). Then why should we not have His Commandments on the court room wall? Why should we not be able to speak his name on TV without someone crying foul because another god’s name wasn’t mentioned? If someone of the muslim faith suggested to Tiger Woods, or anyone eles for that matter, that he should try allah to help him with his problems..no one would say anything because they would not want to “offend” someone of the muslim faith. Would it have upset you had Brit suggested allah instead of God? Or is does it offend you that any mention of any god offends you? Again, not being sarcastic, I just am very curious. I do have to say, it offends me to feel as though I have to defend my God. This was the God our nation was founded on so why now do we have to defend him? Because now there are so many cultures living here in the U.S who bring their god’s here? I know there is US citizens who were born and raised here who do not believe in God. I respect their opinion but, if they moved to say, Iran, would they challenge the courts there about public displays of allah? I would think probably not. Merely for the fact that they can’t..they don’t have that liberty we enjoy here. That liberty we speak of here is in jeapardy, when a person on TV speaks the about the benefits of serving his God and people get upset over it..I say that because I know and I think you probably know to that the day is coming when we will not be able to do that..our freedom of speech, religion will all be taken away..but that’s another discussion. Do you mind if I ask what has turned you so hard against God? Thanks, Renee’

    reneeNo Gravatar
    January 8th, 2010 | 5:56 pm | #172

    I forgot to add something, Heidi, I notice you are an educated woman..as am I. But I must say, as I have read back over our discussions, that when you referred to God, you used the capital G in referring to Him. I think there is something in you that belives..or at least you are respectful enough of Him to use the capital G. I detect something in you, not sure yet what, that makes you wonder about Him. I can’t help but think you were hurt somehow by someone who said they were christian..not trying to psyco-analyze you lol, it’s just my observation..thanks

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact