REMEMBER: You Can NEVER Trust a Democrat… You can sometimes trust Republicans but… You Can NEVER Trust a Democrat.
Stupak flashback: Remember when “pro-life” fraudster Bart Stupak held his town hall last year and said that he’d vote for Obamacare even if it funded abortion? Of course, at the time he didn’t know he was being recorded.
“If everything I want [is] in the final bill, I like everything in the bill except you have public funding for abortion, and we had a chance to run our amendment and we lost. OK, I voted my conscience, stayed true to my principles, stayed true to the beliefs of this district, could I vote for healthcare? Yes I still could.”
Today Democrat Bart Stupak came back home.
The supposed pro-life Democrat will support pro-abortion Obamacare.
Ma Pelosi needed him and he was there.
Free America- 1776-2010… You were a great nation.
Don’t Give Up…. DAN REIHL: I GOT THRU TO STUPAK ON THIS NUMBER 202-225-4735.
UPDATE: Stupak will hold presser at 4PM EST.
UPDATE: Stupak sells his soul. Will vote for pro-abortion bill.
March 21st, 2010 | 11:41 am | #1
Stupak told CNN just moments ago he’s still a No, but they are close to getting a deal.
March 21st, 2010 | 11:42 am | #2
Stupak is like any dem. He’s just looking to get paid.
March 21st, 2010 | 11:44 am | #3
God have mercy on us.
March 21st, 2010 | 11:45 am | #4
We must vote them out no matter how they vote. Final out out in november
March 21st, 2010 | 11:51 am | #5
Hey…… Y’all let me know when the shootin’ starts so I can get home and protect my place and one of my neighbors’ who physically can’t (but is totally on our side).
In the mean time, I’m watchin’ the Bristol race.
Go Jamie !
Git-r-done Ol’ Man Martin !
Kenny Solomon
Jew.
Armed.
Never again means NEVER AGAIN.
March 21st, 2010 | 11:53 am | #6
I wonder how much his “yes” will cost.
March 21st, 2010 | 11:54 am | #7
Stupak has been playing us — all for the attention!
.
March 21st, 2010 | 11:55 am | #8
What was the pay off?
March 21st, 2010 | 11:59 am | #9
This makes it imperative that we get rid of Obama in 2012 . This horrible bill does not go into effect until 2014 ,we can still stop it.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:02 pm | #10
…the chickens are comin’ home to roost..
Stupak= Jack
Pelosi= Sh%t
March 21st, 2010 | 12:03 pm | #11
MSNBC was premature.
Stupak has reiterated that he is still a “NO”, that he has 8 in his bloc, and that the Executive Order deal is still a “work in progress”.
Of course, that he is even entertaining such a “deal” speaks volumes…
March 21st, 2010 | 12:03 pm | #12
[...] BREAKING NEWS, March 21, 2010… from Jim at Gateway Pundit: Breaking: Catholic Bishops AGAINST 11th Hour Stupak Executive Rule on Abortion Funding …Update: Stupak Group Cancels Presser — then, a bit later, guess what? Stunner… Pro-Life Democrat Stupak Was Lying All Along- Will Support Pro-Abortion Obamacare [...]
March 21st, 2010 | 12:04 pm | #13
Comment removed for content.
-Moderator-
March 21st, 2010 | 12:04 pm | #14
[...] BREAKING NEWS, March 21, 2010… from Jim at Gateway Pundit: Breaking: Catholic Bishops AGAINST 11th Hour Stupak Executive Rule on Abortion Funding …Update: Stupak Group Cancels Presser — then, a bit later, guess what? Stunner… Pro-Life Democrat Stupak Was Lying All Along- Will Support Pro-Abortion Obamacare [...]
March 21st, 2010 | 12:06 pm | #15
[...] This was posted yesterday at VotingFemale… Obama Approval falls to 43% on eve of landmark House vote on ObamaCare, so says Rasmussen Reports BREAKING NEWS, March 21, 2010… from Jim at Gateway Pundit: Breaking: Catholic Bishops AGAINST 11th Hour Stupak Executive Rule on Abortion Funding …Update: Stupak Group Cancels Presser — then, a bit later, guess what? Stunner… Pro-Life Democrat Stupak Was Lying All Along- Will Support Pro-Abortion Obamacare [...]
March 21st, 2010 | 12:07 pm | #16
[...] BREAKING NEWS, March 21, 2010… from Jim at Gateway Pundit: Breaking: Catholic Bishops AGAINST 11th Hour Stupak Executive Rule on Abortion Funding …Update: Stupak Group Cancels Presser Or so we thought… a bit later, from Gateway Pundit, we have this: Stunner… Pro-Life Democrat Stupak Was Lying All Along- Will Support Pro-Abortion Obamacare [...]
March 21st, 2010 | 12:08 pm | #17
An EO cannot override law. The EO is worthless. That Stupak would even discuss it is telling.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:09 pm | #18
Plain and Simple…The Dems are the enemy!
I am done with them all even the ones I call friends.
You are part of the problem or part of the solution?
THEY ARE THE PROBLEM “plain and simple”
March 21st, 2010 | 12:10 pm | #19
If Stupak votes YES, it will cement in the minds of every voter that Democrats have no principles no matter what they say publicly. They will all be branded as liars and scoundrels, and they will lose the entire Independent vote in the next several election cyclesw. What is hidden in this bill that is so important to Democrats (no need to use the redundant term “Liberal” when speaking of Democrats, they are ALL Liberals) that they are willing to destroy their Party for the foreseeable future?
March 21st, 2010 | 12:12 pm | #20
Stupak is a liar, may he lose his seat in November and may God forgive him for what he has done. You’re a liar Stupak.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:15 pm | #21
Everyone else is saying this report on MSNBC is false and Stupak is still a NO.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:16 pm | #22
Comment removed for content.
-Moderator-
March 21st, 2010 | 12:17 pm | #23
Even after getting creamed by the Democrats in the 2008 election, you dimwits still haven’t fathomed how their devious minds work.
Stupak was a diversion. While you were watching their one hand, they were picking your pocket with their other hand, and pulling off your belt, so that your pants would drop to your ankles, also.
You insufferable know-it-alls are clueless. Only a fool would fail to realize that Stupak always intended to vote for HC anyway Nancy Nitwit wants it.
Dayum, you’re dumb.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:18 pm | #24
Stupak just confirmed by ABC – still a NO.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:22 pm | #25
I’ll know it’s over when “the fat lady” Pelosi sings.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:22 pm | #26
there is no diff. stupack will vote yes if the witch pelosi need him .she has all the votes she needs .those that are voting no only bec. the witch pelosi let them .we must vote them all out no matter how they vote .
March 21st, 2010 | 12:23 pm | #27
I hate to state the obvious but every single Democrat that is a no, maybe, then a yes, then a no is an attention seeking untrustworthy whore.
This process has disintegrated into cheap tawdry theater and Pelosi and Obama own it 100%.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:23 pm | #28
In the end, who cares about Stupak.. he’s a myth and a falsehood, his vote won’t matter in the end.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:26 pm | #29
Exasperated, you are wrong. WE follow the Reagan axiom: Trust but VERIFY. If the object of that trust proves untrustworthy, he forfeits any future trust from us and will suffer the consequences. In a civilized society, that is the glue that holds us together, and the antidote to anarchy and tyranny. We vote our political opponents out of office, unlike Obama’s heros Marx and Castro and Chavez and “I’m-in-a-Jihad”, who take them out and shoot them.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:27 pm | #30
Rush Limbaugh called it right when he said that Stupak was blowing smoke up people’s a$$es. I was thinking the same thing. Now the fat is in the fire. We will remember in November.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:28 pm | #31
Rep. Paul Ryan is on CSPAN laying it out and telling exactly what is in the bill..He’s kicking butt and taking names. I heart Ryan!
March 21st, 2010 | 12:30 pm | #32
Unless we keep fighting with all we’ve got AND get those under 60 involved as well–they will be able to get the “folks” to forget what has happened here by November. They are telling the rank and file that we will move on after the vote and they believe it! We are discouraged today, but we CANNOT stop fighting.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:31 pm | #33
DKNNo Gravatar
March 21st, 2010 | 12:08 pm | #17
An EO cannot override law. The EO is worthless. That Stupak would even discuss it is telling.
Right you are.
Question: I recall hearing that the Senate bill has language included that makes it impossible to subsequently repeal. Is this true? If so, what recourse do we have.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:32 pm | #34
Even if Stupak votes yes or no, you folks up in Michigan need to get this bum voted out of office.
Stupak is just another “it’s all about me” politician, but comes off as he’s the all caring, “I’m really concerned about abortion” guy. He’s proven beyond a shadow of a doubt he’s a fraud.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:35 pm | #35
(202) 225 4735
Call Bart Stupak, he’s taking a poll on yes/no. Tell him NO
March 21st, 2010 | 12:42 pm | #36
NO PROB:
IF STUPAK VOTES YES, THEN THIS IS HIS LAST TERM.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:47 pm | #37
Called. Left message. Even if it means nothing and he and his so-called Pro-Lifers vote yes, call, leave your information, get in your no vote for yourself, your faith, and your country. Good people need to never do nothing.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:48 pm | #38
wow #33, there is no such thing as an “unrepealable law”. No Congress can bind a future Congress from repealing a law. Even the Constitution can be amended. The Democrats don’t understand or care about the Constitution, but our founders did and understood scoundrels like those temporarily in control today would someday come along. Clearly our founders were smarter than Pelosi and Reed and Obama and the lemmings they are herding over the cliff.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:49 pm | #39
We are not a nation to be ruled. If these folks think that we will have short term memory in November, they are only deluding themselves.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:50 pm | #40
This isn’t over yet. We need everyone to continue the barrage of calls and we need a national prayer and let the Lord hear our voices in unity. We aren’t ready to surrender to the evil people on the left, nor will we ever be. We aren’t ready to throw tax money to fund abortions, nor will we ever be. We aren’t ready to surrender to a self-obsessed so-called demigod, nor will we ever be.
This is a Republic Capitalist national under GOD and trust in your faith but let the evil left hear your voice and let God hear our praises and pleads to protect us from this evil in disguise of reform and when God is for us who can be against us?!?! Amen!
March 21st, 2010 | 12:53 pm | #41
Of course he will change his little mind. He does not want to be left out the New World Order. When they grant amnesty to illegal immigrants in this country they will have all the votes they need to stay in power. Stupak is just another cog in the Marxist wheel and he will do as his master commands.
March 21st, 2010 | 12:56 pm | #42
I got through to Stupak’s office a short time ago at the posted number. Pleaded for him to follow the recommendations of the Catholic Bishops and vote NO!
March 21st, 2010 | 1:03 pm | #43
Bart stupid is more like it. Throw the bums all out
March 21st, 2010 | 1:05 pm | #44
I would still recommend leaving the cork in the Vitriol bottle until after the vote. Even the minor league scoundrels may be having second thoughts, and our tone may push them one way of the other…like trying to talk a jumper back in off the ledge. If they vote to “jump”, at least they won’t be able to say we were so mean and disrespectful that we forced them to do it. I’m not saying don’t make it clear to them that their YES vote means political suicide, but don’t keep kicking them so hard they give up any hope of redeeming themselves and make this their last hurrah.
March 21st, 2010 | 1:07 pm | #45
As of 3:05 PM, Fox reporting Stupak still a NO.
I will not be surprised if he caves.
March 21st, 2010 | 1:09 pm | #46
++
Live Streaming: House of Representatives ObamaCare
==
March 21st, 2010 | 1:15 pm | #47
Stupak has an immense amount of pressure to bear; I pray that he doesn’t fold. This could all be a dramatic stunt, or he could be trying to hold out. Let’s hope this vote goes down in flames. All we can do is pray, we’ve tried everything else.
March 21st, 2010 | 1:15 pm | #48
opaobieNo Gravatar
March 21st, 2010 | 12:48 pm | #38
Thanks. I found it hard to believe that something like that could be possible. That would be tantamount to taking over the government and declaring this a dictatorship, but there have been so many “differing” opinions and so many saying that our goose is in effect cooked, that I began to doubt. You cleared up that doubt. As long as there are decent people in this world, good will eventually prevail, even if it takes time. I too do not think that people cannot redeem themselves Let’s see who has a conscience and who doesn’t. This entire nightmare has been a lesson to us to never again be complacent.
March 21st, 2010 | 1:16 pm | #49
“Lying” is a strong word, and I resent it when it is used against me and those I agree with politically. So I have to come to Mr. Stupak’s weak defense here. I honestly don’t think he has been lying about his position. If he buckles under and votes yes, it will be due to an inability to withstand the pressure, it’s that simple.
March 21st, 2010 | 1:18 pm | #50
If this proves to be illegal can all these Representative loose their big pensions when they get defeated? That would be justice. Just go away with nothing.
Stupak has been playing us. He is just a follower, can’t think on his own. Typical Dem, Nancy says jump and he says HOW HIGH?
March 21st, 2010 | 1:19 pm | #51
[...] from: Stunner… Pro-Life Democrat Stupak Was Lying All Along- Will Support Pro-Abortion Obamacare [...]
March 21st, 2010 | 1:20 pm | #52
Video….. Democrat Congressman Jim McDermott.
Understand this and understand it good: The people he’s talking about are not just on the radio and television, not just in the blog world, or other media. He’s talking about YOU……. That you SHOULDN’T have the RIGHT to speak.
http://www.breitbart.tv/congressman-stages-floor-rant-against-beck-limbaugh-malkin-teabaggers
March 21st, 2010 | 1:26 pm | #53
Stupak voice mail full. All numbers to call or busy or voice mail full. This will not stand. Bloodbath for Dems in Nov 2010 and 2012.
March 21st, 2010 | 1:32 pm | #54
mcg #49, a father had two sons. He asked the first son to do a task, the son got angry and said he would NOT do it, and he stormed out. The second son said he WOULD do it, left smiling, and went to a party. The angry son cooled off, and he did the task. Which son better honored his father, the one who said he wouldn’t do the task and then did it, or the one who said he WOULD do it but was lying and didn’t do it?
March 21st, 2010 | 1:32 pm | #55
bagdad jim mc dermitt and the redistribution of
income so everyone can live optimally….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvT4rTooRS8
March 21st, 2010 | 1:34 pm | #56
Read this and stiffen your spines:
The Democrats cannot do this. Sure, they may get the votes to pass the Senate bill tonight, but ultimately they will be defeated. A representative democracy cannot long endure a political class that is so out of touch with the populace. In some respects, what happens tonight is almost beside the point. The politics are set. Some Democrats are deluding themselves that they can put this behind them and somehow survive in November. They are most assuredly wrong…
And off a cliff is exactly where the Democrat party is going. In 1994, the party lost 54 seats in the House, losing control for the first time in 40 years. 54 seats is my opening bid for November 2010. They will lose that amount if ObamaCare somehow fails tonight. If it passes, their losses will be much worse in the House (hell, I’d take odds on a 100 seat loss) and they likely will lose the Senate as well. Worse for the parties future, they will be decimated in state house races, which is critical to the future of they party. The winners of these races will draw new legislative districts next year. A GOP rout in statehouses could doom the Democrats for a decade.
http://biggovernment.com/mikeflynn/2010/03/21/obamacare-to-pass-or-not-to-pass/
March 21st, 2010 | 1:34 pm | #57
opaobie, I gotta tell you, you’re a real piece of work
March 21st, 2010 | 1:34 pm | #58
mcg #49, a father had two sons. He asked the first son to do a task, the son got angry and said he would NOT do it, and he stormed out. The second son said he WOULD do it, left smiling, and went to a party. The angry son cooled off, and he did the task. Which son better honored his father, the one who said he wouldn’t do the task and then did it, or the one who said he WOULD do it but was lying and didn’t do it?
If Stupak has been lying all along, is he not a worse scoundrel than the ones who pledged to vote for it all along?
March 21st, 2010 | 1:37 pm | #59
Exasperated, thank you…I think.
March 21st, 2010 | 1:39 pm | #60
Duh
March 21st, 2010 | 1:43 pm | #61
From Drudge: “FLASH: Senate Republicans found a provision in the new House health care bill that likely makes it ineligible for expedited ‘reconciliation’ procedures in the Senate. Dems refused to meet with GOP and Parliamentarian…. Developing….”
…looks like Hoyer is carrying a purse and holding hands with Lewis…no epithets, just observing the photo…
March 21st, 2010 | 1:44 pm | #62
Oh no, I’m trapped here!!!!!!!!
They won’t let me get off this thread!!!!!!
Help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
March 21st, 2010 | 1:48 pm | #63
That is one reason I left the Democratic Party because they are favored of the abortion’s right. I am a pro life and joined the Republican Party in 1997. I don’t trust the Democratic Party anymore because they are telling so many lies. If Mr. Stupak does vote yes on this health care plan–he will lose the election in November. The Democratic Congress will lose the election this year because of the job stimulus bill. Obama and the Democratic Congress has really put all the Americans out of work. The job stimulus bill doesn’t work.
March 21st, 2010 | 1:49 pm | #64
opaobie #58, I have no idea why you think your story is apropos, given that neither one of those scenarios describes Stupak as I see it. Look, if you want to call him a coward, a turncoat, a sell-out, fine. I’m not a concern troll: I want this bill to FAIL, plain and simple. I’m just saying that he’s facing pressure from all sides, and within himself. Lying requires intent to deceive, and I’m not seeing it.
March 21st, 2010 | 1:51 pm | #65
Kenny Solomon
March 21st, 2010 | 1:20 pm | #52
Video….. Democrat Congressman Jim McDermott.
Jim McDermott should be in prison or at least kicked out of Congress. He illegally taped Gingrich’s cellphone call. All that happened was a slap on the wrist.
You CANNOT trust anything that comes out of McDermott’s mouth. He is the Liar of Liars. He is a disgrace.
March 21st, 2010 | 1:55 pm | #66
Stupak is under horrendous pressure. His family members are under attack. Horrible things are happening to them from the left. If he buckles under, I do feel sorry for him and them. They will have endured a lot for nothing.
March 21st, 2010 | 1:59 pm | #67
[...] have a news conference at 4 PM ET. Will he say that he is voting no on Obamacare or will he as the Gateway Pundit is reporting say he is a pro-life Democrat that support pro-abortion [...]
March 21st, 2010 | 2:01 pm | #68
Wrong, Pat. In Florida, it is not illegal.
Immoral? Yes. Illegal? No. Not in Florida.
McDermott is a weasel, though. A beady-eyed little rodent.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:03 pm | #69
Exasperated, but relieved
March 21st, 2010 | 2:01 pm | #68
Wrong, Pat. In Florida, it is not illegal.
Maybe it is in Florida. It is where he lives in WA.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:03 pm | #70
[...] Via Gateway Pundit [...]
March 21st, 2010 | 2:04 pm | #71
The word from Fox News is that Stupak got what he wanted from the WH. His presser is upcoming.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:05 pm | #72
Exasperated, Here’s the EXIT…don’t let it hit you on the way out….
mcg, what kind of pressure were the signers of the Declaration of Independence under? They didn’t buckle. No excuses accepted if he claims to be a statesman. He ASKED for the job….so he has to accept all that comes with it. What kind of pressure are our military men and women under? They risk their lives to give scoundrels and saints the same rights. Let’s reserve judgment until after the vote.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:07 pm | #73
One of Stupak’s fellow Rep who is voting “no” was not invited to the presser. I think that shows what it means.
Stupak is voting “yes” per his presser.
There goes the best health care in the world.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:08 pm | #74
Update: Stupak reaches deal with White House; Update: Eight or nine to vote yes
March 21st, 2010 | 2:09 pm | #75
Here he goes. A good soldier looking for cover as he offers his excuse heard before in another place and time;
“I was only following orders.”
March 21st, 2010 | 2:10 pm | #76
Wow . . . Stupak believe B.O. What an idiot! B.O. never tells the truth.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:11 pm | #77
Stupak you LIAR.. Bye bye in November.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:11 pm | #78
Yeah, but he recorded Newty’s call in Florida. The fact that he is from a Washington district is irrelevant.
I recently got two sleazy Florida attorneys prosecuted by tape recording their phone conversations with me.
They tried to get my tape excluded. They went to prison for 14 years and 20 years respectively, thanks to my nifty, little tape recorder and thanks to their irresistible compulsion to gloat smugly with the wrong person..
March 21st, 2010 | 2:13 pm | #79
Let a million lawsuits bloom. Let a million protests flower. Until November, we make sure not one of those who voted “Yes” gets a good night’s sleep and when November comes, we vote out everyone with a “D” after their name.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:13 pm | #80
Well, Stupak and your entire staff better start packing. You are going back home in November. Anyone so stupid to believe B.O. does not deserve his job.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:17 pm | #81
Let the lawsuits begin! If the SCOTUS takes these lawsuits from the 30+ states, this bill sits in limbo for a very long time.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:18 pm | #82
Religious Prayers were answered it would seem.
Rep Stupak’s conscience is voting for the Party of Death’s Universal Death Care implemented to manage Death Care for the Unwanted, the Elderly and the Sick.
We don’t deserve God’s mercy.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:22 pm | #83
wow @33,
I recall there was a provision making a motion to repeal “out of order” (ie. not allowed) unless 2/3 agreed to waive it. Don’t know if it is still in there, but if it is then that may be additional grounds for a constitutional challenge in court.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:23 pm | #84
BTW, McDermott didn’t tape Newty’s Conversation.
Two local goobers did, and they gave the tape to McDermott.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:23 pm | #85
I thought Gingrich’s call was taped by two (retired) teachers who were “driving around with audio equipment, and just happened to tape the call.” It was all quite innocent.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:23 pm | #86
“We don’t deserve God’s mercy.”
Speak for yourself.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:25 pm | #87
What public interest law firms should we support for a lawsuit–to be part of a class action suit.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:28 pm | #88
Susan,
Your comment makes no sense. And who are you to determine who deserves God’s mercy?
March 21st, 2010 | 2:29 pm | #89
Wascally Democwaps.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:33 pm | #90
I speak unto you, leave Susan alone.
She is one of my children.
So it shall be written, so it shall be done.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:36 pm | #91
He’s a lefturd, and ALL lefturds are liars first and human beings second. ALL.!!!
March 21st, 2010 | 2:40 pm | #92
Once they announced Stupak’s press conference, I knew it was over. Still can’t believe he trusts President Obama….does anyone think he will double-cross Stupak in the end and not actually sign an Executive Order? I wouldn’t put it past him. He would cross his hard-core liberal base who want abortions covered. Despicable!!!
And if they vote for the Senate Bill, President Obama will immediately sign it, but what if the reconciliation bill doesn’t get approved or gets slowed down by Republican amendments for months? Then what? All of the bribes in the Senate deal become the law of the land.
This will go down as the MOST PARTISAN bill in history!!!
March 21st, 2010 | 2:43 pm | #93
Stupak must be as dumb as a rock to trust B.O.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:44 pm | #94
Sad day for America and for the Catholic faith.
Thirty pieces of silver for the blood of innocent child. God said, “I knew YOU in your mother’s womb.” I hope Stupak and his pro-lifers hear their cries every night for the rest of their lives.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:48 pm | #95
Non-surrender MonkeyNo Gravatar
March 21st, 2010 | 1:34 pm | #56
Read this and stiffen your spines:
The Democrats cannot do this. Sure, they may get the votes to pass the Senate bill tonight, but ultimately they will be defeated. A representative democracy cannot long endure a political class that is so out of touch with the populace. In some respects, what happens tonight is almost beside the point. The politics are set. Some Democrats are deluding themselves that they can put this behind them and somehow survive in November. They are most assuredly wrong…
I can’t thank you enough NSM — when I saw the headline that Stupak caved, my heart sank.
But you’re right — this won’t stand for long. It’s like the good book says, “For they sow the wind, and they reap the whirlwind” (Hos. 8). The Democrats have no clue what they will unleash with the passage of this bill — the political disaster will be tantamount to near-biblical proportions.
March 21st, 2010 | 2:56 pm | #96
From Hot Air blog… IMPORTANT!!!!
This is the cat running against Stupak:
Dan Benishek
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=287806148754&ref=share
We need to make this guy’s day!!
gary4205 on March 21, 2010 at 4:27 PM
March 21st, 2010 | 3:00 pm | #97
Richard Romano #95 @ 2:48
Wishful thinking ain’t gonna cut it, man.
52% of the USA was dumb enough to elect Obama, and 52% of the USA will be dumb enough to keep Democrats in the majority.
The dummies are controlling this country now.
March 21st, 2010 | 3:00 pm | #98
From this day forward we no longer refer to them as “blue dog Democrats” we refer to them as “green dog Democrats” since they will sell themselves to the highest bidder, and the majority of them are eco-nuts.
Crap and tax, I mean cap and trade is coming, beware of the green dog Democrats during that fight.
March 21st, 2010 | 3:03 pm | #99
Barrack Obama and the Democrat party, turning the US into Europe every day.
And that’s definitely not a good thing.
Next thing: immigration “reform”, also known as “pissing on the American citizens and legal immigrants”.
March 21st, 2010 | 3:05 pm | #100
I just emailed Bart Stupak:
“Congressman Stupak,
You are making a grave mistake.
I am proundly disappointed.”
He is not easy to contact. His phones are inactive and his answering machine is full, so I found a zip-code in the Upper Peninsula (Iron Mountain, MI 49801) to use with his email contact form.
Perhaps you may want to do the same:
http://www.house.gov/stupak/IMA/issue2.htm
(But remember Matthew 5:22.)
March 21st, 2010 | 3:07 pm | #101
Exasperated, who “Relieved” itself, you must not think much of privacy. Unless authorized by a court order, clandestine taping of a conversation is illegal, even by a private citizen, but so is the legislation under consideration by this criminal cabal, so legality has little meaning anymore.
March 21st, 2010 | 3:08 pm | #102
I think the proper literary allusion for Bart Stupak is either “But for Wales, Richard?” from “A Man for All Seasons.”
A comparison to Judas might be appropriate as well. The 3 wise men held out on King Herod, but Stupak did not.
I consider Obama to be President Death. He is a man of death: abortion, euthanasia, killing the nation’s economy and security, dividing and conquering among Catholics, and trying to kill the spirit of this nation. Our Church and our nation shall not die so quickly.
I do pray for God to have mercy on us. We are all open to His mercy.
March 21st, 2010 | 3:09 pm | #103
[...] Sibyl West on March 21, 2010 Stunner… Pro-Life Democrat Stupak Was Lying All Along- Will Support Pro-Abortion Obamacare …Upda… Sunday, March 21, 2010, 11:40 AM Jim [...]
March 21st, 2010 | 3:10 pm | #104
Peggy #87, Landmark Legal Foundation, Mark Levin’s law firm…but there are many more preparing briefs. Liberty Counsel, American Center for Law and Justice, to name a couple off the top of my head.
March 21st, 2010 | 3:21 pm | #105
“clandestine taping of a conversation is illegal, even by a private citizen”
Suffice to say, you don’t know squat about the law, or about how it applies state-to-state.
March 21st, 2010 | 3:22 pm | #106
The Trolls are really celebrating here….
Meanwhile, back on topic, “Blue” Dogs, “Yellow” Dogs”, “Green” Dogs, Who Let The Dogs OUT?
…don’t forget the ones in the Senate, too, like this one still looking for a home for his Socialist legislation.
March 21st, 2010 | 3:30 pm | #107
I normally don’t feed trolls, but I don’t abide nonsense that could affect others either, so, perhaps you missed this part when you took your law class, or maybe you studied under Barak Obama.
Definitions:
A one party state means one party to the telephone conversation has to have knowledge and give consent. In a two party state, all parties must have knowledge and give consent.
A NOTE ON FEDERAL LAW
It would appear that, if a telephone conversation crossed state lines, federal law would have jurisdiction…even MORE stringent rules apply.
Neither Gingrich NOR anyone else who were PARTIES to the telephone conversation were knowledgeable that it was being recorded, so go suck wind.
March 21st, 2010 | 3:30 pm | #108
Stupak sold his soul for an Odrama Queen executive order – in other words, a piece of used toilet paper.
More reward for his soul than he has earned.
Sir Winston Churchill: Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.
Patrick Henry: Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined…. O sir, we should have fine times, indeed, if to punish tyrants, it were only sufficient to assemble the people!
Patrick Henry: Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty, or give me death!
Patrick Henry: Bad men cannot make good citizens. It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains. A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom. No free government, or the blessings of liberty, can be preserved to any people but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue; and by a frequent recurrence to fundamental principles.
March 21st, 2010 | 3:39 pm | #109
<<>>
Stupak has not BEGUN to go through what our Funding Fathers and our Soldiers and policemen and border patrol goes through – AND HE SOLD HIS SOUL FOR TOILET PAPER.
I have no pity for him whatsoever.
God said to Man, you have not yet begun to suffer (to the point of sweating Blood, as Jesus did in the Garden – before He was crucified in our place for our sins) – and Stupak gave up all America as ransom for his “suffering”.
March 21st, 2010 | 3:42 pm | #110
Stupak now looks like a bigger CHUMP than Dennis the Q menace . I heard Stupak say on Gretta his ideal scenario is that they have enough votes for him to hold his principle and still have the bill pass. Opposition was too strong, and they simply had to have his votes. I am glad his fakeness was exposed. Sad that he could have been a real american hero but he’s just not that kind of quality human being.
March 21st, 2010 | 3:43 pm | #111
When are you going to understand that you’re governed by a hostile elite that’s anti-white?
Nothing this government does is good for White Americans. Get ready because you’ll soon be minorities when the illegal immigration deal is passed. If you think you’re going to be treated kindly as minorities, you’re sadly mistaken.
Wake up, folks!
March 21st, 2010 | 3:44 pm | #112
“PeggyNo Gravatar
March 21st, 2010 | 2:25 pm | #87
What public interest law firms should we support for a lawsuit–to be part of a class action suit.”
ACLJ, “American Center for Law and Justice”, Jay Seculow will be filing lawsuits on this mess, I’m sure he would appreciate all the support this nation can manage.
I am sure he has been preparing the briefs for a year at least!
March 21st, 2010 | 3:47 pm | #113
[...] Hoft has video of Stupak’s deception. Posted in: Health care Printer Friendly comments (220) trackbacks [...]
March 21st, 2010 | 3:49 pm | #114
Aw poor opaobie, he had his pride hurt. boo hoo hoo
tsk, tsk, tsk, get your mommie to kiss your boo boo
he he he he As Bugs Bunny once said, what a maroon.
March 21st, 2010 | 3:51 pm | #115
[...] Hat Tip to Stand In The Gap and Gateway Pundit [...]
March 21st, 2010 | 3:56 pm | #116
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by sistertoldjah: RT @gatewaypundit: STUPAK FLASHBACK- I’ll Support Pro-Abortion HCR (Video) http://bit.ly/9Bg03O...
March 21st, 2010 | 4:04 pm | #117
To Stupak and Democrats who bow to Queen Odrama – Jeremiah 22
March 21st, 2010 | 4:06 pm | #118
Thanks to Father Gravatar for Stupack e-mail
March 21st, 2010 | 4:10 pm | #119
They don’t call it Michiganistan for nothing. The state is as blue as California and the sheeple have been shorn equally naked by unions and Democrats for decades.
Stupak now has two potential challengers: LindaGoldthorpe (http://www.lindaforcongress.com/) and Dan Benishek (http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/group.php?gid=287806148754&ref=ts). I doubt he’s going to survive this.
March 21st, 2010 | 4:19 pm | #120
[...] heard of Dan Benishek, but he's a Republican running against Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI), who struck a deal with Nancy Pelosi that is believed to be the decisive vote to [...]
March 21st, 2010 | 4:23 pm | #121
[...] via Gateway Pundit [...]
March 21st, 2010 | 4:26 pm | #122
States are lining up to file lawsuits. FL and VA are just 2 of them.
March 21st, 2010 | 4:29 pm | #123
Bart Stupak is an Eagle Scout.
He violated the solemn charge he agreed to uphold.
The foremost responsibility of an Eagle Scout is to live with honor. To an Eagle Scout, honor is the foundation of all character. He knows that “A Scout is trustworthy” is the very first point of the Scout Law for good reason. An Eagle Scout lives honorably, not only because honor is important to him but because of the vital significance of the example he sets for other Scouts. Living honorably reflects credit on his home, his church, his troop, and his community. May the white of the Eagle badge remind you to always live with honor.
What a shame that he did not have the courage to do what was right.
He will live to regret it.