Gateway Pundit
SUBSCRIBER LOGIN
forgot password? | obtain login




Search First Things

Advanced Search



Favorite American Blogs

Ace of Spades
Althouse
Amy Procter
Andrew Marcus
Another Rovian Conspiracy
Astute Bloggers
Atlas Shrugs
Austin Bay
Bare Naked Islam
Barking Moonbats
Barone Blog
Belmont Club
Betsy's Page
Black and Right
Blogs For Victory
Blog Prof
Blue Crab Boulevard
Byrd Droppings
California Conservative
Carol Platt Liebau
Chicago Boyz
Cold Fury
Commoner Sense
Confederate Yankee
Conservative Thoughts
Da Mihi Animas
Dean's World
Debbie Schlussel
Democracy Project
Dinocrat
Discarded Lies
Don Surber
Doug Ross
Dr. Helen
Dr. Sanity
Ed Driscoll
Elephant Bar
Fausta's Blog
Flopping Aces
Founding Bloggers
FOX Nation
Free Republic
Gates of Vienna
Gay Patriot
Gina Cobb
GOP Bloggers
GOP Vixen
Grand Old Partisan
Grouchy Old Cripple
HotAir
HotAirPundit
Hugh Hewitt
I Own the World
IMAO
INDC
Infidels Are Cool
Insta-Backup
Instapundit
Jammie Wearing Fool
Jules Crittenden
Just One Minute
La Shawn Barber
Legal Insurrection
Let Freedom Ring
Lucianne
Macsmind
Maggie's Farm
Mark Steyn
Michelle Malkin
New England Republican
New Underground Railroad
News Busters
No-Liberal Spin
Noisy Room
Outside the Beltway
Pat Dollard
Patterico
PoliPundit
Power Line
Prairie Pundit
Protein Wisdom
Rantburg
Reaganite Republican
Red State
Riehl World View
Right Wing News
Right Wing Nuthouse
Roger L. Simon
Say Anything
Scared Monkeys
Sister Toldjah
Sound Politics
Strata Sphere
Sweetness & Light
Tammy Bruce
Texas Rainmaker
The Anchoress
The Autonomist
The Corner
The Futurist
The Jawa Report
The Other McCain
The Return of Scipio
TigerHawk
Tom Delay
Urgent Agenda
Verum Serum
Viking Pundit
Volokh Conspiracy
WILLisms
Wizbang!
Zombietime

Blog Ads


Favorite International Blogs


Democracy &
Human Rights


Favorite Military & Foreign Service Blogs


Favorite Media

Pajamas Media
HotAir
Power Line News
Drudge Report
Breitbart.com
Big Hollywood
Big Government
Daily Caller
FOX Nation
Rush Limbaugh
Laura Ingraham
Mark Levin
Neal Boortz
Real Clear Politics
American Thinker
American Spectator
National Review
Weekly Standard
Commentary Magazine
IBD Editorials
SLATE- Kaus Files
Front Page Magazine
Human Events
NewsMax
World Net Daily
Town Hall
The Hill
Ashbrook Center
Media Research Organization
GOP.com
GOP.gov
GOP.gov -House
GOP Senators.com
Cybercast News Service
C-SPAN
Radio Free Europe-Radio Liberty
The White House
US State Department
US Senate
US House of Representatives
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Treasury Department
Defend America
US Central Command
Pentagon Channel
FOX News
Politico
New York Times
Reuters
World Picture News
BBC News
EUX TV News (Europe)
Arutz Sheva- Israel News
Haaretz Daily
IMRA- Independent Media
Jerusalem Post
YNET News
Debka File
Laura Mansfield
Terrorism Research Center
ADN Kronos (Italy)
Internet Haganah
Irin News- UN
War & Peace Reporting
Charter '97- Belarus
All Africa
Sudan Tribune
Arab World News
Aljazeera
Al Arabiya
Asharq Alawsat
Gulf Times
Turkish Daily News
Kurdish Media
Voices of Iraq
Alsumaria (Iraq)
Bahrain Tribune
Maan News (Palestine)
Naharnet
Ya Libnan
Iran Focus
Planet Iran
Iran Press News
Mehr News
Tehran Times
Islamic Republic News
Fars News (Iran)
Afgha-nistan
Hindustan Times
Tribune India
Inside Asia
Japan Today
China Daily
Sound of Hope Radio
Asian Tribune
Korea Times
Dawn (Pakistan)
Daily Times
Pakistani Newspaper
Interfax
Itar-Tass
Pravda
Russian News
Russia Today
Russian News Online
Ferghana
The Australian
El Universal (Venezuela)
Watching America
Babel Fish

Favorites from
Gateway City & Area


Great Websites


Contributors


Email GP


Sitemeter



« « Previous  |Home|  Next » »         

Posted by Jim Hoft on Monday, February 8, 2010, 8:30 PM

The GOP says they will agree to meet with Obama over the Health Care bill if he agrees to start over from scratch.

47% of Americans want Congress to start over on health care. Only 23% want the current bill proposed by democrats.

The Corner posted the GOP letter to the White House today:

Mr. Emanuel:

We welcome President Obama’s announcement of forthcoming bipartisan health care talks. In fact, you may remember that last May, Republicans asked President Obama to hold bipartisan discussions on health care in an attempt to find common ground on health care, but he declined and instead chose to work with only Democrats. Since then, the President has given dozens of speeches on health care reform, operating under the premise that the more the American people learn about his plan, the more they will come to like it. Just the opposite has occurred: a majority of Americans oppose the House and Senate health care bills and want them scrapped so we can start over with a step-by-step approach focused on lowering costs for families and small businesses.

Just as important, scrapping the House and Senate health care bills would help end the uncertainty they are creating for workers and businesses and thus strengthen our shared commitment to focusing on creating jobs. Assuming the President is sincere about moving forward on health care in a bipartisan way, does that mean he will agree to start over so that we can develop a bill that is truly worthy of the support and confidence of the American people? Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said today that the President is “absolutely not” resetting the legislative process for health care.

If the starting point for this meeting is the job-killing bills the American people have already soundly rejected, Republicans would rightly be reluctant to participate.

27 Comments

    Opus #6No Gravatar
    February 8th, 2010 | 8:34 pm | #1

    This is great news. I am so glad that the Republicans are making preconditions and are not willingly going to be patsies for the Democrats.

    enoxoNo Gravatar
    February 8th, 2010 | 8:34 pm | #2

    Obama responded: No.
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/02/08/gibbs-responds-boehner-cantor

    The President is adamant that we seize this historic moment to pass meaningful health insurance reform legislation. He began this process by inviting Republican and Democratic leaders to the White House on March 5 of last year, and he’s continued to work with both parties in crafting the best possible bill. He’s been very clear about his support for the House and Senate bills because of what they achieve for the American people: putting a stop to insurance company abuses, extending coverage to millions of hardworking Americans, getting control of rising premiums and out-of-pocket costs, and reducing the deficit.

    The President looks forward to reviewing Republican proposals that meet the goals he laid out at the beginning of this process, and as recently as the State of the Union Address. He’s open to including any good ideas that stand up to objective scrutiny. What he will not do, however, is walk away from reform and the millions of American families and small business counting on it. The recent news that a major insurer plans to raise premiums for some customers by as much as 39 percent is a stark reminder of the consequences of doing nothing.

    olmNo Gravatar
    February 8th, 2010 | 8:34 pm | #3

    I sure hope they stick to this approach.

    Male SilverbackNo Gravatar
    February 8th, 2010 | 8:35 pm | #4

    We are going to be sold down the river. I can smell it.

    gusNo Gravatar
    February 8th, 2010 | 8:40 pm | #5

    It’s all about COMPREHENSIVE health care reform.
    If it isn’t COMPREHENSIVE it isn’t Kosher.

    GOP House Leaders Say They’ll Meet With White House On Health Care If They Start Over | Liberal Whoppers
    February 8th, 2010 | 8:42 pm | #6

    [...] the article here: GOP House Leaders Say They’ll Meet With White House On Health Care If They Start Over [...]

    RobertNo Gravatar
    February 8th, 2010 | 9:00 pm | #7

    We don’t need any bills that are longer than
    the Constitution of the United States.

    Kenny SolomonNo Gravatar
    February 8th, 2010 | 9:08 pm | #8

    I know much of what’s on GP gets back to at least some of the CongressCritters who are supposedly on our side of the aisle, so y’all in DC listen up and listen good……

    Do not meet with “the administration”….. just don’t.

    Fight them.

    If you don’t, then you are as guilty as them of failing to protect and defend The Constitution of The United States.

    The only way they want to work with you is to help you put the noose around your own neck.

    Understand this very clearly: We’re watching you more than we’re watching them. We know what they’re gonna do. Don’t you dare play their game, because it’s not a game…… It’s our freedom.

    It’s our nation.

    You work for us.

    Kenny Solomon
    DC Works For Us
    http://www.dcworksforus.com

    wanumbaNo Gravatar
    February 8th, 2010 | 9:44 pm | #9

    No. And Hell No.

    RobertNo Gravatar
    February 8th, 2010 | 9:52 pm | #10

    So because they couldn’t ram their travesty of a bill
    down our throats now they want to make nicey-nice.

    And if they could, it would be right back to their totalitarian ways.

    By Bipartisanship « Daniel McAndrew for U.S. Senate
    February 8th, 2010 | 9:59 pm | #11

    [...] 9, 2010 · Leave a Comment It appears that the Republicans have given a counter offer to the President’s Super Bowl interview with Katie Couric. Basically, we need to start over [...]

    Tweets that mention Gateway Pundit -- Topsy.com
    February 8th, 2010 | 10:34 pm | #12

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by conservatweet, Vince Humphreys, raymond blanco, Right, Conservative N Media and others. Conservative N Media said: GOP correctly reining-in Delusional Narcissist on potential public O-Care meeting: Start over or meeting unlikely http://bit.ly/dk6Ro4 #tcot [...]

    DesertRoseNo Gravatar
    February 8th, 2010 | 10:45 pm | #13

    I agree with some of the other posters that the GOP should not get involved with Obama. He is as slippery as an eel and I would not trust him. I personally do not want the government involved in any part of my healthcare. It’s as simple as that.

    excellerNo Gravatar
    February 8th, 2010 | 10:49 pm | #14

    Yes for heavens sake start over. However I would add the additional caveat that the start over won’t happen until the next congress. Republicans will be making the rules and heading up the committees. This congress had its chance and blew it. They cannot be trusted, so the only acceptable answer this year is for Republicans to stick to their guns, NO DEALS.

    SolaratovNo Gravatar
    February 8th, 2010 | 10:49 pm | #15

    Kenny Solomon
    February 8th, 2010 | 9:08 pm | #8

    Well said.

    LilyNo Gravatar
    February 8th, 2010 | 11:06 pm | #16

    If they can’t get their obnoxious bill passed (yea!), they SHOULD start over.

    Peter WarnerNo Gravatar
    February 8th, 2010 | 11:28 pm | #17

    Kenny Solomon @8:

    +100

    Best regards, Peter Warner.

    NahanniNo Gravatar
    February 8th, 2010 | 11:43 pm | #18

    Michelle Malkin is right…

    Obama’s Kabuki summit invitation: Just say no
    http://michellemalkin.com/2010/02/08/obamas-kabuki-summit-invitation-just-say-no/

    BobNo Gravatar
    February 9th, 2010 | 12:19 am | #19

    They want some money too.

    chili palmerNo Gravatar
    February 9th, 2010 | 12:22 am | #20

    Please understand. This is the NY Times, Washington Post, all the TV networks, PLUS Obama and all the money in the world trying to define this as a GOP issue. They don’t need the GOP to pass anything.They never should have responded to Obama’s so-called invitation to sit in a stuffy classroom and be called on like 6 year olds in school for all the world to see. Even the newspapers are getting mad that Obama keeps going on tv instead of having press conferences so THEY can be on tv. Do not answer this again. Obama doesn’t need republicans to pass ANYTHING. This is just a sick game. No more, please. Remember what these people are capable of. Sarah Palin’s Church had a gasoline like substance poured around it, including around the doors so children inside would be burned alive, then it was lit on fire. Children inside at the time were just lucky to get out in time.

    sandyNo Gravatar
    February 9th, 2010 | 12:50 am | #21

    Its another TV propaganda event designed to make the Republicans look like Professional Againsters.

    What Obama is saying to Republicans is you are welcome to join me and the Democrats and share the blame for this Healthcare Boondoggle but I will not insert anything in this 2,700 page bill which you suggest because I don’t need you to pass this bill.

    Robb76No Gravatar
    February 9th, 2010 | 4:56 am | #22

    I am worried. The Republicans in congress have demonstrated so many time in the past, that they can pull defeat from the jaws of victory better then anyone.

    JoelNo Gravatar
    February 9th, 2010 | 5:40 am | #23

    Read my lips…No health care.

    I have trouble paying for my own, let alone a bunch of other people’s health care too!

    Any Democratic health care plan will screw a lot of people…either with high costs or lousy health services.

    There is NO way you are going to get health care for FREE…get over it.

    BuryMeInAGeorgeWashingtonTShirtNo Gravatar
    February 9th, 2010 | 6:14 am | #24

    The Dems are like date rapists; you say ‘no’ and they still persist.

    HedgehogNo Gravatar
    February 9th, 2010 | 6:41 am | #25

    The proper way to offer ideas is by the introduction of legislation. Offer bills that put forth the Republican position and ideas, and let the House and Senate vote on them. Get it all on the record, then see which one is the “Party of NO”.

    FinncrispNo Gravatar
    February 9th, 2010 | 10:35 am | #26

    The meeting is a scam; the deck is stacked, the die is cast. No change possible for the entrenched Marxist plot to destroy America’s healthcare system. Barry is just looking for useful idiots to line up with his useful idiots on his side of the fence.

    No thanks, Barry.

    AuntieMadderNo Gravatar
    February 9th, 2010 | 5:48 pm | #27

    Reducing the cost of health care shouldn’t require a health care bill, anyway, should it? Seems it can best be accomplished with tort reform (would require some legislation), deregulation of health insurance to enable interstate policy sales (repealing current legislation?), and repealing legislation that requires employers to provide health insurance. Then, you don’t have one humongous bill that has tentacles reaching into all areas of health care that would require further legislation should changes need to be made down the road. Instead, there are smaller bills and less legislation, so that should changes be required down the road, a whopping piece of legislation doesn’t end up even more gigantic with amendments.

Links

Blogs

Find Us

Contact